03-19-2010, 02:06 PM | #82 (permalink) |
Extreme moderation
Location: Kansas City, yo.
|
If I was a chick, I wouldn't go somewhere for one night with three pairs of sexy undies and freshly shaved (out of routine) unless I was planning on showing someone.
__________________
"The question isn't who is going to let me, it's who is going to stop me." (Ayn Rand) "The truth is that our finest moments are most likely to occur when we are feeling deeply uncomfortable, unhappy, or unfulfilled. For it is only in such moments, propelled by our discomfort, that we are likely to step out of our ruts and start searching for different ways or truer answers." (M. Scott Peck) |
03-21-2010, 06:56 PM | #84 (permalink) | |
I Confess a Shiver
|
Quote:
This "by the time the need to invade the privacy of your partner arises, infidelity is very likely the least of issues" bit makes zero sense to me, Hoss. It's a reaction, not an action. Said reaction would not have occurred without the initial action by his wife. There is an activity trigger threshold. Consider it like the trigger pull on a pistol, with the pressure on the trigger being evidence and reasonableness as related to the likelihood of Something Wonky. See, you can touch the trigger without the gun going off (she's distant), you can even apply some pressure to the trigger, squeezing it a little, without the gun going off (we don't have sex much)... but the gun only discharges when you provide enough pressure on the trigger (she shaved her snatch'o'doodle and is being really secretive). In this case: I do not dig around in my partner's stuff without seeing that they're shaving the privates for the first time in months/years and notice they're being Really Friggin' Sneakret Squirrel (TM). Is it "wrong?" Yes. A sense of personal privacy is important (in some weird way I haven't quite figured out yet). Is it justified? Probably. If nothing comes of it? __awkward moment text__. But if you uncover something, you just dodged that bullet. Let's say Guy A is completely clueless about any relationship issues until his wife starts doing stuff that a Law & Order camera man would do a four second "this is important" pause shot of... and then suddenly Guy A finds himself with That Wonky Feeling (TM). Something fishy is afoot and he chooses to investigate. What exactly are you trying to convey to me by suggesting that the instant he unzips a duffel bag that the relationship had issues before he decided that investigation was necessary? Is the big issue here that he didn't go, "Hey, toots... you bobbing on any other cock than mine? It's okay... you can tell me." I think the issue is all her. She wasn't happy with [whatever, lame excuse] and decided to go get a little sumfin'-sumfin'. How can both sides of this relationship be the bad guy? One for cheating and one for not being suspicious enough early enough or... uh... huh? I figure you're suggesting that he should have sat down with her and talked to her about his concerns like some kind of Dr. Phil special. It has been my experience that those activities either ruin a relationship where nothing is wrong ("You don't trust me!") or only allow the person who's doing-the-naughty to lie ("You don't trust me?"). I'm suggesting that shit doesn't go down like that in the real world. Real world relationship issues as described in this thread happen based on coincidences, accidents, Freudian slips and Columbo-like hunches. The girlfriend that discovers you're still fapping it to SuicideGirls.com based on your browser history, the husband that discovers his wife is still smoking Cowboy Killers by finding a cellophane in her jeans pocket while doing the laundry. Evidence-based. In this case it was sneaky behavior plus shaved cock-socket that lead to the panties with what was likely semen stains. Change the variables all you want, the axioms themselves never change. ... Ugh, sorry... I realize how poorly written this stuff is... I hope it makes some sense. Last edited by Plan9; 03-21-2010 at 07:22 PM.. |
|
03-22-2010, 12:14 AM | #85 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Tennessee
|
I've got to agree with Plan9 on this one. Trying to talk it out might work but the other person isn't going to tell you unless they had already planned to come to you or the relationship is already past repair. To me its akin to a policeman searching your car when he has reasonable cause (or whatever that phrase is), eventually the evidence just begins piling up and you either ignore it or start looking around for some answers. I guess one could try asking but I would suspect 99 out of 100 times all you get is a fight or a breakup and the next time she/he does it she/he will just be more careful about it.
Why suddenly would a person who has been nothing but deceitful suddenly do a 180 and tell you everything you want to know because you sat down for a talk? Blindly trusting somebody and just ignoring obvious signs of infidelity isn't exactly the best thing for a relationship either. I don't know there really isn't an easy answer in these cases...probably best left to the dynamics of the relationship then a solid rule I suppose.
__________________
“My god I must have missed it...its hell down here!”
|
03-22-2010, 01:39 AM | #86 (permalink) |
Crazy, indeed
Location: the ether
|
I don't think Manic is saying that you need to go all doctor Phil and talk it out.
I took it to mean that if it ever comes a time in a relationship where you have this overwhelming need to snoop because you suspect something, the relationship is already done. No talking, no asking will help it. And that is because even if the significant other isn't cheating RIGHT NOW, the level of suspicion has gotten to the point where you'll always end up feeling like you are walking on egg shells, like the cheating is imminent if not present. I don't know if that is what he meant, and I won't speak for him. But to me, I have never seen or heard of a relationship working out after it got to the point where one felt like snooping on the other. I've never heard about any relationship where one partner went "I really suspected infidelity, but dug around and found nothing, so now we're great again." When it gets to that point, the relationship is in all likelihood done. Snooping and finding out might get you closure, but not finding out will not be the end of it. It's not about the rightness or wrongness of snooping around, but about the utility of it. |
03-22-2010, 02:10 AM | #87 (permalink) |
I Confess a Shiver
|
The overwhelming need, however, is inspired by the right-here-right-now facts of the moment. It isn't something necessarily indicates a problem trend or past issues or whatever. It's more like "Dude! Wait, what's going on?" My issue must be that I don't see this as a violation of privacy or snooping or being paranoid... no, this is following up on facts and evidence. Heh... how obvious do the bloody footprints have to be for someone to follow them?
Now, if you put this issue on a long enough time line and the guy is really unsettled and paranoid? Yeah, the other issue comes into play. Last edited by Plan9; 03-22-2010 at 02:15 AM.. |
03-22-2010, 02:48 AM | #88 (permalink) | |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
Quote:
1) I don't recall anyone talking about bad guys 2) your point of view of seems to be rather narrow, as if every relationship that ends up in one partner cheating involves a good-hearted, attentive, loving person who has done everything they can to keep the relationship healthy, and an evil partner who doesn't give a shit. I doubt that is the case most of the time. Plus, I have witnessed more than several conversations here at TFP where women were lambasted for snooping on their boyfriend's/husband's computers because they thought they were cheating. What were they told? You should talk to him - snooping is bad, that is his private property. Either the climate has changed very drastically or there is a double standard.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
|
03-22-2010, 09:35 AM | #89 (permalink) |
I Confess a Shiver
|
1) Bad guy, as far as defined by this scenario, would be going to play poke-poke outside the relationship. Can't really debate that point a whole lot.
2) Yes. My view is pretty dang narrow because I'm trying to fit it into this one scenario somehow with only half the story... all while not being a cynical prick. No, I don't believe that there is always a "loving partner" and a "cheating evil-doer." I do, however, believe that someone has to be the "bad guy" first through action. That and it isn't really a crime to be an asshole... some assholes are even happily married. Based on my life experience, there is "the occupied and oblivious partner and the cheater" or the "aimless and mediocre partner and the cheater." I've been the dunce in both cases and I'll admit it. Can't blame the landmine if you step on it. I've learned a lot from it. Got outta those situations unscathed and with the benefit of perspective. ... Climate is different today. Like David Bowie stuttered: ch-ch-changes! I'm not a genius, but I'll learn eventually. Last edited by Plan9; 03-22-2010 at 10:00 AM.. |
03-22-2010, 11:15 AM | #90 (permalink) | |||||||
More Than You Expect
Location: Queens
|
Thank you Dip and MM. This:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
His panty raiding paranoia isn't a reaction and serves as indicative of a much larger problem. All of the advice here that encourages it is as dumb as it is unhelpful. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Porn is a zoo of exotic animals that becomes boring upon ownership." -Nersesian |
|||||||
03-22-2010, 11:17 AM | #91 (permalink) | |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
Quote:
Now, as for the wrongs that can be done in a relationship (and I'm not including obvious offenses such as abuse), cheating is just one of them and not even a particularly significant one. I know very few people whose marriages ended by cheating, but very, very many whose ended because they weren't getting what they needed in other ways from the relationship. I agree that cheating is wrong and am not trying to say that people who cheat are 'less bad' than any others. Just that, like I said before, there are other ways of betraying a spouse that are just as 'wrong.' Without having a total picture to go by, it's hard to define what is going on in any given relationship.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
|
03-22-2010, 11:26 AM | #92 (permalink) |
I Confess a Shiver
|
MixedMedia,
Yeah, given the limited information... I'll just speculate. Conjecture and anecdotes. That's what TFP is largely for, right? Correct me... Your last post would be a lot more fun if you had decided to include examples. Especially since I have it in my silly little head that fucking someone outside a relationship without permission is a little more than "significant" to most people. The activity is petty, but the related drama is not. ... ManicSkafe, I'm ridiculous. And tired of this conversation. It's like juggling wet poodles. Last edited by Plan9; 03-22-2010 at 11:36 AM.. |
03-22-2010, 11:40 AM | #93 (permalink) |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
Sounds to me like you've never been in a long-term relationship.
I didn't mean to say that fucking around isn't significant, what I meant was that I've seen many more marriages end because of things like: being cold, emotionally unavailable, disinterest, lack of support, financially irresponsibility, addiction to drugs or alcohol. In fact, I'm sure I've read somewhere that money troubles and detachment are more likely to be fatal to a marriage than sexual infidelity. Momentary drama is far easier to get past than is years of unhappiness.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
03-22-2010, 11:46 AM | #94 (permalink) |
I Confess a Shiver
|
Long term being more than 2 years? No. I'm a relationship greenhorn, a serial monogamist. I've only done the move-in with a few girls, bought major appliances, I was married and have purchased a house. But no duration worth speaking of... my seemingly endless succession of one or two year long relationships all end due to distance issues or... infidelity. *rimshot* Are you "more qualified" to talk about relationships? Mmmm, I dunno.
Don't particularly think I need to be with someone for a decade to figure out that the aforementioned don't-dos are bad thing, though. ... I figure these things you list... they aren't mutually exclusive. Sexual infidelity often results from dealing with an emotionally detached partner, etc. Last edited by Plan9; 03-22-2010 at 03:47 PM.. |
03-23-2010, 09:31 PM | #97 (permalink) | |
Extreme moderation
Location: Kansas City, yo.
|
Quote:
Why do you think this is different?
__________________
"The question isn't who is going to let me, it's who is going to stop me." (Ayn Rand) "The truth is that our finest moments are most likely to occur when we are feeling deeply uncomfortable, unhappy, or unfulfilled. For it is only in such moments, propelled by our discomfort, that we are likely to step out of our ruts and start searching for different ways or truer answers." (M. Scott Peck) |
|
03-23-2010, 11:44 PM | #98 (permalink) |
Upright
|
This thread truly disturbs me. I was recently cheated on by someone I loved and it is ABSOLUTELY tearing me apart. Reading this thread is like watching a crime scene.. can't look away no matter how unsettling. I really don't understand how someone could do something like this to someone they supposedly love. I would like to hear what the "new" evidence was and what made her confess, etc. It's your life so obviously keep it private if you wish although you've already shared this much, but in any case I wish you good luck in the future.
Last edited by Boggy; 03-23-2010 at 11:47 PM.. |
03-24-2010, 06:35 AM | #99 (permalink) |
Still Free
Location: comfortably perched at the top of the bell curve!
|
Hey, what have we got until SwingGirl/WarMoney report on their quest???
__________________
Gives a man a halo, does mead. "Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly." |
04-01-2010, 12:18 AM | #103 (permalink) |
The Worst Influence
Location: Arizona
|
Gee, I wonder which of you guys has been cheated on in the past.
Just an observation. Other than that, I see I have missed this thread completely. I do hope the OP works everything out though, that is a tough situation.
__________________
My life is one of those 'you had to be there' jokes. |
Tags |
opinions |
|
|