03-25-2008, 03:16 AM | #322 (permalink) | |
let me be clear
Location: Waddy Peytona
|
Quote:
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo Last edited by ottopilot; 03-25-2008 at 03:25 AM.. |
|
03-25-2008, 03:19 AM | #323 (permalink) | |
Getting it.
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
|
Quote:
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars." - Old Man Luedecke |
|
03-25-2008, 03:29 AM | #324 (permalink) | |
let me be clear
Location: Waddy Peytona
|
Quote:
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo |
|
03-25-2008, 05:27 AM | #325 (permalink) | ||
Banned
|
Quote:
Why are blacks asked, ad infinitum, to justify what other blacks say and do, when the press would never contemplate asking the same thing of whites, in regard to the speech and action of other whites? You and like minded people do not grasp how ridiculous and petty your "Op" makes you look...you've been carrying on with this stupid bullshit for at least 54 weeks..... please stop NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote:
|
||
03-25-2008, 06:58 AM | #326 (permalink) |
Living in a Warmer Insanity
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
|
I thought Oprah stop attending the church because of Rev. Wright?
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club |
03-25-2008, 07:13 AM | #327 (permalink) |
Her Jay
Location: Ontario for now....
|
So 'white guilt' is the new catch phrase here in Tilted Politics, guess 'cut and run' and 'stay the course' are gonna be dropped by the conservatives who frequent this board, oh well good too see the party gave them a new line to use.
I believe you're correct Oprah left the church, not too sure of the reason though I expect some of our conservative members think it was because Rev. Wright was eating an unborn white child at the altar, all the while preaching about the black man revolting against the white man for keeping him down all these years, and burning down his cities.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder |
03-25-2008, 07:18 AM | #328 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Some place windy
|
Quote:
|
|
03-25-2008, 07:38 AM | #329 (permalink) | |||
Tone.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
03-25-2008, 08:47 AM | #330 (permalink) | |
Darth Papa
Location: Yonder
|
Quote:
|
|
03-25-2008, 09:01 AM | #331 (permalink) | |
Tone.
|
Quote:
yeah, actually I did. But that speech is just words. Words set against the backdrop of spending all those years sitting in that man's church listening to and therefore approving of, what he said. |
|
03-25-2008, 09:43 AM | #332 (permalink) |
Her Jay
Location: Ontario for now....
|
So listening to equates to approval? I'm pretty fuckin sure lot's of people who were in 're-education camps' would disagree with you there, they listened, but I'm positive they didn't agree with what they heard.
So saying that Obama approved of these comments because he listened to them is well flimsy. I have to listen to Ustwo here, does that mean I automatically approve what he says? Ustwo has to listen to us, does that mean he agrees with what we say? So you see listening and approving are two different things that aren't related in any way, but nice shot at trying to make a connection.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder |
03-25-2008, 09:50 AM | #333 (permalink) | |
Darth Papa
Location: Yonder
|
Quote:
|
|
03-25-2008, 10:40 AM | #334 (permalink) | |
Location: Iceland
|
Quote:
The point of going to church is not to fight with the pastor. For me, the pastor was just a sidenote, 20 minutes out of an almost 2 hour long service. I went because I used to love to worship God in that place, and I went because of the sense of community and fellowship that I felt with others there. There were a lot of things I did not like about the church(es) I attended, but disliking something (or even just listening to something scandalous) is not enough reason to walk away from a place like that, on its own. I was a Protestant, but I don't even think Catholics have much reason to walk away from the church as it is, even after all the shit that a lot of their priests have gotten away with... I would call that a cop-out reason to leave the church. Any church is bigger than its priests and pastors, if it's worth its salt. It is a body of people, a community, a place that transcends individuals. That's the whole point. /waits for this to fall on very deaf ears, as usual.
__________________
And think not you can direct the course of Love; for Love, if it finds you worthy, directs your course. --Khalil Gibran |
|
03-25-2008, 11:26 AM | #335 (permalink) | |
Junkie
|
Quote:
I heard you and I agree with you. Unfortunately others likely won't. The simple fact is this. People who are looking for a reason to hate any candidate will find a reason to do so. |
|
03-25-2008, 11:27 AM | #336 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
Quote:
Do you agree everything that everyone you associate believes? Have you ever known someone whose outspoken beliefs you overlooked because they have other redeeming qualities? I'm sorry, but I don't see how anyone who is capable of of forming independent relationships with other people could possibly have an intellectually honest problem with Obama's relationship with his pastor. |
|
03-25-2008, 11:48 AM | #337 (permalink) |
Asshole
Administrator
Location: Chicago
|
My great-grandfather once tried to kill a preacher the Tuesday after a Sunday sermon where the preacher spoke about perils of alcohol and miscegination with the Negros. It wasn't that my great-grandfather wasn't a member of the Klan as well as teetotaler and Revenuer during Prohibition (he was), it was that the sermon mentioned my grandparents and my grandfather's brothers and their wives by name for going into a gin joint on a Saturday night before church. My great-aunt told me when I was about 21 or so that she was still drunk standing (or weaving) when she stood up with the choir.
There's a running joke in my family about "running off with a hoe" because the weapon my great-grandfather used to try to kill the preacher (who soon found a new job) was a hoe that smashed the preacher's car window and stayed wedged in the car as the preacher escaped. Apparently my great-grandfather never referred to the preacher afterwards as anything other than "that damn hoe thief". He showed up at church the next Sunday wearing a pistol and fully intending on shooting that "no good, thieving sonuvabitch" but the preacher was out sick. Clearly, not all parishoners agree wholeheartedly with every sermon. But since everyone's already made up their minds, perhaps my anecdote will amuse.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin "There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush "We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo |
03-25-2008, 01:55 PM | #340 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
Quote:
Even then, the issue here isn't his particular beliefs, or the particular ideology espoused by his church- though I think if you looked into it you'd find the ideas and activities proposed by Obama's denomination much more benign than the ones proposed by Tom Cruise's. The real issue, the one that gets lost in the 20 second loops, is whether it is possible for a person to receive spiritual guidance from someone else when the two disagree about certain social issues. |
|
03-25-2008, 02:20 PM | #341 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Detroit, MI
|
Quote:
|
|
03-25-2008, 03:43 PM | #343 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Fort Worth, TX
|
Quote:
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas |
|
03-25-2008, 03:48 PM | #344 (permalink) | |||
Tone.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
03-25-2008, 04:06 PM | #345 (permalink) |
Human
Administrator
Location: Chicago
|
shakran: you're making one very large assumption: that Wright gave sermons like that every Sunday. I'm sure his sermons were consistently energetic (it'd be near impossible for Obama to go to a black church that didn't have energetic sermons like that), but I doubt he was saying "god damn America" week after week. (Which is not even bothering to address the already exhausted point that for a preacher to say "god damn America ... for killing innocent people" is not something that should be considered scandalous in the least.)
Also, you're assuming that the only reason Obama, or anyone, went to the church is because of Rev. Wright. As abaya pointed out, churches do far more than provide a pulpit to a preacher. There is also the overall church community which, in and of itself, is enough of a reason to attend a church for 20 years. Then there are all the things Trinity does around Chicago. For a lot of people, social service is a very important part of their Christian faith. And while Obama may not agree with certain things Rev. Wright said, such as expressing conspiratorial views about HIV, there is a much larger, much more important issue of the things Trinity does for the community, tangibly speaking. I'd be shocked if Obama could participate in Trinity's community outreach and not befriend Rev. Wright, regardless of any disagreements they may have had. It's all nice to say "actions speak louder than words" as an excuse to hold Obama's 20 years of attendance against him. But then apply the "actions speak louder than words" metric to Rev. Wright and Trinity as a whole. Aside for being the largest United Church of Christ church in the nation, and one of the largest church of any kind in the Chicagoland area (clearly, either Chicago is an anti-American region, or just maybe there's a hell of a lot more to the church than what the media is showing), Trinity has a ton of ministry programs that provide service to the Chicago area and also work to help out poverty in Africa (because, frankly, no one else is doing it). They also provide free computer training and a number of scholarships (most of which are not limited to African Americans). EDIT: And I still don't understand why so many people refuse to give Obama the benefit of the doubt regarding Trinity and Rev. Wright, despite him never having done or said anything to indicate that he is anti-American, a believer in the HIV conspiracy, or any of that. All while Clinton and McCain both get the full benefit of the doubt for their assocations with The Family and John Hagee respectively. Ultimately, I do think it comes down to the fact there are still plenty of Americans today who are afraid of "angry black men," consciously or not. Let's look at this from a slightly different angle as well. Had Rev. Wright said "god damn George Bush for killing innocent people" or "god damn the legislature for making drug laws that target lower income, and often black, abusers," it would have still been controversial, but it wouldn't have created such an enormous uproar. Now, if you think innocent deaths are a justifiable side effect for what you believe to be a just war, there is certainly room to disagree with such a statement. But unless you're incapable of putting yourself in another person's mindset, then you must also understand why some people (many people) would view the cause of innocent death in that manner as damnable. Next - and I know there are some people who contest this, but let's put it aside for now - it is important to remember that George Bush was elected by the people of the United States. And he continues to conduct his administration in the way he does because the people of the United States tacitly accept of it. It doesn't matter that opinion polls say people are overwhelmingly against the war now: few people do anything about it. Make no mistake about it: if enough people put enough pressure on elected representatives, they would get the guts to impeach Bush and Cheney and fight against the Iraq war. The Congressional Democrats are spineless because the most many people are willing to do in order to express their opposition is answer a poll. That hardly gives them confidence that they can weather the storm it'd cause to stand up to this administration. The point is, we, the American people, and America as a whole, are responsible for our government's actions, regardless of whether or not we agree with them. So, why again is it inappropriate to say "god damn America?" Disagreeable, sure...but inappropriate? No.
__________________
Le temps détruit tout "Musicians are the carriers and communicators of spirit in the most immediate sense." - Kurt Elling Last edited by SecretMethod70; 03-25-2008 at 04:28 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
03-25-2008, 04:33 PM | #346 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Detroit, MI
|
I think this has turned into the issue it has because Obama has promised so much from the very start. People are skeptical of false prophets, someone trying to sell them something that appears too good to be true. This is a very, very charismatic politician that is promising a hell of a lot, and I think people have a right to be skeptical. So when cracks start appearing on the surface, when flaws start showing, when skeletons start coming out of the closet, people start to question this person's authenticity. Is he for real? Didn't he promise to bring the whole country together (not just blacks and white liberals)? Can we trust what he says? Or is he just another wolfish politician in sheeps clothing who will do or say anything to secure for himself the most powerful position on the planet?
Last edited by powerclown; 03-25-2008 at 05:01 PM.. |
03-25-2008, 05:36 PM | #347 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
Quote:
The problem isn't that Obama's pastor said controversial things, it's that the fact that his pastor said controversial things gives the people who were looking for the smallest smidgen of a reason to not like Obama the smallest smidgen of a reason not to like Obama. And now they all furrow their brows, hem and haw, and say, "Well, you know, that Obama, he seemed like a good kid, but some guy he knows said things that in context aren't all that surprising or interesting, but when viewed 20 seconds at a time offend Sean Hannity. So, I just don't know anymore." If it weren't for this, we'd probably be talking about how Obama's garbage man is a snake handler, or that his middle name is Hussein. |
|
03-25-2008, 06:08 PM | #348 (permalink) |
Human
Administrator
Location: Chicago
|
Again, what has Obama done that indicates he doesn't intend to try and elevate the level of discourse, and what has he done that indicates he's not interested in hearing other points of view?
He's never promised that he's perfect - in fact, for a politician he's uncharacteristically willing to admit his own flaws, as is his wife. He's never promised that just because he listens to people he'll agree with them. All he has promised is that he is not interested in demonizing anyone simply because they disagree with him, and he has not done anything to indicate otherwise. In fact, his Senate record demonstrates that he is entirely sincere in his interest to work across the aisle, considering how many of his bills have had Republican co-sponsors. Part of the problem, I think, is the expectations people on the other side of the spectrum have when he says he wants to work together. Working together, for Obama, doesn't mean siding with a bill he disagrees with just so that he can get a bill that he agrees with passed. He hasn't demonstrated an interest in the "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" brand of working together. Instead, what he has demonstrated is that while he is not willing to compromise on his own principles, he is still willing to respect the fact that other people have different principles, and he will listen to them. So, many people on the other end of the spectrum say "he's not working together, he's unwilling to change his view on _____ which is really important to us!" Well, no, he's not going to change his stance just because some of his opponents disagree, but what he will do - and this is how he's managed to get Republican co-sponsors on many bills - is approach the issue with respect and try to find where there is common ground without compromising principles. So, I haven't seen a single thing from Obama which would indicate he's not sincere in those intentions. His Senate record shows it, and even his handling of the Rev. Wright situation shows it. He's a very intelligent man, and rather than do what was politically prudent and simply unequivocally reject Trinity, Wright, and the whole nine yards, he gave a speech which he certainly knew would open a can of worms. And seriously, "can we trust what he says?" It's impossible to run a political campaign without the occasional fib, but I haven't seen anything from him that was as much of a bald-faced lie as Clinton's "I was a critic of NAFTA from the start," or her sniper-fire-on-the-tarmac story, or McCain's "oops! I misspoke on perhaps the most important foreign policy issue facing the next president....three times in a row....oh wait, now that you'r criticizing me for it I'll try and point out how I was right all along!" At worst, Obama is no worse than either McCain or Clinton in terms of honesty, etc, which isn't a reason not to vote for him, it simply means it's a wash on that issue. In which case, you look at other issues, like policy positions (there are plenty on his website, so don't say he's an empty suit), or track record (both Clinton and Obama have relatively short Senate records, but Obama more often has bills that get passed and more often has bills with Republican co-sponsors, or any co-sponsors at all for that matter, not to mention that he has clearly run a better campaign than Clinton, which is the closest comparison we're going to get of how the two of them would handle running an administration).
__________________
Le temps détruit tout "Musicians are the carriers and communicators of spirit in the most immediate sense." - Kurt Elling Last edited by SecretMethod70; 03-25-2008 at 09:38 PM.. Reason: clarity |
03-25-2008, 06:21 PM | #349 (permalink) | ||
Junkie
Location: Detroit, MI
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
03-25-2008, 07:10 PM | #350 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
Tone.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And the hell's angels do an annual Toys for Tots drive. Many branches of the KKK volunteer for Adopt-A-Highway. This does not mean I should go become a member of these organization. It certainly does not mean that, assuming I joined the KKK, I should be surprised if people judge me based on the KKK's message rather than their laudable community beautification efforts. Just because a group does a service which is valuable to the community does not mean you can join them and not be judged based upon the message that they put out. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
My main objection isn't to him saying that. It's to the hate-filled, insane rhetoric the guy spews. Again, back to the HIV conspiracy theory. It makes about as much sense as chem trails or a missile hitting the pentagon. And now the guy who wants to effectively run the government turns out to come from a church which thinks the government is out to get them? That, I think, should give people pause. |
||||||||||||
03-25-2008, 07:20 PM | #351 (permalink) | ||
let me be clear
Location: Waddy Peytona
|
Quote:
And BTW - Obama is not being tarred as much as closely scrutinized. Why is it tarring to question a politician's life shaping motivations and motivators? I believe Rekna stated earlier ... Quote:
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo Last edited by ottopilot; 03-25-2008 at 07:54 PM.. |
||
03-25-2008, 07:43 PM | #352 (permalink) | |
Darth Papa
Location: Yonder
|
Quote:
I'm clear that here in the online echo-chamber it's still a big deal for some people, but the mainstream has moved on. Obama appears to be done responding to it, and so am I. |
|
03-25-2008, 08:01 PM | #353 (permalink) | |
let me be clear
Location: Waddy Peytona
|
Quote:
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo |
|
03-25-2008, 08:07 PM | #354 (permalink) | |||
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
Quote:
You're trying to hold Obama responsible for things his pastor said, things Obama has unequivocally publicly rejected. If you want to claim that you think his criticism are disingenuous, then that's your choice. As it stands, I don't think there is much to the idea that Obama is somehow some sort of super secret under cover black nationalist, which is the logical conclusion of what you seem to be insinuating. Quote:
Are you really trying to claim that twenty years ago, a young hotshot mixed-race lawyer with political ambitions decided that the best way to find long-term political success would be to embrace black nationalism? Quote:
|
|||
03-25-2008, 10:10 PM | #355 (permalink) | ||
Human
Administrator
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
There hasn't been a single thing, other than the church he chooses to attend, to indicate Obama is sympathetic to any of the more irrational views espoused by Wright and others. I'm not going to hold his church against him any more than I'd refuse to believe John Kerry is pro-choice simply because he attended Catholic church all his life. It's easy to pick out the conspiracy crackpots on TFP within only a couple posts. If Obama believed HIV were caused by the government, we'd know. To think that he'd make it to where he is now without ever personally expressing crackpot views like that, all while believing them, attributes a bizarre level of clairvoyance to him. As does the idea he'd choose his church 20 years ago based on what would help him become president. (And, note, he didn't "choose" his church, he fell into it by meeting Rev. Wright and being introduced to Christianity. That conversion experience can be very strong, and is yet another reason someone might stick around a church long after hearing some things (non-theologically speaking) that they vehemently disagree with.) But let's say Obama does believe any of the conspiracy theories (a ridiculous presumption, but nonetheless let's say he does). Exactly what damage do you think he'd cause as president? If the government isn't behind HIV, he'll find that out. If he thinks it is but it isn't, what's he gonna do....encourage more HIV research? Oh noes! I don't think for one second that Obama holds that belief, but even if he did it's mostly a non-issue. I'm much more concerned about candidates who think our children shouldn't learn about evolution. Funny thing is, though, that if you pay attention to pretty much anyone who has known Obama personally in his life, even going back to his party days at Occidental, they have nothing but good things to say about him, and almost everyone makes particular mention of his interest in bringing people together and listening to all sides of an issue. It's far more telling to read about what kind of professor Obama was than it is to hear about the preacher he followed. Like I said, McCain is also running for the highest office in the land, and he went out of his way to have the endorsement of John Hagee. I don't think he'll ignore natural disasters just because his most important religious endorsement is from someone who thinks they're punishments from god, and I don't think Obama will suddenly turn the United States into Africa 2.0. Which begs the question, come to think of it, what exactly is anyone here afraid he'll do as president in light of Rev. Wright? Don't talk about how you think he's a socialist, don't talk about how he's a normal big city liberal politician. What bad things did you not think he'd do as president that you now think he'll do after hearing about Rev. Wright? Are you afraid he'll suddenly want to put an end to the genocide in Darfur? Maybe he'll want to help restabilize the Kenyan government? Perhaps he'll show concern for the serious problems with endangered species in Africa. All terrible things, for sure. I just don't get it: I can't think of a single tangible nefarious scheme that any sane person would attribute to Obama in light of his relationship to Rev. Wright. The worst that can be said is that he dines with whores (yes that's a Jesus reference, no I don't think Obama is the messiah ). Quote:
Instead, it's easier to complain about how Rev. Wright preaches that "the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today [is] my own government." Oh wait, that was the anti-American Martin Luther King, Jr. who said that. What a crackpot. God damn America indeed, for remaining true to this statement 40 years later and learning nothing. Please Read: Just a Typical Black Person click to show
__________________
Le temps détruit tout "Musicians are the carriers and communicators of spirit in the most immediate sense." - Kurt Elling Last edited by SecretMethod70; 03-25-2008 at 11:00 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
||
03-26-2008, 03:59 AM | #356 (permalink) | |
Darth Papa
Location: Yonder
|
Quote:
The media has cycled past it. Hillary made a mention of it yesterday which the media referred to as "after the fact". It's done. It's resolved for people. This particular wave has crashed on the beach, and has receded. Moving on. Last edited by ratbastid; 03-26-2008 at 04:03 AM.. |
|
03-27-2008, 03:26 AM | #357 (permalink) | |
let me be clear
Location: Waddy Peytona
|
Quote:
I see, is your integrity determined by the news cycle? Apparently truth for you has less to do about facts and more about winning, outlasting the news cycle. I see no evidence of this ever going away completely. Some powerfully influential people have been left injured in the wake. I doubt the likes of Rev. Wright or Geraldine Ferraro are done with this one, planning, calculating in the background. Don't forget this issue is now fair-game for Hillary and McCain ... food for some very creative minds ... staffers, strategists, PR and advertising wizards ... you only hope this is gone. It appears Obama used Rev. Wright to look extra black when he needed it, he threw them under a bus when light was shone on their racist beliefs, and now his church and new pastor are slamming him hard. He pissed off one of the most powerful women in the Democratic party with a cheap shot. He characterized typical white people as racist by experience. No, revenge is popular in politics and Democrats will eat their own. It's thinned out a bit, but I'd say it's not been put to bed just yet. Scorned political power brokers and influential racist preachers have long memories. Recently, my interest in this has been largely for entertainment. Like a video game. Mention something truthful about Obama's poor judgement (push the button) and watch the hypocrites come out of the woodwork to argue disingenuous rationalizations and mindless slogans. You're right, we should call it the Echo Chamber. Available soon on PS2 and Xbox!
__________________
"It rubs the lotion on Buffy, Jodi and Mr. French's skin" - Uncle Bill from Buffalo |
|
03-27-2008, 05:30 AM | #358 (permalink) | |
Darth Papa
Location: Yonder
|
Quote:
Hillary's ratings went down, not Obama's. So one man's truth is another mans bullshit. And let's not pretend the whole "scandal" wasn't about winning, ok? What got left in the wake of this thing is the POSSIBILITY of a real conversation about race, a conversation that can make a difference. IF we don't let ourselves get distracted by our own political viewpoints, we can actually start LISTENING to each other, and THAT can make a difference. I have no illusions that this thread is about anything OTHER than the distractions at this point. |
|
03-27-2008, 05:36 AM | #359 (permalink) | |
Living in a Warmer Insanity
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
|
Quote:
Yep.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club |
|
03-27-2008, 05:49 AM | #360 (permalink) | |
Easy Rider
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
|
Quote:
Obama's people are combing through Hillary's false statements over the years especially since she is claiming superior experience as first lady. The goal is of course to show that she is a liar and will say anything to get elected. That along with her already high negative numbers may destroy her ability to get elected. McCain seems to be making more mental mistakes lately. Is he getting too old and will these lapses increase when the general election campaign begins in earnest with debates etc.. where a quick grasp of the facts is necessary. |
|
Tags |
jeremiah, rev, wright, wrong |
|
|