08-21-2007, 07:30 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Crazy
Location: Washington State
|
Flirting and Sexual Harassment
All:
You may have seen this on Saturday Night Live a few years ago: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRoFzT2slcM While this video is a bit exaggerated, it brings up a good point. Where exactly is the line between flirting and sexual harassment, or "creepy" behavoir? Sometimes the answer if the woman thinks the guy is good looking or hot, it's flirting. If not, it's harassment, or at best "creepy." This means that a man's behavoir is defined not by what he does or says, but by how someone else reacts to it. Thoughts? |
08-21-2007, 07:40 AM | #3 (permalink) |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
A bit exaggerated?
It's sexual harrassment if it's unwanted attention. I understand that people are different, everyone has different comfort levels when it comes to flirtation in the workplace. I don't think it has much to do with whether the guy is good-looking or not for most women. Key is for men to use observation and common sense to their advantage.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
08-21-2007, 11:23 AM | #6 (permalink) | |
Crazy
Location: Washington State
|
Quote:
What if the woman likes the atention, but she's being coy by pretending she doesn't? In your case, is your reaction to flirting from a guy you have no attraction to going to be the same as from a guy you do find attractive, assuming that the way they flirted was exactly the same and not by itself over-the-line? |
|
08-21-2007, 11:30 AM | #7 (permalink) | |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
Quote:
|
|
08-21-2007, 11:37 AM | #8 (permalink) | |
Darth Papa
Location: Yonder
|
Quote:
That's the right way to legally define it, IMO. You could never draw up black and white rules about what constitutes harassment, because the range of human behavior is just way to broad. And you can't go by the accused's intent, because there are all sorts of behaviors that are obviously harassment that are only intended to be jokes or pranks. No, harassment really HAS to be defined "in the eye of the beholder". |
|
08-21-2007, 11:41 AM | #9 (permalink) | |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
Quote:
I'd say never approach a woman with non-professional interest in her in the workplace unless you are very familiar with her and then, if she shows no interest, drop it immediately. Whether she is being coy or not is totally irrelevant.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
|
08-21-2007, 12:20 PM | #10 (permalink) |
Winter is Coming
Location: The North
|
I've typed and re-typed a response to this thread and I seem to devolve into hyper-specificity. Essentially, I think people need to develop thicker skin and need to be able to stick up for themselves. A compliment, particularly in the workplace, can be just a compliment. People should be astute enough to differentiate between conversations, compliments, casual flirting and inappropriate behavior and the first step should be to try to take care of it yourself. Defining harassment in the workplace as "any unwanted contact" forces people to make ridiculous guesses about what will be wanted and what won't be and removes from the equation any responsibility on the behalf of the person being approached to make it clear to the other person that the behavior should stop.
If it continues AFTER an initial inappropriate conversation, that's much more what I would call harassment. Isolated incidences don't seem to fit that definition to me. Unless there is some power pressure in play (i.e. a boss threatening to fire you if you don't sleep with him) or an obvious inappropriate sexual reference, I think that the flirting should be the time for the other party to step up and say that they aren't interested. For most people, I think that will be that. Maybe I have too much faith in people not being douchebags. Last edited by Frosstbyte; 08-21-2007 at 12:25 PM.. |
08-21-2007, 12:37 PM | #11 (permalink) |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
Well, that is pretty much what I mean by "unwanted attention." But I will go further to say that if the person is unresponsive to flirtation yet doesn't say anything to you about it, for whatever reason - shyness, fear of confrontation, not wanting to offend - the person flirting should stop. Anybody in this day and age who doesn't understand that you shouldn't be pushy with these things is the one with the problem, in my estimation.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
08-21-2007, 03:01 PM | #12 (permalink) |
Banned
|
When a coworker is lying next to you, on your bed, and you're both still fully clothed, is it sexual harassment to start groping her breasts before you've made out?
/had sex with 5 women who were coworkers, 4 of one from one job/store. And by the way, the SNL skit hit it right on the head. It has nothing to do with what you say, it has everything to do with whether or not the person receiving it wants you to have said it. This is just presenting that fact in a humorous way. |
08-21-2007, 03:44 PM | #13 (permalink) |
pigglet pigglet
Location: Locash
|
when it comes to the workplace, i have to say you read non-verbal cues and give it time. we little peoples have all these fabulous ways of letting other people know we are interested in them. they don't all have to involve laying it on thick. so inviting people from work out for a drink where you can do things like, oh i don't know...talk, smile, tell jokes...i've found these are simple ways to find out who wants to fuck whom. after this is established, then tread very carefully. it's not just fear of a lawsuit...who really wants to be the creepy guy that is always trying to fuck people at work? who really wants to fuck people they actually work with? i mean, i'll do it - but it's usually a lot easier if you don't see each other 9-5, and then 6-12. even if the 6-12 is really only 10-1, and it's just alternate thursdays and a few fridays or saturdays you can't remember.
__________________
You don't love me, you just love my piggy style |
08-21-2007, 05:41 PM | #14 (permalink) |
Location: up north
|
If it's unwanted flirting, you should mention it to the other person. Going all crazy and getting a sexual harassement thing going on just for that is fucking extreme!! simple as that.
on the other hand, I love getting hit on by other female coworkers. I have a gf but doesn't mean I hate when girls pay attention to me! girls should be the same way. but it will always matter who the person is. If he's creepy, it will be taken as a weird and possibly scary thing but if the person is good looking and has a big smile, then it will be taken nicely. it's retarded that way.
__________________
|
08-21-2007, 06:12 PM | #15 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Pats country
|
The problem is that many people have difficulty being assertive and saying that the contact is unwanted. The other problem is that many guys have no clue (or don't care to) about reading women's signals of interest. I think the real lesson that we can take from the SNL skit is that Tom Brady rules.
__________________
"Religion is the one area of our discourse in which it is considered noble to pretend to be certain about things no human being could possibly be certain about" --Sam Harris |
08-21-2007, 07:55 PM | #17 (permalink) | |
Psycho
Location: Australia
|
Quote:
I once worked in an office where I could get a way with making flirtatious remarks to the girl on reception. Yet, if the creepy guy in logistics made the same remarks she would slap him down over it. I think the difference is context however. She new I was only mucking around, where is the way creepy guy said it hinted that he was being a bit more serious. I've seen a lot of things go down in the workplace that were clear cut cases of sexual harassment and the women were thick skinned about it and dealt with it on their own terms. I've also seen some women totally over react to something was perfectly innocent. But I think the distinction between 'sexual harassment' and just plain old 'harassment' should be made clearer. I feel sorry for the majority of 'creepy' guys, I honestly don't think they mean any malice or ill intent, they're just shy and awkward. Having said that though some really are just a whole world of creepy and wrong.
__________________
You are not a slave |
|
08-22-2007, 06:29 AM | #18 (permalink) |
Crazy
Location: Washington State
|
So exactly is it that makes a guy creepy? How did he hint that he was being "more serious" while you were playing around?
I've observed this too since high school, and it appeared to me that if the guy looked like Brad Pitt or George Clooney, women are flattered by flirty behavoir, and annoyed or threatened if the guy looks like Steve Buscemi. The better looking the guy is, the forward he can be. Although as he gets more forward, more girls would be put off by it. The irony is that when the girls aren't around, the Pitts and the Clooneys are often more derogatory in how they talk about girls than the guys they find creepy. So I concluded that unless the guy is way over the line (like grabbing a breast or something), the difference between fun flirting & creepy is how attractive the guy is perceived to be - or like the SNL video says: "Be good looking." |
08-22-2007, 06:47 AM | #19 (permalink) |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
You seem to have real appearance issues.
No matter how hard this might be to believe, 99.9% of you guys don't look like George Clooney or Brad Pitt. Most of you are decidedly average-looking. Same goes for women. A lot of what you are perceiving, I'm assuming, is confidence and charm. Someone who has a lot of experience interacting with the opposite sex and a way with words is probably better able to communicate in a flirtatious way without the "flirtee" feeling threatened. Whereas, those who don't come off as light-hearted and cavalier are not. I think that's just a fact of life. Which comes back to my former statement that this sort of interaction should be avoided unless you are very sure about the camaraderie you feel with the other person.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
08-22-2007, 06:52 AM | #20 (permalink) | |
I Confess a Shiver
|
Quote:
His avatar is actually his own portrait. |
|
08-22-2007, 07:01 AM | #21 (permalink) |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
lol, actually I've seen a photo of Will and he looks nothing like Lee Horsley.
*warning: vague early '80s reference...*
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
08-22-2007, 06:11 PM | #22 (permalink) | ||
Psycho
|
LOL never seen that one! That was great.
Yeah, how attractive you are is not the main issue, but it definitely greases the gears of interaction. Quote:
What, exactly, is common sense? Can we specifically define it? Hell no. In this context, it looks to me like a matter of social/gender aptitude. And some people simply have *learned* less of that than others! Those without much sometimes act in a manner that makes women (or anyone, really) uncomfortable without the capability of knowing that it's the response they'll get. They simply don't have the social experience to know where those lines lie. People don't pick up this 'sense' any more than they naturally pick up aptitude with, say, a computer. The lines are inferred through experience and trial & error, Common Sense (rather than specifics) as a guide is as reliable as the rules to Calvin Ball. Should they have learned it? Yeah... It was their responsibility to, even though men have insufficient 'teachers' on this subject nowadays. Should they be maligned for having not learned it? Well that's up for grabs. In reality, whether your flirting is okay is mostly derived from helping women feel comfortable, un-threatened. That process is really socially complex. We often take it for granted. Quote:
Nonetheless, theres nothing we can really do about it. And women certainly face their own hazards in the courtship game as well... *shrug* |
||
08-22-2007, 07:29 PM | #23 (permalink) | ||
Psycho
Location: Australia
|
Quote:
But this guy had absolutely no communication skills. And his social life existed only on Everquest, actually, when he wasn't at work, he was playing Everquest. He doesn't really get out much or talk to people face to face very often. When I'd flirt it was just for shits and giggles and to try and get a bit of rise. She knew this, and she'd dish it back to me. We used to talk a lot because we had similar tastes in music and just got along. She did not really know where logistics guy was coming from, nor did she really like him (He was very abrasive a lot of the time). So when he made certain comments, she'd take it differently. But, the tone and the way he said it was completely different to me. This is where the element of context comes into it. This instance was not a matter of looks or attraction either. The receptionist had a long term boyfriend and a child. And lets be honest, I ain't the best looking bloke around. Quote:
__________________
You are not a slave |
||
08-22-2007, 07:29 PM | #24 (permalink) |
Psycho
|
This seems to aply to everyday life too.
It is what it is. People only get with people who like them from the get-go. Why do you always see couples who are usually of the same attractiveness? A not-cute guy ends up with a not-cute girl. A avg guy with an avg girl. A hot girl with a hot or rich guy ($ makes up for looks, for men). A obese man with an obese girl.. So in this video, had the girls been nerdier and dorkier they would have gotten it on with the first dorky guy. edit: i think one "exception" that can change the equation is the person's self-esteem.. sometimes you see a cute girl with a dorky guy.. what might have happened is that the cute girl has low self esteem for whatever reason (she has small breasts, for example, or a big nose, or something). if the guy is 'cuter' than the girl, more often than not the guy has low self esteem (he is short, or something).. Last edited by match000; 08-22-2007 at 07:32 PM.. |
08-22-2007, 08:25 PM | #25 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: Oh Canada!!
|
It's a hard thing to define because everyone reacts differently. I think a lot of times (from circumstances I have witnessed) a lot of women tend to jump to the conclusion of sexual harassment or call it that, when in my opinion it is not. I think if something is said that makes someone uncomfortable they need to vocalize it and then the other person should obviously stop. Anything further after it is clear that one of the parties is uncomfortable would then be harassment. Then again, I would hate to downplay actual and obvious cases of sexual harassment which would most definitely be a horrible thing to have to experience. I agree that until you are comfortable with a coworker, you need to be careful what you say and do, regardless of whether it is sexual in nature. Personally, in most cases I want a majority of my coworkers to know as little as possible about what I do in my off time. Safer that way. Then again, I have a few coworkers that I can joke and laugh at things that others may deem inappropriate but that we find totally hilarious. There is, to me, some definite truth to that SNL skit. Say the guy who is supposed to be the "less attractive" man hitting on the woman is actually in her opinion MORE attractive to her? When you are attracted to someone (whether this is what society deems generally attractive or not) I would think you are more likely to be open to comments/compliments/etc when they are coming from someone you find attractive or are attractive to. Say the woman in the skit found the Tom Brady character unattractive, perhaps the reaction would be reversed. I dunno, I guess this is one of those things I think has a big ol grey area when it comes to defining what is and isn't. And I guess that's all I have to say about that... for now anyways haha.
__________________
I like things. And stuff. But I prefer to have things over stuff.
|
08-23-2007, 01:20 AM | #26 (permalink) | |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
Quote:
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
|
08-23-2007, 01:32 AM | #28 (permalink) | |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
Quote:
So cute girls who only go for cute guys (or guys with money?) have high self-esteem? What the? This theory doesn't hold water for me. To me that says that people have two modes: shallowness or low self-esteem.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
|
08-23-2007, 07:29 AM | #29 (permalink) | |
Crazy
Location: Washington State
|
Quote:
Do you really feel that the way a man looks is completely irrelevent to the way women react to him? Is it really all confidence, charm and having a way with words? |
|
08-23-2007, 08:00 AM | #30 (permalink) |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
Well, lets put it this way:
I think a handsome guy can be creepy depending on what he says and how he says it. I think an unattractive man can be charming depending on what he says and how he says it. This is how I see it. I can't speak for every woman. That is part of the problem. Which is why I say again, don't even bother with this sort of interaction in the workplace unless you have an easy camaraderie with the other person involved.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
08-23-2007, 09:04 AM | #33 (permalink) |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
I don't think it is unreasonable to refrain from flirting with co-workers unless it is very clearly appropriate. Are you saying that companies should not have sexual harrassment policies?
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
08-23-2007, 09:08 AM | #34 (permalink) | |
spudly
Location: Ellay
|
Quote:
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam |
|
08-23-2007, 09:11 AM | #35 (permalink) | |
Psycho
|
Quote:
|
|
08-23-2007, 10:19 AM | #36 (permalink) | |
Junkie
|
Quote:
The definition has to exist as it is because companies need to be able to say they are tough on the issue. |
|
08-23-2007, 10:25 AM | #37 (permalink) | |
Crazy
Location: Washington State
|
Quote:
As I understand it, no punitive action is taken unless 1) the person being harassed has asked the harasser to stop, and 2) the behavoir continued after the request to stop. As you have pointed out, anyone with basic social skills can tell if someone is receptive to the kind of interest you're showing a person, and if that interest makes the person uncomfortable, the behavoir should stop. I've also read that much sexual harassment is not motivated by romantic interest, it is more about asserting power by making someone uncomfortable, which is why they keep doing it when it is not positively received. But the definition of workplace sexual harassment isn't really what interested me in this post. What the SNL clip brought to my mind was a double-standard in male/female inof what is exceptable for guys considered "hot" vs. guys not considered hot. When I was in my teens & early 20s learning how to act with women I found cute, I observed that what seemed to be acceptable for some guys was not acceptable for me. What is acceptable does vary from woman to woman. But the kind of attention women seemd to enjoy from some guys seemed to annoy the same women when I was doing the same things. The difference seemed to be that women liked that attention when it was from good looking guys and didn't like from less-good looking guys. Social skills and confidence are factors too, but in some cases I didn't think the other guys were necessarily more confident or socially skilled than me. (Face it - most 17-19 years olds are nervious around girls they like). What I'm asking is: when a woman describes a guy who flirts with her or asks her out as creepy, is always his bahavoir that makes him creepy, or is it just that she doesn't find him attractive? |
|
08-23-2007, 10:52 AM | #38 (permalink) | |
Psycho
Location: Grand Rapids
|
Quote:
common sense... thank you.
__________________
And the day came when the risk to remain tight in a bud was more painful than the risk it took to blossom. Anais Nin I Wish You Well. |
|
08-23-2007, 11:09 AM | #39 (permalink) |
pinche vato
Location: backwater, Third World, land of cotton
|
All I know is, I know it when I see it. And I can prove it. I just took a state-mandated training session last week and I passed my exit exam with only one wrong answer.
__________________
Living is easy with eyes closed. |
08-24-2007, 01:00 PM | #40 (permalink) | ||
The sky calls to us ...
Super Moderator
Location: CT
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Tags |
flirting, harassment, sexual |
|
|