Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-27-2009, 09:20 AM   #281 (permalink)
Crazy, indeed
 
Location: the ether
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3 View Post
YouTube - derek redmond's 1992 olympic `400m run retrospective p2

Oh, I guess he did not actually have two broken legs, my bad.
Excellent video to illustrate precisely what I was saying: it wasnt two broken legs, and it wasnt a marathon. Pep talks might help here and there, but not in such a deep crisis.

---------- Post added at 09:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:14 AM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by scout View Post
no matter how much he spent and expanded existing government programs he couldn't buy the love of the liberals because of that giant (R).

Maybe it's because what you spend it on, as opposed to how much you spend. Nation building, creating a huge "security" apparatus, and using current medicare and social security surpluses to push regressive tax cuts through is not exactly my idea of spending liberals would get behind.

Of course, congressional dems are being too slow to revert some of these things.

But given the reaction to Obama's budget by many in the press, you get the idea that so many people are shocked that he is trying to do exactly what he campaigned on. The guy runs a campaign on public investment on healthcare, cap and trade, and reverting the tax cuts for those making more than 250k and when he puts those things in the budget, he gets attacked by most of the press corps.
dippin is offline  
Old 02-27-2009, 11:17 AM   #282 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
Quote:
Originally Posted by dippin View Post
Excellent video to illustrate precisely what I was saying: it wasnt two broken legs, and it wasnt a marathon. Pep talks might help here and there, but not in such a deep crisis.

I want to thank you. Because of your posts, I did a search on people doing exceptional things in adverse situations. I was feeling sorry for myself. Now I have put things back into perspective and I am now inspired. I may not do anything as great as some, but what I saw today has had an impact on me. Again, thanks, words/pep talks/cheerleading matters.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."

aceventura3 is offline  
Old 03-04-2009, 09:04 PM   #283 (permalink)
Cunning Runt
 
Marvelous Marv's Avatar
 
Location: Taking a mulligan
Quote:
Originally Posted by shakran View Post
No, it's realism. For three decades now people have followed the republican borrow-and-spend mantra. The republicans bankrupted the government doing it. And people bankrupted themselves. Now they're figuring out that buying everything on credit isn't such a hot idea and maybe instead of buying the new shiny, it's time to pay off some old debt.






Do you understand the difference between the deficit and the debt? The deficit is not cumulative, the debt is. Yes, he's having to spend a lot of money now, because the republicans screwed everything up so badly. But that doesn't mean he can't cut government spending in the future.
Sorry, does not compute. The problem arose because Jimmy Carter created the CRA, Clinton expanded it, and built a house of cards upon real estate. He further lucked out by getting out of office as the dot com bubble burst, although to hear him tell it, everything was fine in his term.

Bush managed to stave off an economic meltdown in spite of 9/11 by cutting taxes. However, the combination of Democrats taking over Congress in 2006, and their totally mercenary defense of Fannie and Freddie, finally imploded our entire economy. Nice work Barney, Chuckie, Chris, Harry, and Nancy. Why would anyone not trust you to fix the problems you created?

Back to Obama's performance. Geithner, Killefer, Daschle, and now Kirk. Eric Holder is no slouch, either--how much money did Marc Rich's pardon cost again? Obama's appointments make Bush look like a genius!

Good thing our country has no economic problems. If that were not the case, we might think Obama was a fucking dunce for promising $900 million to the Palestinians. If the news media mentioned it, that is.

I am IMPRESSED with how rapidly a community organizer can ruin the lives of average Americans. But hey, as long as he delivers outrageous promises (triple spending, halve the deficit) in impressive sounding speeches, NBC, CBS, and ABC will continue to hide the truth, for whatever reason.

P.S. Someone might want to mention to our financial wizard president that it's "PRICE/Earnings," not "Profit/Earnings."
__________________
"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money."
Margaret Thatcher
Marvelous Marv is offline  
Old 03-04-2009, 09:09 PM   #284 (permalink)
Crazy, indeed
 
Location: the ether
The whole CRA thing is a myth that has long been debunked. Half of subprime loans were made by entities that are in no way regulated by the CRA, and another 1/4 were made by subsidiaries that were only partially regulated by it.

So even if every single loan made by banks regulated by the CRA were only made because of the CRA (which is not true), the majority of troubled subprime mortgages still had nothing to do with it.
dippin is offline  
Old 03-05-2009, 12:47 AM   #285 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
Quote:
Obama's Middle-Class Task Force Has No Middle Class

Last Friday, Vice President Joe Biden and seven White House cabinet members traveled to Philadelphia to kick off the inaugural gathering of President Obama's Middle Class Task Force. The task force will convene monthly in cities across the country to confront the problems faced by average Americans. It's an admirable goal; with rising costs, stagnant wages and job cuts, a Pew Research study found that 78% of self-described middle class Americans have trouble maintaining their current standard of living.

Still, the middle class may have a better shot at making ends meet than at influencing the Middle Class Task Force. That's because no member of the Middle Class Task Force is actually middle class. While defining America's most beloved demographic group has never been an exact science, most academics agree that the term refers to anyone earning between $30,000 and $100,000 a year. (Median household income in the U.S. hovers around $50,000.) Every member of the President's task force - from Biden ($227,000) to Council of Economic Advisors chair Christina Romer ($172,000) to energy secretary Steven Chu ($191,000) - makes well over $150,000, putting them in the top 5% of wage earners. (See pictures of crime in Middle America.)

While middle class Americans are invited to submit questions and ideas through the task force's website, AStrongMiddleClass.gov and tickets for the Philadelphia meeting were distributed to labor and environmental groups, the task force did not accept questions from the audience. "If Biden and his team want to go into this [middle class issue]," said Daniel Morris, communications director of the Drum Major Institute, a think tank that analyzes middle class policy issues, "They're going to need to talk to real members of the middle class. There's no substitute for immediate intimate interaction."

Instead, the task force talked to Pennsylvania governor Edward Rendell ($175,000), Philadelphia mayor Michael Nutter ($167,000) and United Steelworkers of America president Leo Gerard, (who reportedly earns over $170,000). "[The Vice President] is doing the right thing," said Karen Nussbaum executive director of Working America, "but hearing directly from working people who are struggling and finding their way is an essential part of this."

In Philadelphia, the task force members and panelists spent a long time congratulating one another one on their good intentions before turning to the meeting's single topic: green jobs. The stimulus package bestows $500 million for green job training programs, $6 billion in loan guarantees for green industries, and $5 billion for a weatherization assistance program that could save homeowners up to $350 per year on utilities. Van Jones, president of Green For All, made an impassioned plea to "give young people the chance to put down that handgun and pick up a caulking gun." Greg Nelson, official Middle Class Task Force liveblogger, commented on an argument between representatives from Portland, Los Angeles, and Philly, who tried to out-green each other for the title of most environmentally friendly city. (See the top 10 green ideas of 2008.)

The task force didn't specify the number of jobs it hoped to create in the green sector, or how much of an impact the programs are expected to have on the middle class as a whole. Annie Tomasini, Biden's deputy press secretary, says the Philadelphia meeting was just "a listening session" and that the task force will not actually make any decisions regarding green job creation. They'll have to go back to Washington to do that.

Obama's Middle-Class Task Force Has No Middle Class

When I saw this headline, I thought "well maybe there will be some big business types that will be there on the board helping. WRONG....they seem to be all politicians making money from the taxpayer they are bleeding dry. They are all supporters of bailing out banks while unemployment skyrockets and the rich get richer and middle class is losing everything.

But I truly love the "There will be transparency and I will veto all pork"

Then facing reports of all the pork in HIS stimulus bill, "That was Bush's regime, I'll start doing it next year."

This guy is a true politician who doesn't give a damn about the people that make this country great (and to help with your guessing, it ain't the ultra rich).

He's a power hungry jerk, who I truly believe will be worse than Bush by the end of his term.

The Dems have the chance to truly make this country great again securing their power or to destroy it and never regain power. Right now, it is looking more and more likely they are out to destroy than rebuild.

Thank God I will not be here when they do, but my son, my neice and nephew, their kids will be paying for this for generations. And Obama continues to make the rich richer.

So very sad, he could have been great, instead he may go down as the worst president ever.

I pray I am wrong.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
pan6467 is offline  
Old 03-05-2009, 04:48 AM   #286 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Pan:

What was Bush's middle-class task force like?

Was his "Blueprint for the Middle Class" written by the middle class?

Why can't members of the upper class help the middle class?

You talk about bleeding taxpayers dry.

You talk about not giving a damn and being power hungry.

You talk about the country being destroyed.

But you don't talk about the program.

I think your talk is hyperbolic.

Prove me wrong.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 03-05-2009, 10:57 AM   #287 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
Pan:

What was Bush's middle-class task force like?
Don't care he's no longer president and his policies were never geared for the middle class. I really hope we don't have to compare Obama to Bush because if we compare policies that probably means his aren't going to work.

I'd rather be focused on bettering the nation and learning from the past not comparing things to the past.

Quote:
Was his "Blueprint for the Middle Class" written by the middle class?
Again, don't care...see above answer

Quote:
Why can't members of the upper class help the middle class?
I was hoping they were, as my post stated, but they aren't it's filled with people who make their money being politicians and far removed from true heartland middle class.

Quote:
You talk about bleeding taxpayers dry.
Yes, we are. We bail out banks give billions to them then we give taxpayers $13 extra a week.

Who is going to pay for all this? We aren't doing shit to rebuild a true tax base. Without a deep and strong tax base you have no choice but to keep going after those who can pay.

Quote:
You talk about not giving a damn and being power hungry.
And I believe so far that is what we are seeing from Obama. We saw that from Bush. Obama doesn't care about middle class people, if he did he would have lived up to his "I will veto all pork" "I will make government more transparent" I have a feeling if things get worse, he'll blame Bush more and be more hidden than Bush.

He's in over his head but I have a feeling loves the power.

Quote:
You talk about the country being destroyed.
Well, no strong tax base, bailing out the ultra rich with NO true idea where the money is going, times keep getting worse and no one knows what to do, but helping the banks and the ultra rich while the people starve isn't the right way to go.

Quote:
But you don't talk about the program.
what program, Obama doesn't even have any ideas that are going to work.

Quote:
I think your talk is hyperbolic.
We are all entitled to our opinions. That's all I'm giving is my opinion and the way I see things.

If you see things different then by all means offer up your opinion.

Quote:
Prove me wrong.
Nice thing about an opinion is I don't have to prove you wrong and opinions can change.

If this middle class task force starts talking to hard working true middle class citizens and truly works to build some programs that work and help, then I'll commend Obama and state I was wrong about him.... until then, it ain't happening.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
pan6467 is offline  
Old 03-05-2009, 11:21 AM   #288 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i keep not understanding how folk are thinking about the relation between making a statement that an initiative is going to happen and seeing effects from it. it's most strange, like there's an instant gratification thing that cuts across otherwise reasonable people's judgment.

the situation that neoliberalism generated--all the while providing more than enough ideological blah blah blah so that there was no need to look too hard at this situation as it was taking shape--is complicated. look at it this way: it took the united states 30 years of sustained reactionary stupidity to get itself into this mess, so it hardly makes sense to assume that somehow a new president is going to be able to wave a magic wand about and everything will be all better.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 03-05-2009, 11:36 AM   #289 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
It's like nobody has ever heard of momentum.
filtherton is offline  
Old 03-05-2009, 11:56 AM   #290 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy View Post
i keep not understanding how folk are thinking about the relation between making a statement that an initiative is going to happen and seeing effects from it. it's most strange, like there's an instant gratification thing that cuts across otherwise reasonable people's judgment.

the situation that neoliberalism generated--all the while providing more than enough ideological blah blah blah so that there was no need to look too hard at this situation as it was taking shape--is complicated. look at it this way: it took the united states 30 years of sustained reactionary stupidity to get itself into this mess, so it hardly makes sense to assume that somehow a new president is going to be able to wave a magic wand about and everything will be all better.
When you claim to have a middle class task force and fill it with all politicians and talk to not 1 person from the true middle class.... it's a farce. That may change, we will see.

No, there is no quick fix for this, but bailing out the banks and knowing you will have to tax the middle class more to pay for it because you have no idea how to build a tax base (manufacturing, good paying jobs, less imports or higher tariffs is a good way to get this tax base).... you are in no way fixing the country long term because you are adding more to the bill that will be coming due with fewer tax payers.

It's not instant gratification to want to hear and SEE plans to truly change things for the better.

"I will veto all pork" man shows me nothing but he is the same as Bush, just a slightly different platform but no ideas to change the direction of this country.

---------- Post added at 02:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:47 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton View Post
It's like nobody has ever heard of momentum.
Momentum eventually slows down and starts swinging the other way unless pushed in the same direction.... Obama is keeping that negative momentum moving farther into negativity. He isn't trying to slow it down, he's speeding it up.

---------- Post added at 02:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:49 PM ----------

Quote:
12 pct. are behind on mortgage or in foreclosure

NEW YORK – A stunning 48 percent of the nation's homeowners who have a subprime, adjustable-rate mortgage are behind on their payments or in foreclosure, and the rate for homeowners with all mortgage types hit a new record, new data Thursday showed.

But that's not the worst of it.

The reckless lending practices in states like Florida, California and Nevada that were the epicenter of the housing crisis are no longer driving up the nation's delinquency rate. Instead, the foreclosure crisis now is being fueled by a spike in defaults in states like Louisiana, New York, Georgia and Texas, where the economies are rapidly deteriorating and thousands are losing their jobs.

A record 5.4 million American homeowners with a mortgage of any kind, or nearly 12 percent, were at least one month late or in foreclosure at the end of last year, the Mortgage Bankers Association reported. That's up from 10 percent at the end of the third quarter, and up from 8 percent at the end of 2007.

Prime and subprime fixed-rate loans saw sharp increases in the fourth quarter, a sign that the problem is now the economy.

"We're seeing increases in fixed-rate categories and that's where the problems are coming from," said Jay Brinkmann, the group's chief economist. "The foreclosure picture is more clearly driven by the jobs market."

That trend highlights one of the biggest challenges confronting the Obama administration's mortgage relief plan launched this week. While the $75 billion plan could help change the loan terms or refinance up to 9 million homeowners, unemployed borrowers will have a hard time qualifying.

On Thursday, the Labor Department said new unemployment claims last week totaled 639,000, lower than expected, but still at elevated levels. Factory orders also slipped for the sixth month in a row in January, the Commerce Department reported.

"There can be no doubt that employers continue to shed labor at a frightening pace, with no end in sight," Ian Shepherdson, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics, wrote in a client note Wednesday.

The key is what kind of workers are losing their jobs, Brinkmann said. Unemployment for people with college degrees, some college education or technical training — those most likely to own homes and have prime fixed-rate loans — has nearly doubled over the past six months.

In New York, for example, where the financial industry is handing out pink slips like ticker tape, homeowners who once had good credit are defaulting at an increasing clip.

The only bright spot in the report is the devastation wrought by subprime ARMs appears to be waning. Their 30-day delinquency rate continues to fall and is at the lowest point since the first quarter of 2007.

That offers little reassurance to Florida, where 60 percent of homeowners who have a subprime ARM are at least one payment behind and one in five of all mortgage holders aren't current.
12 pct. are behind on mortgage or in foreclosure

For this we continue to bail out banks with our tax money. And Obama keeps wanting to shell money out to them.

Why not shell the money out to the taxpayers or give tax holidays so that maybe people can catch up on a payment.

But we love to blame the people in these situations and not the ass wipes in Washington that keep giving the banks money while they foreclose, raise rates and fees and give big bonuses and parties.

Yeah, change is just another word for more of the same but under a different banner.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
pan6467 is offline  
Old 03-05-2009, 11:57 AM   #291 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan6467 View Post
Momentum eventually slows down and starts swinging the other way unless pushed in the same direction.... Obama is keeping that negative momentum moving farther into negativity. He isn't trying to slow it down, he's speeding it up.
That's arguable.

What isn't arguable is the notion that the fact that things continue to get worse is proof that what Obama is doing is failing. It just isn't true.

Obama's plan might work, it might not. It is too soon to tell.
filtherton is offline  
Old 03-05-2009, 12:09 PM   #292 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
well, pan, there is a vague space of agreement--i would prefer that obama advanced a more comprehensive plan that provided adequate information to back it up and a sequence of clear objectives linked to particular kinds of outcomes. but for that, he'd have to break entirely with the neoliberal past, and it's not clear that either the administration or--especially---the idiots in the mass media who, like it or not, still--somehow--are in a position to structure legitimate opinion (this in a sociological sense)--are ready to do that. what i've seen so far is mostly geared around trying to get things back to a sense of normal--but normal is already 30 years fucked up, so i don't see the point in doing that in principle. in pragmatic terms, which for better or worse we have to think in terms of, i don't see a real alternative IF you accept the idea that a central driver behind all that's been happening is panic. and panic appears to follow from folk having to think too much about the possibility that this, "the best of all possible worlds" is a Problem. so the administration has to play softball with folk. and it's doing it. i just don't think that's a good idea.

manufacturing for example--there's no way back from the just-in-time type system for the strata of corporate entities that have adopted it short of massive state funding for the transition. that ain't happening--so the alternative is seeding new manufacturing--which requires a plan. protective tariffs aren't going to do anything because in the present system "made in america" is functionally meaningless, except in the context of medium-to-small scale firms. there are alternatives--but they require a plan.

one thing the administration is starting to move toward that's maybe interesting is eliminating tax havens. an effect of this would be to slow down something of capital movements. the intent that's been stated is tax revenues, but the idea goes beyond that in principle. again, same problem. no plan really.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 03-05-2009, 09:57 PM   #293 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton View Post
Obama's plan might work, it might not. It is too soon to tell.
The problem with this statement is, how long do we wait? How many more bailouts do the hard working, overburdened, middle class have to pay for? How many more major companies are going to take billions in loans and then say, "oops we need to go bankrupt, thanks for the taxpayer money."?

Granted he inherited a mess but so far he just seems to want to make it worse. And blame Bush. True leaders do not blame they find ways to right things and work to make things better, I just don't see that from him..... yet.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
pan6467 is offline  
Old 03-05-2009, 11:03 PM   #294 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan6467 View Post
The problem with this statement is, how long do we wait? How many more bailouts do the hard working, overburdened, middle class have to pay for? How many more major companies are going to take billions in loans and then say, "oops we need to go bankrupt, thanks for the taxpayer money."?
So you think, like, 6 weeks is enough time to turn around decades of economic momentum?

I understand you don't like paying the salaries of rich failures. Nobody does. What does that have to do with the likelihood that Obama's stimulus plan will have a net positive impact on the economy?

Quote:
Granted he inherited a mess but so far he just seems to want to make it worse. And blame Bush. True leaders do not blame they find ways to right things and work to make things better, I just don't see that from him..... yet.
I could see this being the case if Obama was using Bush as an excuse to not do anything. I don't see the problem in pointing out that the last guy might have played a role, or that the people who subscribe to the same failed economic philosophies as the last guy haven't realized that those economic philosophies have failed.

Despite however you want to classify "true leaders" (I'm continually impressed by the passion you commit to things which are completely arbitrary, and I mean that moderately as a compliment) true leaders lead. Effective leaders get shit done. Right now Obama is getting shit done. Right now Obama is leading most of the nation-- the rest of the nation seems to be being led by either Ron Paul or Rush Limbaugh (or Ramtha). Pick your poison, I guess.
filtherton is offline  
Old 03-06-2009, 12:12 AM   #295 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton View Post
So you think, like, 6 weeks is enough time to turn around decades of economic momentum?

I understand you don't like paying the salaries of rich failures. Nobody does. What does that have to do with the likelihood that Obama's stimulus plan will have a net positive impact on the economy?
What plan $13/week???? A pork loaded bill that shows no true vision but to make some companies richer?


Quote:
I could see this being the case if Obama was using Bush as an excuse to not do anything. I don't see the problem in pointing out that the last guy might have played a role, or that the people who subscribe to the same failed economic philosophies as the last guy haven't realized that those economic philosophies have failed.
"I promise to veto pork if it comes across my desk."

"Ooo well that was Bush's agenda, I'll do it next year."

"I Promise to change the way we do business make it more open to the people to see."

"Read this bill in 48 hours, have no debate and don't release it to the public until after the vote."

"I'm going to raise taxes on tobacco until they are on the black market and/or people quit, thus nullifying that tax increase revenue and losing money because the revenue we do get from tobacco dried up, thus we'll have to tax coffee, soda, fast food anything we , the government deem unhealthy for you uneducated slobs trying to enjoy life."

"Don't smoke...... but we need you to to bail out the rich."

Talk about hypocrisy.

Quote:
Despite however you want to classify "true leaders" (I'm continually impressed by the passion you commit to things which are completely arbitrary, and I mean that moderately as a compliment) true leaders lead. Effective leaders get shit done. Right now Obama is getting shit done. Right now Obama is leading most of the nation-- the rest of the nation seems to be being led by either Ron Paul or Rush Limbaugh (or Ramtha). Pick your poison, I guess.
Really, what has he gotten done? Truly done to better this nation?

What is his plan? How many more billions do we have to give the rich and how much farther does the Dow need to collapse? How much farther is he going to go down a road that isn't working?

Great leaders surround themselves with great people, he hasn't.

Great leaders have true plans and ideas how to better the future. He doesn't.

Great leaders are open to debate and ridicule of the plans and ideas because they may see things they hadn't and make compromises (because great leaders know sometimes compromise works and is best for all) or they have great belief that what they are doing is the best plan and they can shoot down ridicule by proving it and being firm in belief. I don't see any of this from him or the Dem leadership in Congress. They try to scare people in their own party into silence, they want to keep going down a road that has been leading us to ruin and not change course.

Most of all great leaders don't lie, they inspire by stating the truths and as bad as the outlook may be they inspire hope and encourage all (even those who don't agree with them). He doesn't.

I am not led by Limbaugh, Ron Paul or anyone else, I actually think for myself. One very interesting thing I have found tho, is by not having a TV and not watching news, getting it from newspapers, the radio, internet and the like, I am not as liberal as I once was, I think more for myself and pay attention more. I am able to listen to friend's opinions more and have more respect for them, but am less persuaded by things (opinions) I know are wrong.

And to keep this mantra "we have been headed down this road for 30+ years", then let's look who was in power then... hmmm the Dems. (Personally, I believe it was more Reaganomics than anything else in government).

30+ years would also be when the Boomers started taking power also, but we won't go there right now.

These are very scary times and they are getting worse on a daily basis. He doesn't have the benefit of time to try things and see how they work, he better find ways that work immediately or we are just seeing the beginning of a very fast decline in life as we know it.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
pan6467 is offline  
Old 03-06-2009, 04:58 AM   #296 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan6467 View Post
What plan $13/week???? A pork loaded bill that shows no true vision but to make some companies richer?
Pan, what is the proportion of pork to nonpork in this bill? Do you know? Have you read the bill? Or are you just regurgitating?

Even with the pork, did you know that the phrase "economic stimulus" actually means "spending money"? That's how you stimulate the economy. Pork or no.


Quote:
"I promise to veto pork if it comes across my desk."

"Ooo well that was Bush's agenda, I'll do it next year."

"I Promise to change the way we do business make it more open to the people to see."

"Read this bill in 48 hours, have no debate and don't release it to the public until after the vote."

"I'm going to raise taxes on tobacco until they are on the black market and/or people quit, thus nullifying that tax increase revenue and losing money because the revenue we do get from tobacco dried up, thus we'll have to tax coffee, soda, fast food anything we , the government deem unhealthy for you uneducated slobs trying to enjoy life."

"Don't smoke...... but we need you to to bail out the rich."

Talk about hypocrisy.
Not sure what any of this has to do with anything. Maybe the first one has anything to do with Obama blaming Bush for his own inaction. Even then, I question your ability to accurately paraphrase.


Quote:
Really, what has he gotten done? Truly done to better this nation?
It's been six weeks. Let's see: Appointing people to positions relevant to their knowledge and experience. An energy secretary who knows how energy is actually defined physically? OMG!!! He's drastically reducing troop levels in Iraq. He's got economic vision beyond "lower taxes" and "let them fail". I don't know that it makes sense to list more, because I don't think you're really all that interested in hearing about them.

Quote:
What is his plan? How many more billions do we have to give the rich and how much farther does the Dow need to collapse? How much farther is he going to go down a road that isn't working?
You don't know his plan? Why are you so passionately complaining about it then? What do you expect him to do, go down to Wall Street and force people to buy stock? You're ridiculous.

Quote:
Great leaders surround themselves with great people, he hasn't.

Great leaders have true plans and ideas how to better the future. He doesn't.

Great leaders are open to debate and ridicule of the plans and ideas because they may see things they hadn't and make compromises (because great leaders know sometimes compromise works and is best for all) or they have great belief that what they are doing is the best plan and they can shoot down ridicule by proving it and being firm in belief. I don't see any of this from him or the Dem leadership in Congress. They try to scare people in their own party into silence, they want to keep going down a road that has been leading us to ruin and not change course.

Most of all great leaders don't lie, they inspire by stating the truths and as bad as the outlook may be they inspire hope and encourage all (even those who don't agree with them). He doesn't.
I'm glad to see that to go along with your arbitrarily definition of what it means to be a great leader you've decide to arbitrarily interpret reality to mean whatever the hell you want.

Quote:
I am not led by Limbaugh, Ron Paul or anyone else, I actually think for myself. One very interesting thing I have found tho, is by not having a TV and not watching news, getting it from newspapers, the radio, internet and the like, I am not as liberal as I once was, I think more for myself and pay attention more. I am able to listen to friend's opinions more and have more respect for them, but am less persuaded by things (opinions) I know are wrong.
Good for you.

Last edited by filtherton; 03-06-2009 at 05:52 AM..
filtherton is offline  
Old 03-06-2009, 05:15 AM   #297 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
or you could think this out, pan.
it's entirely possible that the way of life that was fashioned under the rickety, cheap umbrella of american empire dressed up as globalization is over. it is entirely possible that the consequences of free marketeer ideology are catching up with the people who were primarily affected by it here--regular working folk--when production mutated and labor became a variable cost and people persuaded themselves that the movement of capital creates wealth and the firms have no particular responsibility to anyone or anything but profit---there were consequences. the scary thing is that there are no easy or obvious answers to this--but the fact is that all this is a direct consequence of 30 years of neoliberal ideological domination in the states. and this is not a mantra--it is a fact, like it or not.

and so it no longer matters what folk think of leadership in the old mode.
it no longer matters what free marketeers think.

this is the start of a long, strange process of the type that does not play well on television and is not amenable to easy snap judgments. the problem this creates is that to address it you cannot rely on prefabricated talking head opinion. but you'll figure that out.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 03-06-2009, 06:00 AM   #298 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy View Post
or you could think this out, pan.
it's entirely possible that the way of life that was fashioned under the rickety, cheap umbrella of american empire dressed up as globalization is over. it is entirely possible that the consequences of free marketeer ideology are catching up with the people who were primarily affected by it here--regular working folk--when production mutated and labor became a variable cost and people persuaded themselves that the movement of capital creates wealth and the firms have no particular responsibility to anyone or anything but profit---there were consequences. the scary thing is that there are no easy or obvious answers to this--but the fact is that all this is a direct consequence of 30 years of neoliberal ideological domination in the states. and this is not a mantra--it is a fact, like it or not.

and so it no longer matters what folk think of leadership in the old mode.
it no longer matters what free marketeers think.

this is the start of a long, strange process of the type that does not play well on television and is not amenable to easy snap judgments. the problem this creates is that to address it you cannot rely on prefabricated talking head opinion. but you'll figure that out.
Bingo. Wake up and smell the coffee, folks. We're not in Kansas anymore. Moe, Curly and Larry have jumped the ship.

Frame it as the consequences of the last 8 years, the last 8 weeks or the last 8 seconds, but those lazy, crazy, hazy days of summer are over. A better idea than sitting around arguing about the Obama administration's excruciatingly protracted first 8 weeks in office is to go out and learn Chinese or Hindi.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 03-06-2009, 09:07 PM   #299 (permalink)
Cunning Runt
 
Marvelous Marv's Avatar
 
Location: Taking a mulligan
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedmedia View Post
Bingo. Wake up and smell the coffee, folks. We're not in Kansas anymore. Moe, Curly and Larry have jumped the ship.

Frame it as the consequences of the last 8 years, the last 8 weeks or the last 8 seconds, but those lazy, crazy, hazy days of summer are over. A better idea than sitting around arguing about the Obama administration's excruciatingly protracted first 8 weeks in office is to go out and learn Chinese or Hindi.
Not a bad idea. It is not lost upon the thinking person that Obama's rush to enact "stimuli" is based not on the urgency of the situation, but on the need to pass these travesties before Congress and the public can read what is being proposed.

Huge problem #1: We will never, ever, get rid of "universal health care," no matter how shitty it is (and it will be) once it's put in place. The damage will be enacted upon all future generations.

Huge problem #2: Obama wants to structure income taxes to have 50% of the people pay no taxes. In one piece of legislation, unless he is stopped, he will create a permanent voting majority of people who have no interest in controlling the expansion of government, nor in limiting tax increases.

Massive numbers of tax refugees will leave this country--educated immigrants already are. This, together with offshoring made more and more attractive by the proposed tax environment, is having a very predictable effect. And people on this forum wonder why they can't find jobs.


Obama may or may not be an evil man, but his ideas are evil. If you voted for him, don't complain when you have no job.
__________________
"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money."
Margaret Thatcher
Marvelous Marv is offline  
Old 03-06-2009, 09:13 PM   #300 (permalink)
Crazy, indeed
 
Location: the ether
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvelous Marv View Post

Huge problem #2: Obama wants to structure income taxes to have 50% of the people pay no taxes. In one piece of legislation, unless he is stopped, he will create a permanent voting majority of people who have no interest in controlling the expansion of government, nor in limiting tax increases.
Please, show me where this has been said or expressed. Any evidence of it will suffice.


Quote:
Massive numbers of tax refugees will leave this country--educated immigrants already are. This, together with offshoring made more and more attractive by the proposed tax environment, is having a very predictable effect. And people on this forum wonder why they can't find jobs.


Obama may or may not be an evil man, but his ideas are evil. If you voted for him, don't complain when you have no job.

Educated immigrants are already leaving this country because the Bush administration has made things seriously harder for legal immigrants. I know, I am one. The idea that educated immigrants are leaving the US because of tax issues is ludicrous.
dippin is offline  
Old 03-07-2009, 12:03 AM   #301 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvelous Marv View Post
Not a bad idea. It is not lost upon the thinking person that Obama's rush to enact "stimuli" is based not on the urgency of the situation, but on the need to pass these travesties before Congress and the public can read what is being proposed.

Huge problem #1: We will never, ever, get rid of "universal health care," no matter how shitty it is (and it will be) once it's put in place. The damage will be enacted upon all future generations.

Huge problem #2: Obama wants to structure income taxes to have 50% of the people pay no taxes. In one piece of legislation, unless he is stopped, he will create a permanent voting majority of people who have no interest in controlling the expansion of government, nor in limiting tax increases.

Massive numbers of tax refugees will leave this country--educated immigrants already are. This, together with offshoring made more and more attractive by the proposed tax environment, is having a very predictable effect. And people on this forum wonder why they can't find jobs.


Obama may or may not be an evil man, but his ideas are evil. If you voted for him, don't complain when you have no job.
I object to my post being used to frame this bullshit. That was uncalled for.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 03-09-2009, 05:36 AM   #302 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedmedia View Post
I object to my post being used to frame this bullshit. That was uncalled for.
Opinions and assholes, everyones got one.

I'd object if I were you also.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 03-09-2009, 07:02 AM   #303 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
nice to see a continued churn through here of rightwing talking points of the moment. not a single autonomous idea, not a single autonomous argument--everything everything culled from the conservative talking heads on cnn or the conservative talking heads on cnbc or the conservative talking heads on faux news.

get a grip folks.
try thinking for yourselves.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 03-09-2009, 02:31 PM   #304 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy View Post
nice to see a continued churn through here of rightwing talking points of the moment. not a single autonomous idea, not a single autonomous argument--everything everything culled from the conservative talking heads on cnn or the conservative talking heads on cnbc or the conservative talking heads on faux news.

get a grip folks.
try thinking for yourselves.
But...Rush says only lieberals think for themselves...
robot_parade is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 07:42 AM   #305 (permalink)
Easy Rider
 
flstf's Avatar
 
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
Another promise broken, signing a bill with about 8500 earmarks in it. Wasn't it just a few months ago Obama promised to never do this?
flstf is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 10:05 AM   #306 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Quote:
Originally Posted by flstf View Post
Another promise broken, signing a bill with about 8500 earmarks in it. Wasn't it just a few months ago Obama promised to never do this?

he's the first President in history to break a promise. clearly the time to impeach is now
Derwood is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 10:34 AM   #307 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
It is getting far to easy to point out the inconsistencies and critiques of the Obama Presidency along with the Democratic Party control of Congress. But I am curious.
Do Obama supporters actually see these issues and are simply making a choice to ignoring them?
Are Obama supporters getting concerned about what going on in Washington?
Are you disappointed in any way?
How is it that about 53% of the people according to Rasmussen ( Rasmussen Reports: The Most Comprehensive Public Opinion Data Anywhere ) think we are going into a depression similar to 1930, but 62% approve of Obama's performance according to Gallup ( Gallup.Com - Daily News, Polls, Public Opinion on Government, Politics, Economics, Management )?

More and more I am becoming a spectator with jawdropping amazement.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."

aceventura3 is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 10:52 AM   #308 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
I don't ignore what's going on. I don't agree with everything he does by any stretch.

That said, I feel like every waking moment of Obama's presidency has been dissected and criticized so far and it's growing really, really tiresome.
Derwood is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 10:57 AM   #309 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
there was some pseudo-discussion of this on one or another of the cable "news" outlets this past week--the argument was that this budget was negociated this past fall, which explains the earmarking. the claim that accompanied it was that there would be no such earmarks on next years budget, which would be negociated under the present administration.

it's obvious that thinking all the way back to, say, september is alot to ask of conservatives, who seem to confuse slicing time into narrow slivers and then yelling about "inconsistencies" that result from their slicing of time into little slivers with meaningful critique.

but it doesn't matter: the right is so mired in a brand identity problem that they're functionally irrelevant. and even if that were not the case, the ENTIRETY of this economic fiasco originated with them--neoliberalism since reagan, 30 years of conservative control---no wonder they have a Problem with thinking in more than tiny slivers of time.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 11:07 AM   #310 (permalink)
Friend
 
YaWhateva's Avatar
 
Location: New Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3 View Post
How is it that about 53% of the people according to Rasmussen ( Rasmussen Reports: The Most Comprehensive Public Opinion Data Anywhere ) think we are going into a depression similar to 1930, but 62% approve of Obama's performance according to Gallup ( Gallup.Com - Daily News, Polls, Public Opinion on Government, Politics, Economics, Management )?
Maybe it's because most people realize that the mess we are in didn't start on 1/20/09 but many, many years before that.
__________________
“If the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it's clean, he has nothing, I will apologize to the nation, and I will not trust the Bush administration again.” - Bill O'Reilly

"This is my United States of Whateva!"
YaWhateva is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 11:38 AM   #311 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
I find it much more troubling that "conservatives" are now pulling their "conservative" heads out of their "conservative" asses and criticizing something. Where the FUCK were these people (including several MAJOR Bush-apologists right here on TFP) for the last eight years???

Congratulations on having a Democrat patsy to blame everything on. That must feel good. Sorry about your party being in shambles, but at least you've got a place to point your finger so you can keep it pointed away from yourself.
ratbastid is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 12:08 PM   #312 (permalink)
Easy Rider
 
flstf's Avatar
 
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood View Post
he's the first President in history to break a promise. clearly the time to impeach is now
Just because I am disappointed in his breaking of campaign promises is no reason to jump to talk of impeachment. I voted for him and really wanted him to bring change to Washington. It is very sad that he is performing like business as usual. This has nothing to do with partisan politics.

I suspect many of his supporters would also be in favor of him vetoing this bill.
flstf is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 12:17 PM   #313 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Quote:
Originally Posted by flstf View Post
Just because I am disappointed in his breaking of campaign promises is no reason to jump to talk of impeachment. I voted for him and really wanted him to bring change to Washington. It is very sad that he is performing like business as usual. This has nothing to do with partisan politics.

I suspect many of his supporters would also be in favor of him vetoing this bill.

From what I understand, the budget bill was structured under the previous Congress, and as such, Obama has allowed it to be voted on "as is". We'll see if he keeps his promise of no earmarks on next year's budget
Derwood is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 12:23 PM   #314 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/12/us...rmarks.html?hp

from the ny times this afternoon, obama on the earmark question. it's basically the same argument that i cited above.
this bit of reality will no doubt have no effect on the right.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 12:24 PM   #315 (permalink)
WHEEEE! Whee! Whee! WHEEEE!
 
FuglyStick's Avatar
 
Location: Southern Illinois
I am baffled by people who expect a magic wand to fix the failed strategy of Reaganomics and "trickle down." Obama has been in office less than 60 days, and some nuts are calling for his head because he can't snap his fingers and erase the last 30 years? I never heard Obama say the fix would be easy or instant. Republicans are the only ones imposing such unrealistic expectations, and only in an attempt to discredit Obama.
__________________
AZIZ! LIGHT!
FuglyStick is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 12:29 PM   #316 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid View Post
I find it much more troubling that "conservatives" are now pulling their "conservative" heads out of their "conservative" asses and criticizing something. Where the FUCK were these people (including several MAJOR Bush-apologists right here on TFP) for the last eight years???

Congratulations on having a Democrat patsy to blame everything on. That must feel good. Sorry about your party being in shambles, but at least you've got a place to point your finger so you can keep it pointed away from yourself.

Ditto.

Hey we did the borrow and spend thing and cut tax and spend for the past and eight years and things didn't work out so well. We'd now like to express our sincere hatred of spending. Seriously who buys that crap load?

I watched one show the other day where some jack-ass detailed that since Obama began running for POTUS the market down huge. Like his running for the office caused the markets to crash. Yeah, that makes sense. I think he may have also been the second shooter on the grassy knoll too.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 12:38 PM   #317 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid View Post
I find it much more troubling that "conservatives" are now pulling their "conservative" heads out of their "conservative" asses and criticizing something. Where the FUCK were these people (including several MAJOR Bush-apologists right here on TFP) for the last eight years???
All it takes is a search.

Unless you are excluding me, your search of my posts will show I strongly supported the administration's foreign policy, the war, Bush's straight talk and my defense of his intellect. When it came to fiscal policy, other than tax cuts, I was not in support of all of his spending initiatives or those acted on by Republicans in Congress. When it came to issues like executive power I was very clear on my positions, indicating that Bush was basically giving Congress the finger. When it came to issues like the Valerie Plame issue, I clearly acknowledged that I thought the Bush administration had an agenda with Plame. When it came to issues like the intel used for war, I clearly stated that Bush "sold" his case for war, and that anyone who supported the war based on his speeches, or his people on talk shows, either did not do their homework or are foolish. On issues the the "politicization" of the AG office, my position was that the AG office has always been political and used by the office of the President for his agenda.

I think there is a big difference between what you will find in my posts relative to those who post in support of Obama.

Quote:
Congratulations on having a Democrat patsy to blame everything on.
After 8 years of having Bush blamed for everything, I find it refreshing to blame Obama. But, unfortunatly Obama is not making it interesting - it is too easy. Just like the fact that he is sending his daughters to a private school in Washington but now is denying that privilege to underprivileged but high performing students in the DC school system. It is unbelievable, simple unbelievable. But what is worse, is how Obama supporters ignore this or try to rationalize it.

Quote:
That must feel good. Sorry about your party being in shambles, but at least you've got a place to point your finger so you can keep it pointed away from yourself.
I have not always been a Republican. I was once a Democrat, a Libertarian, I once voted for Ross Perot and when Reagan ran, I actually voted for John Anderson. I thought the Republican Party reached a low point during the impeachment of Clinton. My loyalty is more to what I believe than to a political party. I did not support John McCain at all.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."

aceventura3 is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 12:42 PM   #318 (permalink)
Easy Rider
 
flstf's Avatar
 
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy View Post
from the ny times this afternoon, obama on the earmark question. it's basically the same argument that i cited above.
this bit of reality will no doubt have no effect on the right.
I think the following statement is probably close to the truth:
Quote:
Mr. Obama’s aides said privately that they did not want a confrontation with Congress over the earmarks at a time when the president needs cooperation on an array of priorities that are more important to him.
If he is not willing to take on Congress now with his popularity so high I don't hold out much hope he will be willing to tackle them later when his popularity is lower.

Last edited by flstf; 03-11-2009 at 12:45 PM..
flstf is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 12:42 PM   #319 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
Quote:
Originally Posted by YaWhateva View Post
Maybe it's because most people realize that the mess we are in didn't start on 1/20/09 but many, many years before that.
August 4, 1961
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."

aceventura3 is offline  
Old 03-11-2009, 12:42 PM   #320 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
that's nice, ace. but none of it stops you from being like a repetition machine when it comes to conservative talking points of the moment. and the "criticisms" coming from the right are transparently about a desperate attempt to salvage their brand and not much at all about coherence...particularly when you start factoring in that old "personal responsibility" nonsense that the right was once on about endlessly (when it applied to people not on the right of course)--you absolutely refuse to acknowledge the obvious in the simple fact that your economic and political views are largely responsible for the disaster that's being visited upon all of us.

but i've long since given up on expecting anything but such inconsistent self-righteous nonsense from conservatives.

====

fistf: we'll have to wait and see. i don't think that the motivations for not taking on congress over the budget which was negociated last fall as are you state them, nor do i think that the next budget will be subject to the considerations you claim--but on the second point, time will tell.

there's surely no basis for saying more than that now.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

Tags
obama, performance


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:04 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360