12-09-2010, 01:40 PM | #161 (permalink) |
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
|
you know, debaser, were the state department cables the only information to be leaked i might be closer to agreement---this despite the fact that as i read through and about them i think that it was, in fact, a very great service that was performed through their release because a lot of what has been happening in the world internationally is clearer for it. and you'd think that would be a good thing in a democratic system, since the people are supposed to be in a position to make informed decisions about political questions. of course i am under no illusions...the united states is not in fact such a system...but it talks the talk and now has to eat the words.
this is a big problem internationally, btw. the us is taking it in the face **for their reaction** to the leak. not for the leak. for their reaction to it. but the iraq documents in particular revealed clear evidence of what i take to be war crimes carried out by people within the bush administration. no wonder the conservative elite wants this sort of thing stopped.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear it make you sick. -kamau brathwaite |
12-09-2010, 01:48 PM | #162 (permalink) |
Sir, I have a plan...
Location: 38S NC20943324
|
I am not being snide, I really have not had the chance to look at the documents in question in any real depth. Which incidents/documents are you refering to? If they do show misconduct, then I applaud their release. However, I still have to question the logic behind the release of the documents that have no such relevence.
Just because I help an old lady across the street does not excuse me from selling heroin to her grandson.
__________________
Fortunato became immured to the sound of the trowel after a while.
|
12-09-2010, 01:56 PM | #163 (permalink) |
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
|
the iraq documents shows the whole pattern of condoning torture, of reporting it when witnessed in the context of a system that assured there'd be no investigation, etc. it outlines the implications of the bush administrations (bogus) legal position on the question of torture; similarly with the rendition process; similarly with guantanomo.
there hasn't even been a chilcot commission in the united states (the state cables reveal information about the extent to which chilcot was constructed to protect american interests, btw...) no investigation of how this was possible, no attempt to tail back the expansive claims to executive impunity advanced by the bush people. nothing. in that, i think wikileaks performed a valuable service. on the afghanistan leaks, i think there is alot of interesting and disturbing information that should have been public from the outset--one can argue about where the line would be drawn optimally---but it's clear that the pentagon's post-vietnam strategy of total information management and a massive over-reaching of the legitimate uses of classification of information has to be pushed back. and wikileaks has demonstrated something of why and how that's the case. the state cables are interesting, like i've been saying. they repay reading about. then there's a conversation to be had, maybe.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear it make you sick. -kamau brathwaite |
12-09-2010, 02:41 PM | #164 (permalink) | |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
Many. One of the most recent is how the United States and China worked together behind the scenes to sabotage the climate summit. There are numerous scandals and instances of corruption outed by this leak.
Quote:
Whole books could be written on how wikileaks serves democracy. |
|
12-09-2010, 05:27 PM | #165 (permalink) | |
immoral minority
Location: Back in Ohio
|
Quote:
I'm not saying that Wikileaks should go away anymore, just that they should be professional journalists (or work with them) and figure out what the public should know of crimes being committed or politically unfavorable choices being made. But not just putting a bunch of random things on-line which may not mean anything to 99.9% of the population, but is critical for the other .1% to find out. And over-classification isn't a crime, yet security managers need to be the ones checking it out. |
|
12-09-2010, 06:21 PM | #166 (permalink) | ||
Sir, I have a plan...
Location: 38S NC20943324
|
Quote:
Now if you could show me a memo that demonstrated that the administration acted only after accepting a payoff from the oil industry or somesuch, I will join you with torches at the gate... Quote:
Do we overclassify? You bet. I have to deal with it every day, and it is a major pain in the ass. Is it for the purposes of denying you your rights? Absolutely not. Information is generally classified at the lowest, most operational levels and continues to be classified as it becomes part of larger issues not because there is an evil scheme to hide problems from the voter (though that is a "convenient" side effect), but because it is an arduous process to declassify anything that has been classified. There are people whos sole job it is to declassify information. They are pitted against the entire lower tiers of the government beaurocracy, all of whom are classifying stuff like mad. Example: An Army private (not the treasonous kind) sits at a secret computer creating documents from patrol debreifs in Iraq. He is 19 years old, and wishes to avoid being shit on and/or missing dinner, both of which can be caused by pissing off his platoon sergeant. He has been told that he has the authority to determine the classification level (up to secret) of any document he creates. He has also been told that any information that comes off of his computer is to be treated as secret as a matter of course. The shit on a shingle and XBOX are calling. What do you think he is going to do once he is done with a routine patrol debreif that contains NO classified material whatsoever? Yep. Now if anyone wants to use the information contained in that report they must hold a secret clearance or , if they wish to release it to individuals who do not hold clearances, they must take it to the proper declassification authority. In that case that authority is the US Army. The Army has people trained and authorized to declassify information. There are about 2 of them for every 4500 soldiers. They must review the document and view it in the both current and possible future operational contexts before deciding to declassify it. But wait! There's more... Let's pretend that patrol gave a pump to a village so they could grow whatever the fuck grows in that godforsaken shithole. A state department dude thinks that's pretty cool, and puts it in his report which also contains information from the CIA on friendly villages in the area which was classified to prevent removal of said village elders heads. Now to declassify the report you must go through a "Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel" (ISCAP henceforth), which as the name suggests, is not the simplest of procedures. /example Now the system above needs work, and there are abuses by those who wish to hide their malfeasance. That being said, do you really think that the answer to the problem is some shithead with an axe to grind simply dumping a ton of documents onto the internet? I think not. You also bring up democracy. You need to realize that for you to have your utopian demopcracy, a lot of other people are going to have to suffer. For example I present the paper regarding US bombing of Yemeni targets and Ali Abdullah Saleh's boozing. Saleh is a shitty leader. But what is the alternative? Anger over this cable could lead to his removal which will strengthen AQAP, probably to the point where nominal control of the country will slip to them. Now Will, I assume you do not want violent fundamentalists running Yemen, nor would anyone in Yemen if they really thought about it. Sure, no music or smiling or fun is all well and good, but when they start hanging women for talking to non-relatives I start to draw the line (unless they are accusing Julian Assange of rape, in that case the bitches had it coming). Meh, I'm rambling. I guess what it comes down to is this. Countries need secrets just like they need armys. If they don't have them, some other country that does will destroy them and take what is theirs. Are we to trust a criminal (Australian/Ex-hacker) to determine what secrets we as a country keep? Do you really think this will lead to a more transparent government? I think it will lead to a far more draconian classification system that will not only prevent the proper dissemination of information to the public, but hamper the very agencies that make use of it legitimately on a day to day basis...
__________________
Fortunato became immured to the sound of the trowel after a while.
|
||
12-09-2010, 06:47 PM | #167 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: New York
|
Quote:
There is no way you are going to convince me that anyone on the wikileaks staff or any journalist has the detailed timely information they need to decide if information needs to be classified. There's also no way that you are going to convince me that publishing a list of worldwide sites that are key to national security interests has anything to to with government transparency. Last edited by dogzilla; 12-09-2010 at 06:51 PM.. |
|
12-09-2010, 08:07 PM | #168 (permalink) |
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
|
what makes you think that assange is personally making these decisions, debaser, when the fact of the matter is that wikileaks has assembled a coalition with some of the major media outlets in the world, all of which are fully co-operating with wikileaks in the redaction and contextualizing of the information? all wikileaks is, really, is a conduit. that's it.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear it make you sick. -kamau brathwaite |
12-09-2010, 09:44 PM | #169 (permalink) | |||||
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
Quote:
This is the point, debaser: This is wikileaks. Wikileaks is a check to balance out power that's wildly one-sided in this world. You and I have almost no power whatsoever, but because of organizations like wikileaks, we get some of the power that's taken from us back. They're giving us the tools to determine if the power we're giving up should be given up, so we can decide with all of the information if the government or corporations really are working in the best interest of the people. In that way, its truly democratic. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I cannot say this enough: ignore Orly, Beck, Libaugh, Hannity and their ilk. This isn't a right/left thing, they're corrupt liars and anyone who listens to them will end up with a warped and incorrect understanding of reality. Ignore them. |
|||||
12-09-2010, 10:28 PM | #170 (permalink) | ||||||
Sir, I have a plan...
Location: 38S NC20943324
|
Handjobs from asian girls?
Quote:
Quote:
Reread my post. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If he is not an egomaniac then why has he threatend to release more damaging documents without even the amature redaction attempted on the earlier ones? It seem an awful lot like he is making it about himself. Add to that the legion of scriptkittys that are basking in his 15 minutes, and I think it is pretty hard to separate the man from his creation. Remember also that he has the final word as to what is published on his site. Quote:
__________________
Fortunato became immured to the sound of the trowel after a while.
Last edited by debaser; 12-09-2010 at 10:30 PM.. |
||||||
12-10-2010, 12:26 AM | #171 (permalink) | |||
immoral minority
Location: Back in Ohio
|
Quote:
Yet I think that there are some in there that the public doesn't care to know, shouldn't know, or doesn't want to know. Quote:
No offense, but I think you're being naive. Classified documents about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan would have meant a solid Kerry win in 2004. Don't fool yourself: those in power use secrecy as a way to maintain and grow their power at your expense. Quote:
|
|||
12-11-2010, 04:47 PM | #172 (permalink) | |||
Upright
Location: lotus land 3rd igloo on the right
|
Quote:
just a tad overboard however you might be surprised to learn i also talk like this nay think as such blame it on the military where the one side of the tech manuals was devoted to that other official language after twenty im used to reading only the left hand side (aint this fun?) and again sorry it bothers you so early ---------- Post added at 04:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:06 PM ---------- Quote:
well thak crap they cleared that up (for those of us losy in the maths) of those paying attention to the story say they believe the release of thousands of secret State Department communications harms the public interest. About half that number (31%) say the release serves the public interest, according to the latest News Interest Index survey conducted Dec. 2-5 among 1,003 adults. Yet the public makes a distinction between WikiLeaks itself and the press' handling of the document release. While nearly four-in-ten (38%) of this group say news organizations have gone too far in reporting the confidential material, a comparable number (39%) say the media has struck the right balance. Just 14% say news organizations have held back too much of the classified material. oh hang on 39s bigger than 38 aint it? yet they wrote it this way? lions and tigers and bears oh my ---------- Post added at 04:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:24 PM ---------- Quote:
we no longer wear the white hats havent for awhile now we cheat steal and lie all to further our gain at others expense after all it wouldnt be a big deal if all that was being exposed was the truth oh hold on it is the truth well shit can we circle those wagons tighter? will it help? nah lets just give him life imprisonment then continue on saying how bad chinas track record is keep those fingers pointing my friends keeps the boogieman under the bed at bay
__________________
never stop questioning,curiosity has its own rewards |
|||
12-11-2010, 06:01 PM | #174 (permalink) | |||
Upright
Location: lotus land 3rd igloo on the right
|
Quote:
hmmmm unthinking asumptions we shall let it pass though it smacks of ignorance "the fertile cresent" http://visav.phys.uvic.ca/~babul/Ast...sopotamia1.gif A state department dude thinks that's pretty cool, and puts it in his report which also contains information from the CIA on friendly villages in the area which was classified to prevent removal of said village elders heads." so what? ya figure their so dumb (your opposition) as to not figure out which tribal leaders dont wish to progress? where do you think this is? alabama? now heres the deal dude they just want the invaders out wouldnt you? they werent doing that badly before you decided your presence was needed (whole other ball of wax) ---------- Post added at 05:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:21 PM ---------- Quote:
1954 Guatemala — CIA overthrows the democratically elected Jacob Arbenz in a military coup. Arbenz has threatened to nationalize the Rockefeller-owned United Fruit Company, in which CIA Director Allen Dulles also owns stock. Arbenz is replaced with a series of right-wing dictators whose bloodthirsty policies will kill over 100,000 Guatemalans in the next 40 years. off to a great start 1954-1958 North Vietnam — CIA officer Edward Lansdale spends four years trying to overthrow the communist government of North Vietnam, using all the usual dirty tricks. The CIA also attempts to legitimize a tyrannical puppet regime in South Vietnam, headed by Ngo Dinh Diem. These efforts fail to win the hearts and minds of the South Vietnamese because the Diem government is opposed to true democracy, land reform and poverty reduction measures. The CIA’s continuing failure results in escalating American intervention, culminating in the Vietnam War. oh theres more 1956 Hungary — Radio Free Europe incites Hungary to revolt by broadcasting Khruschev’s Secret Speech, in which he denounced Stalin. It also hints that American aid will help the Hungarians fight. This aid fails to materialize as Hungarians launch a doomed armed revolt, which only invites a major Soviet invasion. The conflict kills 7,000 Soviets and 30,000 Hungarians. oh my the track record 1957-1973 Laos — The CIA carries out approximately one coup per year trying to nullify Laos’ democratic elections. The problem is the Pathet Lao, a leftist group with enough popular support to be a member of any coalition government. In the late 50s, the CIA even creates an "Armee Clandestine" of Asian mercenaries to attack the Pathet Lao. After the CIA’s army suffers numerous defeats, the U.S. starts bombing, dropping more bombs on Laos than all the U.S. bombs dropped in World War II. A quarter of all Laotians will eventually become refugees, many living in caves. god but we is impressed oh hang on you didnt know this? ---------- Post added at 06:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:44 PM ---------- Quote:
when ya miss something ive posted? oh call me slow could have sworn ya said ya havent read any no disrespect guys (gals) but its how i write its how i get my thoughts out the only way i know how i trust respect is a two way street?
__________________
never stop questioning,curiosity has its own rewards |
|||
12-12-2010, 09:02 AM | #175 (permalink) | ||||
Sir, I have a plan...
Location: 38S NC20943324
|
When was the last time you were in Iraq son?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Fortunato became immured to the sound of the trowel after a while.
|
||||
12-12-2010, 09:40 AM | #178 (permalink) | |
Sir, I have a plan...
Location: 38S NC20943324
|
Quote:
Why am I even bothering responding to this pablum? Do you really put the Soviet Union on the same moral footing as the US? ---------- Post added at 02:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:38 PM ---------- This is the root of the problem, isn't it... I'm not sure what the answer is, but I'm fairly certain this isn't it. (edit- "This" being the uncontrolled leaking of sensitive information.)
__________________
Fortunato became immured to the sound of the trowel after a while.
Last edited by debaser; 12-12-2010 at 09:49 AM.. |
|
12-12-2010, 01:28 PM | #182 (permalink) | |
Sir, I have a plan...
Location: 38S NC20943324
|
Quote:
__________________
Fortunato became immured to the sound of the trowel after a while.
|
|
12-12-2010, 04:24 PM | #186 (permalink) |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
The was no "good guy" in the cold war, just two competing powers doing everything they could to end up on top. There's no "we were better than them" argument to be made because we both ended up hurting and killing a hell of a lot of people for no good reason.
|
12-12-2010, 04:42 PM | #188 (permalink) | |
Sir, I have a plan...
Location: 38S NC20943324
|
Quote:
No one can deny that both powers acted in their own self interest, but at the very least the US was constrained to some small degree by the it's citizens. The Soviets acted in spite of, and often against their own populace. And yes, I know that someone will bring up Kent State and the McCarthy travesty, but these were aberations in a country otherwise at least nominally held to the rule of law...
__________________
Fortunato became immured to the sound of the trowel after a while.
|
|
12-12-2010, 05:31 PM | #189 (permalink) | |
Crazy, indeed
Location: the ether
|
Quote:
And when comparisons between two superpowers start to boil down to who killed fewer millions of people, it is kind of hard to claim any moral superiority, isn't it? Finally, how does it work? I mean, shutting down wikileaks, torturing, regime change, etc. etc. all in the name of "democracy" and "freedom" is a bit of an oxymoron, isn't it? |
|
12-12-2010, 06:25 PM | #191 (permalink) | |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
Quote:
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
|
12-12-2010, 06:37 PM | #192 (permalink) | |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
Quote:
If one reason could be pulled from the thousands as the biggest reason for the country's collapse, it was oligarchy. America didn't have any more or less oligarchy in the 1980s than the USSR, in fact we have more in 2010 than the Soviets had immediately before collapsing, it's just that we don't have the same competition going on that we had then. imho /threadjack |
|
12-14-2010, 09:36 AM | #193 (permalink) | |
warrior bodhisattva
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
|
An interesting development
I suppose this means that the core idea behind WikiLeaks, as well as the actions that arise from it, is decidedly not about Assange.
Introducing OpenLeaks: Quote:
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing? —Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön Humankind cannot bear very much reality. —From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot |
|
12-14-2010, 09:54 AM | #194 (permalink) |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
if this were on facebook I would 'like' it. I'm glad to hear this.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
12-15-2010, 08:38 AM | #196 (permalink) | |
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
|
that's hardly a "free market principle" loquitor.
and there's a lot about this that is specific, in the generational/technological sense... this isn't the deepest piece i've ever seen, but it points to some of the obvious issues: Quote:
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear it make you sick. -kamau brathwaite |
|
12-15-2010, 05:53 PM | #199 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
Quote:
Besides, free markets don't actually exist and in reality-based markets, human ingenuity can be just as much a liability as a blessing. Human ingenuity is arguably responsible for the financial sector shenanigans which brought our economy to its knees. |
|
Tags |
diplomacy, dump, wikileaks |
|
|