Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-07-2008, 11:09 AM   #1 (permalink)
Lover - Protector - Teacher
 
Jinn's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
Obama the perfect candidate?

Is it just me, or is Obama the perfect candidate?

I can't find anything wrong with him. I'm an atheist, and I still strongly support his positions on religion. I agree with his foreign policy, his idea for social reform, his stance on "the green movement," and even his feelings about 'the religious right.'

The only thing I've seen people bash him on is his "lack of experience", but years in Illinois, books written and 11 years teaching Constitutional law is enough for me, even as Commander in Chief. Call me naive.

Can anyone find anything that makes him look bad? I've been google videoing all day and I can't find anything. He doesn't even seem wish-washy. There's no "arguing with himself" videos like there are with Hillary, et. al.

I suppose if you were super religious or super Republican you might not like him, but damn if I'm not close to agreeing with Obama girl. He seems like a very solid candidate.

Some videos to support my hypothesis:

"His Plans for 2008":

Him on Tyra Show - makes him seem very human and humble

His "Relgious" opinion; skip to 2:05 to get past all the Jesus stuff right to his speech

His Foreign Policy:

"Our military power is just one component of our power… [..] and I will do whatever it takes as Commander in Chief to keep the American people safe. But I know that part of keeping us safe is restoring our respect in our world. And I think those who are advising me agree with that, and part of our agenda that we are putting forward …initiating contacts with Muslim leaders in the world, doubling our efforts in terms of in terms of foreign aid. All those are designed to create long-term security, by creating long-term prosperity around the world.”

For giggles; Obama Girl (not really SFW)

His official policy page (biased, but still good):
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/

He's also one of very few candidates to address net neutrality, but that's not surprising considering he has a million mySpace and Facebook pages and seems generally tech-savvy (another important thing, for me).
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel

Last edited by Jinn; 01-07-2008 at 11:20 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Jinn is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 11:18 AM   #2 (permalink)
Asshole
 
The_Jazz's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
I am an Obama donor, and host, I fully expect the post that you're formenting to "shed light" on why he's the devil incarnate or whatever it is this week. I'm looking forward to it.

Disclosure aside, I really like the guy. I met him when he was running for the Senate at a "Barack-B-Q" and again a few weeks ago. He is very impressive. And his wife is even more so, believe it or not.

Clearly, I don't buy the "lack of experience" thing. I don't see where experience has made any difference. Bush and Clinton both had the experience of being govenors of their respective states, and I don't see where that really helped either. Being Vice President didn't really seem to help Ford or Bush Sr.

Is he the right man for the job? That's the important question, I think. You're welcome to your answer on that. I have mine.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
The_Jazz is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 11:24 AM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
 
His reaction to the US spending ten times as much on the military as our next closesr rival is unacceptable to me:
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showpos...95&postcount=1

...and this smells:
Quote:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/p...,2716725.story


Rezko owns vacant lot next to Obama's home

By Ray Gibson and David Jackson
Tribune staff reporters
Published November 1, 2006

When Sen. Barack Obama decided to buy a stately $1.65 million home last year on Chicago's South Side, Antoin "Tony" Rezko and his wife wasted no time. The same day the Obamas closed on the house, the Rezkos closed on the purchase of the adjoining vacant lot, which once was the estate's lush side yard.

In normal circumstances, the two real estate transactions probably wouldn't have raised an eyebrow. There is, after all, nothing illegal or untoward about an aggressive developer buying hot property next door to a rising political star.

But these are not normal times for either Obama or Rezko, two longtime friends whose fortunes have taken sharp turns in opposite directions.....
host is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 11:36 AM   #4 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
I think he'd make a good president.

Voting record: http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Barack_Obama.htm

He has a frighteningly good record, which is why he's my second choice behind Kucinich.
Willravel is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 11:43 AM   #5 (permalink)
Asshole
 
The_Jazz's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
host, from the article you quoted:

Quote:
Over the last 16 months, as they jointly worked to improve their side-by-side properties, the two men entered an ongoing series of personal financial arrangements. Because Rezko was widely reported to be under federal grand jury scrutiny, Obama said he was careful to ensure their transactions were ethical and proper.

"My working assumption was that as long as I operated in an open, up-front fashion, and all the T's were crossed and I's were dotted, that it wouldn't be an issue," Obama said. "If it was a neighbor I didn't know at all, would I have behaved any differently? I felt like the answer was no."
Quote:
It was "already a stretch" to buy the house, Obama said, so the vacant lot was not affordable for his family.
Quote:
Obama said Rezko paid for the fence because a city ordinance compelled Rezko to fence the line between his vacant lot and their house. He added that both men agreed there were broader reasons for a fence.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
The_Jazz is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 11:56 AM   #6 (permalink)
Banned
 
...and, from the same article:

Page 1:
Quote:
...For years, it's been Rezko's practice to befriend up-and-coming political figures, from Blagojevich to the godson of former County Board President John Stroger. Rezko often weaves those political friendships into business ventures....
Page 1:
Quote:
....Obama said his family's real estate broker brought the house to his wife's attention. He said he discussed the house with Rezko but isn't sure how Rezko began pursuing the adjacent lot. But Obama raised the possibility that he was the first to bring the lot to Rezko's attention.

"I don't recall exactly what our conversations were or where I first learned, and I am not clear what the circumstances were where he made a decision that he was interested in the property," Obama said.....
Page 3:
Quote:
.....But Obama said he pays his landscaper to mow Rezko's 7,500-square-foot yard.

A person can't enter the Rezko lot from the street--but Obama's groundskeeper gets in through the gate that opens from Obama's lot.

Service mows both lawns

"Right now my landscaper who comes and does all my work, I have asked him to go ahead and mow the lawn on the other side," Obama said.

"My intention was to have the landscaper figure out some pro-rata cost for that mowing <h3>and send that bill to Rezko," Obama said. "I just haven't had time to do it."</h3>

The lawn-mowing bill that he plans to send Rezko "can't be more than three or four hundred, a thousand dollars," Obama added....
I'm wondering, on cold nights, which one of them "hogs the blankets"....

Last edited by host; 01-07-2008 at 11:58 AM..
host is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 11:59 AM   #7 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Typical tax and spend democrat..

Quote:
* Restore progressive tax; close loopholes; relief to seniors. (Oct 2007)
* Reduce Bush tax cuts to pay for health care & other programs. (Jun 2007)
* Estate tax only affects the wealthiest 1/2 of 1%. (Oct 2006)
* Bush tax cuts help corporations but not middle class. (Jun 2004)
* Tax incentives to create jobs at home instead of offshore. (Jun 2004)
* Voted NO on repealing the Alternative Minimum Tax. (Mar 2007)
* Voted NO on raising estate tax exemption to $5 million. (Mar 2007)
* Voted NO on supporting permanence of estate tax cuts. (Aug 2006)
* Voted NO on permanently repealing the `death tax`. (Jun 2006)
* Voted YES on $47B for military by repealing capital gains tax cut. (Feb 2006)
* Voted NO on retaining reduced taxes on capital gains & dividends. (Feb 2006)
* Voted NO on extending the tax cuts on capital gains and dividends. (Nov 2005)
* Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation. (Dec 2006)
No wonder you all like him.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 12:01 PM   #8 (permalink)
Asshole
 
The_Jazz's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Why? Because Obama mows Rezko's empty lot at MAYBE $1,000 a year, and Obama's the one that doesn't have to look at the overgrown lot?

host, I think that it speak volumes that someone with your excellent research skills can't find anything worse on Obama than this. Let's recap:

Obama didn't know that Rezko was buying the lot.
Obama paid Rezko higher than market value for the land he bought but that the formula he used is perfectly acceptable (1/6th of the purchase price of the lot for 1/6th of its area).
Obama made Rezko pay for the fence because that's what the law says.


Explain to me how this makes Rezko and Obama bedmates, please. It sounds like Obama being a good neighbor and following the law.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
The_Jazz is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 12:10 PM   #9 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Ustwo... we spend, but it's usually to pay for the previous GOP presidency and social programs, not wars.
Willravel is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 12:13 PM   #10 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Host, I somehow have a hard time believing that our next president is going to be in the pocket of... Tony Rezko. The article is careful to say that Obama has taken pains to demonstrate that nothing is amiss. Don't people have the right to have any friends they want and perform any legal financial or real estate transaction with anyone they want? That smear story is unworthy of you.

The military spending thing is, in my mind, tempered by everything else he's said about his foreign policy plans. From everything I've heard him say, plus his Senate voting record, I trust him to represent me on the international stage.

Imagine an Obama/Kucinich ticket!

Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Ustwo... we spend, but it's usually to pay for the previous GOP presidency and social programs, not wars.
Yeah, and holy crap is the phrase "tax-and-spend Democrat" outdated!! How about the last eight years of tax-and-borrow-and-sell-our-children's-future-and-spend-like-drunken-cowboys Republicans?

Last edited by ratbastid; 01-07-2008 at 12:16 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
ratbastid is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 12:17 PM   #11 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Jazz
....Explain to me how this makes Rezko and Obama bedmates, please. It sounds like Obama being a good neighbor and following the law.
So far, it only smells, and it is a sign of poor judgment. Is it "worse than whitewater"? "You know who", will make certain that an investigation attempts to find out, if Barak is elected POTUS.....
Quote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/14/us...in&oref=slogin
An Obama Patron and Friend Until an Indictment

By CHRISTOPHER DREW and MIKE McINTIRE
Published: June 14, 2007

.....Mr. Obama says he never did any favors for Mr. Rezko, who raised about $150,000 for his campaigns over the years and was once one of the most powerful men in Illinois. There is no sign that Mr. Obama, who declined to be interviewed for this article, did anything improper.

Mr. Obama has portrayed Mr. Rezko as a one-time fund-raiser whom he had occasionally seen socially. But interviews with more than a dozen political and business associates suggest that the two men were closer than the senator has indicated.

Mr. Obama turned to Mr. Rezko for help at several important junctures. Records show that when Mr. Obama needed cash in the waning days of his losing 2000 Congressional campaign, Mr. Rezko rounded up thousands of dollars from business contacts. In 2003, Mr. Rezko helped Mr. Obama expand his fund-raising for the Senate primary by being host of a dinner at his Mediterranean-style home for 150 people, including some whose names have since come up in the influence scandal.

And when Mr. Obama and his wife, Michelle, bought a house in 2005, Mr. Rezko stepped in again. Even though his finances were deteriorating, Mr. Rezko arranged for his wife to buy an adjacent lot, and she later sold the Obamas a 10-foot-wide strip of land that expanded their yard.

The land sale occurred after it had been reported that Mr. Rezko was under federal investigation. That awkward fact prompted Mr. Obama, who has cast himself as largely free from the normal influences of politics, to express regret over what he called his own bad judgment.

“Senator Obama is a very intelligent man, and everyone by then was very familiar with who Tony Rezko was,” said Cindi Canary, executive director of the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform, a nonpartisan research group. “So it was a little stunning that so late in the game Senator Obama would still have such close involvement with Rezko.”

While it is not clear what Mr. Rezko got from the relationship, he liked to display his alliances with politicians, including Mr. Obama.

In one instance, when he was running for the Senate, Mr. Obama stopped by to shake hands while Mr. Rezko, an immigrant from Syria, was entertaining Middle Eastern bankers considering an investment in one of his projects.

[Years earlier, as a state legislator, Mr. Obama wrote letters to city and state officials supporting efforts by Mr. Rezko and a partner to build apartments for the elderly with $14 million in government money, The Chicago Sun-Times reported in its June 13 editions. The developers received $855,000 in fees.]

Mr. Obama’s spokesman, Bill Burton, said the senator was one of several politicians who intervened because the project was important to local residents.

Mr. Burton also said in a statement that the senator “has held himself to a high standard and has had a career in public service fighting for the toughest possible ethical rules.”

“This is not a record changed by anything that has happened to Tony Rezko,” Mr. Burton said.

Mr. Rezko, 51, declined to comment. He has pleaded not guilty to the federal charges.

People who know Mr. Rezko describe him as warm and personable......
host is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 12:19 PM   #12 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
Imagine an Obama/Kucinich ticket!
A man can dream... Obama would make a great Vip for 8 years and then president in 2016. 16 years of Dems doesn't sound too bad. Then he'd have the experience people are complaining about.
Willravel is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 12:26 PM   #13 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
I've had my eye on Barack since the 2004 Democratic convention.

He has had my vote from the start.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 12:29 PM   #14 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
A man can dream... Obama would make a great Vip for 8 years and then president in 2016. 16 years of Dems doesn't sound too bad. Then he'd have the experience people are complaining about.
I was kind of thinking the other way around. I like Kucinich a lot, but I don't really see him climbing to the head of the pack and winning the nomination.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedmedia
I've had my eye on Barack since the 2004 Democratic convention.
Yep, I think a lot of people have.

Last edited by ratbastid; 01-07-2008 at 12:29 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
ratbastid is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 12:30 PM   #15 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid

Imagine an Obama/Kucinich ticket!
Oh please, oh please, oh please. I'd love this ticket which should be for obvious reasons.

Quote:
Yeah, and holy crap is the phrase "tax-and-spend Democrat" outdated!! How about the last eight years of tax-and-borrow-and-sell-our-children's-future-and-spend-like-drunken-cowboys Republicans?
I thought they were starving the beast?

The day a democrat votes for real reductions in government spending and does not cry a reduction in the rate of growth is a cut, let me know.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 12:35 PM   #16 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
I was kind of thinking the other way around. I like Kucinich a lot, but I don't really see him climbing to the head of the pack and winning the nomination.


Yep, I think a lot of people have.
I'm old enough to recall the "creamin' in the jeans" for JFK, and that's what some pf these posts remind me of....we need an immdiate, huge reduction in military spending, and this guy will borrow $100 billion per year to keep it the same as now, or higher, even as he talks compassion, corporatism will continue to thrive.
host is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 12:39 PM   #17 (permalink)
Upright
 
bmadison's Avatar
 
Location: So-Cal
The problem with defining what is a problem with Obama is that the problems change depending on what side of the fence you happen to fall upon. If you want to argue ideology, then, one could find several things wrong with him.

However, I sense that you are looking to find "what is wrong with him" in comparison to Clinton. I cannot help you with that because I think they are both wrong (i.e. the Theory of Global Warming and spending money on something that isn't even proven.)

I would say that the thing that could be wrong with him, "universally", is that he is a politician. However, they all are and it would be naive to think that he will do anything other than bend to whatever master he serves, whether it be Corporations (on the Conservative side) or Special Interest/Unions (on the Liberal side). They're all dirty and all it takes is a few lobbyists with a whole lot of money to change their minds.

Remember... In California, the Governator stated "I have plenty of money and I will not need to take money from Special Interests". He held out for a little while, but he eventually turned too. I guess my point is that no one can be trusted because the untrustworthy people have made it impossible for anyone at that level to be trusted.

/rant
bmadison is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 12:45 PM   #18 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Typical tax and spend democrat..



No wonder you all like him.
Sounds like sour grapes to me.

It's not our fault that you guys got nothing but crapola on a ritz cracker this go-around.

__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 03:48 PM   #19 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
Any ticket involving Kucinich has no chance of winning unless the east and west coasts declare war on and carpet-nuke every inch of ground between Chicago and San Francisco.

And that won't happen, simply from an environmental standpoint
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 04:24 PM   #20 (permalink)
Junkie
 
samcol's Avatar
 
Location: Indiana
Quote:
Originally Posted by djtestudo
Any ticket involving Kucinich has no chance of winning unless the east and west coasts declare war on and carpet-nuke every inch of ground between Chicago and San Francisco.

And that won't happen, simply from an environmental standpoint
Why does the MSM and America hate Kucinich so much? He's like the only sane on on the Democratic side.
__________________
It's time for the president to hand over his nobel peace prize.
samcol is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 04:55 PM   #21 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by samcol
Why does the MSM and America hate Kucinich so much? He's like the only sane on on the Democratic side.
Apparently we have a different definition of sane in the Midwest.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 05:22 PM   #22 (permalink)
Junkie
 
highthief's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Isn't his middle name "Hussein"?

Obvious Islamic conspiracy.

Nuff, said.
__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum.
highthief is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 07:02 PM   #23 (permalink)
All important elusive independent swing voter...
 
jorgelito's Avatar
 
Location: People's Republic of KKKalifornia
Quote:
Originally Posted by highthief
Isn't his middle name "Hussein"?

Obvious Islamic conspiracy.

Nuff, said.
Dennis Hussein Kucinich?
jorgelito is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 07:26 PM   #24 (permalink)
Walking is Still Honest
 
FoolThemAll's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
I like him, his relative lack of experience doesn't bother me in the least, and I don't think he'd kill the country or anything, but I wouldn't ever vote for him.

I just don't like Democratic policy much at all. I'll echo Ustwo's post #7, and while I don't know if it's really sour grapes for him, it IS sour grapes for me. I wish we had an Obama. Why the hell not? Some of my best friends come across as honest and idealistic.

I'll either hold my nose as in 2004 and vote for the republican nominee - if he isn't GWB II or Giuliani - or throw my vote away on some libertarianish third party candidate.
__________________
I wonder if we're stuck in Rome.
FoolThemAll is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 08:22 PM   #25 (permalink)
lost and found
 
Johnny Rotten's Avatar
 
Location: Berkeley
No, he's not perfect. Takes a lot of big donations from Goldman Sachs and the like. Too much Wall Street investment in his campaign for my taste. But I like him more than any other candidate, because he's willing to listen to both sides of the aisle and has proven that he can bring people together towards a common cause, like his campaign for videotaped interrogations in Illinois. He isn't about "us versus those nasty Republicans" like Hillary is. People are tired of the partisan bullshit.

Don't like her much. She's frosty, and her composure is easily punctured. Bad combination, and the sheiks and imams in the Middle East quagmire just aren't really going to warm up to her. Not when her husband was the guy responsible for placing all those military bases in their holy land, and refusing to close them down even when threatened by terrorists about dire consequences. Meanwhile, a dark-skinned man named Barack Hussein Obama? I'm thinking he'll get a wee bit more traction over there.

Edwards is all right, but he doesn't have Obama's charisma. He'll probably get a cabinet position if Obama wins. Right now, he's good enough as Barack's foil. You can tell neither of them like her, on a personal level. Edwards really seemed to sour on her when she fell behind and started sniping at Obama. Barack, meanwhile, is just sitting back and giving her as much rope as she wants. Political jujitsu.
__________________
"The idea that money doesn't buy you happiness is a lie put about by the rich, to stop the poor from killing them." -- Michael Caine
Johnny Rotten is offline  
Old 01-08-2008, 03:31 PM   #26 (permalink)
Upright
 
bmadison's Avatar
 
Location: So-Cal
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Rotten
because he's willing to listen to both sides of the aisle and has proven that he can bring people together towards a common cause, like his campaign for videotaped interrogations in Illinois. He isn't about "us versus those nasty Republicans" like Hillary is. People are tired of the partisan bullshit.
Seriously?!?!? He is willing to listen to both sides, as long as it works with his ideology. There is not a single thing conservative about Obama. That may sound appealing to you, and thats fine with me, but to make the statement that he is bi-partisan is absurd. Just because he says he is bi-partisan over and over and over again does not make it true. He is the most left leaning candidate you have. He speaks well... Very Well, but when you look at his voting record, it was either liberal causes or simply voting "Present". Someone who refuses to vote one way or another when it doesn't fit their agenda is not bi-partisan, its making no decision at all, but saying "I will not vote against you". The only thing worse than a person who makes the wrong decision is a person who doesn't make a decision at all.

Besides, Bi-Partisanship is overrated. Its just each side saying... "If you vote to pass my bill, I will vote to pass your bill regardless of whether I believe it will actually benefit the Country or not." There is no belief in that. Take a stand, stand up for what you believe, carry out what you say, and realize you can't please everyone.

Last edited by bmadison; 01-08-2008 at 06:34 PM..
bmadison is offline  
Old 01-08-2008, 09:26 PM   #27 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
Imagine an Obama/Kucinich ticket!
Pardon me while I go throw up for a few minutes.
MSD is offline  
Old 01-08-2008, 11:31 PM   #28 (permalink)
Psycho
 
MuadDib's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Apparently we have a different definition of sane in the Midwest.
Honestly, Kucinich got most of his support in 2004 from Midwestern states. He got a big push from farmers and big plugs through Farm Aid. Of course, by "big" I mean relative to his overall vote-getting potential. Kucinich really is a good man and is personally very inspiring with a real human, down-to-earth life. He has a lot of good ideas and ideals, but he fundamentally misunderstands how politics works. The man isn't a real politician and, in some ways, that's his greatest quality, but the fact of the matter is that our political system is pretty damned great and has worked very well for quite a while now. America works through compromise and that allows for slow change, but more importantly it safe guards us in many ways. That's very frustrating when there are injustices piling up, but that's what the role of candidates/politicians like Kucinich is.

I am a fan of Kucinich the man and very much so, but as a national politician (not just a state representative, I mean) I just can't get behind someone who is so uncompromising. That's the problem we have now in Bush and I don't want to trade an idiot-tyrant for an enlightened-tyrant. As for Kucinich as a VP I think that would be alright assuming he doesn't ascend to the presidency and that picking him up as a VP united either the party or country by filling a void in the ticket. Unfortunately, neither assumption is valid. The man does great work in the House and brings an important voice to the national political discussion. I think he might have a place in a democratic presidents cabinet.

Anyway, to somewhat relate back to the original topic I do want to say that I really am going to have to grit my teeth at the ballot box if Obama wins the nomination. I live in a solidly blue state so I might be able to get away with not doing so, but in a close race I will show up to vote Democrat. Obama is far from perfect for many reasons. I think experience matters. I'm not from Missouri but when you talk change or consistency I say 'show me'. I refuse to take someone at there word, no matter how trustworthy or unimpeachable that person is, when nothing less than the presidency of the United States is on the line. Additionally, I see Obama as the media's darling. He is the Howard Dean of this race. I feel that the media is giving Obama a free ride because he is hard to report on due to his relative lack of experience and, chiefly, because by crafting another mover-and-shaker, semi-populist, semi-liberal, Dean-esque candidate they can sell a candidate that will sell more viewers/readers on their outlet. He's fresh and new and people will tune in to hear about it him while the Clinton and Edwards stories have already sold their papers. Finally, I am a moderate democratic and I largely find Obama as more left than Hillary and more divisive in a hypothetical 4 year term. He is just too vague and programatic in his 'plans' and 'issues', he is a one-trick pony and that trick is repeating the word 'change' as much as possible while accusing everyone else as being an 'insider' and thus part of the status quo problem. It really is a masterful strategy, but I just don't buy into it. I feel that his seeming 'perfection' is a veil created through the methods I've mentioned earlier. It's all smoke and mirrors and I can only hope that voters realize that before Super Tuesday or else the nation will by November and us Democrats will be in real trouble.
__________________
"The courts that first rode the warhorse of virtual representation into battle on the res judicata front invested their steed with near-magical properties." ~27 F.3d 751
MuadDib is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 07:45 AM   #29 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
I'm utterly stunned: My dad is for Obama.

My dad has only in his life voted something other than Republican when he voted for Ross Perot.

He hates every GOP option--McCain is too entrenched, Giuliani is a scaremongering clown, and he lives as a non-Mormon in Utah so Romney's out. He thinks the post-tears Hillary is phony (the whole "I've found my voice" thing leaves him cold). But he can see a future of change promised by Obama, and he's for that.

Stunning. I'm here to tell you, if Obama wins the nomination, we're going to get a BUNCH of aisle-crossing votes.
ratbastid is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 08:06 AM   #30 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
I'm utterly stunned: My dad is for Obama.

My dad has only in his life voted something other than Republican when he voted for Ross Perot.

He hates every GOP option--McCain is too entrenched, Giuliani is a scaremongering clown, and he lives as a non-Mormon in Utah so Romney's out. He thinks the post-tears Hillary is phony (the whole "I've found my voice" thing leaves him cold). But he can see a future of change promised by Obama, and he's for that.

Stunning. I'm here to tell you, if Obama wins the nomination, we're going to get a BUNCH of aisle-crossing votes.
Until the press stops having an orgasm over him and shows him for what he is, a smooth talking tax'em all liberal.

I rather doubt your dad knows his voting record.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 09:46 AM   #31 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
There's an old saying.... "when someone appears too perfect.... they usually have the worst skeletons in their closet."

I don't see him electable in November and personally, there's something about him I just can not trust or like.

He scares me almost, if not as much as Hilary.

We are very limited this presidential race. I don't see one true great leader on either side.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"

Last edited by pan6467; 01-12-2008 at 10:01 AM..
pan6467 is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 02:10 PM   #32 (permalink)
Junkie
 
biznatch's Avatar
 
Location: France
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan6467
There's an old saying.... "when someone appears too perfect.... they usually have the worst skeletons in their closet."

I don't see him electable in November and personally, there's something about him I just can not trust or like.

He scares me almost, if not as much as Hilary.

We are very limited this presidential race. I don't see one true great leader on either side.
Then again, it's been the same way for a few elections now.
__________________
Check it out: The Open Source/Freeware/Gratis Software Thread
biznatch is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 03:39 PM   #33 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Houston
He can't be perfect because his stance on the space program is severely flawed.
supersix2 is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 03:41 PM   #34 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by supersix2
He can't be perfect because his stance on the space program is severely flawed.
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=26647
Next Gen shuttles, complete the ISS, keep weapons out of space, and improve math and science education... where is the flaw?
Willravel is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 04:03 PM   #35 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Houston
Quote:
Barack Obama's early education and K-12 plan package costs about $18 billion per year. He will maintain fiscal responsibility and prevent any increase in the deficit by offsetting cuts and revenue sources in other parts of the government. The early education plan will be paid for by delaying the NASA Constellation Program for five years
Source is

Which is pulled from

Section X in the PDF

Since the information I have that Obama wants to delay the Orion by at least 5 years is from his own website in a document he endorsed I think my information is more accurate than your web link.

I think its foolish of him to cut NASA's budget to fund education in science and math. Its counter-productive you give kids a better opportunity with science and math but you hurt the industry that relies heavily on people who are good at science and math.

Its not just NASA that would be affected by this. NASA employs just a small fraction of the space program's work force. There are thousands of contractor employees for Boeing, Lockheed-Martin, Honeywell, Hamilton-Sunstrand, and United Space Alliance. Those are just the big ones. There are dozens of smaller contractors who all have jobs that rely on the space program.

What we need is a leader who isn't afraid to set ambitious goals for NASA and increase its funding to actually accomplish those goals safely, effectively, and in a reasonable amount of time.
supersix2 is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 04:16 PM   #36 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Of the companies you mentioned, VASTLY more of their budget comes from weapons systems than space technologies. Like, orders of magnitude more. I know not all of them are in that field--even so, total their space-related revenues and total their military-related revenues and you'll see what a drop in the bucket NASA is in the "areospace" industry.

As far as I'm concerned, compared to what we're facing domestically and abroad, NASA can go hang. And I'm a major space geek. Having an Orion orbiter happen would be great--and getting us the hell out of Iraq, pulling our economy back from the brink, and solving the health care crisis are WAY bigger issues for this voter.
ratbastid is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 04:42 PM   #37 (permalink)
Insane
 
joshbaumgartner's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by supersix2
I think its foolish of him to cut NASA's budget to fund education in science and math. Its counter-productive you give kids a better opportunity with science and math but you hurt the industry that relies heavily on people who are good at science and math.
The Aerospace industry is facing a significant crisis, particular in the United States, over the issue of recruitment and retention. The biggest problem is not training, education, or even pay and benefits. It is the sense most young people have of the industry being a moribund place where they will have little opportunity for initiative or to make a difference. The thought is that it is an industry afraid to take risks, unwilling to fund new ideas, and closed to inventiveness and entrepreneurship.

You can train all of the engineers you want, but if you do not give them even the hope of ever seeing their dreams take flight, why would they seek to join such an industry?
joshbaumgartner is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 04:54 PM   #38 (permalink)
Psycho: By Choice
 
dd3953's Avatar
 
Location: dd.land
i don't know if Obama is perfect. for a while i thought clintion was. granted, i'm not on the 'top' of the game.

but a friend sent me a link that was pretty cool. you answer 11 questions and they "select a candidate" for you. telling you how your opinions and thoughts rank among them and gives you a pretty good idea of who wants what.

check it out. http://www.wqad.com/Global/link.asp?...v=menu132_3_10 i was shocked by what i saw, but there's a good chance i'm not changing my vote. . . .
__________________
[Technically, I'm not possible, I'm made of exceptions. ]
dd3953 is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 05:36 PM   #39 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Houston
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshbaumgartner
The Aerospace industry is facing a significant crisis, particular in the United States, over the issue of recruitment and retention. The biggest problem is not training, education, or even pay and benefits. It is the sense most young people have of the industry being a moribund place where they will have little opportunity for initiative or to make a difference. The thought is that it is an industry afraid to take risks, unwilling to fund new ideas, and closed to inventiveness and entrepreneurship.

You can train all of the engineers you want, but if you do not give them even the hope of ever seeing their dreams take flight, why would they seek to join such an industry?

As an employee in the aerospace industry who works at Johnson Space Center I find it difficult to really make other people understand what the main problem is with the aerospace industry.

The single biggest problem why our space industry is plateaued and has the appearance of an industry "afraid to take risks" is because we lack one major all important ingredient. NATIONAL LEADERSHIP.

Why was NASA so effective in the 60's up to Apollo 11? Because we had large national leadership and a goal.

Countless dollars were wasted throughout the 90's because NASA had no defined goal. Programs were started, funded, then canceled a year or so later because no one would see them out to the end.

The other main issue is that NASA budget has literally remained constant since the mid 80's at some 14 billion per year. It hasn't even been adjusted for inflation which means since the 80's NASA purchasing power has decreased every year. There was a time when in order to fly the shuttle in the 90's NASA had to sacrifice money from the budget to build a space station or in order to actually develop a space station it had to sacrifice money that should have been spent on shuttle improvements and upgrades. This continued for over 15 years. Now at least we have a goal to finish the station by 2010, fly Orion by 2015, and go back to the moon by 2020. This of course could all go out the window if a new president steps up and kills our budget. And then of course all the money and effort that went into the program up to that point would have been wasted.

What we need is someone with the guts to make a plan and see it out to the end. Not more budget cuts and setbacks which ultimately causes more apathy and mistrust in the space program.

Furthermore, proponents of slashing NASA's budget to fund other government programs need to really take a look at how well NASA manages its money for all that it has to do every year. NASA is charged with launching the space shuttle to construct the space station, run space station operations, run un-manned exploration operations, research space, research and develop new space technology (probes, launch systems, manned vehicles), research and develop new aircraft and aircraft technology, and do ALL of this in full view of public scrutiny with stricter safety standards than ANY other industry out there. I challenge anyone to find any government program that can do that with a measly 14 billion per year or less than 1% of the total national budget.
supersix2 is offline  
Old 01-13-2008, 01:03 AM   #40 (permalink)
Insane
 
joshbaumgartner's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by supersix2
As an employee in the aerospace industry who works at Johnson Space Center I find it difficult to really make other people understand what the main problem is with the aerospace industry.

The single biggest problem why our space industry is plateaued and has the appearance of an industry "afraid to take risks" is because we lack one major all important ingredient. NATIONAL LEADERSHIP.

Why was NASA so effective in the 60's up to Apollo 11? Because we had large national leadership and a goal.

Countless dollars were wasted throughout the 90's because NASA had no defined goal. Programs were started, funded, then canceled a year or so later because no one would see them out to the end.

The other main issue is that NASA budget has literally remained constant since the mid 80's at some 14 billion per year. It hasn't even been adjusted for inflation which means since the 80's NASA purchasing power has decreased every year. There was a time when in order to fly the shuttle in the 90's NASA had to sacrifice money from the budget to build a space station or in order to actually develop a space station it had to sacrifice money that should have been spent on shuttle improvements and upgrades. This continued for over 15 years. Now at least we have a goal to finish the station by 2010, fly Orion by 2015, and go back to the moon by 2020. This of course could all go out the window if a new president steps up and kills our budget. And then of course all the money and effort that went into the program up to that point would have been wasted.

What we need is someone with the guts to make a plan and see it out to the end. Not more budget cuts and setbacks which ultimately causes more apathy and mistrust in the space program.

Furthermore, proponents of slashing NASA's budget to fund other government programs need to really take a look at how well NASA manages its money for all that it has to do every year. NASA is charged with launching the space shuttle to construct the space station, run space station operations, run un-manned exploration operations, research space, research and develop new space technology (probes, launch systems, manned vehicles), research and develop new aircraft and aircraft technology, and do ALL of this in full view of public scrutiny with stricter safety standards than ANY other industry out there. I challenge anyone to find any government program that can do that with a measly 14 billion per year or less than 1% of the total national budget.
I absolutely and wholeheartedly agree. I am not directly in aerospace, though certainly many of my customers are aerospace firms. Leadership takes vision and determination, and the ability to infect the public with the same. Space programs, be they a moon visit, a shuttle, Mars trips, whatever, are easy to justify budget slashing by short-sighted politicians and administrators who think only in direct dollars. Leadership is key to keeping the investment going until it bears fruit, and frankly, while we never got a direct dollar from the moon, the benefits we reaped as a country were immeasurable. How hard it is though, to put your heart and soul into a project when it might be one political gust away from cancellation?

I do not think it is a bad idea to invest in K-12 education. Not at all! But just cavalierly tapping NASA for the dollars is incredibly short sighted. A vibrant space and aviation research agency that continues to lead the way in such exciting fields can inspire kids across this country for K to PhD to study and be genuinely interested in science and engineering. $18 million can do a lot of good, but so can inspiring kids (and adults) with programs that we do not sell short, but instead allow to truly give us goals to achieve as a nation, that all Americans (and all the world as we internationalize the space effort) can feel proud of reaching.
joshbaumgartner is offline  
 

Tags
candidate, obama, perfect

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:07 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360