Quote:
Originally Posted by supersix2
As an employee in the aerospace industry who works at Johnson Space Center I find it difficult to really make other people understand what the main problem is with the aerospace industry.
The single biggest problem why our space industry is plateaued and has the appearance of an industry "afraid to take risks" is because we lack one major all important ingredient. NATIONAL LEADERSHIP.
Why was NASA so effective in the 60's up to Apollo 11? Because we had large national leadership and a goal.
Countless dollars were wasted throughout the 90's because NASA had no defined goal. Programs were started, funded, then canceled a year or so later because no one would see them out to the end.
The other main issue is that NASA budget has literally remained constant since the mid 80's at some 14 billion per year. It hasn't even been adjusted for inflation which means since the 80's NASA purchasing power has decreased every year. There was a time when in order to fly the shuttle in the 90's NASA had to sacrifice money from the budget to build a space station or in order to actually develop a space station it had to sacrifice money that should have been spent on shuttle improvements and upgrades. This continued for over 15 years. Now at least we have a goal to finish the station by 2010, fly Orion by 2015, and go back to the moon by 2020. This of course could all go out the window if a new president steps up and kills our budget. And then of course all the money and effort that went into the program up to that point would have been wasted.
What we need is someone with the guts to make a plan and see it out to the end. Not more budget cuts and setbacks which ultimately causes more apathy and mistrust in the space program.
Furthermore, proponents of slashing NASA's budget to fund other government programs need to really take a look at how well NASA manages its money for all that it has to do every year. NASA is charged with launching the space shuttle to construct the space station, run space station operations, run un-manned exploration operations, research space, research and develop new space technology (probes, launch systems, manned vehicles), research and develop new aircraft and aircraft technology, and do ALL of this in full view of public scrutiny with stricter safety standards than ANY other industry out there. I challenge anyone to find any government program that can do that with a measly 14 billion per year or less than 1% of the total national budget.
|
I absolutely and wholeheartedly agree. I am not directly in aerospace, though certainly many of my customers are aerospace firms. Leadership takes vision and determination, and the ability to infect the public with the same. Space programs, be they a moon visit, a shuttle, Mars trips, whatever, are easy to justify budget slashing by short-sighted politicians and administrators who think only in direct dollars. Leadership is key to keeping the investment going until it bears fruit, and frankly, while we never got a direct dollar from the moon, the benefits we reaped as a country were immeasurable. How hard it is though, to put your heart and soul into a project when it might be one political gust away from cancellation?
I do not think it is a bad idea to invest in K-12 education. Not at all! But just cavalierly tapping NASA for the dollars is incredibly short sighted. A vibrant space and aviation research agency that continues to lead the way in such exciting fields can inspire kids across this country for K to PhD to study and be genuinely interested in science and engineering. $18 million can do a lot of good, but so can inspiring kids (and adults) with programs that we do not sell short, but instead allow to truly give us goals to achieve as a nation, that all Americans (and all the world as we internationalize the space effort) can feel proud of reaching.