Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Sports


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-04-2004, 09:20 PM   #1 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
LSU defeats Oklahoma 21-14

Good game, came down to the very end.

LSU gets half of the National Championship.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 01-04-2004, 09:21 PM   #2 (permalink)
Dumb all over...a little ugly on the side
 
Sion's Avatar
 
Location: In the room where the giant fire puffer works, and the torture never stops.
LSU won the only half that matters.
__________________
He's the best, of course, of all the worst.
Some wrong been done, he done it first. -fz

I jus' want ta thank you...falettinme...be mice elf...agin...
Sion is offline  
Old 01-04-2004, 09:26 PM   #3 (permalink)
Llama
 
goddfather40's Avatar
 
Location: Cali-for-nye-a
Quote:
Originally posted by Sion
LSU won the only half that matters.
And you think LSU will be the only one in the record books?
__________________
My name is goddfather40 and I approved this message.

I got ho's and I got bitches,
In C++ I branch with switches

-MC Plus+
goddfather40 is offline  
Old 01-04-2004, 09:31 PM   #4 (permalink)
The GrandDaddy of them all!
 
The_Dude's Avatar
 
Location: Austin, TX
pete carrol or at least the prez/AD of USC agreed to the BCS system and its way of crowning the national champs. LSU is the national champs and congrats to them.
__________________
"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity." - Darrel K Royal
The_Dude is offline  
Old 01-04-2004, 09:43 PM   #5 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
We'll see when the polls come out.

It's a long shot for sure, but what IF USC was voted #1 in both polls? There would definitly be something wrong if they weren't considered the winners under that circumstance.

But, I would not mind seeing LSU as sole champions; they are a great team and beat another great team.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 01-04-2004, 09:56 PM   #6 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Arkansas ....summer home in Harlem
The BCS was created to eliminate the human bias that affects the AP and Coaches polls. THe polls are only relevent in the fact that they are point generators for the BCS formula. The BCS works and did work this year.

Why is a loss at the end of the year more pertinent than a loss at the beginning? Because in the human polls a team that loses has to slide lower than the teams that won for that week. Just like USC slid a few notches when it lost to that powerhouse team from Berkeley. How can a team that loses to Cal claim to be better than any other team?

Facts:
OU - 1 loss to a highly ranked team (K-state)
LSU - 1 loss to a highly randed team (Florida)
USC - 1 lost to an unranked team (Cal)

OU - very high strength of schedule points
LSU - very high strength of schedule points
USC - lost points due to weak strength of schedule

USC is in one of the largest media generating areas of the country (if not the largest) and this is the only reason that anyone keeps this argument going.

The only national championship acknowledged by the NCAA members is the BCS champion - NOT the human biased poll winner.

Ladies and gentlemen, please meet the NCAA College Football National Champions - the LSU Tigers!!!!!!!!
__________________
No Comment....
billclinton is offline  
Old 01-04-2004, 10:01 PM   #7 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: , NC
Props to the MLB # 58 for LSU, he made one hell of a hit there at the end. Go Tigers!! I think Stoops is an asshole
kwIII is offline  
Old 01-05-2004, 01:15 AM   #8 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Arkansas
Yeah Stoops is kind of an asshole... But he does win games. Unfortunately he doesn't seem to be able to win the games at the end of the season.

IIRC the same thing happened last year where they went undefeated till the last game or two of the regular season.

Been a long time OU fan and it is really tough to watch them lose in the manner that they have lately.
redneckdude is offline  
Old 01-05-2004, 05:51 AM   #9 (permalink)
Super Agitator
 
Liquor Dealer's Avatar
 
Location: Just SW of Nowhere!!! In the good old US of A
I don't know where either of you get the idea that Stoops is an asshole. Everything I have ever seen, or heard shows him to be a perfect gentleman. Our football team didn't end up the way we hoped - it was a good run but the wheels came off in the end. That in no way belittles what they accomplished or in any way denegrates Bob Stoops. To say he can't win when the chips are down is not only incorrect, it's assinine. Look at his record. The Sooners aren't losers by any stretch of the imagination - they may only be the third or fourth best team in the country at this instant, but they're way out ahead of several hundred others. The Sooners will be right back on top next year - and you can take that to the bank. We don't duck and run or hide from anyone.
__________________
Life isn't always a bowl of cherries, sometimes it's more like a jar of Jalapenos --- what you say or do today might burn your ass tomorrow!!!
Liquor Dealer is offline  
Old 01-05-2004, 05:52 AM   #10 (permalink)
Insane
 
Was it really a good game?

The score was close, but it was clear from the start LSU was going to win. Take out the fumble on the 1 and the blocked punt and you have a 35-7 yawner.

Thanks for listening.
wwcd101 is offline  
Old 01-05-2004, 06:04 AM   #11 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Dallas TX
Take away the 2 penalties that nullified LSU turnovers and u got a 24-14 OU victory. Both teams looked rusty at times, and both teams had 1 or 2 plays that, had they been changed jsut a lil, could have made the difference in the ball game. LSU didn't shoot themselves in the foot on a continual basis, and as such they won the game. Thats what makes college football great, especially when u have 2 well matched teams. Lil plays can make the difference.
Jaiddin is offline  
Old 01-05-2004, 08:39 AM   #12 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Florida
GEAUX TIGERS!
The first national championship since 1959 and it won't be the last in the next few years as long as Saban stays aruond. I'll hope for a USC-LSU BCS Championship match up next year to prove who the real champs were.
/LSU alum '02
fearofmear is offline  
Old 01-05-2004, 07:37 PM   #13 (permalink)
Llama
 
goddfather40's Avatar
 
Location: Cali-for-nye-a
Quote:
Originally posted by billclinton
The BCS was created to eliminate the human bias that affects the AP and Coaches polls. THe polls are only relevent in the fact that they are point generators for the BCS formula. The BCS works and did work this year.

Why is a loss at the end of the year more pertinent than a loss at the beginning? Because in the human polls a team that loses has to slide lower than the teams that won for that week. Just like USC slid a few notches when it lost to that powerhouse team from Berkeley. How can a team that loses to Cal claim to be better than any other team?

Facts:
OU - 1 loss to a highly ranked team (K-state)
LSU - 1 loss to a highly randed team (Florida)
USC - 1 lost to an unranked team (Cal)

OU - very high strength of schedule points
LSU - very high strength of schedule points
USC - lost points due to weak strength of schedule

USC is in one of the largest media generating areas of the country (if not the largest) and this is the only reason that anyone keeps this argument going.

The only national championship acknowledged by the NCAA members is the BCS champion - NOT the human biased poll winner.

Ladies and gentlemen, please meet the NCAA College Football National Champions - the LSU Tigers!!!!!!!!
You know, the media conspiracy thing is really old and a poor argument. They've tried to pin that on the NBA before too with the Lakers, give me a break. The AP writers are from all over the country anyways, so how could a regional bias affect them all? Are the coaches in a big conspiracy too, we know damn well that they would have voted USC number 1 if they could have. Even with a contractual obligation to vote LSU number 1, USC still got 3 first place votes, and was number 1 at the end of the season with 37/63 first place votes.

Also, if you go to www.ncaafootball.net, an official NCAA site, they herald both teams. The NCAA will not officially give anyone a trophy for the Div I-A title.

And trying to pump up Florida (24th in AP poll and 25th in the coaches poll) as a 'highly ranked opponent' is flawed too. Florida finished 8-5 and beat LSU at home. Granted, Cal is an inferior team to Florida, but they showed up for a bowl game against Va Tech and finished 8-6. On top of that, it took them 3OT's to beat USC in Berkeley.
__________________
My name is goddfather40 and I approved this message.

I got ho's and I got bitches,
In C++ I branch with switches

-MC Plus+
goddfather40 is offline  
Old 01-05-2004, 07:57 PM   #14 (permalink)
The GrandDaddy of them all!
 
The_Dude's Avatar
 
Location: Austin, TX
strength of schedule. lsu played a tougher one than usc.
__________________
"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity." - Darrel K Royal
The_Dude is offline  
Old 01-05-2004, 08:27 PM   #15 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Arkansas ....summer home in Harlem
USC lost 1 game - to Cal - fact
LSU lost 1 game - to Florida - fact

LSU had the tougher schedule - fact
USC had the weaker schedule - fact

LSU according to the BCS formula had the better ranking - fact
USC according to the BCS formula had the worse ranking - fact

The media never mentioned LSU to win the nat. champ. - fact
The media pissed all over themselves saying that USC should be the Nat. Champs - fact

The coaches poll and the writers poll is BIASED - which is the reason that everyone wanted to come up with an UNBIASED way to determine the two teams that are most deserving to play for the national championship. The BCS was created due to the exact circumstances that occurred this year - several teams having the same records and no clear way to pick the best two to play for the Nat. Champ.

LSU is the sole national champions, the polls are only meaningful because they are point generators in the BCS formula - the BCS formula is the NCAA accepted method to determine the national champions.

If it is not media bias, please explain why USC is still being mentioned as the co-national champs, when they do not deserve anything other than a solid number 2 or 3?

I have nothing against USC and I have nothing for LSU...but dang, it seems that people go brain dead awfully easy.
__________________
No Comment....
billclinton is offline  
Old 01-05-2004, 09:06 PM   #16 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Ok, I'll give ya that USC really isnt the National Championship team. But saying they arent a great team is ludicrous? Did you watch the Rose Bowl? Have you watched USC play? They have an offense that is better than Oklahoma's, IMO and a defense thats very good as well, although I will give the edge to LSU there. And I'm not from California, hell, I'm sitting outside Chicago. No bias there.
bellzboy is offline  
Old 01-05-2004, 11:56 PM   #17 (permalink)
Cherry-pickin' devil's advocate
 
Location: Los Angeles
Fact is, enough of the stir is there to make you wonder enough. Its easy to rule out and say one team had a weaker schedule than another - but these are people who *do* see the games all the time, have played hte games often, and believe it or not, if people feel theres a fuck up somewhere on this level, people obviously think something is wrong.

*Personally* i'd rather they have a reformed system and/or a bowl game after of the winner between rose bowl and sugar bowl or whatever, would be pretty damn sweet IMO.
Zeld2.0 is offline  
Old 01-06-2004, 12:17 AM   #18 (permalink)
Bang bang
 
Spartak's Avatar
 
Location: New Zealand
Fact is it took all of 3 overtimes for USC to lose, I mean flip a coin 3 times and you're bound to lose eventually.
__________________
I can read your mind... looking at you... I can read your mind...
Spartak is offline  
Old 01-06-2004, 08:20 AM   #19 (permalink)
Registered User
 
skysooner's Avatar
 
Location: Oklahoma
Kudos to LSU. I thought we would have trouble against them and we did. Also, in reaction to my earlier post where I said KSU didn't have a chance, boy was I wrong
skysooner is offline  
Old 01-06-2004, 07:58 PM   #20 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Arkansas ....summer home in Harlem
And you know what else?!!!! the media thing IS getting old........except when it involves a team from Southern...fuckin' LA......California!!!!! You can't even imagine the amount of money that would be made in NCAA licensing fees on "The Number One Team in the Country......USC!!" The NCAA is a business that deals very closely with all media outlets. To think that there is NO influence in what they would like the media to announce is not only naive, but also un-American. College football is a business that makes a ton of money. I don't have a problem with them making all the money that they can possibly make, but the BCS attempts to moderate all of the teams regardless of locale or demography, ie highly populated areas.

The BCS doesn't care if the team is SoCal or NoCal or Bowling Green.......it takes several complex variables and plugs them in a mathematical formula and spits out the result.

ONCE AGAIN, THE BCS DID EXACTLY WHAT IT WAS SUPPOSED TO DO. THE POLLS ARE MEANINGLESS. LSU IS THE NATIONAL CHAMPION.

PS. I never said that USC isn't a great team, as a matter of fact, I would love to see an LSU/USC matchup. I wouldn't bet on either!
__________________
No Comment....
billclinton is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 09:05 PM   #21 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
http://umterps.ocsn.com/sports/m-foo...010604aaa.html

I think we should go by the NY Times poll
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
 

Tags
2114, defeats, lsu, oklahoma


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:19 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360