10-12-2010, 04:04 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Addict
|
sexual acts while breastfeeding
ok, a disclaimer - No this did not happen. just something i thought about today.
I wanted to get everyones thought on this. If you mrs was pregnant and breastfeeding your child and you were turned on so much that you couldnt help yourself, is it ok to engage in sexual acts while the kid was feeding off its mother. of course, the child is not involved in any way with the sexual act. does it cross any boundaries? and would you do it? |
10-12-2010, 05:26 AM | #3 (permalink) |
Still Free
Location: comfortably perched at the top of the bell curve!
|
I would ask what is turning you on about the situation?
The baby would be unaware of what was going on, other than being irritated at the disturbance of his peaceful feeding. If you think about it, the baby was far closer to that act when you were banging her in the third trimester. Also, if the baby is in a bassinet during the night, it's been pretty close to the act anyway. Finally, family units used to live in very tight quarters and it was fairly common for different generations to be in the same space as intimacy. Now, having said all of that, I personally would not have sex with my wife WHILE she was breastfeeding. It is not the time for a sexual act. Also, the child could bite and injure her. I suspect it's as much a jealousy issue for you than anything else. The boobs are huge and you don't get to play with them. Plus, the wife is showing more attention at the time to someone other than you. Then there's the raging "I'm a man, I make baby, hear me roar!" testosterone surge...
__________________
Gives a man a halo, does mead. "Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly." |
10-12-2010, 06:51 AM | #6 (permalink) |
Asshole
Administrator
Location: Chicago
|
Fast forward 5 years: are you going to interrupt a nice family dinner to pound the mrs on the dining room table because you're hungry?
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin "There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush "We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo |
10-12-2010, 09:02 AM | #7 (permalink) | |
Addict
Location: WA
|
Quote:
Secondly, what you mean by sexual acts? Is it foreplay? Kissing? Giving her a hand or head? The boundary is crossed only when you are annoying the mother and/or baby by what ever you are doing. Lastly, I don't think it is abnormal to be aroused seeing your wife feeding your baby. But practically I guess the mother could be tired and taxed. I dont know whether your turn-on will be understood and entertained in that situation. |
|
10-12-2010, 05:24 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Eccentric insomniac
Location: North Carolina
|
To be fair, there was an episode of Seinfeld about that.
__________________
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill "All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dream with open eyes, to make it possible." Seven Pillars of Wisdom, T.E. Lawrence |
10-12-2010, 09:20 PM | #9 (permalink) |
Addict
|
its not the breastfeeding that is a turn on. nor is it the baby.
but why should a sexual act be confined to the bedroom when a newborn is not aware of its surroundings? for all it cares, its suckling its mothers breast, albeit on a bumpier ride. if i wanted to have sex with the mrs, and the baby is latched on to her breast, if she gave me some lovin' is that such a bad thing? for the record, no i wouldnt do it with the kids at age 5. i wouldnt have sex in the bedroom with a 5 year old present, but theres no issues going at it with a newborn present. curiousbear - by sexual acts i mean anything and everything. |
10-13-2010, 05:25 AM | #10 (permalink) |
Asshole
Administrator
Location: Chicago
|
Clearly you haven't been around newborns. They're not going to be happy when you stop mealtime. Which you're going to have to do to "get some" just because of the simple logistics involved.
And there's nothing more boner-crushing than a screaming infant.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin "There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush "We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo |
10-13-2010, 08:08 PM | #12 (permalink) |
Getting it.
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
|
I don't think this is cool at all.
Do you want to have sex with your child in the room? More to the point, I can't imagine there are too many women who would be all that interested in fucking you while they are breastfeeding.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars." - Old Man Luedecke |
10-13-2010, 08:34 PM | #13 (permalink) | |
Junkie
|
Quote:
I don't know myself, but I've been told breastfeeding is an intimate moment between mother and baby, so I really don't see how a mother could, and would, want to do both. O_o |
|
10-14-2010, 11:42 AM | #15 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Near Raleigh, NC
|
Sometimes you gotta get it while you can. The mother is awake, and the baby don't care. Mom will probably be passed out later, and that's a definite no. Don't forget Mom might want the attention too.
__________________
bill hicks - "I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out." |
10-25-2010, 07:13 PM | #17 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: Whatever house my keys can get me into
|
that's my question - is mom interested? If she's instigating, or intimating, that she's good to go at that very moment, i suppose what the hell.... but there has to be a line....? obviously the five years is a bit much, but what about a one-year-old? two? where does it stop? what age is appropriate for you to stop fucking while your offspring is in the room?
i think it's kind of a weird path to go down. i say watch mom feed the baby, get turned on, put the baby down and then have at it in the next room. is it a baby from another guy? would that be some kind of freak revenge thing?
__________________
These are the good old days... formerly Murp0434 Last edited by raging moderate; 10-25-2010 at 07:15 PM.. |
10-27-2010, 12:46 PM | #18 (permalink) |
Tilted
Location: Here
|
Speaking from experience, there is a shut off valve between mother and partner, when a baby is involved. It is normal to react to heaving bosoms, but nursing and sex are two very opposing things. I had a childless (female) friend, who could barely even talk about the fact that I went through with this act of barbarianism and would squirm with embarrassment when I strategically and innocently opened my blouse. God forbid, I ever mention “feeding” in front of her boob-loving husband.
“Don’t you get turned on?” She had asked me. The answer is an emphatic NO! Nursing provides a very special instant between Mom and baby and men don’t really fit into this equation. Honestly, that is kind of the beauty of it. Nursing is probably THE most sacred of all female mammalian moments. So, just for the record, the last thing on her mind, when she whips out her boob for a baby is your dick. But, yeah. It’s okay for you to be turned on. It’s just not very likely that she will be. |
Tags |
acts, breastfeeding, sexual |
|
|