Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-16-2010, 05:12 PM   #161 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
I've already weighed in on the positioning of the community centre.

My problem is that people who are opposing it are opposing it on the grounds that it's too Islamic. It's based on the assumption that Islam is essentially the cause behind 9/11.

Islam wasn't the cause behind 9/11 any more than America was. Americans should be opposing terrorism and hatred, not Islam.

How long is it going to be too sensitive to have an Islamic presence in the proximity of Ground Zero, and where do you draw the line? Should all Muslims stay away from Lower Manhattan out of respect for Islamophobes? What's the right thing to do?
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 08-16-2010, 06:15 PM   #162 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
When I was a kid in the 70s, I was under the impression that America was (essentially) a progressive place (or at least progressing) and that because shows like The Jeffersons and All in the Family and music groups like The Village People and Parliament were popular, that we were steadily moving toward a national culture that was inclusive, even celebratory, when it came to appreciating non-white, non-heterosexual, non-Christian members of American society. But I was kid, you know, I really only knew what my parents taught me and what I observed of our culture through movies, music and television.

Since then, I've gotten older and wiser and after years of reflection am pretty much convinced that that 'happy colorful place,' that 'America' I grew up in, was sold to me, or rather that it was what I wanted to see and (because of that time and place in history) it was given to me...I'm no longer certain that it ever really existed outside of the political climate established at home by my parents and by the 'marketplace' which found these ideals to be very profitable at the time (hence the old 'liberal media conspiracy' canard, perhaps). How else could things be so different now? So terribly wrong, in my estimation.

I just spent the better part of two weeks traveling around the southeastern US and I've come back with a fortified confidence in this theory. I've read regional magazines and newspapers, seen political campaign ads on tv, overheard conversations and seen enough ignorant bumper stickers, billboards and rebel flags to cover 'Ground Zero' twice over with good old American fear and radicalism. And before the good old boys pile on, I'm not apt to believe that this is a 'Southern' thing. How could it be, it's too pervasive, too popular, to be regional.

So, I'm sorry to pile on with the 'right wing' bash-a-thon without contributing significantly to the issue with the mosque, but I think the reaction to the mosque is a perfect example of the exclusionary, reactionary antithesis of everything I was brought up to believe in as an American. This shit wouldn't have flown in 1975.

Perhaps, like much of life, this is just a turn of the tide and all the little conservative children of the world are growing up thinking that (basically) their country is heading in the right direction while their popular culture teaches them that their fears are justified and their reactions are rational. I dunno.

I guess my point is, it's my impression that all this anti-Mosque hoopla is just a single incident in a much more troubling and pervasive trend toward the legitimizing of some very old, ugly and dangerous ideas.

sorry I didn't have something more specific to add to the discussion, but to me there's no sense in talking specifically about it without addressing the bigger issue. It would be akin to swatting a single termite crawling across the floor of your living room while the multitudes are busily eating away your floorboards.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 08-16-2010, 06:23 PM   #163 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
An excellent point mix, I feel the same way. Lots of things I thought were "real" were not and just specters and lip service to the diversity.

I do not think that it is much the case today, but I can see it in other parts of the country when I visit. I wonder "where are the black people?" a lot when I am traveling the US and around the world. I look for the diversity of culture and I don't see it much in other countries either. It's always an us versus them, the invaders, the ones that don't belong here. Yet immigration is strong all over the world, people cross borders to get a better life. Nothing trips me out more than meeting Asian people who speak perfect Castillian Spanish, German, or speaking Icelandic.

I do think that the small minded will be the small minded and they will eventually die off as those in the younger generations grow up with more diverse classrooms and workplaces.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 08-16-2010, 07:02 PM   #164 (permalink)
WHEEEE! Whee! Whee! WHEEEE!
 
FuglyStick's Avatar
 
Location: Southern Illinois
If you would have told me two years ago that this would be the political environment after a black man was elected president, I wouldn't have believed you. Yeah, there was racism after 9/11, and hatred directed at Muslims, but it seemed to be a small minority; most Americans seemed to have grown up and left their prejudices behind.

Then a black man got into the oval office, and the blindfold was removed. We're no more evolved than we were a century ago. The racists had always been there, but they were hiding; now they're going to rallies preaching their ignorance on signs. As bad as America looked when Bush was in office, I'm more ashamed to be an American today. What must we look like to the rest of the world?
__________________
AZIZ! LIGHT!
FuglyStick is offline  
Old 08-16-2010, 08:20 PM   #165 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
....

I do think that the small minded will be the small minded and they will eventually die off as those in the younger generations grow up with more diverse classrooms and workplaces.
I wish I could be as optimistic as you are. I'm not sure that diversity in and of itself fosters tolerance and inclusion. It is an attitude, perhaps even a philosophy. There has to be respect and appreciation and trust. Sophistication. Objectivism. What I observe in young Americans today doesn't reflect a tendency toward these things. Not to say that there isn't tolerance in our society, just that it seems we are resigned to it rather than grateful for it.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 08-17-2010, 02:03 AM   #166 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pearl Trade View Post
Am I the only one getting tired of people in this thread bitching about "the right wing" being the big problem and how the media fucks everything up? For the last few posts there hasn't been much discussion about the planned mosque, it's mostly anti-conservative sentiment. I'm not saying this because I am a conservative, I'm saying this because I'm tired of everyone blaming the conservatives for not wanting the mosque to be built. It's a true cop-out, not having an opinion of your own and blaming a political party for saying something you don't like. I'd like to read people's opinions of the issue at hand and not hear all of this "conservatism is only propaganda!" bullshit. You give these little quips that don't contribute jack shit to the discussion, and you think you've said something smart because you think it's "exposing the real side of the issue", but you aren't, we've heard it all before. Please, use your fucking head to think about the quality of your post and if it actually contributes anything to the thread.

We all know they have a right to build a mosque wherever they want, no matter who gets offended or doesn't like it. That's what America is, a free country. Everyone has acknowledged that. But who here thinks the placement of the mosque is the BEST idea? Tell me why you think it must be built in that spot and not some where else of equal importance but less controversial.

My first post in this thread was very clearly against the building of the mosque. I have since changed my mind on this issue and my thoughts have taken a complete U-turn, thanks to this thread and the other members opinions alone. My opinion now is: they have the right to build it there and they should build it there, whether it's "morally right" or "morally wrong" is irrelevant. Morals don't matter, the law does.
I think it's wrong because it's not ok to tell any religion where they can and can not build a community center. Islam did not attack us on 9-11. Al Qaeda did. You have groups like "Stop Islamization of America" calling themselves a "human rights group." I find that offensive.

And many people here have expressed why they thought it should be built where it's planned. Cyn, who disagreed with Obama speaking about it, stated there is a need based on current residential use of of the area. Lastly I'm not blaming "a" political party... I blame both parties. People in the Dem party have stated they're against it too. I blame them and think they're wrong too.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 08-17-2010, 02:25 AM   #167 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Did someone actually say that Harry Reid is a liberal?

The reason that this whole situation gives me pause is that we seem to be building towards the type of highly charged, overtly xenophobic political atmosphere that sets the stage for widescale, institutionalized atrocities.
filtherton is offline  
Old 08-17-2010, 05:13 AM   #169 (permalink)
Junkie
 
dogzilla's Avatar
 
Location: New York
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
So what are you saying? That America is at risk of normalizing racism? I don't think that liberals and conservatives are going to get into a pissing contest to see who has more racists. Wouldn't that be interesting?
My point was that the liberals need to get their house in order before complaining. I've seen bigotry and racism from both sides. Shouldn't be, but it is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
Do you honestly think it was only a local issue until Obama made his statement?
Since I live in New York I've seen a lot of discussion about the mosque. The national aspect of it certainly increased after Obama made his comments.

---------- Post added at 09:13 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:06 AM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pearl Trade View Post
Am I the only one getting tired of people in this thread bitching about "the right wing" being the big problem and how the media fucks everything up? For the last few posts there hasn't been much discussion about the planned mosque, it's mostly anti-conservative sentiment. I'm not saying this because I am a conservative, I'm saying this because I'm tired of everyone blaming the conservatives for not wanting the mosque to be built. It's a true cop-out, not having an opinion of your own and blaming a political party for saying something you don't like. I'd like to read people's opinions of the issue at hand and not hear all of this "conservatism is only propaganda!" bullshit..
I personally have no objection to the mosque being built anywhere they choose. I don't think Muslim beliefs have anything to do with terrorism. That link is thanks to a small number of charismatic nutcases who have twisted Muslim principles to suit their own purposes and for their own personal power and influence.

As long as people of any race or of any religious beliefs aren't committing acts of violence, I really don't care what they do or where they live. Deal with the troublemakers individually, not as a class of people.

I'm also tired of conservatives being labeled bigots or racists. Another example of falsely labeling a group of people because of a few vocal personalities.
dogzilla is offline  
Old 08-17-2010, 07:01 AM   #170 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogzilla View Post
I'm also tired of conservatives being labeled bigots or racists. Another example of falsely labeling a group of people because of a few vocal personalities.
It wasn't until I moved to NYC that I learned there are fiscally conservative moderate socially Republicans existed.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 08-17-2010, 07:08 AM   #171 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
it's like an olympic games of stupid is breaking out on the televisual airwaves.

Newt Gingrich compares mosque to Nazis - Andy Barr - POLITICO.com

legitimating racism is a dangerous game.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 08-17-2010, 07:24 AM   #172 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
I like the matter-of-factly way that Gingrich places an entire religion into a cubbyhole next to a now non-existent racist, antisemitic, fascist political party and its ally, a now non-existent empire guilty of horrendous war crimes.

The fact is, the Nazi party couldn't place anything anywhere because they don't exist.

The Empire of Japan couldn't place anything in Pearl Harbor because it doesn't exist.

Isn't it odd how the Germans and the Japanese aren't viewed as The Enemy? Why is that?
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 08-17-2010, 07:44 AM   #173 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Because we have a new enemy. I have come to the conclusion that much of this nation can not exist without an enemy. I don't understand why we need a bogeyman but for some reason we do.
Rekna is offline  
Old 08-17-2010, 08:11 AM   #174 (permalink)
Junkie
 
kutulu's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogzilla View Post
Since I live in New York I've seen a lot of discussion about the mosque. The national aspect of it certainly increased after Obama made his comments.
Palin, Gingrich, Hannity, Beck, and other GOP leaders have been pounding on this since May but Obama making a statement over the weekend made it a national issue?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dogzilla View Post
I'm also tired of conservatives being labeled bigots or racists. Another example of falsely labeling a group of people because of a few vocal personalities.
The problem is that instead of kicking those people out or just ignoring them, they are pandering to them to create wedge issues. What other conclusion are we supposed to come to when one of the main 2012 hopefuls is speaking on behalf of the "human rights group" called "Stop Islamization of America"?
kutulu is offline  
Old 08-17-2010, 09:33 AM   #175 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by kutulu View Post
Palin, Gingrich, Hannity, Beck, and other GOP leaders have been pounding on this since May but Obama making a statement over the weekend made it a national issue?

The problem is that instead of kicking those people out or just ignoring them, they are pandering to them to create wedge issues. What other conclusion are we supposed to come to when one of the main 2012 hopefuls is speaking on behalf of the "human rights group" called "Stop Islamization of America"?
I don't think that's possible.

Just like the black folks didn't vote or want Al Sharpton to speak for them, I don't expect Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich, or Sarah Palin to speak for me. I didn't ask them to speak for me nor did I vote for them to speak on my behalf.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 08-17-2010, 10:57 AM   #176 (permalink)
Junkie
 
kutulu's Avatar
 
That may be true for you but as a whole those people are widely popular in the current GOP. There is no organized force pushing back from them so it isn't much of a stretch to say that they represent mainstream conservatives.
kutulu is offline  
Old 08-17-2010, 11:17 AM   #177 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by kutulu View Post
That may be true for you but as a whole those people are widely popular in the current GOP. There is no organized force pushing back from them so it isn't much of a stretch to say that they represent mainstream conservatives.
I guess then that it's fair to say the same thing about the fanatical Muslims since there isn't any organized force pushing back from them that it isn't much of a stretch to say that they represent mainstream Muslims.

I guess you've demonstrated the point for me.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 08-17-2010, 11:35 AM   #178 (permalink)
WHEEEE! Whee! Whee! WHEEEE!
 
FuglyStick's Avatar
 
Location: Southern Illinois
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
I guess then that it's fair to say the same thing about the fanatical Muslims since there isn't any organized force pushing back from them that it isn't much of a stretch to say that they represent mainstream Muslims.

I guess you've demonstrated the point for me.
Au contraire, Muslims are VERY vocal that fanatical terrorists are not representative of the mainstream. A very disingenuous position for you to take, Cyn.
__________________
AZIZ! LIGHT!
FuglyStick is offline  
Old 08-17-2010, 11:48 AM   #179 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Wes Mantooth's Avatar
 
Location: Tennessee
What bothers me so much about issues like this is there seems to be an underlying idea that we have some right not to be offended as though others rights are less important then their right to not be uncomfortable. I don't know how you really reconcile that with living in a free country or any value on what we (should) stand for.
__________________
“My god I must have missed it...its hell down here!”
Wes Mantooth is offline  
Old 08-17-2010, 11:53 AM   #180 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by FuglyStick View Post
Au contraire, Muslims are VERY vocal that fanatical terrorists are not representative of the mainstream. A very disingenuous position for you to take, Cyn.
That's my point, there are individuals who are in any community or group, but not any organizing body which is why kutulu is saying it's okay to make the stretch. There are conservatives out there who speak out and state they aren't represented by Rush et. al.

I don't think it's okay to make the stretch for any generalities.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 08-17-2010, 12:19 PM   #181 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Wes Mantooth's Avatar
 
Location: Tennessee
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
That's my point, there are individuals who are in any community or group, but not any organizing body which is why kutulu is saying it's okay to make the stretch. There are conservatives out there who speak out and state they aren't represented by Rush et. al.

I don't think it's okay to make the stretch for any generalities.
I agree Cyn its unfair to generalize any group due to a few (or many) out spoken idiots. Conservatives aren't against the Mosque being built SOME conservatives (and liberals) are and they should be the ones held accountable not the entire group. This guilt by association crap that's so common in politics is BS, there isn't one giant conservative brain being shared by millions of people and many of them can and do disagree on issues like this. Most conservatives I know HATE Rush.
__________________
“My god I must have missed it...its hell down here!”
Wes Mantooth is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 06:15 AM   #182 (permalink)
Sober
 
GreyWolf's Avatar
 
Location: Eastern Canada
A good part of the blame for the outrage and indignation associated with the mosque lies firmly with the major polarising force in the world today... the internet. The ability to spout extreme opinions and to easily find others who agree with you is one of the major impacts of the web. Neo-nazis, white supremacists, radical Muslims, extreme fundamentalist Christians... all these groups can now find an audience for their opinions, and because of the activist nature of their leanings, their voices/websites/media exposure is far greater than their numbers merit.

The age of the silent majority is truly now. Most people just don't care, but you'll never hear that. They don't espouse their feelings from the rooftops as the extremists do.

I'm not against the mosque... Muslims did not attack the WTC... idiot terrorists who happened to be Muslims did.

The vast majority of Muslims subscribe to the tenet of peaceful co-existence that is a basic part of Mohammed's teachings. The vast majority of Christians subscribe to the basic teachings of Christ. Pick your religion... none of them are based on aggression towards others. What we are seeing today is that the fringe elements of any group can now make themselves appear MUCH more numerous than they actually are. I'm not giving up on society as a whole... but I [am MUCH more jaundiced about what I read in the media and on-line.
__________________
The secret to great marksmanship is deciding what the target was AFTER you've shot.
GreyWolf is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 06:57 AM   #183 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wes Mantooth View Post
I agree Cyn its unfair to generalize any group due to a few (or many) out spoken idiots. Conservatives aren't against the Mosque being built SOME conservatives (and liberals) are and they should be the ones held accountable not the entire group. This guilt by association crap that's so common in politics is BS, there isn't one giant conservative brain being shared by millions of people and many of them can and do disagree on issues like this. Most conservatives I know HATE Rush.

I don't think anyone can really say what conservatives want. There's just too many types of conservatives now to make a general statement as to their desires. Around the time of Reagan the GOP started melding social conservatives with fiscal conservatives and now we have so many voters who vote one issue it's impossible to really define the conservative movement. As you point out many conservatives seriously dislike Rush, other love him. Same with Palin. One thing they usually have in common is there's no way in hell they're voting for a Dem.

The same can be said for liberals to some degree. And the one thing they're not doing is vote GOP.

Which is why both parties do whatever they can to get independent voters. Which every way the Ind. votes swing so does the election, usually.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 07:02 AM   #184 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
I don't know if the internet bears the brunt of the responsibility. This story has been helped immensely by the fact that network and cable news channels are all too eager to trumpet and validate bullshit like "the ground zero mosque".
filtherton is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 07:22 AM   #185 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
so here we are again: the ultra right and it's racist constituency gets ahead of this non-issue in the context of the conservative media apparatus and waves the fascism problem about for a few days. this is not a matter of margins taking over either: from the politco and salon pieces above, we know that exploiting this non-issue is a tactical choice made by the organized right. but the ultra-right does not represent the whole of the republican party, nor, obviously, all conservatives.

now it seems that other republicans are concerned that appearing to be (or being) a bunch of racist assholes could damage the gop in upcoming elections:

Quote:
Some Republican figures urge candidates not to focus on Ground Zero mosque issue

By Karen Tumulty
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, August 18, 2010

As Republican candidates across the country seize on the proposed construction of a mosque near New York's Ground Zero as a campaign issue, some influential figures in the GOP are growing concerned that it could backfire.

Although public opinion is running overwhelmingly against the construction of the Islamic center, Republican strategists said there are dangers in pushing the issue too forcefully.

Pollster David Winston, who advises GOP congressional leaders, worries that the mosque controversy could overshadow the issues voters care about most. "While this is certainly an issue that has generated a lot of emotion, when it comes to voting, the election is going to be about the economy and jobs," he said.

Others fear that the party risks appearing intolerant of religious differences.

"One of the biggest dangers in politics is to overplay an issue," said former Republican National Committee chairman Ed Gillespie, who warned that voters could conclude that Republicans who oppose the New York mosque are taking a stand against Islam in general. "It's very important that, as Republicans talk about this issue, we be thoughtful and careful about making those distinctions," he said.

Yet some of the party's most visible figures have taken the opposite approach in reaction to President Obama's declaration that Muslim Americans have a right to build the center.

Former House speaker Newt Gingrich (Ga.) told the Fox News Channel that building a mosque so close to where terrorists killed thousands of Americans would be like putting a Nazi sign next to the Holocaust Memorial Museum. On the same network, former Alaska governor Sarah Palin warned: "This is an insensitive move on the part of those Muslims who want to build that mosque in this location. It feels like a stab in the heart to, collectively, Americans who still have that lingering pain from 9/11."

In congressional districts nationwide, hundreds of miles away from Ground Zero, Republican candidates have demanded that their Democratic opponents declare their positions on the mosque. Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) -- under pressure from his GOP opponent, Sharron Angle -- issued a statement on Monday saying he opposes the project.

Not all Republicans see an advantage in exploiting the controversy. New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, a rising star in the party, declined to give his opinion. He said that Obama and some members of the GOP are "playing politics with this issue, and I simply am not going to do it."

"We have to bring people together," Christie added. "And what offends me the most about all this is that it's being used as a political football by both parties."
ad_icon

It was not all that long ago that Republicans considered Arab and Muslim Americans to be a potentially important voting bloc. In his 2000 campaign for president, Texas Gov. George W. Bush paid particularly close attention to their concerns. In his second debate with Vice President Al Gore, Bush criticized racial profiling of Arab Americans. He ultimately won the endorsements of various Muslim American organizations. Bush was also the first U.S. president to use the word "mosque" in his inaugural address.

Even in the days after Sept. 11, 2001, Bush made a point of visiting the ornate mosque on Washington's Embassy Row. But after the passage of the USA Patriot Act and other measures that heightened Muslim American concerns about civil liberties, their political support for him evaporated. And with his departure, the Republican Party's Muslim outreach effort gave way to assertions that Obama was too solicitous of the Arab world's opinion.

Strategists in both parties say that they think the issue will be all but forgotten by November.

"The support for criticizing a mosque is half a mile wide and an inch deep," conservative activist Grover Norquist warned. "And at the end of the process, the only people who will remember it are the people who feel threatened by this -- not just Muslims, but Sikhs, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and Mormons."

Although there may be short-term political gain now from criticizing the mosque project, he said, the subsequent backlash and perception of religious intolerance may last a long time.
washingtonpost.com

if you look at the names involved, it's pretty clear what's really going on.

a) first and foremost this is a way for the conservative media apparatus to bump its ratings. something to get really lathered about. harumph harumph.

b) this is yet another conservative non-issue that's designed in part to created a phantom "battle" at the level of news cycles which they can control and thereby pretend to "win"--having nothing to say of any substance about any economic or social issue except either warmed over versions of the same nonsense that got us into the present economic situation in the first place or NO, creating and "winning" such image battles is maybe important because

c) this is likely a non-issue that was used to galvanize the demographic that votes conservative not because of what they think so much as because of who they "are"--so the identity politics crowd. the front national impersonators. all the kind of folk that sane conservatives want to be lumped in with.

and

d) it seems to also be a play within conservativeland in the ongoing factional fight for control of the movement such as it is: rove's organization versus the republican party in a knockdown drag out fight over patches of astroturf and donor money.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 07:38 AM   #186 (permalink)
WHEEEE! Whee! Whee! WHEEEE!
 
FuglyStick's Avatar
 
Location: Southern Illinois
Quote:
"The support for criticizing a mosque is half a mile wide and an inch deep," conservative activist Grover Norquist warned. "And at the end of the process, the only people who will remember it are the people who feel threatened by this -- not just Muslims, but Sikhs, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and Mormons."
...and people who see the opposition to the "mosque" (community center) for what it is--unconstitutional religious intolerance.
__________________
AZIZ! LIGHT!
FuglyStick is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 07:47 AM   #187 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
not to mention, there are primaries in many states next Tuesday...I can only hope that this bloated piece of nonsense illuminates the blatantly racist/xenophobic/generally intolerant tone of many of the 'conservative' campaign ads I've seen in the last couple of weeks.

I say conservative because I noticed that many of the repub nominees refer to themselves in their ads as 'conservatives' rather than 'republicans'. Which leads me to believe that the ideological split in the party must be pretty wide.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 11:32 AM   #188 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Wes Mantooth's Avatar
 
Location: Tennessee
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tully Mars View Post
I don't think anyone can really say what conservatives want. There's just too many types of conservatives now to make a general statement as to their desires. Around the time of Reagan the GOP started melding social conservatives with fiscal conservatives and now we have so many voters who vote one issue it's impossible to really define the conservative movement. As you point out many conservatives seriously dislike Rush, other love him. Same with Palin. One thing they usually have in common is there's no way in hell they're voting for a Dem.

The same can be said for liberals to some degree. And the one thing they're not doing is vote GOP.

Which is why both parties do whatever they can to get independent voters. Which every way the Ind. votes swing so does the election, usually.
Sure, and I think it leaves a lot of voters out in the cold while the old "lesser of two evils" decision pops up that a lot of us find ourselves having to make around elections. Whats average Joe Conservative to do? Vote Dem to show he doesn't support bone heads like Rush and Sarah? Everybody is just trying to get by in the world and just because you feel the GOP represents you better then the Dems doesn't mean you should have to get lumped in with this garbage.

Although I wish those that opposed stupid things like this would be a little more vocal about it...I sure as hell would be pissed off is somebody claiming to represent me was going around trying to pull this crap.

You know, you'd think with so many independent voters having such a huge impact on elections it might be a sign that we need more parties....then people could also pick and chose whats right for them instead of having to shoe horn into a group that sort of represents them.
__________________
“My god I must have missed it...its hell down here!”
Wes Mantooth is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 11:41 AM   #189 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
We do have other parties to vote. I've voted the Working Families Party which sometimes can have either a democrat or a republican on their line. It's helped me vote for a democrat without ever having voted on the democrat line.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 11:57 AM   #190 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Wes Mantooth's Avatar
 
Location: Tennessee
Well I should have written viable parties, most people are too scared to throw away their vote so they stick with the big two. Buy anyway yeah, I often vote for third parties for the same reason Cyn.
__________________
“My god I must have missed it...its hell down here!”
Wes Mantooth is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 02:01 PM   #191 (permalink)
Junkie
 
dogzilla's Avatar
 
Location: New York
The Democrats have made an even more offensive move now with Nancy Pelosi wants an investigation of how the opposition to the mosque is being funded. It's really none of the government's business who is opposed to the mosque or how they are funded. Has Nancy conveniently forgotten about the first amendment?

Quote:
With the controversy still swirling over plans for a mosque near the former World Trade Center, President Obama said Wednesday that he had "no regrets" about his involvement in the debate.

Answering a reporter's question at a political event in Columbus, Ohio, the president initially paused, then turned to a TV camera and said, "The answer is — no regrets."

Obama entered the fray Friday, saying he supported the right of Muslims to build there. Amid political backlash a day later, the president said he was commenting on religious freedom, not the exact location of the mosque .

With Republicans trying to wrest control of Congress from Obama's Democrats, and facing a tough re-election battle of his own, Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid broke with the president over the issue Monday , saying the mosque should be built elsewhere.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also entered the fray, saying Tuesday she supports "looking into how is this opposition to the mosque (is) being funded."
'No regrets' on mosque issue, Obama says - Politics - More politics - msnbc.com
dogzilla is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 02:12 PM   #192 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
I wouldn't call that wanting an investigation. She's merely calling for transparency on both sides of the issue.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 02:48 PM   #193 (permalink)
Addict
 
Pearl Trade's Avatar
 
Location: Houston, Texas
I'd like to know how the mosque is being funded. That seems like a more appropriate inquiry compared to questions of how the opposition is being funded.
__________________
Our revenge will be the laughter of our children.
Give me convenience or give me death!
Pearl Trade is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 02:57 PM   #194 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Wes Mantooth's Avatar
 
Location: Tennessee
It is a little strange to be looking into who is funding the opposition...of course I'm not sure it really matters who is funding the Mosque either. For better or worse people have a right to express how they feel about a Mosque being built near ground zero...it shouldn't have any effect on the out come but they have the right. Who cares how they got the money to do it? Freedom of speech and all that.

Jesus christ, just when you think this story couldn't get any stranger they find a way to up the ante one more time.
__________________
“My god I must have missed it...its hell down here!”
Wes Mantooth is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 03:21 PM   #195 (permalink)
Junkie
 
kutulu's Avatar
 
Rather than calling for who is funding who, can't we just call for all sides to just shut the fuck up and forget about it?
kutulu is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 03:53 PM   #196 (permalink)
Junkie
 
dogzilla's Avatar
 
Location: New York
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
I wouldn't call that wanting an investigation. She's merely calling for transparency on both sides of the issue.
"Looking into something" is an investigation. But the government has no business even asking for transparency from either side. Who is funding either side is none of the government's business. Nancy Pelosi is way off base on this.
dogzilla is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 04:31 PM   #197 (permalink)
WHEEEE! Whee! Whee! WHEEEE!
 
FuglyStick's Avatar
 
Location: Southern Illinois
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogzilla View Post
"Looking into something" is an investigation. But the government has no business even asking for transparency from either side. Who is funding either side is none of the government's business. Nancy Pelosi is way off base on this.
I'm inclined to agree with you on this, dog. It doesn't matter who's funding it; what matters is it's unconstitutional and wrong. This shouldn't even be a debate.
__________________
AZIZ! LIGHT!
FuglyStick is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 05:06 PM   #198 (permalink)
Addict
 
Pearl Trade's Avatar
 
Location: Houston, Texas
This issue is really bringing out the worst in people. I'll zero in on politicians because they hold the most power and everyone knows when they say something stupid (like what Pelosi said).

Sticking to the Constitution seems like the easiest, least complex way to solve this problem. Let them build it, because they have the right to do so. Don't let the government investigate anything we do as private citizens, because they have no right to do so. Everyone should just look at the Constitution as the end-all for problems.
__________________
Our revenge will be the laughter of our children.
Give me convenience or give me death!
Pearl Trade is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 05:33 PM   #199 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Blah this shouldn't even be a debate. I'm sickened by both sides for turning this into a political football.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 06:45 PM   #200 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
this is why the republicans were worried about this non-issue.
they cant control it. the question "who's funding the opposition" is an indication of loss of traction. the constitutional questions are a canard.
what's worse is that the damage this non-issue will do the right outweighs the benefits.

personally, i hope this blows up in their faces.
live by the sword die by the sword.

maybe it'll back the conservatives off from legitimating racism as a campaign strategy.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

Tags
built, groud, mosque, planned


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:40 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360