09-10-2005, 01:14 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Upright
|
Lime Wire
Sorry if I am somewhat of a newbie and someone has posted about LimeWire already and (just now I am realizing that perhaps a search in TF on "LimeWire" might have been prudent) but I am taking the excuse of newbies acting stupid to heart and posting this thread here without looking for closer relations.
All this talk about "community" and contribtuing (and my recollections that when I first ran across T.F. about a year ago and my jaw dropped for the week or so I was on it before I discovered that whole section became banned... does the words keys ring a bell?... ...are they still coming??? ) But my "contribution" is this question: Also, at about the same personal historic period, I was a newbie to "LimeWire" (which I am under the impression is hard to find on the net these days as legal stipulates are getting tougher) ... (being a newbie on that as well I ran into the very disastrous problem of newbie eating trojans... so I swore off limewire for a while... ie to this day) but back to my question: I was running Limewire on Win98 and a 56K dialup. a property of this configuration is that almost universally (I cant tell but the new MS Windows update mechanism seems to get around this limit as well???) ... "almost" universally, when you are using a 56K dialup and downloading a file, your average top speed is 5.5 K to 4.5 K. (whether P2P or web pages) So why do they tell you you get 56K? BUT, and I do mean BUT... the insatllation of limewire seemed to do something else. AM I WRONG ABOUT THIS??!! --> If you left Limewire alone it would start downloading at speeds up around 45K!!! Now what I mean by this is that it seemed to me that when the screen saver made the whole screen black... ie all processor use devoted to the OS (no GUI) then the download speed was maxing at the actual claim of about 56K... And I have never seen this to actually happen. My belief that this is true is based on falling asleep, seeing the black screen, touching the mouse, and looking at the rates Limewire was claiming which would be up around 45K but immediately dropping once the screen was not black... AM I WRONG ABOUT THIS??? petsho |
09-11-2005, 03:07 AM | #2 (permalink) |
Upright
|
LimeWire (fixed the spelling) link to site
http://www.limewire.org
For those looking for the real limewire. My bet is that if the .com version and the .org version are different , you will be safer with the .org version... (Of course I am stating the obvious for most people) |
09-12-2005, 05:30 AM | #3 (permalink) |
Registered User
|
I see no reason why you couldn't get 45kb on a dialup connection..especially if you're connected to a fast host. As far as the answer to your screen saver issue.. nfi.
All I know is limewire is a mem/proc hog and will never be on my compy again. Use soulseek if you want a good program and a good p2p community. |
09-12-2005, 06:20 AM | #4 (permalink) |
peekaboo
Location: on the back, bitch
|
I have both soulseek and limewire and, while I agree that limewire is a hog of a proggy, selection is far better and doesn't depend on the file owners to actually be on.
That being said, I would strongly advise against using limewire for program downloads and sharing and stick to basic music files. I got hit time and again with trojans trying to get software, but never have getting music. It slows down everything, agreed. I can't even play music while getting new music and I have cable and just recently upped the cache to double what it had been. I would suggest if, you really want to use limewire, don't do multitasking or take everything and download it overnight.
__________________
Don't blame me. I didn't vote for either of'em. |
09-12-2005, 06:23 AM | #5 (permalink) | |
strangelove
Location: ...more here than there...
|
Quote:
Us slsk users love it for the selection ... I could test your claim, you know
__________________
- + - ° GiRLie GeeK ° - + - ° 01110010011011110110111101110100001000000110110101100101 Therell be days/When Ill stray/I may appear to be/Constantly out of reach/I give in to sin/Because I like to practise what I preach
|
|
09-12-2005, 06:51 AM | #6 (permalink) | |
Registered User
|
Quote:
so.. I can d/l from someone who isn't even online?? how's that work? there's no way limewire has better selection.. sorry.. been there tried that. |
|
09-12-2005, 07:03 AM | #7 (permalink) |
peekaboo
Location: on the back, bitch
|
Just did a little 'test'...things I listen to that are a bit more 'obscure' can be found on limewire, they cannot be found on slsk...(limewire works like those older fileshare programs and you did not have to be online as your music file becomes a shared 'library', of course with cable, technically, you're always 'on', until you shut the computer off; dial-up, no so that obviously would not work).
My point is, what I can find on slsk I can also find on Limewire and then some and I don't have to be 'allowed' nor do the files I seek have to be 'allowed'. You're online, you're sharing, and don't have to have limewire open to do so, as I understand it.
__________________
Don't blame me. I didn't vote for either of'em. Last edited by ngdawg; 09-12-2005 at 07:06 AM.. Reason: G would have jumped all over my oversight |
09-12-2005, 07:07 AM | #8 (permalink) | |
Registered User
|
Quote:
"you're on, you're sharing" .. exactly one of the main reasons I'll never use it again. I like having the option of allowing my shares to be shared and having control over my user list. As far as obscure goes.. I'm not really sure what you're listening to but I've always found hard to find stuff (you call it weirdo music hehe) on slsk better than anywhere else with the exception of eMule. I guess it all comes down to personal preference. I prefer slsk.. easy to use, easy on memory and easy to control my files. |
|
09-12-2005, 07:49 AM | #10 (permalink) |
peekaboo
Location: on the back, bitch
|
No spyware here, but then again I have at least 3 programs for that purpose.
G-I got tired of being 'queued' on slsk, losing the connection, not finding what I want etc, and you yourself have cursed it plenty of times The file control is really not much different-you designate and that's that, unlike Kazaa, which took over like some alien force. Getting back to at least part of the original query, I do have one tiny, insignificant rant: large files that dial-up users share. It shouldn't take me an hour or more to download a 4 minute song with my cable, but because the one who has that file has their 56k, sometimes it shows that as the DL time!!! Of course, with slsk, there's no way of knowing this til the dl starts, at which point I cuss and abort. Limewire shows the type of connection you will be dealing with, at least, so there's no surprises and no queuing for half a day.
__________________
Don't blame me. I didn't vote for either of'em. |
09-12-2005, 09:59 AM | #11 (permalink) |
Evil Priest: The Devil Made Me Do It!
Location: Southern England
|
What about WinMX?
__________________
╔═════════════════════════════════════════╗
Overhead, the Albatross hangs motionless upon the air, And deep beneath the rolling waves, In labyrinths of Coral Caves, The Echo of a distant time Comes willowing across the sand; And everthing is Green and Submarine ╚═════════════════════════════════════════╝ |
09-12-2005, 01:30 PM | #13 (permalink) | |
Registered User
|
Quote:
usually the only time I curse it is when a user is being stupid or the whole network goes down. You can get a general idea of how long a song is going to take using slsk by looking at the users avg. speed. This gives you a good idea on their upload speed.. the higher the number the better. I don't mind ques because if I'm que'd I just go look for other people who have the same files or for other stuff that I want.. I don't think I've ever been que'd for an entire album for more than a few hours. Which isn't that bad especially if it's hard to find stuff. |
|
10-25-2005, 10:12 AM | #17 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: Vegas!!
|
Help Please!?
Could somebody tell me if I am at risk by using limewire!? Is it legal? I am confused. I deleted it off the computer in fear of being prosecuted. I recently restarted my computer and there it was!! I want to use it again but am afraid. Anyone?
I figured this wouldn't be stealing away the thread since it's related. Seems silly to start a whole new thread for this little question. Thanks.
__________________
Hey! Wait! I've got a new complaint, Forever in debt to ((your)) priceless advice. - Nirvana |
10-25-2005, 11:50 AM | #18 (permalink) | |
Psycho
Location: London
|
Quote:
Whether you want to use limewire or any other p2p or torrent is up to you. Your actions may cause a reaction - let that be a warning. Then again there Music 'artist' can make money elsewhere. Sorry now i'm going off topic. So i shell stop... hope this goes some way to anwering your question.
__________________
"The only way to discover the limits of the possible is to go beyond them into the impossible." - Arthur C. Clarke |
|
10-25-2005, 02:17 PM | #19 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: Vegas!!
|
...
Now, I don't agree with stealing music. I find it hard to believe that people have never borrowed and burned cds from friends... but whatever. Seems the same to me.
I would use it except I don't want to get caught. Thanks for info.
__________________
Hey! Wait! I've got a new complaint, Forever in debt to ((your)) priceless advice. - Nirvana |
10-25-2005, 06:55 PM | #20 (permalink) |
Psycho
|
Most p2p .mp3s don't seem to be of that high quality. I mean, if you aren't an audiophile then that's ok, but if you want high quality stuff I would use .torrents. Torrents seem to either use lossless compression like FLAC, or high bit rate mp3s. The only time I use limewire or other p2p is when I just need one song to learn how to play. You shouldn't have to go out and buy the album just for a 3 minute long song.
-- edit -- I forgot to mention that Limewire and other p2p programs are legal, it's just what most people do with them that's not. Some independant artists release their songs onto p2p networks to get their stuff out there. -- Ehh... another edit... -- If you are concerned about legal action taken against you, don't be. They won't go after you unless you have 1000+ songs you are distibuting. My suggestion is if you have 1000+ songs, download a song, let it upload for a day or two, then stop sharing it.
__________________
Last edited by muckluck; 10-25-2005 at 06:59 PM.. |
10-25-2005, 08:31 PM | #21 (permalink) | |
Young Crumudgeon
Location: Canada
|
Quote:
__________________
I wake up in the morning more tired than before I slept I get through cryin' and I'm sadder than before I wept I get through thinkin' now, and the thoughts have left my head I get through speakin' and I can't remember, not a word that I said - Ben Harper, Show Me A Little Shame |
|
10-26-2005, 05:59 PM | #22 (permalink) | |
Psycho
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
04-08-2006, 01:00 PM | #24 (permalink) |
Searching for the perfect brew!
|
Is anyone using soulseek or any p2p anymore? Are there any relatively free from virus or trojans. I just got a new Dell and cable, I don't want to f*** it up but would like to download some music & movies. Any suggestions?
__________________
"That's a joke... I say, that's a joke, son" |
04-16-2006, 07:59 PM | #25 (permalink) | |
is a tiger
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
Quote:
__________________
"Your name's Geek? Do you know the origin of the term? A geek is someone who bites the heads off chickens at a circus. I would never let you suck my dick with a name like Geek" --Kevin Smith This part just makes my posts easier to find |
|
04-16-2006, 08:14 PM | #26 (permalink) | |
peekaboo
Location: on the back, bitch
|
Quote:
__________________
Don't blame me. I didn't vote for either of'em. |
|
Tags |
lime, wire |
|
|