Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Life


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-27-2004, 01:14 PM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
skysooner's Avatar
 
Location: Oklahoma
Maximum heartrate

My wife and I have both caught the exercise bug. She has been doing it for several years while I have been doing cardio for the last 6 months. Our chosen forms of exercise are different. I bike and job on occasion. She pretty much sticks to jogging on a treadmill. Here is a question from her:

She read on a website that she should not exceed 85% of her maximum heart rate for extended periods of time since supposedly the body starts to burn muscle. Based on a website for 35-40, she shouldn't exceed 156 beats/minute. When I exercise on the bike, I typically fluctuate between 124 and 145 depending upon how hard I'm working. When I job, I'm around 145 to 162 (again depending upon how I'm pushing myself. When she jogs, her heartrate gets up to 178 beats/minute sustained only doing 10 minute miles. Even though she has been doing this for 2 years and typically runs 5 miles/day, she got a bit concerned about this. She has had genetic hypertension in the past that was controlled through medication. Once she started exercising regularly, her blood pressure reduced to regular levels.

I guess her question is if this advice on not exceeding 85% of her maximum heart rate is correct, and if she is, would this affect her weight loss? She is 5'6" 127# or so. She has been down to around 122# in the past and really wants to lose those last 5 lbs. I tell her that some of it is due to building muscle mass due to weight lifting, but she is concerned that if the website is correct and if she is burning muscle that weight loss is not occurring the way it should. She eats a very healthy diet but somewhat low on calories (in my opinion anyway).
skysooner is offline  
Old 02-28-2004, 06:07 AM   #2 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: NC
Hey Sky...my first question would be about your wife's hydration. That could affect her HR.

Secondly...I might would check with my doc...178 seems a bit excessive for someone in pretty good shape. Although if she was pushing herself hard she could acheive this. The only problem with super high heart rates is that your heart works less effectively because there is not enough time for it to fill properly between beats. I wouldn't expect to see this unless there was something else going on such as hyperthyroid or dehydration etc.

I'm not a doc, so take that with a grain...
__________________
The sad thing is... as you get older you come to realize that you don't so much pilot your life, as you just try to hold on, in a screaming, defiant ball of white-knuckle anxious fury
mr sticky is offline  
Old 02-28-2004, 03:39 PM   #3 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Quote:
Originally posted by mr sticky
178 seems a bit excessive for someone in pretty good shape.

I would agree. Here's a link to the WebMD pulse measurement page, which has a chart for a person's target heartrate during exercise:

http://my.webmd.com/hw/heart_disease...-9531713CA348}


Is she pushing herself too hard? Getting enough nutrients in her diet? Drinking enough water?

That's great her blood pressure is down to normal. So she deffinitely doesn't want to stop exercising.

Best thing to do is to go have a check up with a cardiologist. Better to be safe.
sadatx is offline  
Old 02-29-2004, 08:56 AM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
skysooner's Avatar
 
Location: Oklahoma
Thank you for your answers. I'm going to have her check it out with a cardiologist. It sounds like our GP might not be the place to start.
skysooner is offline  
Old 03-01-2004, 01:26 AM   #5 (permalink)
Addict
 
Vaultboy's Avatar
 
Location: Third World
The main effect of exceeding your MHR is that your muscles start to respirate aneaobically, which builds up. Also, its not really good for burning fat. Muscle wasting is the end product, as you rightly mention.

The fact that her heart rate reaches 178 is not the main problem, IMO.

MHR is a method that one should use to tailor your workplan. Its a zone that you should strive to exercise in. From what you say, it sounds like she's doing her set routine, and her HR is thus going above the MHR.

The cardiologist might not find anything wrong with her, in which case she should go consult a trainer who will give her a routine that will best complement her. As you mention, the excercise has yielded benefits over the last two years, with no negatives as yet. i think that a slightly less strenous cardio workout will still give her all the same benefits, plus a few more.
__________________
"Failing tastes of bile and dog vomit. Pity any man that gets used to that taste."
Vaultboy is offline  
Old 03-02-2004, 05:05 PM   #6 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: San Francisco
Vault, what are you referring to as MHR? I always knew this to be Maximum Heart Rate. What I think you are referring to, and correctly but just with the wrong name, is the Anaerobic Threashold (AT). Basically the point at which your body switches from burning Carbohydrates/Fats to burning Proteins which are harder for the body to consume. Typically this is about 60% of the MHR, if my memory serves me correctly.

Here's an article I just looked up from Triathlete Magazine that may help designing a training program:

http://www.triathletemag.com/story.c...92&pageID=1732
__________________
"If something has to give then it always will."

-- Editors

Last edited by Nazggul; 03-02-2004 at 05:10 PM..
Nazggul is offline  
Old 03-04-2004, 12:33 AM   #7 (permalink)
Addict
 
Vaultboy's Avatar
 
Location: Third World
Nazgul, your reference seems faulted. That guy is a 52 year old with a claimed MHR of 195. His MHR calculation is also probably more precise for PROFESSIONAL ATHLETES.

Current research shows that the average UNIVERSAL way to calculate your MHR is to subtract your age from 220 (that of a newborn baby) THat would give you a close approximate MHR, good enough for exercise/gym. 85% of your MHR can be regarded as your AT.

If your AT is 60% of your MHR as you claim, and virtually every fundi states that you should keep aerobic exercise between 60% - 85% of your MHR, then you are saying that every time you work out at 60% or more of your MHR, you are burning protein. And that aerobic exercise is actually anaerobic exercise.

Which is complete bollocks, if you dont mind me saying. And if you read the initial poster's question, you would see that she is indeed concerned with going above 85% of her MHR, (crossing her AT). Her reference thus concurs with 85%, and not 60%.
__________________
"Failing tastes of bile and dog vomit. Pity any man that gets used to that taste."
Vaultboy is offline  
Old 03-04-2004, 06:43 AM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
skysooner's Avatar
 
Location: Oklahoma
To respond to this, it is actually my wife I was concerned about. This has been interesting information for us. We have actually talked extensively to people at our gym about their heartrates. She is working out near the top of where she should be working out, and I suspect it has something to do with her inability to lose a few pounds. She also has been undereating a bit which I think has caused her body to go into "starvation" mode and means she is packing on lbs rather than shedding them. She has an appointment next week with a nutritionist plus a doctor that specializes in proper exercise. She lost most of her weight (approximately 20 lbs) when she wasn't dieting or exercising as much, and she has a hard time believing that working harder and eating less doesn't have more of an effect.
skysooner is offline  
Old 03-04-2004, 08:53 AM   #9 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: San Francisco
Quote:
Originally posted by Vaultboy
Nazgul, your reference seems faulted. That guy is a 52 year old with a claimed MHR of 195. His MHR calculation is also probably more precise for PROFESSIONAL ATHLETES.

Current research shows that the average UNIVERSAL way to calculate your MHR is to subtract your age from 220 (that of a newborn baby) THat would give you a close approximate MHR, good enough for exercise/gym. 85% of your MHR can be regarded as your AT.

If your AT is 60% of your MHR as you claim, and virtually every fundi states that you should keep aerobic exercise between 60% - 85% of your MHR, then you are saying that every time you work out at 60% or more of your MHR, you are burning protein. And that aerobic exercise is actually anaerobic exercise.

Which is complete bollocks, if you dont mind me saying. And if you read the initial poster's question, you would see that she is indeed concerned with going above 85% of her MHR, (crossing her AT). Her reference thus concurs with 85%, and not 60%.
Sorry Vault, didn't mean to derail the topic or get your ire up. My point was only that you were referring to the MHR as the AT or Target Heart Rate, that's all. You mention exceeding your MHR which is really not possible by definition. You were simply swapping terms of Target Heart Rate or AT with MHR. Small issue. Appologies if I insulted you.
__________________
"If something has to give then it always will."

-- Editors
Nazggul is offline  
Old 03-04-2004, 10:43 PM   #10 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Brisbane Australia
Unfortunately this thread contains much of the mis-information that abounds regarding this topic

1. MHR is calculated most simply by 220 - age. This is very simple and only a guide! Not a rule, is can be easily skewed as can the lactate inflection point or the point where you really feel like you cant maintain the effort much longer at that rate.

2. Gluconeogenesis which is the creation of sugar for energy from non-sugar building blocks i.e. fat and protein (particularly branch chain amino acids, which happen to be most commonly in skeletal muscle) can happen in a number of ways and through all levels of intensity. Eample lactic acid made in a working muscle is taken to non-working muscle and converted to sugar.

3. The 80's circa posters outlining the "zones" is very misleading. The aerobic and anaerobic metabolic activity levels are not mutally exclusive i.e. they can both be on at the same time

4. As mentioned above, your wifes fluid levels are very important. She should weigh herself before and after exercise and there should be no change. Any loss and she is not drinking enough.

5. Rhabdomyolysis is very rare where the muscle literally melts. Gluconeogenesis is very common and can be activated by simply missing a regular meal.
__________________
Forgiveness is like the fragrance a flower gives after it's been stepped on.
Anibal5 is offline  
Old 03-05-2004, 12:20 AM   #11 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Quote:
Originally posted by skysooner
She also has been undereating a bit which I think has caused her body to go into "starvation" mode and means she is packing on lbs rather than shedding them.
Yes, having a good supply of QUALITY CARBOHYDRATES in your body is a must for anyone who runs regularly.

You'll probably want to get Nathan Pritikin's Diet For Runners (you can pick it up for cheap used at Amazon http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...books&n=507846). It's a little outdated (he thinks all, and I mean all, fats and oils should be avoided), so don't take everything in the book as law. However, it remains and excellent source on nutrition for runners. I highly reccomend it.
sadatx is offline  
Old 03-07-2004, 08:41 PM   #12 (permalink)
Addict
 
Vaultboy's Avatar
 
Location: Third World
Quote:
Originally posted by Nazggul
[B]Sorry Vault, ...<snip>
Hey, no offense taken. and none meant.

__________________
"Failing tastes of bile and dog vomit. Pity any man that gets used to that taste."
Vaultboy is offline  
Old 03-08-2004, 06:28 AM   #13 (permalink)
Junkie
 
hannukah harry's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Anibal53. The 80's circa posters outlining the "zones" is very misleading. The aerobic and anaerobic metabolic activity levels are not mutally exclusive i.e. they can both be on at the same time
[/B]
good stuff, anibal.

to add on to this one, the "zones" people should be using today aren't actually based on maximum heart rate. there are two main methods today, doing it based on heart rate reserve or vo2max reserve. the american college of sports medicine (the group which sets the industry standards) goes by vo2max reserve.
__________________
shabbat shalom, mother fucker! - the hebrew hammer
hannukah harry is offline  
Old 03-08-2004, 09:17 AM   #14 (permalink)
An embarrassment to myself and those around me...
 
VitaminH's Avatar
 
Location: Pants
Quote:
Originally posted by Nazggul
What I think you are referring to, and correctly but just with the wrong name, is the Anaerobic Threashold (AT). Basically the point at which your body switches from burning Carbohydrates/Fats to burning Proteins which are harder for the body to consume.
Not entirely accurate there, the AT is when the body doesn't have enough Oxygen to burn carbs through the full cycle that it usually would, and switches to a partial cycle that makes energy without the oxygen requirement. The result is lactic acid buildup, which is what causes muscle cramps and the like when you've worked them out to hard, and consequently what causes chest pain if you are having angina or a heart attack.
__________________
"Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever."
- Napoleon Bonaparte
VitaminH is offline  
 

Tags
heartrate, maximum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:56 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360