01-09-2004, 07:59 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: Indiana
|
LSU vs USC?
Have you guys read about this? What do you think? I personnally would love to see this game played but I doubt it will happen. What would be so wrong about allowing this game to be played to answer who is the champion in years where there might not be a clear winner??
Here is a link for anyone who hasn't heard. http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/NewsStory...ORTS&oid=41988 |
01-09-2004, 11:09 AM | #3 (permalink) |
Baltimoron
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
|
What they need is for someone to go into the office of Myles Brand with a briefcase and a large, hairy man and say, "Dr. Brand, this is a briefcase full of money, and this is Bubba. If you allow LSU and USC to play for a real national championship, you get the briefcase. If not, Bubba violates your 'NCAA regulations' right on your desk. Choose wisely."
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen." --Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun |
01-09-2004, 06:36 PM | #6 (permalink) |
Tilted
Location: In my own little world.
|
Hell. I would love it just so LSU can shut up all those who think they're not in USCs' league and get some respect.I look at some sports websites and all you have is how USC is national champs and no word about LSU.In a LSU-USC match-up I think LSUs' defense would hold USC and win the game,I mean Oklahoma was averaging over 40 pts.a game this year and LSU kept them to 14 pts.They have to get their props for that at least.
|
01-09-2004, 09:26 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Banned
Location: Tucson
|
Well, I give props to Gateway for having the balls for such an offer. It sounds like they have good intentions, and in a perfect world, this would hopefully happen.
Unfortunately, I doubt it will. The NCAA will or already has shit upon it. Plus, I don't know how you can logistically pull off something like this in two weeks. It's an interesting idea, I have to admit. Thinking about it some more, it would be great if it could happen somehow. But, there are 2 champions this year, let's just live with it and move on. Why don't we all just figure out a way to fix the damn system? |
01-10-2004, 11:19 AM | #10 (permalink) |
WoW or Class...
Location: UWW
|
The NCAA should do the one thing that would make it golden right now and save itself from all the BCS controversy that happened this year. Let this happen, but force the money to be split equally and go to scholarships for each respective school.
USC and LSU would almost have to do it if the NCAA approved it, I doubt anyone can imagine the backlash from the fans and the media if one of the schools declined.
__________________
One day an Englishman, a Scotsman, and an Irishman walked into a pub together. They each bought a pint of Guinness. Just as they were about to enjoy their creamy beverage, three flies landed in each of their pints. The Englishman pushed his beer away in disgust. The Scotsman fished the fly out of his beer and continued drinking it, as if nothing had happened. The Irishman, too, picked the fly out of his drink but then held it out over the beer and yelled "SPIT IT OUT, SPIT IT OUT, YOU BASTARD!" |
01-10-2004, 09:57 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Crazy
|
It's funny how any time USC plays in a non-confrence game everyone always talks about how they are "soft" and will get worked. I remeber before the rose bowl how someone one this website talked about how dominated that they were going to be by michigan. Although i think LSU is a great team there offense is nop match for the usc defense in my opinion but i could be wrong.
__________________
People who love people |
01-19-2004, 02:34 AM | #13 (permalink) |
Loser
Location: Paradise
|
fucking eh!
I was lucky enough to watch my Cal Bears stick the BCS where the sun don't shine against U$C, but the Condoms ARE impressive. As such, I'd like to take 1 quick moment to bask in my boys destroying (hopefully) the sham that is the BCS
LSU is a great team too. No way in hell should OU have been in that NC game, with their not having won their conference and all... and the fact that of the 3 teams, they were the only ones to get their asses handed to them. Don't give me this "the Pac-10 doesn't have a conference game" shit either--it didn't need 1, with $C knocking off all of the close competition (WSU was #2 in conference). I know that $C knockers say that $C "LOST TO CAL" (I take offense at this being an insult), but this same CAL team is a preseason 10 on SI's list and 11 on ESPN's for next year. K-State kicked the shit out of OU, yet Cal played them well. You can't compare apples to oranges, but you can safely say--I hope--that SC is better than OU. I could see LSU beating $C, but I think that if you play 10 games between the two, SC is gonna come out on top. As everyone has no doubt already pointed out, $C has a much more powerful offense, and while I'll give LSU the nod on D, the gaps between SC's D and LSU's is far less than the gap between the offenses. Leinart is far and away the best QB even though he isn't even the best QB in his own conference, and Mauck doesn't impress at all--even vs. SC's corners. Unfortunately, we'll never know, and that is what blows. Also, I'd like to point out that I am partisan--as are most of the LSU backers that appear to be living on the east coast. Also, I'd like to point out that I can't fucking stand the University of Spoiled Children, that I fear they will be even better next year with their top ranked recruiting class (LSU will be scary too), and that I fucking hope they choke. But I still root for the PAC-10 come bowl time. Maybe next year we'll get that LSU $C matchup. Last edited by cheesemoney; 01-19-2004 at 02:38 AM.. |
Tags |
lsu, usc |
|
|