Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


View Poll Results: Have you ever fired a firearm, and do you consider yourself generally pro/anti gun?
I have fired a gun, and I consider myself pro-gun. 34 53.97%
I have not fired a gun, and I consider myself pro-gun. 6 9.52%
I have fired a gun, and I consider myself anti-gun. 11 17.46%
I have not fired a gun, and I consider myself anti-gun. 12 19.05%
Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-05-2004, 07:59 AM   #41 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Kadath
That's fair, although not always applicable. I've never raped or been raped, yet I am opposed to that. You may call that a strawman if you like.

Also, "anti-gun" is like saying "pro-abortion." I am not anti-gun. I am for gun control.

Specious comparison.

Owning a gun harms no other person. It is a personal act.

Raping involves direct harm to another.

One does not have to experience a transgression against another individual to realize that such an act is a violation of their individual rights.
wonderwench is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 08:03 AM   #42 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Pacifier
so you think someone should have fired a gun to see the problems involved with gun-ownership?

do you also think that some need to try hard drugs to oppose drug use?

Another specious comparison.

A gun is a tool that one can handle with safety and responsibility - which the vast majority of gun owners practise.

Drugs are ingested, altering the mind and body. There is plenty of empirical evidence of the delterious effects.

Owning a gun is not inherently dangerous - the danger lies in how one handles it.
wonderwench is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 08:40 AM   #43 (permalink)
Muffled
 
Kadath's Avatar
 
Location: Camazotz
Quote:
Originally posted by wonderwench
Specious comparison.

Owning a gun harms no other person. It is a personal act.

Raping involves direct harm to another.

One does not have to experience a transgression against another individual to realize that such an act is a violation of their individual rights.
Fair enough! I did admit you could call it a strawman if you liked. I shall throw one other example out; feel free to argue with it as well.
I don't have any tattoos, though my of my friends including my girlfriend do. I don't need one to know I don't want one. I have seen many people regret the permanent marks they have made on their bodies, and I don't pretend to think any of the things I hold important today will still matter to me in ten years, when I will likely have children and a mortgage.
__________________
it's quiet in here
Kadath is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 08:40 AM   #44 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ARTelevision
One of the advocates of increased gun control legislation that I give a great deal of credibility to is former Assistant to the President and White House Press Secretary, James S. Brady. Why do I ascribe an extra dose of credibility to his position? Because he was a victim of gun violence. And he was motivated to study and research the issues in an especially personal way.
I think that you make an important point here...."experience with guns" means more than just handling firearms. The experiences of a trauma surgeon or police officer with regards to weaponry will differ greatly from that of a sportsman but are equally valid.
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 08:52 AM   #45 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Kadath
Fair enough! I did admit you could call it a strawman if you liked. I shall throw one other example out; feel free to argue with it as well.
I don't have any tattoos, though my of my friends including my girlfriend do. I don't need one to know I don't want one. I have seen many people regret the permanent marks they have made on their bodies, and I don't pretend to think any of the things I hold important today will still matter to me in ten years, when I will likely have children and a mortgage.

A bit more apt comparison. A tattoo is a matter of personal taste, affecting the individual who will have it.

It is not to your taste - but I do not see you advocating for a ban on tattoos which prevent others from adorning their bodies.
wonderwench is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 08:55 AM   #46 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
cthulu23: Yes.
As point of fact I did support the Brady Bill. That's exactly where I draw the line. The sad fact is that it has not reduced the rates of violent crime or murder. However, I accept the provisions for a waiting period and other regulatory provisions that it and other gun laws sustain. One can not paint all gun advocates with a broad brush.
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 09:08 AM   #47 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ARTelevision
cthulu23: Yes.
As point of fact I did support the Brady Bill. That's exactly where I draw the line. The sad fact is that it has not reduced the rates of violent crime or murder. However, I accept the provisions for a waiting period and other regulatory provisions that it and other gun laws sustain. One can not paint all gun advocates with a broad brush.
In the same way, the label of "anti-gun" is too broad....there is a world of difference between advocacy for tighter controls (waiting period, background check, etc), limiting certain weapon/ammo types and all-out abolition.

One tangential point: haven't the rates of cartain violent crimes been on the decline for the last decade? I'm not claiming that the Brady Bill is or isn't partially responsible for this decline, but it does tie into your statement about the continuance of violence post-Brady Bill.
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 09:15 AM   #48 (permalink)
Banned
 
Crime rates are affected more by the economy than then are by gun legislation, imo. There is quite a bit of evidence, however, that when conceal carry permits are easier to acquire, the murder rates falls - FL is a good case study.
wonderwench is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 09:17 AM   #49 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
Here's a link from Newsmax. I know it's not a universally quoted source. I'm open to hearing about the stats others may have access to. If it's doing some good - so much the better.

http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=2000/8/1/183258
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 10:04 AM   #50 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Kadath
I don't have any tattoos, though my of my friends including my girlfriend do. I don't need one to know I don't want one.
I think the problem people are having here is that it is not a universally transferable idea, and some of you are trying to do just that.

Just because Art's saying that experience tends to give one a higher degree of credibility does NOT mean that you have no credibility if you have NOT had experience.

A prime example: People always bitch about how "people who don't have kids shouldn't tell people WITH kids how to raise them." Society places a higher level of credibility in the parenting opinions of an actual parent, but that does not mean that if you are not a parent, you can't have any credibility.

Credibility can be gained in many different ways, without ever having a kid or tending for one- but we, as a society, will still place the most credibility in those with whom direct experience lies.

So, if you have kids- answer me this, and you'll know what I mean. If you had to pick a babysitter when you went out, and only had two choices- one, a woman of 30 who has a child of her own who is older than yours, or two, a woman of 30 with no children but who has "read up a lot on it and formed their own opinions"....

Which would most people choose? I think you know what I mean now.
analog is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 10:42 AM   #51 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i am skeptical of arguments that run: if everyone is strapped, then the murder rate will go down---simply because:

i cannot see the value of the dodge city 1880 western film model for interaction betwen civilized beings.

second it assumes that, again like a western film, everyone who is strapped will have their six gun in a handy holster at thier side and be able to whip the thing out at the critical moment without fucking up.

third because i do not think it is necessarily a good idea for everyone to have a gun in a situation that generates some level of fear--it seems to be a handy way to bypass negociation and go straight to a situation where people are likely to end up dead....

fourth because i would not personally feel any safer if i had a gun on me--i would worry far too much that if i were to use it in a stupid situation, that through no fault of my own, quite apart from my intentions, some passer-by might end up dead or maimed because even if i were to take a sudden interest in weapons and go to a firing range and practice ad infinitum, it would seem to me that in moments of real stress, real fear, my control over the minutae of the physical mechanisms required to be in more-or-less total alignment so as to aim the thing properly could not be counted on, and again, someone passing by, or sitting in a nearby apartment watching tv or talking to a friend, maybe a kid, could end up dead or maimed because of a stray bullet...and because regardless of your experience with weapons like this, it cannot be deined that a gun is something of an abstract mechanism the projectiles from which rip through all bodies/materials without differentiation.

and it would seem that walking down the street and happening upon such a situation would not be comparable with being in a war scenario because in a war scenario, such situations are part of the expectations you bring into the game. surprise like what i talk about above seems to me totally different.

i do not know how i would handle the balance between my sense of personal space and its defense as over against mowing down some kid by mistake. i dont know if i could deal with it. but i **do** know that once the gun was out, i could not be certain of what was going to happen.

as for credibility, i would think that one should have it granted in this kind of scenario because it requires only that one have lived a certain period of time as a human being, be able to imagine scenarios, and know something about your own reactions.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite

Last edited by roachboy; 07-05-2004 at 10:45 AM..
roachboy is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 11:13 AM   #52 (permalink)
Banned
 
"An armed society is a polite societ."

For another viewpoint, roachboy, I recommend the very excellent scifi novel "Voyage from Yesteryear" by James P. Hogan.
wonderwench is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 11:45 AM   #53 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i think that quote is madness.
and it says nothing about the substance of the post.

but i will check out the scifi suggestion--thanks.

let's say everyone did have a gun, and a scenario unfolded like the one i outlined above, and your nervousness caused you to, say, mow down a kid--how would you deal with it? as "collateral damage"? and how would killing someone by mistake not be an infringement on the rights of another individual in a kinda radical way? wouldnt the possibility of errors, and the consequences of them, run straight against the fetishism of the isolated individual so important to a libertarian viewpoint?
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 11:47 AM   #54 (permalink)
Banned
 
You are making a mistaken assumption that I would be nervous.
wonderwench is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 01:43 PM   #55 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Over there --->
Own guns, pro-gun.
Grew up in South Africa with everyone killing each other, so I feel unsafe without them around.
Unleashed is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 02:04 PM   #56 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally posted by roachboy
let's say everyone did have a gun, and a scenario unfolded like the one i outlined above, and your nervousness caused you to, say, mow down a kid--how would you deal with it?
If you are nervous having a gun, then simply do not have one, or do not ever use it. If you make a mistake while using a gun- assuming that you HAD to use it to begin with- then you face the consequences of your actions, just like with anything else.

It is irresponsible gun ownership and use that causes many of the gun problems in this country. Every time some fuckhead leaves a loaded gun under his/her pillow for their kid to blow their head off with, we hear about how horrible guns are on the news for a month. Bullshit.
analog is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 02:24 PM   #57 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
maybe so--but i did not know that training/practice/experience with a gun would eliminate chance.
particularly in really nervewracking situations.

maybe that is the secret of training with a gun--that you eliminate all contingency.

i mean, i have been playing piano for 35 years--i have a shitload of training--i play in situations i can control, but which remain nervewracking--i would wager that i have as high a level of control over that instrument, have put more time in with it, as anyone of my age has with a gun---and yet i find that arbitrary things still go wrong. that you cant eliminate chance.

but maybe you're right: maybe a gun is different from any other object, and the zone around it magically transforms people from agents capable of error into perfect beings who can talk with absolute assurance about all possible situations.

i didnt know that about guns.

i guess i missed out.

and not to worry--i would not carry a gun---i dont like them---but i still am agnostic on matters of legislation.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 02:54 PM   #58 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally posted by roachboy
but maybe you're right: maybe a gun is different from any other object, and the zone around it magically transforms people from agents capable of error into perfect beings who can talk with absolute assurance about all possible situations.
Your sarcasm aside, it is a simple fact that if having one makes you uncomfortable, or if you feel you cannot handle the responsibilities inherent to gun ownership, then you should not have one.

Some people cannot handle knives well, and repeatedly cut themselves if they ever try to chop anything (in food preparation)... and many of them simply do not use knives unless they must because they know their limitations.

There is no shame in knowing your limitations.
analog is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 03:18 PM   #59 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i just dont see how this particular line of argument gets any of us anywhere, really--the thread was about a correlation between attitudes toward guns and bakc ground--i think we are confirming the correlation over and over.

i wasnt being particularly sarcastic---i was rephrasing the argument---what i find is that it is sometimes difficult to maintain an agnostic position because the particular attitudes of individuals who are passionate about gun ownership sometimes leads tham to make arguments that make others think--geez--is this really how people think about guns?--and maybe even prompts anti gun ownership people to move further into their positions because they think the other side is simply nuts.

the flip is also true---the people who have gradually backed me away from supporting gun control were those who grew up with them and who did not fall into logic problems in trying to explain their positions. **they** got me to listen, and to re-evaluate things.

btw---not liking guns personally is not a limitation. it is a position that is as coherent as your is--for people other than you.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 04:08 PM   #60 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Never Never Land
Pro-gun/anti-gun, such a black & white choice isn't it? What about those of us who end up somewhere in the middle, like me for instance. Growing up in a very rural region of the mid-west I grew up with guns in my house just like everyone else that I knew as a kid did. Reflecting back on my childhood, though, I’ve realized something. When you grow up with guns in the house, you learn how to treat them with a great deal of respect and learn the proper do’s and don’ts of gun ownership (like never point one at anything you don’t want to kill, whether it is loaded or not). Like most kids I knew, I took gun safety courses and training exercises from our local chapter of the NRA and became quit a good marksmen too.

But herein lies the problem, many gun owners have never taken a gun safety course or ever been properly trained in gun ownership. Now, I share the common sentiment that most pro-gun people have, that any responsible adult should have the right to own arms, per the 2nd amendment. The problem I have is with the word “responsible” because as it is there is no real way to gage just how responsible a person will be with their guns. This is why I am in favor of gun handling training in all of our public schools, if nothing more then to teach people what to do if they happen to find a weapon lying around, and some form of gun “drivers licence” that shows that a person has satisfactorily completed a gun ownership safety and usage course (preferably one that is well established like those offered by the NRA). If a person is unwilling to take such a course then I don’t think that they should be allowed to own a gun because they have not demonstrated that they are a responsible citizen (just like people who don’t bother to resister shouldn’t be allowed to vote come election day). Would this be an undo burden upon gun owners? I don’t believe so as most people would be able to pass the course easily, and some of them could probably use a refresher course in gun safety anyway (I have met more then a few actually who I have wanted to smack upside the head for mishandling their weapon). So what does this make me? Pro-gun or Anti-gun? How about pro-gun for those willing to demonstrate that they are responsible enough citizens to exercise their 2nd amendment right.
Publius is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 04:32 PM   #61 (permalink)
Banned
 
In CA, one is not able to purchase a gun without having first taken a gun safety and handling course.
wonderwench is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 05:50 PM   #62 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally posted by wonderwench
In CA, one is not able to purchase a gun without having first taken a gun safety and handling course.
And we all know what a peaceful place California can be
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 06:26 PM   #63 (permalink)
Sauce Puppet
 
kurty[B]'s Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Stare At The Sun
I have fired a gun, and am very pro gun.

I feel that it is almost your responsibility to own a gun in America. Not only to protect yourself, and your home, but to let the government know that the people are still armed, and won't be walked all over.
I agree with this.

I'm joining the discussion a bit late.

I've fired guns, I've been fired at. Once was trespassing on an old man's property, and him shooting his shotgun and telling my friends and I to leave (I was young, and he was probably shooting into the air, but it was enough to scare the crap out of me and get me off his property in no time flat). The other time was in middle school when a 15 year old who stole his father's gun and thought he was some sort of gangster with it decided he'd try and be tough, luckily he didn't know what he was doing, and had horrible aim.

Now, I know some of those people who experienced that middle school incident are completely anti-gun. My take on it... The kid wasn't a licensed gun owner, he stole his father's gun. I do feel that gun owners should be licensed, and new gun owners should be required to attend some sort of training on handling, firing, and respecting the weapon you will soon own, and I fully support background checks.

Now, taking away our right to have guns... Those who want to use them for the WRONG reasons will find a way to get access to one if they really want to.

I'm still on the fence about automatic weapons.
kurty[B] is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 06:57 PM   #64 (permalink)
Illusionary
 
tecoyah's Avatar
 
Fired guns....and sold guns (legally at retail).
If current laws were enforced adequately....I would have no problem with individual gun ownership. I do however....dislike Charleton Heston....lol

I will not own a gun....as I have kids.
__________________
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
tecoyah is offline  
 

Tags
experience, firearm, politics


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:04 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360