Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


View Poll Results: Have you ever fired a firearm, and do you consider yourself generally pro/anti gun?
I have fired a gun, and I consider myself pro-gun. 34 53.97%
I have not fired a gun, and I consider myself pro-gun. 6 9.52%
I have fired a gun, and I consider myself anti-gun. 11 17.46%
I have not fired a gun, and I consider myself anti-gun. 12 19.05%
Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-02-2004, 10:11 PM   #1 (permalink)
BFG Builder
 
Location: University of Maryland
Firearm Experience and Politics

I'm curious. How many members of TFP have fired a firearm? Of those who have and have not, what is the distribution of pro/anti gun status? I'm mostly interested in the hypothetically nonstereotypical combinations; people who are pro-gun but have not fired a gun, and people who have fired a gun but consider themselves anti-gun.

So have you ever fired a gun, and do you generally consider yourself pro or anti-gun?

I have fired guns before, and I consider myself pro-gun. I believe the US should be a "shall-issue" country for concealed carry permits, and that the only gun legislation truly required is the National Firearms Act of 1934.
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, you must be having an orgasm.
DelayedReaction is offline  
Old 07-02-2004, 10:19 PM   #2 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
I have used all sorts of weapons, and I see no reason that a responsible adult should not be allowed to own one and carry it under most circumstances.
MSD is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 12:10 AM   #3 (permalink)
Insane
 
I am neither anti-gun nor pro-gun. I am anti pro-gun.
hammer4all is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 12:19 AM   #4 (permalink)
WoW or Class...
 
BigGov's Avatar
 
Location: UWW
Quote:
Originally posted by hammer4all
I am neither anti-gun nor pro-gun. I am anti pro-gun.
Then please elaborate.

I have fired a gun, and I see no reason for a person to be restricted from owning and using a gun safely and legally.

I live in Wisconsin, in an area where guns are plentiful. Easily in half the houses. I know many people who have used guns. I do not know of a single person killed or even remotely seriously harmed by a gun.
__________________
One day an Englishman, a Scotsman, and an Irishman walked into a pub together. They each bought a pint of Guinness. Just as they were about to enjoy their creamy beverage, three flies landed in each of their pints. The Englishman pushed his beer away in disgust. The Scotsman fished the fly out of his beer and continued drinking it, as if nothing had happened. The Irishman, too, picked the fly out of his drink but then held it out over the beer and yelled "SPIT IT OUT, SPIT IT OUT, YOU BASTARD!"
BigGov is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 01:09 AM   #5 (permalink)
undead
 
Pacifier's Avatar
 
Location: Duisburg, Germany
I fired a gun, still I'm sort of anti-gun.
I see no reason for a private person to be armed to the teeth.
__________________
"It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere. Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death
— Albert Einstein
Pacifier is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 01:30 AM   #6 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
firearmed and pro-gun.
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 01:30 AM   #7 (permalink)
Junkie
 
I've fired guns, but I don't own one or have any plans to get one. Nevertheless, I fully support the Constitutional right of individuals to bear arms.
SinisterMotives is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 05:11 AM   #8 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Sydney, Australia
I'm not black or white on this issue; I'm not American and I don't live under that thing called the Second Amendment.

Instead, I see a lot of shades of grey - arcane policy questions about the degree and method of regulation. Even when I was at school a few years back (in my country where guns are "banned") the rifle club guys could still carry weapons across the grounds from the vault to the range without the whole nation engaging in emotive cultural warfare.

Having said all that, I've fired a .22 living in a democracy and an M16 while on holidays in an authoritarian country. They were interesting tools to use but I didn't get all emotional. I'm just barely anti-gun. Hey, I'm a gun "agnostic".
Macheath is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 08:02 AM   #9 (permalink)
Upright
 
I have not fired a gun. I'm not against firing them, I just haven't had the opportunity. I am aware that certain regulations need to be made in today's society to allow it, but when the explicit right TO own firearms is put in front of our faces, it seems kindof rediculous to simply cut it out. I mean, the 2nd amendment..what that tells me is it was pretty high on list of priorities, and if the writers/founders of the Constitution made it such a priority, it would seem blasphemous to cut it out.
bodymassage3 is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 08:12 AM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
I own several guns, have fired them and am Pro 2nd Amendment.

A gun is a tool. It is neutral, neither inherently good or bad. The use to which it is put is what imparts a moral distinction.

Shooting a pedophile caught raping a child = Good

Shooting a clerk at the Circle K while robbing the cash register = Bad
wonderwench is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 09:32 AM   #11 (permalink)
Junkie
 
highthief's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
I don't think I quite fit any of those definitions. I carried a gun on the job for a while a number of years ago (armed security work). I think people should be able to have firearms, but I do agree with licensing and registration, background checks, trigger locks and limits on things like hollow points and fully automatic weapons.
__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum.
highthief is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 09:54 AM   #12 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i have been finding that the question of whether you grew up around guns/hunting/etc or not explains alot about the politics of gun control, and that this experience and its implications cuts across all other political lines....i did not grow up around guns and it to some extent explains my wariness of them in particular and in general. i also live in a city--and have for most of my life--and seeing folk packing in a city is not the same as it might be elsewhere
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 10:13 AM   #13 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
It's very telling when people with no experience of something are opposed to it.
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 10:24 AM   #14 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i have some experience with guns, art--if you were referring to me---but i did not live in a rural area, and hunting (for example) was not a part of my childhood--except with a bow and arrow, which i would do.

on the other hand, art, you have to admit that if you live in a city the hunting option is kinda reduced and the gun looks quite different--if you are carrying a gun to hunt--that is to kill something---in a rural space, you could be hunting any number of things--carrying in a city means you are most likely hunting people, or worried about being hunted. not the same space, not the same meanings. situation rather than experience, in this case.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 10:25 AM   #15 (permalink)
it's jam
 
splck's Avatar
 
Location: Lowerainland BC
I've shot lots of firearms since I was a child, own several and feel comfortable using them. However, the thought of an armed society doesn't sit well with me. I never feel very safe while visiting the USA (justifiable or not, this is how I feel).
I'm glad carrying concealed weapons is not allowed in my country (it just isn’t needed around here, thankfully).
__________________
nice line eh?
splck is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 10:39 AM   #16 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally posted by roachboy
on the other hand, art, you have to admit that if you live in a city the hunting option is kinda reduced and the gun looks quite different--if you are carrying a gun to hunt--that is to kill something---in a rural space, you could be hunting any number of things--carrying in a city means you are most likely hunting people, or worried about being hunted. not the same space, not the same meanings. situation rather than experience, in this case.

B'loney. I live in a city. I do not hunt people. The other gun owners of my acquaintance do not hunt people. The overwhelming majority of gun owners are careful and responsible.

I enjoy target shooting; it is fun.
wonderwench is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 10:43 AM   #17 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
edit.....

if you are carrying a gun TO HUNT--that is to kill something---in a rural space, you could be hunting any number of things--carrying in a city means you are most likely hunting people

wasnt talking about target shooting. geez.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 10:45 AM   #18 (permalink)
Banned
 
When law-abiding people carry a gun in a city it is for self-protection.
wonderwench is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 11:00 AM   #19 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
Note: Unless I state otherwise, my comments are always directed toward general trends and opinions in threads and not directed toward specific posters. That's how I operate on forums.
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 01:13 PM   #20 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i should add that i do not have a consistent position on gun control matters---i have come to understand that much of my position comes from my background and intuitions based on that, and i havent done the research to get beyond that....so iam agnostic on the matter.

besides, i thought this was the thrust of the thread--i was writing to confirm that so far as i can figure out, there is a direct correlation past experience/background--positions on/about guns.

so i wrote before from my unease about guns in a city.
i did not pretend to have a comprehensive mystical intuition about why everyone who carries one might carry one.
what i will say is that i would feel alot safer in the city where i live if i knew that there were few-to-no guns.

but then again, if i was neurotic about the matter of safety, i would not every day ride my bicycle in the city--given how i lead my life, i have a much better chance of getting hit by some fuckwit in a car than being hurt by a gun. as for drivers versus cyclists...totally off topic i know.....but dont get me started..........
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 06:33 PM   #21 (permalink)
Upright
 
One could say that "people only carry guns in cities to defend themselves from people in the city who also have guns." Well, you can just as easily get attacked/killed by a person with a knife/blunt weapon, or even their bare-hands.
bodymassage3 is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 06:58 PM   #22 (permalink)
Mencken
 
Scipio's Avatar
 
Location: College
I think your question is of questionable value. Things aren't really black and white, and I think you already know what point you're trying to make. If I were you, I'd just argue it.

That said:

I think you can put gun owners into three broad categories:

1. Recreational users, like hunters and target shooters

2. People who purchase guns for protection

3. Criminals who use guns for protection and intimidation (and for shooting people, though they're a minority; I assume most criminals prefer to get what they want without murdering people.)

I suspect that a sizeable majority supports gun ownership for the first category (or wouldn't take their guns away). I'd even guess that it's an 80-90% majority. I also suspect that nearly 100% of people would want the third group, criminals, to not have guns.

To me, the gray area is in the middle. People who just have guns laying around. People who don't really know how to use them. People who might not really need them. These are the people who have firearm accidents in their homes, who try to shoot criminals, but accidentally hit innocent bystanders or family members.

To me, gun ownership by these people ought to be discouraged. They have every right to own one, but they endanger themselves and others when they choose to buy one.

So that's me; keep guns away from criminals, let responsible people own them, promote education, and discourage people who don't really need guns from having them.
__________________
"Erections lasting more than 4 hours, though rare, require immediate medical attention."
Scipio is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 07:02 PM   #23 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
My feelings about guns are too complicated to represent with simple for or against thinking. I have fired many guns and I find it an enjoyable experience. I don't own guns, though, nor do I plan on purchasing one.

I agree that the 2nd amendment does guarantee our right to bear arms as a protection from a tyrannical government, so I can't support any kind of roundup of guns, but I also wouldn't shed a tear if 99% of all guns (and the human propensity for violence...it has to be a package deal) disappeared tomorrow.

Until Superman or Jesus comes down and takes away our passion for killing each other, call me conflicted.

Edit: Come to think of it, if we could stop killing each other, than why not have guns?

Last edited by cthulu23; 07-03-2004 at 08:02 PM..
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 08:03 PM   #24 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: Boston, MAss., USA
Ok, I've fired mutliple types of guns, from shotguns for skeet, to 9mm pistols and M-16A2's (both semi and fully auto), and I have to say that I'm more aolng the lines of pro-gun than anti. I'd love to see a world where guns in general aren't necessary, but I'm also enough of a realist to know that sometime a gun is the best, and somethimes only defense available.
My mother is a better shot than I am with a handgun (thanks to being left handed and right eye dominant), and I'm glad to know that she can have a handgun in her house, and that she knows how to use if , if necessary.

Personally, I see a simple easy to understnad technological answer to the problem: Wheel locks. See, in the local supermarkets, when you take the cart outside the local supermarket, they stop working, because a radio transmitter there "tells" the cart that it's gone beyond it's usefull range, and a wheel lock kicks in, stopping it from working. Now, why can't people who want handguns for protection for their homes have the same thing? Say, you buy a home, or condo, or apartment. You get a gun, and it comes with a locking mechanism that, if you take it outside your home area, disables the firing mechanism? Poeple who want the handgun for protection have it, but they can't take the gun outside to use on the neighbors, or whomever.
You could also extend the concept to recreational hunters and the like, setup areas where the gun works only if they're inside a zone where the gun receives a signal OK'ing it to work, or after it's passed through a "reader" of some sort that ok's it for use for a specific time frame, or in a specific region.

I could definitely see where something like this would be disapproved of, second amendment-wise, but it would maybe ease the idea of gun ownership being an inherently evil thing for some people, since the guns would be designated for uses they were intended for.
__________________
I'm gonna be rich and famous, as soon I invent a device that lets you stab people in the face over the internet.
JohnnyRoyale is offline  
Old 07-03-2004, 10:59 PM   #25 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ARTelevision
It's very telling when people with no experience of something are opposed to it.
Sometimes I just love this guy. Well said.

Last edited by analog; 07-03-2004 at 11:03 PM..
analog is offline  
Old 07-04-2004, 04:47 AM   #26 (permalink)
undead
 
Pacifier's Avatar
 
Location: Duisburg, Germany
Quote:
Originally posted by ARTelevision
It's very telling when people with no experience of something are opposed to it.
so you think someone should have fired a gun to see the problems involved with gun-ownership?

do you also think that some need to try hard drugs to oppose drug use?
__________________
"It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere. Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death
— Albert Einstein

Last edited by Pacifier; 07-04-2004 at 04:51 AM..
Pacifier is offline  
Old 07-04-2004, 07:13 AM   #27 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
I didn't use the word "should" and I won't be responding to a position I did not take.

I said "It's very telling...."
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 07-04-2004, 07:39 AM   #28 (permalink)
Unbelievable
 
cj2112's Avatar
 
Location: Grants Pass OR
I have owned and fired various guns. Myself and my children are active members of our local gun club, and shoot at the clubs range at least once a month. Between that information, and my signature, one can make an educated guess about my stand on the issue.
cj2112 is offline  
Old 07-04-2004, 08:47 PM   #29 (permalink)
Muffled
 
Kadath's Avatar
 
Location: Camazotz
Quote:
Originally posted by ARTelevision
It's very telling when people with no experience of something are opposed to it.
That's fair, although not always applicable. I've never raped or been raped, yet I am opposed to that. You may call that a strawman if you like.

Also, "anti-gun" is like saying "pro-abortion." I am not anti-gun. I am for gun control.
__________________
it's quiet in here
Kadath is offline  
Old 07-04-2004, 10:57 PM   #30 (permalink)
No Avatar, No Sig.
 
Gotta agree with Kadath here. There's no reason that one has to have fired a gun to be opposed to them. What extra information might one collect from firing a gun? Would that be guarateed to change one's mind? I don't think it tells us anything, in fact I think your own bias is showing Art.

I was raised around guns (loaded gun in every room when I was a kid) own several and shoot them. It's fun, but I can still see their detrimental effects on society. Am I anti-gun? No. I don't think anyone should be allowed to own a full automatic weapon, but that doesn't make me anti-gun. Neither am I pro-gun, unless by that you mean that I think people should be able to buy guns for target shooting and hunting and collecting.

Perhaps that makes me gun-neutral.
Wax_off is offline  
Old 07-04-2004, 11:45 PM   #31 (permalink)
Eh?
 
Stare At The Sun's Avatar
 
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
I have fired a gun, and am very pro gun.

I feel that it is almost your responsibility to own a gun in America. Not only to protect yourself, and your home, but to let the government know that the people are still armed, and won't be walked all over.
Stare At The Sun is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 02:11 AM   #32 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
I've observed that there is a higher degree of credibility that is nearly universally granted by normative humans to those with experience in a subject. I'm sure you've noticed this in life.
There are many people against drugs, for example. But in general, a person who has battled addiction and comes back with a strong anti-drug message is typically granted more credibility.

Perhaps there's a notion that I'm implying one can't have an opinion at all without experience. Well, this forum, filled as it is with countless informed and uninformed opinions on many subjects, certainly makes it obvious to even me that anyone can have an opinion on anything.

My point has to do with the amount of credibility that humans generally ascribe to those with experience in a subject. This is a no-brainer, when you think of it.
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 03:08 AM   #33 (permalink)
Wah
 
Location: NZ
guns don't kill people, people do
i am anti-killing people
therefore i am anti-people
__________________
pain is inevitable but misery is optional - stick a geranium in your hat and be happy
apeman is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 04:00 AM   #34 (permalink)
Right Now
 
Location: Home
I'd like to hear more from the "I have not fired a gun, and I consider myself anti-gun" sector. What factors led you there, short of the actual first hand evidence you lack?

I'm a gun owner and operator.

One of my favorite T-shirts:
Quote:
Guns Don't Kill People.
I do.
Peetster is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 04:41 AM   #35 (permalink)
undead
 
Pacifier's Avatar
 
Location: Duisburg, Germany
What kind of evidence or experience do I need to be allowed to be anti gun?

do I need to have killed someone? so I can say "gee, I can really kill with this"

or do I need to have a fatal accident in my family?

or should I try to be around a gang shooting or a robbery?
__________________
"It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere. Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death
— Albert Einstein
Pacifier is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 05:24 AM   #36 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
Obviously, one doesn't need anything at all to be anti-gun.

How much credibility one's position is granted by others is the prerogative of the others' in question.

Opinions are free. Credibility is earned.
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 06:16 AM   #37 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ARTelevision
There are many people against drugs, for example. But in general, a person who has battled addiction and comes back with a strong anti-drug message is typically granted more credibility.
Conversely, if someone has used drugs and does not consider them to be a life-destroying scourge, then they have less credibility in many American's minds. It seems that it isn't just the experience that gives credibility but whether or not an expected conclusion about said experiences was reached.
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 06:22 AM   #38 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Within the Woods
I have never fired a gun designed to kill people/animals. I have used airguns, but that's it.

I have never seen a gun IRL, unless you coun't one in a holster on a police.

I'm anti-gun.

800 000 swedes have a license to own a gun. (2000) To get a firearms license you need to get a hunter's exam or be a cop.
__________________
There seem to be countless rituals and cultural beliefs designed to alleviate their fear of a simple biological truth - all organisms eventually perish.

Mehoni is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 06:51 AM   #39 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
cthulu23, absolutely.
What I'm saying is that each individual grants credibility to sources and opinions according to personal standards. There is some measurable commonality to how folks tend to do that sort of thing.

Here's an example that goes to the point of this.

One of the advocates of increased gun control legislation that I give a great deal of credibility to is former Assistant to the President and White House Press Secretary, James S. Brady. Why do I ascribe an extra dose of credibility to his position? Because he was a victim of gun violence. And he was motivated to study and research the issues in an especially personal way.

As to the largest reason for my continued opposition to additional gun control legislation - in my opinion, we have more than sufficient regulation and legislation already on the books. The need is not for more legislation. The need is for enforcement of existing laws and regulations.

As always in this forum and on this board, I am not debating anything. I'm simply stating my positions as regards topics under discussion.

I do note that many people are interested in debating things here.
I'm not one of them.
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 07-05-2004, 07:51 AM   #40 (permalink)
Muffled
 
Kadath's Avatar
 
Location: Camazotz
Pacifier, therein lies the problem with the poll. It only had room to ask if you had fired a gun, not if you had other experience with it. My cousin shot his wife to death in front of their children; that is part of the reason I arrived at my current stance. I suppose if I fired a gun I would know more about firing guns, but I doubt it would make me want to own one.
__________________
it's quiet in here
Kadath is offline  
 

Tags
experience, firearm, politics

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:58 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360