Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-28-2007, 05:34 AM   #81 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
So a few "innocent" people die. Big deal. Innocent people die every day on the outside
whoever said this clearly has no understanding of why the judicial system was set up the way it was by patriots of this country.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 06:13 AM   #82 (permalink)
Junkie
 
highthief's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaniFaye
Im curious to know from those that oppose the death penalty.....do you think no one should ever be executed? ever? for any reason? or is it just against the american death penalty?

For example....should Saddam Hussein have been hung?
I'd like to see the death penalty abolished all over the place, including Iraq, but yes, it would be nice if the US would join the rest of the Western world and abolish it.

So, no, I don't agree with hanging Saddam. Justice must be applied equally to all - from gangsters to domestic murderers to those guilty of war crimes.
__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum.
highthief is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 06:40 AM   #83 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by highthief

So, no, I don't agree with hanging Saddam. Justice must be applied equally to all - from gangsters to domestic murderers to those guilty of war crimes.
What an interesting word. Justice.

We can join the rest of the free world I suppose and abolish the death penalty.

But again...justice.

dictionary.com has this as the 5th meaning and the one that applies here...

5. the administering of deserved punishment or reward.

So what is the deserved punishment for murder? For 10 murders? For a 100? For a million?

For some of you, apparently its life in prison. Now I can't say that life in prison would be a happy time, but how many of you will be committing suicide rather than face a life in prison? Not to many.

Where there is life, there is hope. Maybe I could escape, maybe a bunch of hippie types get on the state supreme court and change the life without parole law with their typical judicial activism, maybe I finally work on the writing I've been putting off for 10 years.

But justice? No, my victims, they are gone, dead, no life, but me, I'd have hope, and in my view, an undeserved hope.

You can oppose the death penalty based on human error, I can respect that, but don't talk about justice while doing so.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 07:17 AM   #84 (permalink)
will always be an Alyson Hanniganite
 
Bill O'Rights's Avatar
 
Location: In the dust of the archives
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crompsin
Nothing, especially the legal system, is 100% anything. Death penalty is about justice and general deterrence. 90% "rightness" would be acceptable to me. So a few "innocent" people die. Big deal.
To me...that 10% is a big deal. If 1 out of every 10 executions was that of an inncent person, that is abysmal. 1 out of 1000 is too many.
Look. If your wife, or girlfriend, disappears, or turns up dead, guess who they're going to focus on. All investigation will be conducted to gain a conviction of the most likely suspect. You. There will be little, if any, effort expended to ascertain what really happened. Evidence that is contradictory to the prefered theory will be overlooked and ignored. The prosecutor wants a quick win, to add to his resume when it comes time to run for State Attorney General. The judge wants to demonstrate how tough he is on crime when it comes time for re-election. Death is a pretty high price to pay, just to be a political pawn.

Are there people out there who deserve to be executed? Oh, you bet your ass there are. But, thier lives are not worth the price of a single innocent person being put to death.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crompsin
Felons who get better treatment than the poor veterans of the Vietnam war (or this war, soon). Warm meals, cushy beds, TeeVee, god knows what else. Our system is so good that some felons commit additional crimes to go back because it is better than being free. What does that tell us about our system?
Now, on this point, I'm with you 100%. Prison time is even a badge of honor with some of these little gang banging thugs, as it gives them "street cred". Prison should be a son-of-a-bitch, where no one ever wants to go. But, that is probably an issue better brought up in another thread.
__________________
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony

"Hedonism with rules isn't hedonism at all, it's the Republican party." - JumpinJesus

It is indisputable that true beauty lies within...but a nice rack sure doesn't hurt.

Last edited by Bill O'Rights; 11-28-2007 at 07:20 AM..
Bill O'Rights is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 07:28 AM   #85 (permalink)
Young Crumudgeon
 
Martian's Avatar
 
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill O'Rights
Now, on this point, I'm with you 100%. Prison time is even a badge of honor with some of these little gang banging thugs, as it gives them "street cred". Prison should be a son-of-a-bitch, where no one ever wants to go. But, that is probably an issue better brought up in another thread.
This is true. The American penal system doesn't seem to be working. Hell, neither does the Canadian one, I'm right there with ya. But really, I don't think the answer is to kill the convicts.

Otherwise, my opinion has been well represented by Bill O'Rights, roachboy et al.
__________________
I wake up in the morning more tired than before I slept
I get through cryin' and I'm sadder than before I wept
I get through thinkin' now, and the thoughts have left my head
I get through speakin' and I can't remember, not a word that I said

- Ben Harper, Show Me A Little Shame
Martian is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 07:37 AM   #86 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
You can oppose the death penalty based on human error, I can respect that, but don't talk about justice while doing so.
Let's not use a dictionary to teach us about justice. We must go beyond even encyclopedic entries.

A deserved punishment for murder is one that restores at least some semblance of harmony to society. Life imprisonment removes guilty parties from free society for an extended period of time. Killing them causes more discord.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 07:39 AM   #87 (permalink)
Junkie
 
highthief's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
You can oppose the death penalty based on human error, I can respect that, but don't talk about justice while doing so.
Justice IS the same for all, or there is no justice. This is basic to free societies. Obviously, different punishments can apply to different crimes but given that I don't agree with a death penalty under any circumstances, I'm not going to make an exception for tin-pot dictators nor for elected presidents. The maximum penalty that should be imposed for any crime is a life time of hard labour - this is more productive than anything else.

Having said all that, Iraq is effectively a third world country these days and it is not surprising they wish to maintain a death penalty and a rather dodgy court system, nor that other nearby nations also cut hands off thieves and whip women who go about with their faces uncovered.
__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum.
highthief is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 07:57 AM   #88 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by highthief
Justice IS the same for all, or there is no justice. This is basic to free societies. Obviously, different punishments can apply to different crimes but given that I don't agree with a death penalty under any circumstances, I'm not going to make an exception for tin-pot dictators nor for elected presidents. The maximum penalty that should be imposed for any crime is a life time of hard labour - this is more productive than anything else.
So you don't agree with the death penalty.

I ask you this, because so far no one else is answering.

Hypothetically someones guilt was 100% in a horrible murder. Why do you feel the death penalty is not appropriate?
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:14 AM   #89 (permalink)
spudly
 
ubertuber's Avatar
 
Location: Ellay
Quote:
Originally Posted by ustwo
I ask you this, because so far no one else is answering.

Hypothetically someones guilt was 100% in a horrible murder. Why do you feel the death penalty is not appropriate?
I haven't been answering all of the individual cases because I think my first post in this thread sums my position up. I'll go farther than your question does. If I were to witness the murder and have first-hand, 100% knowledge of the murderer's identity, I still wouldn't support the death penalty.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ubertuber
No death penalty. Not at all, not ever, not for anyone, not in any case.
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam
ubertuber is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:16 AM   #90 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
I think I've stated my opposition quite clearly more than once.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:19 AM   #91 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ubertuber
I haven't been answering all of the individual cases because I think my first post in this thread sums my position up. I'll go farther than your question does. If I were to witness the murder and have first-hand, 100% knowledge of the murderer's identity, I still wouldn't support the death penalty.
Why?
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:24 AM   #92 (permalink)
I Confess a Shiver
 
Plan9's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
So what is the deserved punishment for murder? For 10 murders? For a 100? For a million?

For some of you, apparently its life in prison. Now I can't say that life in prison would be a happy time, but how many of you will be committing suicide rather than face a life in prison? Not to many.

Where there is life, there is hope. Maybe I could escape, maybe a bunch of hippie types get on the state supreme court and change the life without parole law with their typical judicial activism, maybe I finally work on the writing I've been putting off for 10 years.

But justice? No, my victims, they are gone, dead, no life, but me, I'd have hope, and in my view, an undeserved hope.

You can oppose the death penalty based on human error, I can respect that, but don't talk about justice while doing so.
Somebody oppose this by illustrating the value of human life in this context.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
whoever said this clearly has no understanding of why the judicial system was set up the way it was by patriots of this country.
How's that? I'm sure the "founding fathers" would agree with the death penalty for certain crimes based on the current standard of evidence at "beyond a reasonable doubt."

I like how supporting the death penalty questions my patriotism, too.

...

We're talking about the death penalty for heinous crimes here, right?

I get the feeling a lot of people are forgetting that aspect.

Death Penalty Criteria (3rd grade edition):

A: A particularly brutal crime was committed (murder, rape).
B: There is evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant committed the crime.
C: Society believes that this individual is a threat to lawful citizens.
D: The jury feels that the crime warrants the death penalty.
E: Automatic appeal covers any legal issues are ironed out (in theory).

This, of course, is in the best of all possible worlds.
__________________
Whatever you can carry.

"You should not drink... and bake."

Last edited by Plan9; 11-28-2007 at 08:31 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Plan9 is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:27 AM   #93 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I ask you this, because so far no one else is answering.

Hypothetically someones guilt was 100% in a horrible murder. Why do you feel the death penalty is not appropriate?
See post #86.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:35 AM   #94 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crompsin
How's that? I'm sure the "founding fathers" would agree with the death penalty for certain crimes based on the current standard of evidence at "beyond a reasonable doubt."
The founders supported capital punishment, quite enthusiastically I believe. My statement wasn't about your support of the death penalty, it was about your indifference to the idea that 'so some innocents are executed, so what' that my statement was directed to you.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:36 AM   #95 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
So you would find a murderer innocent because you don't like the law.
I've never not been the smartest guy on a jury. Most other smart people avoid them, you see. It'd be easy to use my unwillingness to kill the guy to get them down to life in prison. No one would be found innocent.
Willravel is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:40 AM   #96 (permalink)
I Confess a Shiver
 
Plan9's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
The founders supported capital punishment, quite enthusiastically I believe. My statement wasn't about your support of the death penalty, it was about your indifference to the idea that 'so some innocents are executed, so what' that my statement was directed to you.
Oh, a bit of tongue-in-cheek commentary to represent the blind polarity here, man.

Some: "No, no, no! Death penalty is all bad and never works and makes baby Jesus cry!"
__________________
Whatever you can carry.

"You should not drink... and bake."
Plan9 is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:49 AM   #97 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
A deserved punishment for murder is one that restores at least some semblance of harmony to society. Life imprisonment removes guilty parties from free society for an extended period of time. Killing them causes more discord.
The only discord I see is from those saying it shouldn't be done.

By that logic if your imprisonment can cause enough social unrest than by default it is best you are let free.

No I see no justice in this logic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
I've never not been the smartest guy on a jury. Most other smart people avoid them, you see. It'd be easy to use my unwillingness to kill the guy to get them down to life in prison. No one would be found innocent.
So if the prosecuting attorney asked if you would support the death penalty under any circumstance in jury selection, how would you answer?
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.

Last edited by Ustwo; 11-28-2007 at 08:51 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 09:27 AM   #98 (permalink)
Junkie
 
highthief's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
So you don't agree with the death penalty.

I ask you this, because so far no one else is answering.

Hypothetically someones guilt was 100% in a horrible murder. Why do you feel the death penalty is not appropriate?
Perhaps for the same reason you support it? What is the basis of your preference for the death penalty?

It conforms with my general world view that we (Western societies at any rate) are evolved cultures and we view the taking of a life as little more than revenge and not either an effective deterrant nor a way to improve society as a whole.

It is the action, the concept, of state-sanctioned murder that offends me and, I think, many others, not the virtues or lack thereof of the convicted party nor of the individual crime.

Do I think the system we have in Canada is perfect? Of course not. I'd like to see hard-labour introduced.

But we've also had Donald Marshall, Steve Truscott, and dozens of others - cases of men convicted of crimes they did not commit and who would be dead in Texas or Florida.

So, for both the concept of state-sanctioned taking of life and the fact that even one innocent death is too much, I do not support the death penalty.

I think of note, when it comes to the nations that support the death penalty, we often equate the US to Iraq or Sudan or some third world hell hole, but perhaps it is also due to the impersonal aspect of crimes in the US due to the A) the amount of crime, and B) the size of the population. Many of the nations with the largest populations support the death penalty and people look upon the death of "just another criminal" a bit more remotely and with detachment.
__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum.

Last edited by highthief; 11-28-2007 at 09:55 AM..
highthief is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 09:31 AM   #99 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
So if the prosecuting attorney asked if you would support the death penalty under any circumstance in jury selection, how would you answer?
I'd tell him I do support the death penalty and of course be referring to the death penalty for the lamb I'd eaten the night before. He'd need to be ridiculously specific in order to get a straight answer out of me.
Willravel is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 09:39 AM   #100 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
I'd tell him I do support the death penalty and of course be referring to the death penalty for the lamb I'd eaten the night before. He'd need to be ridiculously specific in order to get a straight answer out of me.
in this instance, your sole purpose for being incredibly ambiguous unless the prosecutor was ridiculously specific would be simply to ensure that this jury could not mete out a death sentence? in other words, you would lie to see your ideology on the death penalty succeed?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 09:40 AM   #101 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
I'd tell him I do support the death penalty and of course be referring to the death penalty for the lamb I'd eaten the night before. He'd need to be ridiculously specific in order to get a straight answer out of me.
So you would lie under oath (I think juries are sworn in for selection).

And then if it happens you can't manipulate the jury because you happen to not be the smartest guy there for once?

You possess an amazing degree of certainty in your statements.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 10:02 AM   #102 (permalink)
has a plan
 
Hain's Avatar
 
Location: middle of Whywouldanyonebethere
Despite the rage I feel for murders and rapists living in prison eating three hots and sleeping on a cot and getting better health care than my own family only because it would be cruel and unusual to let them suffer illness in prison... I don't support the death penalty. The system isn't perfect, and it is not equal. Men who can afford their own private justice seem to be able to do whatever they feel like doing. That does not make them any less guilty or any less deserving of the punishment fit for them... What we call punishments are more like consequences of actions. The death penalty is a finality---if it cannot be distributed evenly, then it shouldn't be distributed at all, because we can't make up for that punishment.

Even if guilt was 100% possible, I still would not let be them executed: make them work. Somehow scrounge some sort of usefulness out of them for society.

Also, something has to be done about that health care system. My father, whom worked 16 hours a day at the same job on a fixed salary for 25 years, has a bum ticker. He has never done a damn thing wrong in his life... and he can't get that kind of health care prisoners receive? Shit, prisoners can receive state-paid hormone treatments... but my pops can't see a decent doctor for his heart? /rant
__________________

Last edited by Hain; 11-28-2007 at 10:07 AM..
Hain is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 10:08 AM   #103 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
So you would lie under oath (I think juries are sworn in for selection).
You can't possibly think that was a serious answer. Jesus.
"Would you support the death penalty under any circumstance?"
"By support, do you mean, 'Will I ever sentence someone to death'?"
"Well no, I can't actually ask that."


Will wins.
Willravel is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 10:16 AM   #104 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
You can't possibly think that was a serious answer. Jesus.
"Would you support the death penalty under any circumstance?"
"By support, do you mean, 'Will I ever sentence someone to death'?"
"Well no, I can't actually ask that."


Will wins.
you'll be directed to give a yes or no answer will. prosecutors may not be geniuses, but they aren't stupid either. I'm pretty sure they've come across people with your ideology in the past and know how to get the answers they need to choose you or send you home.

will doesn't win.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 10:24 AM   #105 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
you'll be directed to give a yes or no answer will. prosecutors may not be geniuses, but they aren't stupid either. I'm pretty sure they've come across people with your ideology in the past and know how to get the answers they need to choose you or send you home.

will doesn't win.
I absolutely can ask for clarification on a question. Once I have the full question, I would give a yes or no answer, but that's only assuming they're allowed to ask the question. Lawyers are only as successful as the jury is stupid. They count on people not understanding the process in order to use them.
Willravel is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 10:24 AM   #106 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
The only discord I see is from those saying it shouldn't be done.

By that logic if your imprisonment can cause enough social unrest than by default it is best you are let free.

No I see no justice in this logic.
That is because you have used faulty logic. Why not think this through some more?

Just because you personally don't see discord, it doesn't mean it isn't there.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 11:48 AM   #107 (permalink)
Winter is Coming
 
Frosstbyte's Avatar
 
Location: The North
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
I absolutely can ask for clarification on a question. Once I have the full question, I would give a yes or no answer, but that's only assuming they're allowed to ask the question. Lawyers are only as successful as the jury is stupid. They count on people not understanding the process in order to use them.
Yay for ends justifying means. In order to combat what you believe to be an incorrect policy and judicial system, you commit perjury to get yourself on a jury when the attorneys may want to exclude you. Do you also do outside research when you're on a jury to see all of the evidence as opposed to the evidence that jurors are allowed to access?

Important safety tip: You're a juror. You have a specific and prescribed role in the judicial system. If you want to do anything else, get a JD or get elected and stop mucking around with the process in furtherance of your own personal crusade. Obviously the result isn't as extreme, but from a legal perspective it's no different than vigilantism-you're eliminating the legal process and replacing it with your own beliefs.

Last edited by Frosstbyte; 11-28-2007 at 11:52 AM..
Frosstbyte is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 12:05 PM   #108 (permalink)
Junkie
 
highthief's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by highthief
Perhaps for the same reason you support it? What is the basis of your preference for the death penalty?
Hey USTWO - are you going to answer?
__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum.
highthief is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 12:13 PM   #109 (permalink)
has a plan
 
Hain's Avatar
 
Location: middle of Whywouldanyonebethere
@ Frosstbyte:
willravel did just say, "You can't possibly think that was a serious answer. Jesus," and proceeded to mock the system where the lawyer avoids outright saying, "Yes you will be a juror for a trial where your determination can sentence someone to death."

I thought that is what he said but I never was good at making inferences---seriously I am not.
__________________
Hain is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 12:34 PM   #110 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frosstbyte
Yay for ends justifying means. In order to combat what you believe to be an incorrect policy and judicial system, you commit perjury to get yourself on a jury when the attorneys may want to exclude you. Do you also do outside research when you're on a jury to see all of the evidence as opposed to the evidence that jurors are allowed to access?
You may not be aware of this elusive fact, but asking for clarification for a question isn't exactly the same as perjury. I know. Crazy, right? What I'm actually doing (for those who care to read what I wrote) is preventing the lawyer from asking what amounts to an illegal question by purposefully being vague about it. I'm essentially saying "What you're actually asking is illegal". By asking for clarification, they either have to tell the truth and admit that their question was illegal or they have to change the question and thus make it something I can answer but that has nothing to do with me and the death penalty.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frosstbyte
Important safety tip: You're a juror. You have a specific and prescribed role in the judicial system. If you want to do anything else, get a JD or get elected and stop mucking around with the process in furtherance of your own personal crusade. Obviously the result isn't as extreme, but from a legal perspective it's no different than vigilantism-you're eliminating the legal process and replacing it with your own beliefs.
I'm fixing the mess that lazy people who don't know shit about the process make by their ignorance. Shame on me!

BTW, "vigilantism"? If you knew what you were talking about, you'd know that was actually perfectly legal. Google "jury nullification". The google "I don't know anything about the legal system".
Willravel is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:09 PM   #111 (permalink)
will always be an Alyson Hanniganite
 
Bill O'Rights's Avatar
 
Location: In the dust of the archives
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Lawyers are only as successful as the jury is stupid.
Well...I'm not sure that I'd have phrased it quite that way...but...yeah.
A jury of my peers? Exactly.
__________________
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony

"Hedonism with rules isn't hedonism at all, it's the Republican party." - JumpinJesus

It is indisputable that true beauty lies within...but a nice rack sure doesn't hurt.
Bill O'Rights is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:25 PM   #112 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill O'Rights
Well...I'm not sure that I'd have phrased it quite that way...but...yeah.
A jury of my peers? Exactly.
What I mean to say is the dishonest lawyer will never be successful so long as there's at least one juror who has an idea of what's really going on. If all 12 are there with no clue of what's going on, the dishonest lawyer is likely to get away with stuff, though.
Willravel is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:33 PM   #113 (permalink)
Winter is Coming
 
Frosstbyte's Avatar
 
Location: The North
I know very well what jury nullification is, thanks, but you misrepresenting your beliefs in order to get on a jury to "force" the jury to come to the resolution that you've decided BEFORE THE TRIAL is not jury nullification. That's you taking your outside thoughts and beliefs into the jury box, ignoring the attorneys and then convincing the rest of the jurors to agree with you, effectively trying to act as attorney, judge and juror which sounds remarkably like vigilantism to me.
Frosstbyte is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:37 PM   #114 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
You can't possibly think that was a serious answer. Jesus.
"Would you support the death penalty under any circumstance?"
"By support, do you mean, 'Will I ever sentence someone to death'?"
"Well no, I can't actually ask that."


Will wins.
If you say so, but I didn't think you were serious in thinking a vasectomy would lower testosterone levels either
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:41 PM   #115 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frosstbyte
I know very well what jury nullification is, thanks, but you misrepresenting your beliefs in order to get on a jury to "force" the jury to come to the resolution that you've decided BEFORE THE TRIAL is not jury nullification.
You're misunderstanding the situation. Lawyers aren't allowed to ask "If you're on the jury, will you allow the death penalty?" In order to get around that rule, they make the question more vague. It's none of their fucking business what I believe in, as it's my right to bring my philosophy onto the jury. I'm not misrepresenting anything, I'm just not going to tell them what they're not allowed to ask for. I'm not allowing them to cheat. Or do you think that people who are against the death penalty not be on a jury where it's a possibility? Isn't that kinda dishonest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frosstbyte
That's you taking your outside thoughts and beliefs into the jury box, ignoring the attorneys and then convincing the rest of the jurors to agree with you, effectively trying to act as attorney, judge and juror which sounds remarkably like vigilantism to me.
My beliefs aren't against the law, so they're allowed. It's not illegal for a juror to say the death penalty isn't the right punishment. If the person is guilty, then we all agree that life in prison would be the best way to go. Besides, I'm a pretty fair guy. Anyone would be lucky to get me on their jury instead of some idiot who doesn't understand that he's being toyed around with by the lawyers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
If you say so, but I didn't think you were serious in thinking a vasectomy would lower testosterone levels either
They can, just not nearly as often as I figured. Still, touche.

Last edited by Willravel; 11-28-2007 at 01:41 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Willravel is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:42 PM   #116 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by highthief
Hey USTWO - are you going to answer?
So many hours in the day, and this is my past time between patients. Now you have to wait extra time for being pushy and impatient, thats not polite.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:42 PM   #117 (permalink)
Winter is Coming
 
Frosstbyte's Avatar
 
Location: The North
Your beliefs are not illegal, but making decisions about any part of a case before you've heard the evidence or the arguments undermines the entire purpose of an adversarial legal system presented to an impartial jury of peers.

I want jurors to do their job in the case at hand and not be activists for causes in an improper venue. I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree about that and hope we're never on one another's juries.

Last edited by Frosstbyte; 11-28-2007 at 01:45 PM..
Frosstbyte is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:49 PM   #118 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frosstbyte
Your beliefs are not illegal, but making decisions about any part of a case before you've heard the evidence or the arguments undermines the entire purpose of an adversarial legal system presented to an impartial jury of peers.
I'm not making a decision about the case, I'm just setting aside specifics when it comes to sentencing. There's a huge difference there. I'm still totally impartial about hearing the cases and making my decision (guilty or not guilty). That's what impartiality is all about.
Willravel is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:54 PM   #119 (permalink)
has a plan
 
Hain's Avatar
 
Location: middle of Whywouldanyonebethere
What decision has he made? He has no preconceived notions pertaining to the guilt of the person to be on trail. The only thing he has brought is his legal belief that there is no reason to punish by death. If the lawyer refuses to specify whether or not the case warrants the death penalty, Will has every right to refuse to answering the lawyers question. As I noted about his previous comment before: he was joking.
__________________
Hain is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 02:04 PM   #120 (permalink)
Winter is Coming
 
Frosstbyte's Avatar
 
Location: The North
As his multiple statements to the contrary evidence, while he may have been joking about that exact phraseology, he was in no way joking about the underlying principle.

As for what decision he's made, he has decided ahead of time that he would not give the death penalty no matter what the circumstances presented to him were. While that doesn't affect his impartiality in the guilty/not guilty part of the process, he has made a decision about sentencing, which is another part of the process in which we expect jury neutrality and impartiality. Where juries are allowed to make determinations of death sentences, they should be just as impartial about the sentence as they are about guilt. Going into the trial knowing that you won't give it under any circumstances makes you by definition not impartial.
Frosstbyte is offline  
 

Tags
death, penalty


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:20 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360