Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
I absolutely can ask for clarification on a question. Once I have the full question, I would give a yes or no answer, but that's only assuming they're allowed to ask the question. Lawyers are only as successful as the jury is stupid. They count on people not understanding the process in order to use them.
|
Yay for ends justifying means. In order to combat what you believe to be an incorrect policy and judicial system, you commit perjury to get yourself on a jury when the attorneys may want to exclude you. Do you also do outside research when you're on a jury to see all of the evidence as opposed to the evidence that jurors are allowed to access?
Important safety tip: You're a juror. You have a specific and prescribed role in the judicial system. If you want to do anything else, get a JD or get elected and stop mucking around with the process in furtherance of your own personal crusade. Obviously the result isn't as extreme, but from a legal perspective it's no different than vigilantism-you're eliminating the legal process and replacing it with your own beliefs.