06-20-2008, 07:18 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Baltimore MD
|
no ferrari/lambo in Gran Turismo
i've always wondered this, and i've only played GT3 and 4, but why are there no ferrari's or lamborghini's (or porches other than RUF)? is it that they didn't feel they needed them? will ferrari et al not allow them to do so? what's the story? i can't help but feel the game is lacking a little without these historic staples of racing.
__________________
-Tim- ~I swear sometimes i feel like i'm married to a child. ~You better watch who you're calling a child, Lois, cause if i'm a child than you know what that makes you? a pedophile. and i'll be damned if i'm going to stand here and be lectured by a pervert. |
06-20-2008, 07:23 AM | #2 (permalink) |
Knight of the Old Republic
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
|
I'm sure it's due to licensing BS.
I personally haven't enjoyed the series as much since GT2 due to supercars being the only type of cars in the game. GT2 seemed funner because you got to buy a $10k shitcan and then mod it out and put turbokits on them to make them fast. You got good with your own car and competed against the supercars using your sleeper. You even got to put decals and bodykits on your car and see how the engine was modified. It feels like something is missing from the latest GTs and I think it's a lack of "regular" cars that GT2 had. The series still has awesome controls and tracks and graphics but I think they took out one of the best aspects of the series since 2. Racing with supercars just isn't the same. |
06-20-2008, 07:33 AM | #3 (permalink) | |
Lover - Protector - Teacher
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel |
|
06-20-2008, 07:36 AM | #4 (permalink) |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
From a licensing perspective GT was an administrative nightmare. I'm pretty sure of it based on the deals that I'm looking at now for just book publishing.
I didn't realize that GT3 and forward had changed that model from being able to drive the shitcans... I loved that part. Being able to drive a vehicle I can normally drive, hard and fast, like I wouldn't in real life made it much more real for me. and here I was waiting for the right time to get a PS3 for that very game.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
06-21-2008, 04:06 AM | #5 (permalink) |
I'm a family man - I run a family business.
Location: Wilson, NC
|
GT3 and GT4 had the older cars as well. They just didn't have the "racing modification" option that you could choose in GT2 to turn your car INTO a supercar.
You could still mod out your shitcan and make it fast - but not to the point of competing with $100,000 cars like in GT2. GT4 had shitcans a plenty!
__________________
Off the record, on the q.t., and very hush-hush. |
Tags |
ferrari or lambo, gran, turismo |
|
|