ironpham

It's looking like there's a countdown on the Blizzard webpage. It's been a while since they've released a new game. This could possibly be exciting depending on the game (please God, not World of Starcraft). What do you guys think?

Personally, I'd be happy with just a Starcraft 2 or a Diablo 3.

Willravel

If it's not Starcraft 2 or Diablo 3 (with a fully orchestrated soundtrack), Blizzard has lost me. WoW was almost as boring as DAOC, SC: Ghost has taken like 35 years and is still in development, and one of the greatest games of all time, Starcraft, wasn't given the same treatment as Warcraft in the form of sequels. God knows we have enough novels about the Xel'naga to throw together a decent storyline, and we know they can make an engaging strategy game.

n0nsensical

Starcraft 2. It'll be like printing money.

ironpham

Well to be fair, Starcraft came out after WC2, and for a little while there, there seemed to be an order in which the games were coming out (WC2, SC, D2, WC3). I guess WoW is a sequel, but I don't think SC in it's current form would lend itself to being an MMO. Warcraft had 2 clear cut factions with several different races in each. Starcraft had 3 factions, but there weren't really races in each. Also, each faction had it's own good and evil side within. To be honest, I wouldn't know how to make that into an MMO.

Back to the original point, the most likely game would be SC2 which is really what I'm hoping for.

n0nsensical

I think a Starcraft MMO would only cannibalize WoW at this point. People only have one life to give and I doubt there's a big untapped market of potential MMO players who are just waiting for one based on Starcraft. Then again, the profit margins of popular MMOs may be large enough to justify running two even if there's some overlap of playerbase. We have a good idea of the income from MMOs, but I'm very curious how much it actually costs to develop and operate one.

Also I don't think we'll see a Diablo 3 for a while because of the demise of Blizzard North. With Starcraft just sitting there begging for a sequel and the Ghost project failing it seems like the obvious move.

Frosstbyte

SC would lend itself to a VERY DIFFERENT MMO than WoW. Think blizzard does SW: Galaxies instead of blizzard does EQ. However, there's not a snowball's chance in hell blizzard is releasing another MMO until WoW starts to really go downhill. With just one xpac and several million subscribers who disagree with will's assessment of the game, I see no reason nor chance blizzard will try to compete with itself for the MMO market.

SC: Ghost is DOA. As far as I know, it's been axed for good. Blizzard outsourced and was displeased with what they served up so they simply took the hit and laid it to rest (if only 3drealms would be so kind as to do the same with Duke 4).

D3 and SC2 are the very obvious choices, but blizzard could be cooking up something delicious and new. I'm very very interested to see what they'll be offering up for my future consumption. For my money, I'm guessing RTS, since while Diablo certainly isn't WoW, it's pretty dang close and we've been without a new RTS from them for some few years. I'll go with SC2 or a new RTS in a new universe. We'll just have to see.

skier

Quoted for sad truth


I'm hoping for a revitalization of the RTS genre, currently while RTS games are getting prettier, nearly all the developments in the genre are an increase in complexity while attempting to balance micromanagement. Or at least that's the way it's seemed to me. Case in point supreme commander... while complexity is not necessarily a bad thing, the level of management required to successfully compete online almost changes it from being a game to a job. As an addition to that, i haven't noticed a balanced strategy game where the different races/armies/etc played completely different yet were balanced like starcraft was

__________________
"Asking a bomb squad if an old bomb is still "real" is not the best thing to do if you want to save it." - denim

Shauk

it's SC2.

couple of online sources.

xepherys

Shauk, I think that may be more wishful thinking on the part of those hosts. i see a Diablo coming before a SC. For those die-hard SC fans, it's the be-all, end-all of gaming. However, WC and Diablo have MUCH larger fan bases and sold far more copies than SC. *shrug*

Personally, I can't stand SC. Playing it is akin to watching ice freeze... around my body. However, Blizzard very rarely displeases me. Even an SC2 might be worthwhile... we shall see.

__________________
The prospect of achieving a peace agreement with the extremist group of MILF is almost impossible...
-- Emmanuel Pinol, Governor of Cotobato

My Homepage

Willravel

Oh, I wasn't speaking to the timeline, simply that WC got sequels and SC didn't. WC came out in like 94, which was 4 years before Starcraft. My thought was always that SC was the son of and should have been the successor of WC, as it was the superior strategy game. As such, after SC should have been SC2, then SC:Ghost, then, from those moneys, they folow up Diablo and WC in one swoop. By the time WoW would have come out, Blizzard would almost have a monopoly.

But I digress....here's to hoping for SC2, or at least another Diablo.

MexicanOnABike

if they make sc2 the same as wc3, i don't want it.

__________________

- Movie Reviews - Ratings-

Willravel

WC3 is already outdated. If they're smart they'll head in the direction of Command and Conquer, but include a wider array of gameplay.

BurntToast

Hey now... don't forget about The Lost Vikings. Blizzard has not given them any love in a long time.

Oh and I forgot about this article on IGN. Looks like an MMO for sure

__________________
The taint. Conveniently located between the snack bar and the dumpster.

Willravel

They love spreading hiring rumors. Blizzard has been doing that for years. I remember when words like "high interest sequel" and "space cinimatics" were common, suggesting a SC sequel, but it was just their marketing department jerking us around.

BurntToast

Regardless, they are set to make the announcement in Korea this Friday. Guess we will see then.

I hope it is a Lost Vikings MMO. So much fun to be had in that world.

__________________
The taint. Conveniently located between the snack bar and the dumpster.

Willravel

It would make sense. They jumped on Warcraft after the Lord of the Rings, so it makes sense that Pirates of the Crappean would inspire interest in swashbuckling in much the same way.

Lasereth

A few points of interest:

There are job listings on their website for a next-gen MMO in development. This could easily be World of Warcraft on XBox 360 because a lot of people consider the 360 a next-gen console still. It could also be World of Starcraft, but that's extremely unlikely even if I want it to happen.

Starcraft Ghost is a likely product, but it was totally canned due to them not being pleased with it, so I doubt it will make a comeback (even though one of the big reasons it was canned was because they weren't happy with current-gen hardware, which would be fixed by now).

If the product was a next-gen MMO (let's say it's World of Starcraft) it would NOT be a direct competitor to WoW as most people are saying. Blizzard takes 5 fucking years to make their games so any game that they're announcing soon won't come out until at least 2009, and in all probability 2010. An MMORPG game coming out in 2010 isn't a WoW competitor, it's a WoW sequel.

Let us all hold hands and rejoice at the incredible amount of entertainment we get from wondering what the next Blizzard game will be.

__________________
"A Darwinian attacks his theory, seeking to find flaws. An ID believer defends his theory, seeking to conceal flaws." -Roger Ebert

Gabbyness

Here's hoping for Diablo 3! I'm putting my betting money on SC2, however.

__________________
One, two, three, four, fiiiiiiiifth.

Pogue Mahone

I'd love to see a new Lost Vikings game. I've been playing the first one virtually nonstop for the past few weeks.

__________________
I still wave at the dots on the shore
And I still beat my head against the door
I still rage and wage my little war
I'm a shade and easy to ignore

hulk

Shock Horror; Could always be a new franchise

__________________
"'There's a tendency among the press to attribute the creation of a game to a single person,' says Warren Spector, creator of Thief and Deus Ex."
-- From an IGN game review.

Prophecy

While I could see Blizzard announcing a game that's three years out I don't think it's likely. Friday's event is going to be about a game that's already in works and is hush hush.

Like most of other people, I'm betting it's not a PC MMO and it's in the Warcraft family of games. Diablo III doesn't hold any interest for me, so here's to hoping for another solid entry in the Starcraft Universe. RTS or otherwise I don't really care.

__________________
La Disciplina È La Mia Spada,
La Fede È Il Mio Schermo,
Non salti Ciecamente In Incertezza,
E Potete Raccogliere Le Ricompense.

hulk

Just look to WoW for an example; it was announced in September 2001 and made public Novemeber 2004. A Starcraft MMO successor is entirely feasible and timely; Next-Gen now is past-gen in three years

__________________
"'There's a tendency among the press to attribute the creation of a game to a single person,' says Warren Spector, creator of Thief and Deus Ex."
-- From an IGN game review.

xepherys

*blink*

First of all, why in the world would Blizz make a C&C-type game? That market is so overfilled (with both awesome and crappy games) that it makes no sense. I'd expect SC: Ghost before a C&C-type RTS. My ranking guesses are:

SC2 - unfortunately, the masses demand it!

WoW360 - It wouldn't suprise me that much. Console MMOs are horrible IMHO, but it seems likely, especially with Microsoft's "Games for Windows" initiative and Live! crossover gameplay. I guess I might need the 120GB drive after all.

Diablo MMO - If they are indeed making a new MMO (which, like will said, is a Blizz marketing ploy as far as job positions are concerned), I'd suspect Diablo over SC. Despite my disike for SC, I really cannot see an SC MMO. If they made an SC action game first, perhaps, but the storyine isn't nearly as well developed as Diablo or Warcraft. A Diablo MMO might eat into WoW profits, but... Fantasy MMOs are always more popular than others (case in point, SWG, CoH, etc.)

WoW II - Though nobody knew why Sony did it with EQ, with the announcement that Guild Wars is scrapping in-line updates for a full sequel, this seems to be a new trend. There have been a LOT of advances lately, and I can see a graphics engine rewrite here. Still similar "unlifelike" graphics, but even richer environments.

Diablo III - If they are NOT going with an MMO, this seems like a tasty choice. The Diablo games have been a staple for Blizz for a good long while (trumped only by Warcraft) and D2 is OOOOOLLLLDDD. A Diablo 3 based on the Half Life 2 engine, Unreal engine, or an in-house equivalent would be something entirely wonderful.


I mean, obviously I don't have any better knowledge than anyone else, but it's what I see.

__________________
The prospect of achieving a peace agreement with the extremist group of MILF is almost impossible...
-- Emmanuel Pinol, Governor of Cotobato

My Homepage

Prophecy

Keep in mind this major announcing is going to happen in Korea. What do Koreans like? Starcraft. That's my major thinking behind the universe setting of the new game. Of course Koreans like their MMOs, their PC market is flooded with them. So from that alone Starcraft > Diablo, Warcraft or a new IP.

About MMOs, I guess I'm just I'm tired of them. Even WoW bored the mess out of me. Granted I only played the free trial, but if they couldn't hook me by then what's the point in giving it another 30 days and money out of my pocket. Meh, I just miss Blizzard's old battle.net days when it wasn't Pay-To-Play.

__________________
La Disciplina È La Mia Spada,
La Fede È Il Mio Schermo,
Non salti Ciecamente In Incertezza,
E Potete Raccogliere Le Ricompense.

Challah

My guess is Starcraft 2.

www.blizzard.com
www.starcraft2.com

Yeah.

blahblah454

starcraft2.com just brought me to blizzard. All that means is that they dont want some jerk off taking that name and building some ass site with it.

Although here is something pretty funny.

"World of Warcraft Rewards Visa
The card that pays you to play.

Blizzard Entertainment has teamed up with First National Bank of Omaha to bring you a Visa card that rewards you with World of Warcraft game time! You can check out the press release to learn more. Sign up today, and once your application is approved, you will be eligible for special card rewards and benefits. APPLY NOW!"

Kadath

I don't know, they didn't get warcraft4 or diablo3. I'd be willing to bet it's starcraft2, I agree they don't want to dilute their WoW base with another MMORPG right now.

__________________
it's quiet in here

Carno

Maybe because Starcraft isn't one of the greatest games of all time and Warcraft is better?

Um, not really. Here's how they were actually released: WC, WC2, Diablo, SC, D2, WC3, WoW.

__________________
http://how-to-spell-ridiculous.com/

Willravel

No, that can't be it. I suspect it has more to do with WC being released first. A lot of people don't know this, but Starcraft is the second best selling console game of all time, falling short only of The Sims. Starcraft has sold 9.5 million copies. Warcraft 3: Reight of Chaos has sold 3m and Frozen Throne has sold 1m. Even letting alone reviews, which clearly prefer Starcraft over Warcraft, sales figures don't lie. Starcraft made battlenet. Starcraft has been on IGN's Top Games of All Time not once but twice (2003 and 2005), and the articules included language like, "best real time strategy game ever made."

http://top100.ign.com/2005/001-010.html

xepherys

Actually, Diablo made Battle.net what it is today... more than a year before SCs release, bnet was already the best and most used matching service at the time.

Also, I don't see sources listed, but look here: http://forum.pcvsconsole.com/viewthread.php?tid=8655

__________________
The prospect of achieving a peace agreement with the extremist group of MILF is almost impossible...
-- Emmanuel Pinol, Governor of Cotobato

My Homepage

Willravel

...best selling CONSOLE game of all time, xepherys. The 9 million copies shipped number is everywhere online, but I read it in an article a few years back. To me it's like saying that the sky is blue, you don't really need a source.

hulk

Define console, for starters. IIRC Starcraft was only released on the N64

__________________
"'There's a tendency among the press to attribute the creation of a game to a single person,' says Warren Spector, creator of Thief and Deus Ex."
-- From an IGN game review.

Willravel

When considering all the games that have been available to play on Windows or Mac operating systems in history, Starcraft ranks second over all in number sold.

I misspoke (or miswrote) before. I intended to write "PC or computer console". My mistake.

Frosstbyte

On a total threadjack, what the hell does PC or computer console mean? Is that some mac-speak trying to further distinguish the dreaded linux/windows PC distinction and the pristinely and totally different "Mac computer console?"

You people REALLY need to get over yourselves.

Console=Nintendo, PS, xbox
PC=personal computer
computer console=silly made up category because god forbid a Mac ever fall into the same category as a computer running Microsoft operating system

Willravel

I clearly said Windows or Mac, meaning both, together. Again I misspoke, and then I corrected it. I'll say this one more time, as simply as I can: Starcraft is the second most sold computer game of all time. Is that clear enough for you?
It's hardly my fault that Macs are cool and PCs are for squares.
/sarcasm

Video game console is the name you seem to be referring to, and the name I was trying to avoid. That's how one differentiates between something like a Play Station or Nintendo 64 and other types of game playing electronics. I mistyped (I made a mistake and tried to correct it, something admirable, yes?) and now you're pretending like that has anything to do with the difference between Macs and PCs. As for the 'You people' statement, I don't appreciate being spoken to that way. I happen to enjoy using Macs, but discussions surrounding that belong in a completely different thread.
Semantics lesson, eh?

PC = personal computer that runs Windows, but no Mac operating system
Mac = a computer produced by Apple Inc. that runs an operating system from the same company

..but of course you're the only person in this thread that suddenly jumped on this as if it were a Mac vs. PC fight. You do know that Bootcamp will be included in Leopard this year, right? So I'll be running Windows (probably Vista) on my Mac. I'm glad, because there are some applications only exist for Windows. Probably not something a the Mac zealot you portray me as would say.....

...but this is a massive threadjack so we're getting back on subject.



I know we all love the Blizzard games be they Warcraft, Starctaft, Diablo, WoW, or otherwise. They are a mighty company. I am left wondering if this might be something original. Maybe they want to make a new type of game. Maybe they're going to work on something original. I dunno.

Frosstbyte

I'll leave my snarky comments at the door. Sorry about that, will. I read too much into what you wrote, since I guess I was looking for it whether or not you meant it.

Either way, I can most definitely agree with what I've quoted above. I'd really rather see something new and different from blizzard, since I know they're capable of it. Guess we have about an hour and a half to go before we know for sure...

Cynthetiq

so far.... nuthin.

__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.

Prophecy

Edit: CG Footage of the Blizzard release
Gameplay Images

From IGN.

__________________
La Disciplina È La Mia Spada,
La Fede È Il Mio Schermo,
Non salti Ciecamente In Incertezza,
E Potete Raccogliere Le Ricompense.

Carno

Are you smoking crack? A Mac is not a personal computer? Is it not personal, or is it not a computer?

Anyhow, yeah, it's SC2. Pretty obvious when they decided to announce a new game at a professional Starcraft tournament.

__________________
http://how-to-spell-ridiculous.com/

skier

Some screens from gamespy


















phew took longer to mirror than i thought it would

__________________
"Asking a bomb squad if an old bomb is still "real" is not the best thing to do if you want to save it." - denim