04-07-2004, 12:01 PM | #42 (permalink) |
More Freedom, Less Bullshit
Location: Tulsa, OK
|
If the mother gave permission, it was only because they said that he couldn't be in the picture with hair like that. The school has a right to set appearance standards, but they don't have a right to change them on some whiny parent's whim.
__________________
-Erik Stupid people shouldn't breed. |
04-07-2004, 12:10 PM | #43 (permalink) | |
Cracking the Whip
Location: Sexymama's arms...
|
Quote:
You're right. And IMO, the "whiny" ones are the parents that are bitching their kid should have been in the picture with a blue mohawk.
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU! Please Donate! |
|
04-07-2004, 12:41 PM | #45 (permalink) | |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
|
04-07-2004, 12:51 PM | #46 (permalink) |
Junkie
|
Maybe some parents will be upset because their kids is next to the fat kid. Maybe some of the kids have really stupid clothes. How far do you want to take it?
It would be nice if we could see where school policy is on this. It wasn't mentioned in the article, was it? |
04-07-2004, 01:32 PM | #47 (permalink) | |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
It doesn't end, you're right with people having to get over it, but at the same time those that want to live "alternatively" have to equally get over it sometimes too. it's called compromise.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
|
04-07-2004, 01:34 PM | #48 (permalink) | |
Registered User
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
Quote:
There is no place for a blue fucking mohawk in any school, and it's foolish to think there is a place for it. 99% of us would lose our jobs if we came into work with a blue mohawk. There is a place called the real world, and if you want to succeed you have to conform. Hell, I don't like it, but it's a fact of life, and it doesn't make any of us conformist whiners. The only ones whining here are the people who want kids to look like freaks. |
|
04-07-2004, 01:44 PM | #49 (permalink) |
hovering in the distance
Location: the land of milk and honey
|
such a diverse set of opinions on this topic. interesting views all the same. In my opinion, what the school did wasn't right, but that is up to the school district and/or courts to decide.
my opinions: 1. A six yr old with a mohawk is bad parenting, why? because you are teaching a child to get attention (negative and positive) with their appearance. 2. schools should have uniforms and dress codes. why? because it's just less disruptive, they are there to learn, not show off their clothes. With uniforms, the lines between the rich kids and the poor kids is less distinguishable. it will help reduce all the hazing and kids picking on other kids because of their clothes. I'm not a conformist, but i do believe that there is a time and a place for everything. and public schools are not the place for seeking attention through clothing and hairstyles. anyone who doesn't think that a six yr old wants a mohawk for attention, then you obviously need to pay more attention to children.
__________________
no signature required |
04-07-2004, 01:49 PM | #50 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
I'm confused when it comes to the work/school comparison. They are two very different things. Nobody gets fined for truancy if they don't go to work.
How exactly is a blue mohawk disruptive? How? What the hell is wrong with someone that they can't learn with a mohawk in the room? I want a real explanation, none of this "well, it just is" bullshit. |
04-07-2004, 01:56 PM | #51 (permalink) | |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
work and school are very similar, they are modeled as such because it's preparation in entering the work force. i don't have a supporting link at this moment, but I do recall reading it someplace. note the time structure, work 2 hours, break 15 mins, 2 more hours, break for lunch, work 2 hours, break 15 mins. work 2 hours go home. as for disruptive, for me in my school it was disruptive because I was mad and upset that someone esle was flaunting the rules. I was concerned with when they were going to get into trouble and if they didn't why did I get into trouble because I wore sneakers. It was a total distraction to me.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
|
04-07-2004, 01:59 PM | #53 (permalink) | |
Tone.
|
Quote:
If you want verification of that, note that teens who work are required to file tax returns even though they can't vote - taxation w/o representation. |
|
04-07-2004, 02:02 PM | #54 (permalink) | |
Registered User
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
Quote:
It's disruptive because there are kids who will call the kid a fucked up loser freak, and pick on him to no end. I know because I woulda been one of many kids fucking with the idiot. If you want to stand out and look like a freak, expect to get picked on like one. Kids are ruthless, most of us were. Nobody said you can't learn with a blue mohawk, did they? Would you still have a job if you went into work with a blue mohawk? I seriously doubt it. School is supposed to prepare kids for the real word/adulthood, isn't it? |
|
04-07-2004, 02:04 PM | #55 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
I know that it amounts to being preparation for the workforce to a certain degree. I just think that justifying forced conformity based on that reasoning is somewhat foolhardy. There is a difference. I could be complete ass to any of my high school teachers and as long as i did it in the right tone of voice i was untouchable. You can already get away with so much in school that you could never get away with at a job. The two things really don't compare when it comes to certain things. Anyone with half a brain knows that most workplaces won't allow you to have blue mohawk. This is common sense in america. We all learn by inferrence that conformity is one of the most important parts of being a social being long before we get through elementary school. I know that i have to take out my earrings if i want a better chance of having a successful job interview, despite the fact that my school allowed me to wear them. Seriously, how is letting someone in elementary school or high school look different going to effect their job prospects at all?
Last edited by filtherton; 04-07-2004 at 02:07 PM.. |
04-07-2004, 02:05 PM | #56 (permalink) | |
hovering in the distance
Location: the land of milk and honey
|
Quote:
but this is just my experience.
__________________
no signature required |
|
04-07-2004, 02:12 PM | #57 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
A mohawk will only be disruptive as long as it is percieved as being rebellious or atypical. Give it a week, or a month and see how disruptive it is. If anything by making such a huge deal out of it they are only succeeding in making a huge deal out of it.
Breasts are really disruptive to most any boy over the age of 11. Do those who would deny the right to hairstyle choice based on said hairstyle's distraction potential think we should split schools up by gender just to make sure no one's education is disrupted? |
04-07-2004, 02:18 PM | #58 (permalink) | ||
Tone.
|
Quote:
Quote:
For another, when's the last time you passed by a guy with neon hair that you didn't look over at him? You really want YOUR kid busy looking at the idiot with the smurf hair when he's supposed to be learning how to read? For yet another, it teaches the other children that if you want attention, the easiest way is to dress or groom yourself to look like a sideshow. Forget accomplishing something - that's hard. Just dye your hair and do your best imitation of a centurion's helmet and you'll get all the attention you want. Plus, whether it's disruptive or not, it teaches the kid with the mohawk that it's OK to look like a freak, and if people don't accept you, that's their fault. That's total bullshit. It's just like the people who run around in gothic clothing leading each other around with leashes attached to studded collars around their necks, then wonder why they can't get a job anywhere but a used CD store. These people are idiots. If you want to be accepted in society, you have to conform to societal norms. If you don't care about being accepted, that's great, more power to you, but don't bitch when society doesn't give you a job. |
||
04-07-2004, 02:20 PM | #59 (permalink) |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
I can tell you here at MTV I sometimes wonder....
there are some people here with blue hair, multiple piercings on face and body, tatoos. They wonder why they cannot catch a break and get hired for some of the executive positions. I don't find it disruptive in this environment. Heck I have long hair to my waist almost, but when in Rome. I find it very interesting to see people on the elevators in suits standing next to people with all these body modifications.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
04-07-2004, 02:32 PM | #61 (permalink) | |
Registered User
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
Quote:
|
|
04-07-2004, 02:37 PM | #62 (permalink) |
Guest
|
I can understand moonstruck's p.o.v.,
this is a 6 yr. old. I spike my son's hair when he wants me to, but no mohawk and especially not color! He's only 6. I would want him to enjoy school and know that school is for learning, not about getting the attention of others. Besides, he is already natural at being the center of attention w/o any eye-catching haristyles or clothes. Being a teen is different, although I agree with moonstruck- schools would be improved with a dress code. School isn't about what you wear and how you do your hair- it's about learning. If you take away the street clothes and give them uniforms- not just a strict dress code- but actual uniforms, cliques wouldn't be a major development. I am not on the parents' side, nor the principal's side- I feel sorry for the kid who had to deal with this. |
04-07-2004, 07:38 PM | #63 (permalink) | ||||||
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not really certain where you're coming from here, but i'm pretty certain the responsibility to accept or reject people does, in fact, lie within each individual person. If someone chooses to not accept someone with "weird" hair, it is their choice(or, fault, in your terms). To be sure, a lot of people don't really take the time to evaluate whether society is doing a good job of deciding who looks "right" and who looks "wrong". That's fine, that's your right as an american. Just don't pretend that being an ethnocentrist isn't a choice. Quote:
You're right though, no amount of individuality will change the fact that the majority of americans are afraid of and misunderstand people who are different from them. It is interesting to see you say such things though. From reading some of your other posts i thought you were a big advocate of rewarding people based on abilities rather than appearances. Let me ask you this. Do you think it is fair that we are all expected to conform to various folkways which, despite being completely arbitrary, can ultimately decide whether we sink or float? Do you think that it is acceptable for the more qualified candidate to not get the job because his hairstyle was unconventional or because his earrings were too big? Why? What's the point? It seems obvious to me that this isn't really about a six year old. This is about you ranting against every other goth kid who ever made you feel uncomfortable. I have some advice for you and timalkin and sixate. The next time you see someone who looks different, be it a mohawk or piercings or whatever, and you start to feel the righteous indignation/scorn rising up inside of you like an ulcer, just ask youself a simple question: Why the hell do i give a damn about how this person chooses to look? Why is it so important for me to feel like i am better than this person? Last edited by filtherton; 04-07-2004 at 07:55 PM.. |
||||||
04-07-2004, 09:27 PM | #64 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
Tone.
|
Quote:
Quote:
You're right. That's why kids can wear jeans and a Tshirt to school. Lemme ask you this. Your kid comes home and says Billy wore a Tshirt that said "fuck you" on it. Do you think that's an appropriate thing for the kid to be wearing? Why not? It won't distract anyone, it won't teach anyone anything, it won't influence anyone. Why not let 'em wear it? While we're at it, let's let them wear pants with a penis painted onto the crotch. Same arguments apply. If you claim nothing the kid can wear can influence, distract, disrupt, or teach bad lessons, then why not let the kids wear literally ANYTHING? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If you want to be a nonconformist, you can't be surprised when people don't accept it. What YOU want is your cake and eat it too. You want to do whatever you feel like doing and NO ONE is allowed to form a negative opinion on it. That's simply not living in the real world. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
04-08-2004, 01:51 AM | #65 (permalink) |
Cracking the Whip
Location: Sexymama's arms...
|
I was going to comment more on the concept that being an "individual" is ok, even while pissing on other peoples rights, but shakran and sixate are doing fine.
But I will say that comparing standing next to a fat kid in a school pic with standing next to a kid with a blue mohawk is ludicrous.
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU! Please Donate! |
04-08-2004, 03:57 AM | #67 (permalink) | ||
Registered User
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
Quote:
Quote:
Lastly, I'll never get tired of looking at breats. Last edited by sixate; 04-08-2004 at 05:40 PM.. |
||
04-08-2004, 10:28 AM | #68 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I was just trying to point out that we could speculate for hours about what the kids are learning from this. This will not change the fact that we don't have all the details and are in no position to pretend to have a complete picture of what the children will take away from this situation. A real scientist will acknowledge when he doesn't have all of the facts and is only making vague educated guesses. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
btw sixate readily admits that he is an intolerant old fart(see quote below). Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||||||||||||
04-08-2004, 04:39 PM | #69 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||
Tone.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You have absolutely no basis in fact to say that the kid will not be distracted, yet you claimed above that he would not. And you want to talk to me about vague generalizations? Quote:
And as I said, if you want to wear a mohawk, that's great. Don't bitch when others think you're bizarre. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Try rereading my post if you're still confused about the sunburn bit. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||||
04-08-2004, 08:25 PM | #70 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
Since i've apparently misinterpreted everything that you have said why don't you tell me what your point is again?
I guess i just disagree with you that allowing a child to have a mohawk will somehow damage anybody. Despite having dyed hair in school and being a reject i know all this and, so far, it has not effected my employment opportunities in any way that i cannot live with. I don't need a degree to tell me that it doesn't really matter because i am living proof. I'm not sure where you're hearing all of these gothkids complaining about not being accepted by society. I have heard people complain about the superficiality of society because they ended up on the wrong side of conformity. It's not "Why won't they accept me?" It's more like "Why can't they see that i'm just like them except for my hairstyle/jewelry/manner of dress?" Intelligent people know when they are making choices that will probably result in bearing the scorn of the conformists. I know my piercings will harm my job prospects at many places and i accept that. I also know that i will do what i have to do to earn the money that i need to survive here including taking them out. I don't, however, accept for a moment that it is fair or rational to place as much importance on appearance as our society does. The only way a piercing effects my ability to do a job is if the people i work with and/or the customers can't accept it. That's wrong and pandering to it will only encourage it. |
04-08-2004, 10:54 PM | #72 (permalink) | |
Psycho
Location: Alberta, Canada
|
Quote:
And 'coloured' people riding on busses. And about being gay. Perhaps some people here are just too close minded.
__________________
Mokle "Your hands can't hit what your eyes can't see" -Ali |
|
04-09-2004, 03:10 AM | #73 (permalink) |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
to those of you arguing over if a shirt is distracting or not, let me interject something. Whatever you may think is "okay" in your book and "no I didn't mean KKK where did you get that?"
If it said, "Nazis kill Jews Dead" or "AIDS kills fags dead" would also have to fit under your tshirt freedoms. Obviously your common sense kicks in suddenly and you say,"No that's wrong!" but sorry it also has to be right.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
04-09-2004, 03:25 AM | #74 (permalink) | |
Registered User
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
Quote:
If you can't see a difference then we really don't have anything to discuss now do we? |
|
04-09-2004, 08:04 AM | #76 (permalink) | |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
EDIT: I was just thinking about this and noted... There's not many parents on this thread. Most of the people discussing passionately here don't have kids and/aren't planning on them. IMO Proof is in the pudding. Those that have kids that have done such things, we'll see where they are in a number of years. For some it's a fad, passing fancy. Others it becomes a lifestlye.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. Last edited by Cynthetiq; 04-09-2004 at 08:35 AM.. |
|
04-09-2004, 08:43 AM | #77 (permalink) | |
Registered User
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
Quote:
You have my opinion already... Blue mohawks are stupid. Period. |
|
04-09-2004, 08:43 AM | #78 (permalink) | ||
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
04-09-2004, 08:47 AM | #79 (permalink) | |
hovering in the distance
Location: the land of milk and honey
|
Quote:
it's good that non-parents feel compelled to advocate for children, but parenting is all about choices. and it is always going to be up to the parent to choose what is best for their child.
__________________
no signature required |
|
04-09-2004, 02:12 PM | #80 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
I can't advocate for a child, but i can advocate for what i think i would have benefitted from as a child. I can also claim that knuckling under to the superficial whims of popular culture isn't a good way to teach a child to be true to him/herself.
|
Tags |
debate, mohawk, sparks |
|
|