Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Technology


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-20-2003, 12:47 AM   #1 (permalink)
Devils Cabana Boy
 
Dilbert1234567's Avatar
 
Location: Central Coast CA
win XP or 2K

do you Prefer windows XP or 2K (if you dont use either dont vote)

please include why (stability, options ...)
__________________
Donate Blood!

"Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen
Dilbert1234567 is offline  
Old 06-20-2003, 01:27 AM   #2 (permalink)
Junkie
 
cchris's Avatar
 
Location: Sydney
I was one of those unfortunate souls that purchased a pc with windows millenium edition.
After only a few months I wanted to throw the whole box and dice out the window just to see how many pieces it would break into.
I got some advice from a friend and 18 months later after installing Windows 2000 professional,I have not looked back.
Very stable,easy to operate and suits me fine.
Have run a few websites as well with it and not one problem.

Hope that helps.
__________________
There's a fine line between participation and mockery

Last edited by cchris; 06-20-2003 at 01:33 AM..
cchris is offline  
Old 06-20-2003, 01:40 AM   #3 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: to the right of the Coral Sea
I use both (but not on the same computer). I like a couple of the features of XP:
system restore
"filmstrip" view in a directory of photos
the new Start menu design
fewer (not zero) problems with hardware drivers

A lot of stuff I just turned off, like Windows messaging.

I have had problems with networking between XP computers which got me to go back to W2K on one machine. I have seen lots of other people on the web describe the same or similar problems with XP (basically, the ability to browse networked machines just stops one day) but I did not find a fix.
__________________
I've had a perfectly wonderful evening. But this wasn't it.
Groucho Marx
Motry Latchman is offline  
Old 06-20-2003, 02:52 AM   #4 (permalink)
Loser
 
I bought xp when it was released , i don't wanna go back to 2k really. Althought i find 2k more realiable than XP.

XP <> 2k

imo, you take yur pick.
alterEGO is offline  
Old 06-20-2003, 02:58 AM   #5 (permalink)
Loser
 
2K is not bad, very stable.
XP is better, it has more to it.

'nuff said.
rogue49 is offline  
Old 06-20-2003, 04:31 AM   #6 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: California
winxp, has more bells and whistles.
m0j0 is offline  
Old 06-20-2003, 05:22 AM   #7 (permalink)
Addict
 
Ratman's Avatar
 
Location: Somewhere... Across the sea...
I am using 2k and like it. Stable with multi languages, etc. I have started to see XP Multimedia edition. Anyone using it?
__________________
The difference between theory and reality is that in theory there is no difference.

"God made man, but he used the monkey to do it." DEVO
Ratman is offline  
Old 06-20-2003, 05:27 AM   #8 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: Wisconsin, USA
I've used 2K and now use XP Pro. The main thing to consider is what you'll be using it for. 2K absolutely sucked for me as it had a lot of difficulty recognizing some of my peripherals, and did not work well at all with a lot of my games. XP works with everything and is a lot more stable.
mtsgsd is offline  
Old 06-20-2003, 05:44 AM   #9 (permalink)
The GrandDaddy of them all!
 
The_Dude's Avatar
 
Location: Austin, TX
i've used both, and i think that xp is more user friendly.

2k is hardcore for networking, that's my understanding.

and i've heard of some problems w/ win2k and games.

one of my friends couldnt get the drivers to work for his video on 2k either
__________________
"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity." - Darrel K Royal
The_Dude is offline  
Old 06-20-2003, 06:17 AM   #10 (permalink)
"Officer, I was in fear for my life"
 
hrdwareguy's Avatar
 
Location: Oklahoma City
2000 Pro was designed for the business market and power users, not for gamers. As such many high end drivers needed for games wouldn't work with 2000, and some games wouldn't work with it either.

Although it was designed for the business market, many power users put it on their home machines because of the increased stability over Win98. Now these power users have a stable machine but a lot of their stuff wouldn't work. Then came XP which has the stability of 2000 but the product support of 98. Now you have an os for the Power User who also games.
__________________
Gun Control is hitting what you aim at

Aim for the TFP, Donate Today
hrdwareguy is offline  
Old 06-20-2003, 08:59 AM   #11 (permalink)
Stop. Think. Question.
 
rubicon's Avatar
 
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
XP.

It's got all the guts of 2000 with fancy window-dressing. Besides, Windows 2000 is circa 2000 and today is 2003. Why step into something old when you can have what's new?

But seriously, XP runs just fine for a workstation.
__________________
How you do anything is how you do everything.
rubicon is offline  
Old 06-20-2003, 09:36 AM   #12 (permalink)
Dubya
 
Location: VA
XP is purty...

2k at work, xp at home. Doesn't really make that much of a difference.

My favorite feature is customizing the login screen...
__________________
"In Iraq, no doubt about it, it's tough. It's hard work. It's incredibly hard. It's - and it's hard work. I understand how hard it is. I get the casualty reports every day. I see on the TV screens how hard it is. But it's necessary work. We're making progress. It is hard work."
Sparhawk is offline  
Old 06-20-2003, 09:49 AM   #13 (permalink)
SiN
strangelove
 
SiN's Avatar
 
Location: ...more here than there...
Quote:
Originally posted by rogue49
2K is not bad, very stable.
XP is better, it has more to it.

'nuff said.
and, it looks better.

and i don't mean themes, i'm using 'windows classic'.
it's just smoooother.

/me likes
__________________
- + - ° GiRLie GeeK ° - + - °
01110010011011110110111101110100001000000110110101100101
Therell be days/When Ill stray/I may appear to be/Constantly out of reach/I give in to sin/Because I like to practise what I preach
SiN is offline  
Old 06-20-2003, 12:28 PM   #14 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
I use both.... depends on the application and what I'm trying to really accomplish.

I have computers running 98, 2k, XP... depending on the performance of the computer will determine the OS to load.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 06-20-2003, 01:05 PM   #15 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: shittown, CA
2K. Less bloat.
juanvaldes is offline  
Old 06-20-2003, 09:08 PM   #16 (permalink)
Insane
 
i like 2000 better.

XP makes me feel like i don't know anything about computers.............which isn't true
fuelmyfire is offline  
Old 06-20-2003, 09:16 PM   #17 (permalink)
Not so great lurker
 
Location: NY
I like 2000 better because I don't care much for the "pretty" icons that waste cpu power. Then again i haven't used XP much except for installing it and then spending the time to make it look like "classic" windows.
Both OS's have their own strengths, but I think that XP still has a few too many bugs that are being worked on.
Note: I might be biased on the "pretty" XP interface since I learned to use computers in DOS here graphics were functional, and not pretty.
heyal256 is offline  
Old 06-20-2003, 09:38 PM   #18 (permalink)
Upright
 
i have two computers, one with 2k professionsal, and one with XP home edition. the 2k machine has dual processors, which you can only do with an NT machine. I've always loved 2k above all else. However, compatibility is a big problem with 2k. If you like to play games, especially old school games, get XP. It's a lot more compatible. I managed to run System Shock 2 in XP, which any fan of the game can tgell you is IMPOSSIBLE in 2k.

In short, gamers, video, audio people choose XP. Software developers, computer geeks choose 2k.

That's my 2 cents
ajullr01 is offline  
Old 06-21-2003, 01:58 AM   #19 (permalink)
The Matrix had a point...
 
BuDDaH's Avatar
 
Moderator Emeritus
Location: 10th Mountain ASB Fort Drum, N.Y.
XP all the way.

If you really want to know, its WIN2k on steriods...
__________________
I'd hit that so hard whoever could pull me out would become King of England!
BuDDaH is offline  
Old 06-21-2003, 03:30 AM   #20 (permalink)
The Original JizzSmacka
 
Jesus Pimp's Avatar
 
Xp Pro! Don't use XP home.
__________________
Never date anyone who doesn't make your dick hard.
Jesus Pimp is offline  
Old 06-21-2003, 08:06 AM   #21 (permalink)
Loser
 
Among the things that XP has that 2K doesn't, my favorite is probably transparency. Transparency, resource eater that it is, still rocks my world. It's beautiful being able to browse a thread on TFP AND watch mimi on ART's webcam because the TFP thread is translucent.
Thraeryn is offline  
Old 06-21-2003, 07:19 PM   #22 (permalink)
Junkie
 
MontanaXVI's Avatar
 
Location: Go A's!!!!
2k was designed more for professional use since it was based on the NT platform. I used it for a while and it worked great for all basic computing needs, it was kinda stingy for games though as all the mutli-media is there for pretty muc basic stuff, ALTHO it DOES WORK!!!!

I have since switched to XP which I have been using for over a year and I have to say I love XP it reminds me of a hybrid 2k/9x which is STABLE, FAST, and did I mention STABLE, also it is very multimedia friendly and easy to use.

just my 2¢ I say XP all the way, I use the pro version since I built a dual processor rig, and XP Home does not support duallies
__________________
Spank you very much
MontanaXVI is offline  
Old 06-21-2003, 07:39 PM   #23 (permalink)
Women want me. Men fear me.
 
crewsor's Avatar
 
Location: Maryland,USA
On the subject of OS, what are the major differences between xp home and pro. I'm getting ready to get a new computer and its about 60.00 to upgrade to pro and I'm wondering if its necessary and worth it for home use to get pro.
I've been using win 2000 pro and am pretty happy with that.
__________________
We all have wings, some of us just don't know why.
crewsor is offline  
Old 06-21-2003, 08:30 PM   #24 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: shittown, CA
Quote:
Originally posted by crewsor
On the subject of OS, what are the major differences between xp home and pro. I'm getting ready to get a new computer and its about 60.00 to upgrade to pro and I'm wondering if its necessary and worth it for home use to get pro.
I've been using win 2000 pro and am pretty happy with that.
Home does not run on dual CPU systems. Also Pro has a VNC like application.
juanvaldes is offline  
Old 06-21-2003, 09:56 PM   #25 (permalink)
Upright
 
When you strip out all the B.S. from XP, what do you have?....2k. If XP would have come out 5 years ago when I know absolutly nothing about compuers, I might have thought about getting it. Now that I know more then the average user, XP's politically correct B.S., I don't know WTF I'm doing interface, just gets in the way. I will admit XP is better for gamers and first time computers users. If your a first time PC owner, my advice is start with XP. Once you know what your doing, UPGRADE to 2k.
Drake is offline  
Old 06-25-2003, 04:01 AM   #26 (permalink)
Women want me. Men fear me.
 
crewsor's Avatar
 
Location: Maryland,USA
Quote:
Originally posted by juanvaldes
Home does not run on dual CPU systems. Also Pro has a VNC like application.
I understand the dual processors, but you lost me on the VNC. Virtual networking? Thats the only major differences? If so I see no reason for me to upgrade to pro. I'm not getting a dual system and don't even know what that other feature is.
__________________
We all have wings, some of us just don't know why.
crewsor is offline  
Old 06-25-2003, 10:18 AM   #27 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Washington State
I like XP for its friendliness to USB and Firewire. It generally seems more compatible. I used 2k for a long time, from the time it came out untill a few months after the XP launch. I thought that I wouldn't like XP, but I've been really happy with it.
Oh and Don't get XP Home.... mainly cause the bar under the start up is that puky gold color.
BigJonnyJ is offline  
Old 06-25-2003, 12:09 PM   #28 (permalink)
Women want me. Men fear me.
 
crewsor's Avatar
 
Location: Maryland,USA
Quote:
Originally posted by BigJonnyJ
I like XP for its friendliness to USB and Firewire. It generally seems more compatible. I used 2k for a long time, from the time it came out untill a few months after the XP launch. I thought that I wouldn't like XP, but I've been really happy with it.
Oh and Don't get XP Home.... mainly cause the bar under the start up is that puky gold color.
I would think you could change the color, no?
__________________
We all have wings, some of us just don't know why.
crewsor is offline  
Old 06-25-2003, 12:46 PM   #29 (permalink)
Tilted
 
spillblood's Avatar
 
my vote goes to XP i have used every windows and after you get use to XP, it is better by far everything but the new search(find file) i hate the little dog
spillblood is offline  
Old 06-25-2003, 01:11 PM   #30 (permalink)
Crazy
 
AxelF's Avatar
 
Location: Europe
Win XP pro is the way to go. Everyone that prefers 2k was very sceptical to begin with and went with 2k as soon as they had the first little problem with XP they could dig up, I'm sure.

Like those who say they will never install SP1 because it messes everything up. They just want to be excentric about it.

XP can be set to look just like 2k if you don't like the new style, including search if you hate the puppy.
__________________
Coffee
AxelF is offline  
Old 06-25-2003, 01:41 PM   #31 (permalink)
Crazy
 
AxelF's Avatar
 
Location: Europe
Regarding differences

Technically, XP pro has ALL that 2k has and then some.
To clarify the differences between Home and Pro comes here a LONG description. But it shows you why going with Home is a tough choice. You may have to upgrade when your needs mature.

The following features are not present in Windows XP Home Edition.

Power user
--------------
Remote Desktop - All versions of Windows XP--including Home Edition--support Remote Assistance, which is an assisted support technology that allows a help desk or system administrator to remotely connect to a client desktop for troubleshooting purposes. But Only Pro supports the new Remote Desktop feature, which is a single-session version of Terminal Services with two obvious uses: Mobile professionals who need to remotely access their corporate desktop, and remote administration of clients on a network. You can access a Windows XP Remote Desktop from any OS that supports a Terminal Services client (such as Windows 98 and, interestingly XP Home). XP Home can act as the client in a Remote Desktop session; only Pro can be the server.

Multi-processor support - Windows XP Pro supports up to two microprocessors, while Home Edition supports only one.

Automated System Recovery (ASR) - In a somewhat controversial move, Microsoft has removed the Backup utility from the default Windows XP Home Edition, though it is available as an optional installation if you can find it on the CD-ROM (hint: it's in the /valueadd folder). The reason for this the integration of Microsoft's new Automated System Recovery (ASR) tool into Backup. In Pro, ASR will help recover a system from a catastrophic error, such as one that renders the system unbootable. ASR-enabled backups are triggerable from XP Setup, allowing you to return your system to its previous state, even if the hard drive dies and has to be replaced. Unlike consumer-oriented features such as System Restore, ASR is not automatic: It must manually be enabled from within the Backup utility in Windows XP Pro. In any event, while there is a Backup utility available for Home Edition, you cannot use ASR, even though mentions of this feature still exist in the UI. Confusing? Yes. But it's better than no Backup at all, which was the original plan.

Dynamic Disk Support - Windows XP Professional (like its Windows 2000 equivalent) supports dynamic disks, but Home Edition does not (instead, HE supports only the standard Simple Disk type). Dynamic disks are not usable with any OS other than Windows 2000 or Windows XP Pro, and they cannot be used on portable computers. Likewise, Home Edition does not include the Logical Disk Manager.

Fax - Home Edition has no integrated fax functionality out of the box, though it is an option you can install from the XP Home CD.

Internet Information Services/Personal Web Server - Home Edition does not include the IIS Web server 5.1 software found in Pro.

Security
----------
Encrypting File System - Windows XP Professional supports the Encrypting File System (EFS), which allows you encrypt individual files or folders for local security (EFS is not enabled over a network). EFS-protected files and folders allows users to protect sensitive documents from other users.

File-level access control - Any user with Administrator privileges can limit access to certain network resources, such as servers, directories, and files, using access control lists. Only Windows XP Professional supports file-level access control, mostly because this feature is typically implemented through Group Policy Objects, which are also not available in Home Edition.

"C2" certification - Microsoft will attempt to have Windows XP Professional certified with the "C2" security designation, a largely irrelevant status, but one which will not be afforded to Home Edition.

Management
----------------
Domain membership - Home Edition cannot be used to logon to an Active Directory domain. For obvious reasons, the Domain Wizard is also missing in Home Edition.

Group Policy - Since Home Edition cannot be used to logon to an Active Directory domain, Group Policy--whereby applications, network resources, and operating systems are administered for domain users--is not supported either.

IntelliMirror - Microsoft lumps a wide range of semi-related change and configuration management technologies under the IntelliMirror umbrella, and none of these features are supported in the consumer oriented Home Edition. IntelliMirror capabilities include user data management; centrally-managed software installation, repair, updating, and removal; user settings management; and Remote Installation Services (RIS), which allows administrators to remotely install the OS on client systems.

Roaming profiles - This feature allows users to logon to any computer in an Active Directory network and automatically receive their customized settings. It is not available in Home Edition, which cannot logon to an Active Directory domain.

Corporate deployment
----------------------------
Multi-language support - Only Windows XP Professional will ship in a Multi-Language version or support multiple languages in a single install.

Sysprep support - Windows XP Pro will support the System Preparation (Sysprep) utility, while Home Edition will not.

RIS support - See the IntelliMirror heading in the previous section; Home Edition does not support RIS deployments.

Networking features
--------------------------
The following networking features are not included in Home Edition:
- The user interface for IPSecurity (IPSec)
- SNMP
- Simple TCP/IP services
- SAP Agent
- Client Service for NetWare
- Network Monitor
- Multiple Roaming feature

User interface features
-----------------------------
Windows XP Home Edition has some different default settings that affect the user interface. For example, Guest logon is on by default in Home, but off in Pro. The Address bar in Explorer windows is on in Pro by default, but off in Home. During the beta period, Microsoft had intended to use a business-oriented shell theme ("Professional") by default in Pro and the "Luna" consumer theme in Home Edition. But feedback from corporate users suggested that everyone liked the consumer-oriented Luna theme better, and development of the Professional theme was cancelled. Other user interface features that are present in Pro but not Home include:

- Client-side caching
- Administrative Tools option on the Start menu
(a subset of the Admin tools are still present in Home, however).


Read more at: http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase...p_home_pro.asp
AxelF is offline  
Old 06-25-2003, 05:19 PM   #32 (permalink)
Insane
 
VirFighter's Avatar
 
Location: Raleigh, NC / Atlanta, GA
I use win2k but have thought about upgrading to XP since I can get it for free from school.

I've joked with my friends that XP is "2K for dummies"

The only differences that appeal to me in XP are:

the better text (cleartype or truetype or whatever its called)
the new start menu design (I hate desktop icons)
better customizability

Today at work I got my first exposure to XP home... yuck is all I can say. I felt so crippled by it, way too sugar coated.
__________________
"The South is gonna boogie again"
- Disco Stu
VirFighter is offline  
Old 06-26-2003, 11:38 AM   #33 (permalink)
Upright
 
2k for Business/office use

XP for Home/Home office use


2k is a great operating system with a lot of great functionality but a lot of hardware is still not supported. XP on the other hand supports great amounts of hardware/software and also has the compatibility feature which allows you to run older programs.


Celeb
celeb is offline  
Old 06-26-2003, 12:51 PM   #34 (permalink)
Psycho
 
I use XP Pro at work, 2000 Pro at home.
My home system gets pushed way harder
than the one at work (that is, the apps I
run are more demanding). I'd call the two
equivalently stable in that I can't really
recall the last crash on either one.

I haven't had any problems with hardware
recognition on 2K Pro, and that box has all
of my odd bits -- jog/shuttle control, video
capture card, graphics tablet, film scanner,
etcetera.

So, to twist rubicon's words around, I'd say:

"2000 Pro.

It's got all the guts of XP without the
useless window-dressing."

And it doesn't think it ought to phone up
Microsoft to discuss my computer
TwoToTango is offline  
Old 06-26-2003, 09:11 PM   #35 (permalink)
Psycho
 
I am not much on "'nuff said" statements, but....

<i>2K is not bad, very stable.
XP is better, it has more to it.</i>

....seems to be dead on.

I took classes on w2k thinking it was going to replace nt, and, well, we know what happened there.

XP is smarter for pnp, (large .cab files), networks at the touch of a button, no more stacks, and "heals when wounded" nicely.

2000 was an excellent transition, for home users like me, from the semi-dos OS to the "I know nothing, just work dammit" computer.

XP just works without massive tutelage.
poof is offline  
Old 06-27-2003, 08:21 AM   #36 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: the hills of aquafina.
XP Pro.
.
.
Get it.
.
.
Love it.
.
.
Care for it.
.
.
Nurture it.
.
.
It will love you back.

Or don't
.
.
abuse it
.
.
do your worst
.
.
try and hurt it.
.
.
it will still love you back.
__________________
"The problem with quick and dirty, as some people have said, is that the dirty remains long after the quick has been forgotten" - Steve McConnell
cartmen34 is offline  
Old 06-27-2003, 06:37 PM   #37 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Sydney, Australia
I like to install Win XP Pro, then strip out all the eye candy. So it runs just about as quick as Win2k, but with more up-to-date driver support XP Pro's Remote connection is great too - I can control my XP box from my Mac PowerBook in the next room without a hitch at all!

There's not much between 2k and XP anyway IMHO. At work I'm still using NT4 - and even that's better than most of the company - they are still on Win95!!!
losfp is offline  
Old 06-27-2003, 09:53 PM   #38 (permalink)
Upright
 
xp is just as stable as 2k it just has more features

and most people would like it once they get used to it!

at first i thought it i couldn't find anything cuz it was all moved around but a year later and i cant even look at 2k
funk-e is offline  
Old 06-28-2003, 10:54 AM   #39 (permalink)
Crazy
 
AxelF's Avatar
 
Location: Europe
You are so right funk-e, it happens at every new release of any software. Some hate it because it's too user friendly, some because it's too pretty, some say it's bloated, some paranoids says it's spying on us.

First: whatever works for you - fine - use it!

I have been using personal computers with various OP's since before the first release of DOS. It happens at EVERY release. I'm quite tired of these complainers. We have seen them come around and upgrade eventually everytime.

MS states that XP pro is a superset of all previous versions of Windows. Win 2k only have less of the stuff. Not only less user friendly interface, but quite alot less of technical hardcore stuff too. You can stick with 2k if you like it, if it works for you - great! But please don't keep ranting in public that it is better than XP pro. You embarrass yourself.

Happy computing!
__________________
Coffee
AxelF is offline  
Old 06-29-2003, 02:41 PM   #40 (permalink)
Once upon a time...
 
If it's a new pc, XP pro. It's just better.

If the pc is lil older, or doesn't have lots of ram, I would think 2K.

XP Home is not worth it. Stay away. Learn the lesson that was 2K's success: the business windows is better supported, more patched and more stable.
__________________
--
Man Alone
=======
Abstainer: a weak person who yields to the temptation of denying himself a pleasure.
Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary.
manalone is offline  
 

Tags
win


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:04 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360