Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Sports


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-23-2004, 05:54 AM   #1 (permalink)
feeling tingly
 
Portis for Champ?

INDIANAPOLIS -- Desperate to land a tailback who could make a major impact in new coach Joe Gibbs' run-oriented offense, the Washington Redskins are in discussions about a blockbuster trade that would bring them one of the NFL's premier young backs.


The proposed deal, which percolated here over the weekend at the annual draft combine sessions, would net the Redskins tailback Clinton Portis, who rushed for over 1,500 yards in each of his first two seasons with the Denver Broncos. In return for Portis, 22, Denver would receive Redskins four-time Pro Bowl cornerback Champ Bailey and perhaps one of Washington's choices in the 2004 draft.


-------

Portis would be a huge pickup for the Redskins. Champ Bailey is a great cornerback, but there are few CB's who can dominate a game, compared to a strong RB.

As for Denver, the way their scheme is and because of their line, they could line up virtually anyone behind the QB and rush for 1,200 (Olandis Gary, Mike Anderson, Terrell Davis....)
__________________
My mom is a Diamondbacks fan. She really likes the Big Unit
JoeyB is offline  
Old 02-23-2004, 08:06 AM   #2 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
Trade Bailey for a first and second, draft a runningback in the second round, they'll be better off. They have many more needs then just a running back to do this deal.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 02-23-2004, 12:19 PM   #3 (permalink)
Bang bang
 
Spartak's Avatar
 
Location: New Zealand
Hmm, you make a valid comment about Denver's o-line, but lets face it.. Portis is a stud, and 9/10 he gets things done, picking up another promising rookie and working on him takes the Broncos 2 years back.

And do the Broncos need a CB that badly ? They could probably draft one in this years' draft, there are plenty of decent ones there.
__________________
I can read your mind... looking at you... I can read your mind...
Spartak is offline  
Old 02-23-2004, 04:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
Surviving Hurricanes
 
SAM821's Avatar
 
Location: Miami, Florida
Denver is crazy if they trade portis away, this kid is only getting better... I mean he's ONLY 22!

bad mistake if denver does this, but if you are a Skins fan you guys must be licking your chops...
SAM821 is offline  
Old 02-23-2004, 05:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
Two words...Olandis Gary.

It's as much the system as the back. Portis is looking like a great running back no matter where he plays, but they have another guy who can step in, plus need the CB help and want the pick.

Denver is the smart team here.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 03:12 AM   #6 (permalink)
Bang bang
 
Spartak's Avatar
 
Location: New Zealand
Ok, I've been thinking this deal over, and I still don't like it:

Clinton Portis has some talent, but could be a potential dud with the rag-tag o-line of the Skins. I mean the Indy/Denver playoff game, where the Indy run D manhandled the o-line and stuffed Portis repeatedly.

The Skins are also trading away the best player, in what is often a shambolic secondary, and probably a 2nd round draft choice.

The Skins "already" lost their 3rd round pick for Brunell. Their first draft choice then has to be spot on, they have to get their guy.

Anyway.. the thing is.. probably for whatever Portis is going to ask, they could re-sign Champ. Then draft a RB with their early 1st round pick, and maybe an offensive lineman with their 2nd.
__________________
I can read your mind... looking at you... I can read your mind...
Spartak is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 08:23 AM   #7 (permalink)
Crazy
 
I heard that the NY Jets are working hard for a deal. Lamont Jordan and there 1st round pick for Bailey. What are your thoughts? I think the Jets would be ripping off the Redskins.
Parker is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 09:48 AM   #8 (permalink)
Insane
 
i think this deals retarded. washington just spent 48 million in landing brunell, a great qb at his age, and now there going to try to shift there offense into a running one? with portis, the redskins might as well have just saved there money and kept ramsey as the starting qb.

i feel sorry for denver. i feel there getting the raw end of the deal. losing portis and a second rounder for champ? no way! champs a hellova cb but damn...your losing your stud running back and a 2nd round pick which you can use this draft, a draft thats STOCKED with cornerbacks!!
__________________
Best told at a place called...the TFP.
on a quest...
quest1mark is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 10:58 AM   #9 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: the Midwest
This seems like a bad trade for everyone involved. There are CBs in the draft and while I do believe that the system is very important in Denver, Portis is a great RB. Bailey is a great CB, but this is not a fair trade. Although maybe Champ would have had the sense to touch Marvin Harrison when he was on the ground.
What are the Skins thinking? I agree you need a RB to compete, but they are easier to come by than a shutdown CB, especially a 25 year old shutdown corner. You don't need a stud RB if you just spent $43 million on a QB. Fix the O-line and the running game will improve, don't trade away one of your last high draft picks for a RB who will fail behind an awful line while making your pass defense awful. I know that Gibbs is a coach who doesn't want players who don't want to be there, but this is a bad trade.
johnsmith is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 11:18 AM   #10 (permalink)
Junkie
 
I think this is a good trade. A good CB is hard to come by, as Denver has learned some of the draft and free agent busts they have had. Meanwhile they have had four different running backs rush for over 1,000 yards the past 6 seasons, and Quentin Griffin can easily make it a fifth back.
laconic1 is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 02:01 PM   #11 (permalink)
Crazy
 
the more i look at this the more i think it is a good trade for the broncos. bailey is one of the best cb's in the league. a stud cb is much harder to find than a stud rb. this makes sense for denver but i question the redskins motive. if i am denver i pull the trigger. also the jets jumping in with lamont jordan and #1 doesn't seem to be enough for me. if the skins go that way i would look for more.
jobu is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 03:29 PM   #12 (permalink)
feeling tingly
 
I appreciate the quality and rarity of a great DB, but I just don't see many of them changing the course of games. Ronnie Lott, Lester Hayes, Deion all could alter the games, but it's not common to have a game change on the play of a DB.

Running backs dominate games....if I'm looking at this trade, I'm looking to pick up a back like Portis and I'll take my chances on replacing Bailey.
__________________
My mom is a Diamondbacks fan. She really likes the Big Unit
JoeyB is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 04:22 PM   #13 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
A top cornerback can change games by taking a team's best receiver out of the game.

Interestingly, I've heard a lot of discussion on Ravens fanboards about whether it would be worth it to trade Chris McAlister, who is only slightly behind Bailey on the list of top corners, to one of these teams for the picks they are offering, if not a 1 and 2, maybe a 1 and 3.

I would do this for several reasons: the Ravens don't have a 1st rounder, they have Gary Baxter playing very well and who could probably step into McAlister's place, there are plenty of available corners in the second and later rounds, the Ravens would kill for a top receiver like Roy Williams or Mike Williams, and Ozzie Newsome and his staff have an unbelievable track record with their drafting.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 10:15 PM   #14 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: Sinaloa, Mexico
This would be a hell of a trade for the Redskins (dammit). They would have the best runningback in the NFC East (and arguably the NFC), and I'm sure Bill Parcells would kill to have Clinton Portis, Mark Brunell and Patrick Ramsey as his backfield. My cowboys need to start making some moves, quick.
__________________
...I'm that cat by the bar toasting to the good life...
Jesus Malverde is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 10:15 PM   #15 (permalink)
Bang bang
 
Spartak's Avatar
 
Location: New Zealand
Very good move for the Ravens, they need some passing offence badly!

If Boller can stay healthy, and they get a stud WR in the draft, they could take command of AFC North and mount a serious playoff run.
__________________
I can read your mind... looking at you... I can read your mind...
Spartak is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 12:49 PM   #16 (permalink)
you can't see me
 
grayman's Avatar
 
Location: Illinois
If I were the Redskins I would offer these three players giant contracts in this order:
1. Bailey
2. Arrington
3. Brunell
I don't know what the Skins are thinking. Plus, if they don't have the money Bailey wants, where are they going to get the money that Portis wants?
__________________
That's right - I'm a guy in a suit eating a Blizzard. F U.
grayman is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 09:53 PM   #17 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Miami Beach, Fl
Is Portis that good, or is Denver's blocking the best in the NFL? Portis reminds me a lot of Davis, but as good as he is, if he goes to Washington, he probably won't perform as well. Anyhow, it's a retarded move by Denver, Portis has 1,500+ yards in each of his two seasons and he's real young too. He's also from UM... and anyone from UM kicks ass, like Sean Taylor... now there's a guy that'll spice up the CB position come this season.
__________________
/Knowledge is Power/
SiphonX is offline  
Old 02-26-2004, 08:37 AM   #18 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
It's probably both. Portis is one talented sonovabitch, but two things stand out to me.

Butch Davis, when he went to Cleveland after coaching Portis at Miami, thought he wouldn't be tough enough inside, and eventually drafted the legendary William Green instead.

The other thing is simply two names: Mike Anderson; Olandis Gary.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 02-26-2004, 11:08 AM   #19 (permalink)
feeling tingly
 
Quote:
Originally posted by grayman

I don't know what the Skins are thinking. Plus, if they don't have the money Bailey wants, where are they going to get the money that Portis wants?

I think they have the money, they're just going a different way with the offense under Gibbs. Instead of lightning fast receivers with Spurrier, Gibbs wants to develop a ground game beyond Ladell Betts. That's where Portis comes in.

I feel that money isn't the only issue, it's who their giving the money to....Gibbs would rather have a quality running back rather than a quality defensive back. Bailey is amazing, but you have to give up to get.
__________________
My mom is a Diamondbacks fan. She really likes the Big Unit
JoeyB is offline  
Old 02-28-2004, 10:52 AM   #20 (permalink)
follower of the child's crusade?
 
I think its a good trade for Denver, a shut down CB is more valuable than a good running back, because its a rarer commodity.
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate,
for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing
hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain
without being uncovered."

The Gospel of Thomas
Strange Famous is offline  
Old 02-28-2004, 05:34 PM   #21 (permalink)
Upright
 
really this is a great trade. gibbs wants a great runner, smoot is an up and coming corner, they can get a great player with the fifth pick, and bailey has been having a little trouble lately (for example: bailey falls down while covering marty booker, leaving him wide open on the streak for a 30 yard td)
jjjjjj is offline  
Old 02-28-2004, 09:11 PM   #22 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: NY
Quote:
Originally posted by jjjjjj
(for example: bailey falls down while covering marty booker, leaving him wide open on the streak for a 30 yard td)
lol... c'mon... u arent serious rite? I saw Randy Moss drop a pass, and also Harrison too... I wouldnt call them bad
__________________
b000yahed up your w000pah!!

Joygasm~!!
thephuse is offline  
Old 02-28-2004, 09:58 PM   #23 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
Oh my God! Lavar Arrington missed a tackle! Let's cut the no-talent sonovabitch!
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 02-29-2004, 09:10 PM   #24 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Strange Famous
I think its a good trade for Denver, a shut down CB is more valuable than a good running back, because its a rarer commodity.
My sentiments exactly. And I will say right now that Quentin Griffin will probably rush for 1200+ next year. Denver goes through running backs faster than women go through shoes.
bellzboy is offline  
Old 03-01-2004, 12:31 PM   #25 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/column...len&id=1748249

Eight-year, $50+ million deal. Maybe the fifth best RB in the conference, let alone the whole league, plus the 'skins lose the best CB in football AND a second-round pick.

Saying Snyder's going to get bitten on the ass by this deal is like saying Robert Shaw got bitten on the ass at the end of Jaws.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 03-01-2004, 03:38 PM   #26 (permalink)
feeling tingly
 
I have said from the beginning of this thread that I think trading for Portis is a great idea.

Giving him that much money is ridiculous. Portis still had a contract for about 6 figures a season. With nobody else seriously bidding against them, the Redskins just dump a truckload of money at him.

Even if Portis does run for 1,700 yards--in the end, this will cripple them with the salary cap.

The trade---brilliant. The contract---idiotic.
__________________
My mom is a Diamondbacks fan. She really likes the Big Unit
JoeyB is offline  
Old 03-01-2004, 04:13 PM   #27 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
Well, he was talking about holding out in Denver to get more money, so he probably would have done the same thing in Washington.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 03-01-2004, 05:44 PM   #28 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: Virginia
Quote:
Originally posted by djtestudo
Two words...Olandis Gary.

It's as much the system as the back. Portis is looking like a great running back no matter where he plays, but they have another guy who can step in, plus need the CB help and want the pick.

Denver is the smart team here.
Didn't know what you were trying to say about Olandis Gray, but he isn't even on the Broncoes anymore.

It's Quentin Griffin now...sorry if I misunderstood you.
AL9045 is offline  
Old 03-01-2004, 07:13 PM   #29 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Quote:
Originally posted by AL9045
Didn't know what you were trying to say about Olandis Gray, but he isn't even on the Broncoes anymore.

It's Quentin Griffin now...sorry if I misunderstood you.
He was saying (I believe) that if Olandis Gary can rush for 1000 yards in the Denver system, they won't have a problem getting another back plugged in for a great season. That back being Griffin, like you said.
bellzboy is offline  
Old 03-01-2004, 07:33 PM   #30 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
Quote:
Originally posted by bellzboy
He was saying (I believe) that if Olandis Gary can rush for 1000 yards in the Denver system, they won't have a problem getting another back plugged in for a great season. That back being Griffin, like you said.
Exactly
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 03-02-2004, 11:21 AM   #31 (permalink)
Baltimoron
 
djtestudo's Avatar
 
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
I guy on another board made this point, and I think it fits well...

Quote:
Lets just say the Ravens still needed a QB(I don't think they do). The Rams offered Mark Bulger in return for Chris McAlister and a 2nd round pick. The Rams have made two unknown QBs Pro-Bowlers over the last few years though many would say it is because of the system, and not just there talent. I would not want to do this trade because Bulger got a huge boost from the system he was in.

This is what the Redskins are doing right now with the Portis trade. They are filling one need but at the same time, a very important piece is leaving. The need they are filling is with a player that may be just mediocre, but was made to look very good in a certain system and they are giving him a load of money.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen."
--Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun
djtestudo is offline  
Old 03-02-2004, 11:50 AM   #32 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: Virginia
Can't wait for Portis to come. .
AL9045 is offline  
Old 03-03-2004, 12:05 PM   #33 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: USA
Well it's official now. Here is a Bronco's biased article on the final trade. I still say its a good trade for both teams.
enough is offline  
Old 03-03-2004, 12:15 PM   #34 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: the Midwest
Well, I guess we know which is more important to Portis: Money or winning.
Good luck on the 600 yard season behind that (n)O-Line.
johnsmith is offline  
 

Tags
champ, portis


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:04 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360