Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Sexuality


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-01-2003, 01:51 AM   #1 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Stigma w/ "sluts"?

Can someone explain to me why it's so bad to be a sexually promiscuous girl? What is the stigma?

Thank you in advance.
rainheart is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 02:37 AM   #2 (permalink)
who?
 
phredgreen's Avatar
 
Location: the phoenix metro
for the same reason it's a good idea for women to stay away from loose guys. it's an empty act, devoid of any emotional meaning, and there's a very real danger of infection from their many undocumented exploits.
__________________
My country is the world, and my religion is to do good.
- Thomas Paine
phredgreen is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 05:54 AM   #3 (permalink)
Upright
 
religion
ooferomen is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 06:15 AM   #4 (permalink)
Loser
 
Quote:
Originally posted by phredgreen
for the same reason it's a good idea for women to stay away from loose guys. it's an empty act, devoid of any emotional meaning, and there's a very real danger of infection from their many undocumented exploits.
umm...phred...I disagree here.
As long as the woman is responsible with her encounters,
and she taking some pleasure with the acts,
then there is no issue.

You're placing your context for sex into another's standards.

Unfortunately...our society has a double standard.
It's "unofficially" encouraged for men to be studly,
and ladies to be "proper".

Men are more allowed to be detached from the act,
and ladies are viewed as more delicate.

I don't believe in calling ANY woman a slut
it's a negative conotation applied by those who are either prudish, unexperienced, judgemental
or even being hypocritical.

As long as a woman is being responsible for her encounters,
and understands the consequences of sex.
Then the number of lovers shouldn't be an issue.
As it should be applied to men too.

We are in a modern society, where women don't have the consequences of earlier times.
We should adjust our thinking,
Unfortunately sometimes viewpoints don't change as fast as culture.

Last edited by rogue49; 11-01-2003 at 07:01 AM..
rogue49 is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 06:46 AM   #5 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
[quote]
Quote:
Originally posted by rogue49
unfortuanately sometimes viewpoints don't change as fast as culture.
Very enlightened thinking, rogue49. I wonder if it could be said that ALL stigmas are simply a matter of society and culture not yet having caught up with reality? If that's the nature of a stigma? There are some stigmas that I'm not quite ready to say are just backward social conditioning. Incest, for instance. I guess I could just be highly conditioned about it, but it still seems wrong.

As far as this particular one goes, what society says and what many of us here at TFP say are likely to be very different. It's Double Standard Number One that a woman with many sexual partners is dirty and wrong, and a man with many sexual partners is a hero and a stud. Doesn't make it right, but in the minds of many, many people, it's true.

Explain it? I can't. Doesn't make much sense, when you actually sit down to think about it.
ratbastid is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 10:35 AM   #6 (permalink)
I'm not a blonde! I'm knot! I'm knot! I'm knot!
 
raeanna74's Avatar
 
Location: Upper Michigan
Quote:
Originally posted by ratbastid
Incest, for instance. I guess I could just be highly conditioned about it, but it still seems wrong.
When it comes to incest it makes good sense not to mix blood with sex. I have a friend who's parents were 1st cousins and he is a hemophiliac. The reason is that any latent genes for disorders such at that are more commonly able to manifest when the parents are close on the genetic map.

Personally I wouldn't engage in it because I know my family and know the problems that would come of it. Not saying the criticism but I don't want to be that open with my family even though I think my sister-in-law is hot and I know she's bi too.

As far as sluts - I think that originates from back when women did not work outside the home. They were more dependant on their husbands for their livlihood. A woman needed a man who would stand by her when she got pregnant. A man could have sex without living with the consequences as much. I'm glad for the laws that ask a man to take equal responsibility for the children that that help make. Also Birth Control was not as convenient or readily available in past times. I think that it is a stigma that has not adjusted with time.
__________________
"Always learn the rules so that you can break them properly." Dalai Lama
My Karma just ran over your Dogma.
raeanna74 is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 12:22 PM   #7 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: The capital of the free world??
I think there's an evolutionary viewpoint to this. Men are designed to spread their seed to as many women as they can, while women need 9 months of preparation for having a baby and then that baby is not self suficient for many years after.

I think we're a little bit above that now a days, but that is my guess as to why it is so engrained in out heads that women should not be promicuous.
__________________
Go Kool Aid. OH YEAAHH

http://www.retrocrush.com/archive2003/koolaid/
gabshu is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 12:48 PM   #8 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: San Diego, CA
Quote:
Originally posted by gabshu
I think there's an evolutionary viewpoint to this. Men are designed to spread their seed to as many women as they can, while women need 9 months of preparation for having a baby and then that baby is not self suficient for many years after.

I think we're a little bit above that now a days, but that is my guess as to why it is so engrained in out heads that women should not be promicuous.
Wow thats a pretty cool theory...

But yeah i think its wrong (well mabey impropper) for anyone to have sexual relations without emotion involved.
visotech is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 01:06 PM   #9 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Met22's Avatar
 
Location: X-posed
It's not about how much really,
It's who's talking about it. After all what's too many?
Depends who you ask. To judge someone by only their sexual exploits is closed minded and shallow.
Condemnation is only self serving. I have met many nice people others would call sluts. So what is the right answer?
__________________
Living on the west end dreaming of the theater playing in the Metropolis - Dream the Dream Live the Dream
Met22 is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 03:47 PM   #10 (permalink)
Insane
 
Rogue put it perfectly. 'nuff said.
Uuudar is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 05:54 PM   #11 (permalink)
Banned
 
See the biggest problem I have is this: it's gotta be the frequency of sex that is the turn-off, right? So if the girl has had a million partners and had safe sex with all of them, and only once, how is that different than a million separate acts with 1 man?

I think that that's where some of the social double-standard comes from. Some girl or guy hears a girl go on about wanting sex and loving this position and that position and so on and so forth and can't get enough, etc... and that person in their closed-mindedness thinks "slut", ok?

The problem is, she has a boyfriend/husband she's monogamous with and fucking 3 times a day. Somehow just her lust for sex has caused someone to put her in the "slut" box, even though she's only fuckign 1 guy.

This way of thinking came about when a guy i barely know was having lunch with a female friend of mine and I. He didn't know she and I were close, and when she got up to go to the bathroom after having gone on about having so much sex and this and that, having left out the fact she was talking about doing it with her boyfriend, he turns to me and calls her a slut.

At first, I let him speak, then I said to him, "my girlfriend talks just like that, except she's referring to getting it from ME, 3 times a day, so does that make my girlfriend a slut too?" And then I explained that she also had a boyfriend. My friend came back from the bathroom, I told her what he said, and she told him to leave and never call her again. He was some guy she met at school, they were working on a project or something.

Funny thing is, about 3 days later she comes to me laughing and asks why the guy came to her complaining that I had kicked the shit out of him. I just smiled and shrugged.

MORAL OF THE STORY: Be careful what you say- but more importantly, is in front of whom it is said.
analog is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 07:19 PM   #12 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: St. Paul, MN
Quote:
Originally posted by phredgreen
for the same reason it's a good idea for women to stay away from loose guys. it's an empty act, devoid of any emotional meaning, and there's a very real danger of infection from their many undocumented exploits.
I'd totally agree. Men can be sluts, too...

I'm not going to judge a woman who is forward about her desires, etc...i think that's great. but in world in which AIDS exists, sleeping around isn't smart. i think there are emotional costs, which women might be more likely to feel, but i wouldn't bet the house on that. for me, its a question of respect-does a person, regardless of gender, love themselves enough to be careful with their health, physical and emotional.
chavos is offline  
 

Tags
sluts, stigma, w or


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:28 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360