01-12-2007, 12:01 PM | #1 (permalink) | |
Cunning Runt
Location: Taking a mulligan
|
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss
http://www.washingtontimes.com/natio...0720-2734r.htm
Quote:
Oh, wait .... The Democrats couldn't WAIT to begin fixing the country (except, of course, for the day Congress took off to watch football), and THIS is the first thing on their agenda? I can hardly wait for a comment from a traditional non-conservative that "raising the minimum wage costs jobs." Samoans don't deserve a "decent living wage?" Looks like a rocky ride ahead.
__________________
"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher |
|
01-12-2007, 12:56 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Ventura County
|
I tried looking for the bill with the exclusion, I could not find it. Anyone have a link?
This is hypocracy on many levels. Not only is Pelosi protecting big business in her backyard at the expense of what they call a living wage for working people, the Democrats had to pay their union dues. Unions are the primary backers of minimum wage increases. On top of that Pelosi is going to stand up in her $20,000 pearls and proclaim how hard she is working to reduce the gap between the haves and the have nots.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch." "It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion." "If you live among wolves you have to act like one." "A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers." |
01-12-2007, 01:19 PM | #5 (permalink) |
Kick Ass Kunoichi
Location: Oregon
|
The problem here is that the territories of the United States have different minimum wages, and as it currently stands, people in American Samoa are already making a higher minimum wage than people in the Northern Mariana Islands.
Every news article I found relating this "conspiracy theory" was not from a reputable news source, and the articles I did find were poorly edited. But they did inform me that the current minimum wage in American Samoa is $3.62/hr, which is more than what people in the Northern Mariana Islands stand to make even after the wage increase--their wage will increase to $3.55 after its passage. They will pass up American Samoa after six months, when the wage will increase to $4.05 an hour. All that this tells me is that we ought to be looking at a bigger picture of cost of living versus wage increases in the Pacific Islands, as we as mainlanders probably have little or no idea what a living wage means there. It clearly means something different than a living wage in the mainland United States. So as to whether the absence of American Samoa in the bill is fair or not--only the people of American Samoa can say.
__________________
If I am not better, at least I am different. --Jean-Jacques Rousseau |
01-12-2007, 01:57 PM | #6 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Ventura County
|
Quote:
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch." "It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion." "If you live among wolves you have to act like one." "A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers." |
|
01-12-2007, 08:44 PM | #7 (permalink) | ||
Location: Washington DC
|
The entire bill is 3 sections long:
Quote:
This is all much ado about nothing or more appropriately described as a shameful distortion of the facts. A different perspective from The Hill - the nonpartisan paper that covers Capitol Hill extensively: Quote:
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 01-12-2007 at 09:41 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
||
01-12-2007, 10:54 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Lennonite Priest
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
|
And so it begins, 2 years of constant bickering, one side bitching and complaining about the other and nothing getting done....
Bravo.... On a side note...... as I have stated before and the OP is quoted from ONLY the Washington Times....... I will never trust or put faith into a paper owned by a man who buys nuclear subs from the old USSR and GIVES them to N.Korea, a man who GIVES MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS to the leadership of N. Korea (notice I said the leadership not the people, a man who declares himself king of the universe.... yeah.... Rev. Moon owns and controls what is printed in the Times.... he supports Kim Il Jong of N. Korea.... hmmmmm I'm supposed to believe anything that comes from that propaganda machine????
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?" Last edited by pan6467; 01-12-2007 at 11:01 PM.. |
01-13-2007, 03:02 AM | #9 (permalink) |
Psycho
|
And so it begins? I beg to differ, this partisan bullshit started some +230 years ago and will continue long after we are both dead and gone. The best we have had in the last 40 years or so is a Democrat president and both houses controlled by the Republicans. Maybe we should give that another try the next election and maybe, just maybe, something will get done in Washington besides bickering, bitching and complaining about nothing.
|
01-13-2007, 06:13 AM | #10 (permalink) | |
Insane
Location: rural Indiana
|
Quote:
__________________
Happy atheist |
|
01-13-2007, 06:23 AM | #11 (permalink) | |
Tone.
|
Quote:
Why does anybody watch Fox news? Because they say things that the right wants to hear, even when there's clear evidence that it's bullshit (source: Any program featuring Bill O'Reilly) The paper says things that right-wing neoconservative conspiracy theroists like to hear, so they read it. |
|
01-13-2007, 11:54 AM | #12 (permalink) | |
Lennonite Priest
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
|
Quote:
All you hyave to do is go back into the archives and search for the thread where I blow Moon and the Wash. Times out. or google and read about the man and the paper. Do you know Rev. Moon in the 70's worked for the CIA? Did you know he was funded by the CIA during the time Bush Sr. was head of it? Do you know that when Reagan was elected, his advisors and the powers behind him, decided they needed a press they could control that would back SDI Technology (that didn't exist), and many other programs...... then lo and behold the Rev Moon, a CULT leader calling himself the reincarnation of Jesus, who had been funded by the CIA, opened the Wash. Times? Look it up. Read up on it, then you tell me why people read and believe that newspaper. You make your own decision.....
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?" Last edited by pan6467; 01-13-2007 at 12:01 PM.. |
|
01-13-2007, 12:12 PM | #13 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: bedford, tx
|
are you people seriously trying to tell me that the only biased news is right wing biased?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him." |
01-13-2007, 12:44 PM | #14 (permalink) | |||
Banned
|
pan....I would put my "two cents" in...... concerning the record that is "out there" to support your posts concerning Moon and the Washington Times, regardless of who posted the information. I don't think that there are reliable sources to support or to authenticate much of what you posted.
Please clear this "murkiness" up....by posting your strongest authorities to back your most serious allegations. This is some of what I've found, and I am not completely comfortable with the accuracy of it all, but I think that it is more measured, and reasonable start. I do agree that the Washington Times is an unreliable, heavily partisan source (the reporter of the OP article, uses the term, "democrat leaders" in some of his other stories, just as Mr. Bush and other highly partisan republicans consistently do in their speeches and statements to the press. It is not a convicting sign, but it is a "tell".) Charles Hurt was also criticized for shilling for Mr. Miranda, the disgraced former Sen. Bill Frist aid who stole files from a Sen. Edward Kennedy computer, and distributed the information in the computer's files to embarrass democratic senators.... Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
01-13-2007, 01:25 PM | #15 (permalink) | |
Lennonite Priest
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
|
Quote:
Host, I will show you the material when I get a chance.... I have my son this weekend so it may be awhile.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?" |
|
01-13-2007, 02:59 PM | #16 (permalink) |
Location: Washington DC
|
Back to the OP....
My guess is that the provision on the Marianas was included by the Dems,in part, as a political statement (along with a sincere interest in bringing some wage standards to the Marianas) to John Boehner and Roy Blunt, the two top Repubs in the House, both of whom had ties to Tom Delay, Jack Abramoff and the K Street project* that resulted in the worst abuse and influence peddling by lobbyists (ahd the Repubs) in our lifetime. Chances are the provision will be dropped in the Senate version and replaced with something similar to the exisiting minimum wage standards and procedures for American Samoa - neither of which should be held to wage rates that apply in the US, but both of which should have some minimal standards as US territories that benefit from having that status. ---- * The K Street Project, according to former Washington Monthly editor Nicholas Confessore, is (was) an attempt to build a new Republican political machine "built upon patronage, contracts and one-party rule ... among Washington's thousands of trade associations and corporate offices, their tens of thousands of employees and the hundreds of millions of dollars in political money at their disposal." The theory behind the project, Confessore wrote, boils down to this: "As Republicans control more and more K Street jobs, they will reap more and more K Street money, which will help them win larger and larger majorities on the Hill."
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 01-13-2007 at 03:33 PM.. |
01-13-2007, 04:10 PM | #17 (permalink) | ||
Cunning Runt
Location: Taking a mulligan
|
Quote:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars Quote:
__________________
"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher |
||
01-13-2007, 04:37 PM | #18 (permalink) | |
Easy Rider
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
|
Quote:
At least with gridlock our bought and paid for polititians would have a harder time passing bills like this one or the President's and Senate's immigrant amnesty bill. |
|
01-13-2007, 09:01 PM | #19 (permalink) | |
Location: Washington DC
|
Quote:
Do you think consumers should have an unfettered "right" to record (for use other than personal listening) copyrighted music played on cable, satellite radio or the internet? The bill seems like a reasonable compromise to me. Whats wrong with requiring broadcasters to "use reasonably available and economically reasonable technology to prevent music theft?" Do you consider musicians who rely on the sale of their music for their livelihood a "special interest" group?
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 01-13-2007 at 09:07 PM.. |
|
01-13-2007, 09:08 PM | #20 (permalink) | |
Junkie
|
Quote:
I'm pretty sure recording of broadcast materials has been ruled as fair use. If they ban this what will stop them from banning VCRs, Tivo's, DVRs, mythtv, tape recorders, ect? |
|
01-13-2007, 09:13 PM | #21 (permalink) | ||
Location: Washington DC
|
Since this article also only presents one side of the issue, here is more from two of the sponsors:
Quote:
Quote:
I agree there is a fine line between personal use and redistribution, but there has been an explosive growth in "piracy for profit" in recent years at the expense of the performer.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 01-13-2007 at 09:22 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
||
01-13-2007, 09:20 PM | #22 (permalink) | |
Junkie
|
Quote:
|
|
01-13-2007, 09:33 PM | #23 (permalink) |
Location: Washington DC
|
I assume the requirement to "use reasonably available and economically reasonable technology to prevent music theft" would be some techonology similar to coding CDs, DVDs to prevent re-recording -- but on the broadcast side (although I have no idea how these technologies may work).
IMO. the bill at least deserves a hearing where the issues and solutions can be presented by all the interested parties before summarily dismissing it as a "bad" bill. I just find it a little tiresome to hear people whine about bad bills (perhaps based solely on one article from one biased publication) before they have a full understanding of both sides of the issue.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 01-13-2007 at 09:39 PM.. |
01-14-2007, 04:30 AM | #24 (permalink) | |
Easy Rider
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
|
Quote:
I believe if this bill passes the media companies will continue to pay our polititians to enact further restrictions including TV recording. |
|
01-14-2007, 07:02 AM | #25 (permalink) |
Location: Washington DC
|
I would like to hear in testimony from the artists, the RIAA, the MPAA how they believe cable and satellilte radio companies can use "reasonably available and economically reasonable technology" without severely impacting (not just inconviencing) fair use for personal enjoyment.
There are "special interests" on both sides trying to effect any legislation- the music and movie recording industries (RIAA, MPAA) on one side and the cable, satellite radio, and internet broadcast companies on the other side. Both are movitated by profit and not necessarily the consumers or artists best interests. In light of the growing piracy made even easier with new technologies, should there be an effort to protect both your fair use of copyrighted material and the artists right to the full value of the works they produce for their liveihood? This bill may not be the best answer, but I would like to hear more, or an altenative, beforing dismissing it completely as just another special interest bill.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 01-14-2007 at 08:10 AM.. |
Tags |
boss, meet |
|
|