I assume the requirement to "use reasonably available and economically reasonable technology to prevent music theft" would be some techonology similar to coding CDs, DVDs to prevent re-recording -- but on the broadcast side (although I have no idea how these technologies may work).
IMO. the bill at least deserves a hearing where the issues and solutions can be presented by all the interested parties before summarily dismissing it as a "bad" bill.
I just find it a little tiresome to hear people whine about bad bills (perhaps based solely on one article from one biased publication) before they have a full understanding of both sides of the issue.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
Last edited by dc_dux; 01-13-2007 at 09:39 PM..
|