10-23-2006, 07:18 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Wehret Den Anfängen!
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Stem Cell Research
I ran into this Micheal J Fox political ad:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9WB_PXjTBo&eurl= Mr Fox was a well known actor. He has Parkinsons at an unusually young age. You can see what it does to his nervous system in the above ad. On the issue of "Stem Cell Research", McCaskill is in favour, while Talent puts forward anti-stem cell/cloning arguments like "I don't want to be walking down the street and run into myself". I suspect opposing "Stem Cell Research" was a short-term gain, and a medium and long-term mistake on the part of the Republicans in congress. People sick with fatal deseases can quite blatantly say "slowing stem cell research will kill me, and kill others like me". It is a pretty damn powerful message. The short term gain the Republicans cashed in on was the support of Zealot Christian groups, who view any kind of scientific advancement (especially in the Biological sciences) with extreme fear and prejudice. Finally, I salute Mike. Standing up in front of a State or a Nation and saying "I'm crippled, look at me" is not the easiest thing in the world. Edit: moved "Gah -- this was supposed to be in Politics, not Philosphy. It could be a decent Philosophical debate, but I was focused on the Politics of the issue... Could a moderator move this to Politics please?" from the start of the post. Moderator moved the post. Thanks!
__________________
Last edited by JHVH : 10-29-4004 BC at 09:00 PM. Reason: Time for a rest. Last edited by Yakk; 10-24-2006 at 10:42 AM.. |
10-23-2006, 07:26 AM | #2 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
Yeah, i'm always amazed at how much "respect for life" the social conservatives have concerning anything reproductive compared to their almost complete disregard for life when it comes to many things political and economic.
If only there was some way that we could blame fetuses (feti?) for their predicament... Then this whole issue wouldn't exist. We could do to the fetuses what we do to all "parasitic classes" and let them twist in the wind, maybe grudgingly throw them a bone now and then. |
10-23-2006, 09:38 AM | #3 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Lake Mary, FL
|
Embryonic stem cell research should be ditched and the focus turned solely to adult stem cell research, as the latter has produced more results (Someone correct me if I'm wrong). If that were to happen, most-- If not all-- Of the opposition to stem cell research would dissipate, as the moral obligation to the fetus would be gone (No fetus = No moral obligation).
__________________
I believe in equality; Everyone is equally inferior to me. |
10-23-2006, 12:11 PM | #4 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Tobacco Road
|
The American people are ignorant about the facts of embryonic stem cell research. There are people in this country (and on this very board) that think research on ESC is banned and that is not the case at all. They dont even understand the issue is. The most successful stem cell research being done now is on adult stems cells and stem cells umbilical cord blood. I wonder if Michael Fox knows that, and if he does, has no problem pimping out his illness for a political candidate?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
10-23-2006, 12:23 PM | #6 (permalink) | ||
Junkie
Location: Tobacco Road
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
10-23-2006, 12:34 PM | #8 (permalink) | ||
Junkie
Location: Tobacco Road
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
10-23-2006, 01:59 PM | #9 (permalink) | |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
Quote:
My personal stance is that if people are flushing their babies we might as well use them as they have already been killed, and even if I were a fundamentalist Christian I would have that stance. Much like using the Nazi hypothermia research, it would be research gained from an evil source but the evil was already done, and I'm all for some good comming out of evil. Its even easier since I don't view the act as evil but simply a new form of genetic selection.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
|
10-23-2006, 03:58 PM | #10 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: South Carolina
|
stranger things have happened, but not in a while..but
i agree wtih ustwo..again I just don't see how using the remains for research could be negative. it's a tragedy that they occur, but something good could come from it. What is the problem with that? btw, i did not know Michael J Fox's condition had deteriorated so much. Gotta agree with Yakk..the repubs screwed up royally for a short term gain. wasn't reagan's son at the DNC in 2004?
__________________
Live. Chris |
10-23-2006, 04:05 PM | #11 (permalink) | |
Psycho
Location: Sweden - Land of the sodomite damned
|
Quote:
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/1...tor-after-all/ Honestly, Limbaugh has to be the scum of the earth...
__________________
If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. |
|
10-23-2006, 05:01 PM | #12 (permalink) | |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
Rush speaks on this.
Quote:
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
|
10-23-2006, 05:32 PM | #14 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Lake Mary, FL
|
As I stated earlier, just do away with embryonic stem cell research and only focus on adult stem cell research, as not only is it more productive but the moral implications which are involved in embryonic stem cell research don't exist with adult stem cell research (As you're mainly using skin and spinal cord cells).
__________________
I believe in equality; Everyone is equally inferior to me. |
10-23-2006, 05:37 PM | #15 (permalink) | |
All important elusive independent swing voter...
Location: People's Republic of KKKalifornia
|
Quote:
|
|
10-23-2006, 05:40 PM | #16 (permalink) |
Location: Washington DC
|
We wont know the value of embryonic stem cell research until more research is conducted on embryonic stem cells to determine for a fact that adult stem cells are equally productive. There is no conclusive evidence that I have seen to support this conclusion.
And I have a hard time seeing the moral implications. It is not like embryos are being created for the purpose of stem cell research, which should never be allowed. The idea is to utlize the thousands of existing embryos created "in vitro" and that will otherwise be disposed. The potential life saving possibilities, as slim as they may be until we know more, is a reasonable alternative to disposal. Just as an aside, would we even have millions of couples that have benefited from in vitro fertilization if we had been prevented from exploring the boundaries of medical science as a result of the moral concerns expressed by a less than majority segment of society?
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 10-23-2006 at 06:06 PM.. |
10-23-2006, 07:03 PM | #17 (permalink) |
All important elusive independent swing voter...
Location: People's Republic of KKKalifornia
|
DC, you make some interesting points but I would like to know more. How do you know it is less than a majority of the population that has a moral concern with this issue? Also, even if it is less than a majority, would that matter? After all, there have been case in the past where the majority was not in the right.
It's a complex issue butI think there can be a compromise there. More discussion and civil debate is definitely a good thing. |
10-23-2006, 08:00 PM | #18 (permalink) |
Addict
|
I genuinely, honestly don't understand what the problem is with stem cell research. Being that it is a science with great potential like any other, I am for supporting it fully and wholeheartedly; to the extent that scientists are willing and able to pursue this research, I can think of no reason to limit them and plenty of reasons to positively support them, without reservation.
So can someone who thinks otherwise (whether you're against it, or simply have reservations or qualifications) please explain their position to me? This isn't meant as a rhetorical challenge; I'm actually curious and just would like to hear frank responses. I'm not asking you to prove anything to me. |
10-23-2006, 08:18 PM | #19 (permalink) | |
Location: Washington DC
|
Quote:
http://pollingreport.com/science.htm#Stem I believe that if it was explained that it doesnt mean creating new embryos for the research but using existing embryos that would otherwise be destroyed, the numbers would be even higher...but that is conjecture. Cutting edge science always has to deal with the moral implications regardless of the level of public support. But in this case, there are potential medical benefits that cant be fully determined without research and public support.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire |
|
10-23-2006, 08:27 PM | #20 (permalink) |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
Actually I did think of a problem with stem cell research that I had forgotten about.
I will NEVER EVER support discarded human fetuses as a commodity. If anyone is making money off them, I do view that as wrong, and I can just imagine if it became a market where breeder women sell the right to their abortion. That is one horror I would not abide by.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
10-23-2006, 08:37 PM | #21 (permalink) | |
Location: Washington DC
|
The bill that Bush vetoed with the statement "these boys and girls are not spare parts" restricts the research:
Quote:
PRESIDENT BUSH: Yet we must also remember that embryonic stem cells come from human embryos that are destroyed themselves. Each of these human embryos is a unique human life, with inherent dignity and matchless value. We see that value in the children who are with us today. Each of these children began his or her life as a frozen embryo that was created for in vitro fertilization, but remained unused after fertility treatments were complete. Each of these children was adopted while still an embryo, and has been blessed with the chance to grow up in a loving family. These boys and girls are not spare parts.According to the background from the Castle bill, only 10 percent of the "in vitro" embryos not used by the primary parents are "adopted" and the rest destroyed.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 10-23-2006 at 08:53 PM.. |
|
10-23-2006, 09:41 PM | #22 (permalink) | |
All important elusive independent swing voter...
Location: People's Republic of KKKalifornia
|
Quote:
My starting point would be abortion. I am against abortion through and through. No compromise there. My reason is that for me, I need science or a consensus by clergy determine when life actually began (i.e. - at conception or at birth or somewhere in between). But until then, I believe life to begin at conception. SO abortion to me would be murder plain and simple. Stem cell research as I understand it thus far, requires the stem cells from an embryo or fetus. That's where things get murky for me. I hesitate because while I understand that those embryos or fetuses are to be discarded regardless, I share the same concern as UsTwo with the potential for trade or commerce in fetuses and embryos. This I cannot abide. Especially if there were to be a trade in aborted fetuses etc.... Now this new info you guys are talking about, the adult stem cell research stuff, is definitely intriguing to me. I don't know anything about it really but I am open-minded enough to listen. That's it for now, I need to take a break, but I hope that helps you understand one opposing opinion, HiredGun. |
|
10-24-2006, 04:29 AM | #23 (permalink) | |
Walking is Still Honest
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
I agree with Ustwo's point, too, but that isn't the main thing for me. And yes, I also have a problem with in vitro fertilization. edit: seems that jorgelito put together a much more thorough explanation, feel free to address his post instead... I'll only add that I don't see any good reason for opposing adult stem cell research and don't personally know anyone who opposes it. It's the embryonic stuff that gets a minority of religious folk and secular oddities like me upset.
__________________
I wonder if we're stuck in Rome. Last edited by FoolThemAll; 10-24-2006 at 04:34 AM.. |
|
10-24-2006, 10:56 AM | #24 (permalink) |
Wehret Den Anfängen!
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
There is a ban against using federal funds to do embriotic stem cell research.
Now, on the face of this, it doesn't seem to be that huge of a ban. But you have to remember something. Not one penny. Not one penny of federal funds, from the past or the present, could have been used in any equipment, buildings, administration, or salaries. If the building was made 20 years ago, paid for from a fund that got 1% of it's input from Federal funding -- you can't do any stem cell research in that building. Even if it is just one penny of Federal funding that went into the building, using it for stem cell research is illegal. So, either you have to do a huge accounting backtracking check to find and guarantee a research building is federal-funding free, from now and back to the beginning of time, and then sequester it off from the main revenue of the research institution (to prevent it from being contaminated with Federal funds), or you have to build a completely seperate and sequestered research institution and avoid contaminating it with Federal funds. Don't get me wrong -- this is being done. There are US universities that refuse Federal funding, and I believe there has been some attempts in California to build stem cell research buildings. But the Federal ban on stem cell research isn't just "the Fed's won't earmark any funds for Stem Cell research" -- it means that anyone who ever accepted Federal money is retroactively constrained (to a greater or lesser extent) in what they can do. ... I was actually under the impression, after doing some research, that M.J.F.'s rocking behaviour during that add was a side effect of a drug that helps him speak more clearly. (the claim is that without his meds, at the current time, MJF cannot effectively speak) The drug kills the small-scale tremours, and allows speech -- but it causes a significant low-frequency rocking motion.
__________________
Last edited by JHVH : 10-29-4004 BC at 09:00 PM. Reason: Time for a rest. |
10-24-2006, 11:42 AM | #25 (permalink) | |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
Quote:
Perhaps rather than spending ones effort to elect people to publicly fund, the best course of action would be to privately fund it, if there is such a public desire to see it happen. Maybe a stem-cell telethon
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
|
10-24-2006, 08:02 PM | #26 (permalink) | |||
Crazy
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.michaeljfox.org/news/arti...p?id=153&sec=2 Quote:
They're not "tireless," but it seems obvious who the "crooks and liars" are, and the lies they're willing to tell to influence the next election. |
|||
10-24-2006, 08:23 PM | #27 (permalink) |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
How dare people try to cure Parkinson's! Damn crooks.
How about what we do is give Limbaugh Parkinson's, then we can let him see what it's like when you are dying slowly from a crippling disease. He'd be rallying for stem cell research in a split second, and then O'Reilly would be all over his ass. Then we give O'Reilly Parkinson's, and someone else is on his ass. The whole thing is dispicable. How about instead of shooting down a possible cure, these idiot pundits get off their fat asses and try to fucking help? |
10-24-2006, 09:22 PM | #28 (permalink) | |
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
Quote:
This might be hard for you to gasp but SOME people view abortion as murder, I'm not going to fault them for this, I'm not so sure myself. I'm just evil and think that if people want to murder their children more power too them as those people won't be teaching their children their own fucked up values in the next generation.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
|
10-25-2006, 05:41 AM | #29 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Fort Worth, TX
|
Sorry, but look up the bill that he is trying to get passed.
It's not to legalize stem-cell research, that research is legal and Talent has stated he has NO plan to criminalize it. It's a constitutional bill which is labeled the Stem-Cell Research and Protection (or something similar), look it up and you'll realize that this mis-label is actually to constitutionally protect cloning. Michael J. Fox thinks he is helping stem-cell research when in reality he's helping cloning research. While I support stem-cell, I am completely against cloning.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas |
10-25-2006, 05:58 AM | #30 (permalink) | |
Location: Washington DC
|
Perhaps you can explain how the bill that both the House and Senate passed and Bush vetoed contitutionally protects cloning.
Quote:
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire |
|
10-25-2006, 06:04 AM | #31 (permalink) |
Addict
|
Thanks to those who clarified their stance for me.
Seaver, do you have a link on that info? UsTwo: Of course a cure isn't a sure thing, but no research ever is. The point is that there's a possibility, and that possibility is too valuable not to be pursued. If the lives of our adult, fully human soldiers are worth the possibility of whatever we think we're achieving in Iraq, is the use of a few dead fetuses not an acceptable price for the possibility to preserve life by fighting disease? |
10-25-2006, 06:17 AM | #32 (permalink) | |
Walking is Still Honest
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
The people in the armed forces - as it's currently all-volunteer - all consented to be enforcers of United States foreign policy. You could say that they didn't consent to this particular war - and perhaps there's a good argument there - but there is basic, general consent. An embryo cannot consent. I don't see the donor's consent as being sufficient for life-discarding medical research, just as I wouldn't consider consent from the parent of an infant sufficient (which is not to say that there aren't differences between the two situations, just not any relevant differences in my view).
__________________
I wonder if we're stuck in Rome. |
|
10-25-2006, 06:46 AM | #34 (permalink) | |
Walking is Still Honest
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
I'd agree that use for research is better than destruction for extra space or destruction according to the donor's wishes, but I don't believe that any of these should be legally permitted. Let alone taxpayer-funded.
__________________
I wonder if we're stuck in Rome. |
|
10-25-2006, 07:31 AM | #35 (permalink) | |||
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
10-25-2006, 07:52 AM | #36 (permalink) | |
Addict
|
Quote:
|
|
10-25-2006, 07:56 AM | #37 (permalink) | ||
Pissing in the cornflakes
|
Quote:
(1) The stem cells were derived from human embryos that have been donated from in vitro fertilization clinics, were created for the purposes of fertility treatment, and were in excess of the clinical need of the individuals seeking such treatment. These stem cells are pretty much worthless for any disease research, its basically nothing beyond an egg. They are totally non-differentiated, and there isn't much we can do with them except let them differentiate, aka develop. This is very useful for the study of cloning (an identical twin is a natural clone) but won't make M.J. Fox stop shaking. Quote:
That comparison is a weee bit of a stretch. The obvious counter argument is that the fetuses didn't volunteer to be killed.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps. |
||
10-25-2006, 07:58 AM | #38 (permalink) | |
Asshole
Administrator
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
/threadjack and rational thought
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin "There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush "We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo |
|
10-25-2006, 07:59 AM | #39 (permalink) |
Addict
|
Ustwo: I refer you to the post right above yours. If we're willing to sacrifice the lives of Iraqis, I don't understand the unwillingness to use these embryos.
The comparison is a huge stretch, imo; on the one hand you have discarded embryos that have never been born or lived, and on the other you have adult humans who have lives, memories, and families. Last edited by hiredgun; 10-25-2006 at 08:01 AM.. |
10-25-2006, 08:01 AM | #40 (permalink) | |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
cell, research, stem |
|
|