Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-04-2006, 01:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Negative campaign ads

What do you think of negative campaign ads? You know that ones I mean. A candidate doesn't state what he/she thinks about anything or his experience or record, only how his/her opponent thinks about issues. I despise them. Everyone I've spoken to about them hates them, too. But they must be appealing to some voters because they are used in every single campaign!

Why can't candidates and proposition backers tell us about their side? Why must they just be negative about their opposition?

If you are actually a fan of or swayed by negative campaign ads, please share why they appeal to you.
lindalove is offline  
Old 10-04-2006, 01:19 PM   #2 (permalink)
Asshole
 
The_Jazz's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
I guess I don't define negative campaigning the same way you do. As long as the issues are being actually addressed. Issues would not include personal things. If the add in question says that so-and-so voted some way on some bill, the implication is that the opponent sponsoring the add wouldn't have voted that way.

Negative adds attack things that are typically out of bounds, IMHO, with personal issues again being the issue. The Jack Ryan sex scandal would be the obvious example.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
The_Jazz is offline  
Old 10-04-2006, 01:25 PM   #3 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
My state is a special case.

We have an incompetent, uncharismatic, semi-corrupt govenor. And we have an incompetent, uncharismatic, quite possibily corrupt challanger.

All they have are negative adds, there is nothing possitive to say about either of them. There is just something odd about illinois in the last few years that we just have only the dregs running.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 10-04-2006, 01:26 PM   #4 (permalink)
Asshole
 
The_Jazz's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
I'd hardly call Obama "the dregs", but for the most part, you're right about the other state office holders.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
The_Jazz is offline  
Old 10-04-2006, 01:36 PM   #5 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Jazz
I'd hardly call Obama "the dregs", but for the most part, you're right about the other state office holders.
Another party line socialist, wouldn't even make a ripple if he wasn't a well spoken black man, which is rare in the democratic party these days.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 10-04-2006, 01:40 PM   #6 (permalink)
"Afternoon everybody." "NORM!"
 
Paradise Lost's Avatar
 
Location: Poland, Ohio // Clarion University of PA.
I don't think they are of any use, period, and I think people who watch them, anyone, probably don't take them as anything but a joke.

Say you supported candidate A, and A has a bad record on abortion laws, it should be fairly obvious that those who voted for candidate A in the first place are OK with this. So candidate B runs a segment on how A has a bad record on abortion laws (usually kept vague like this just to say, implicitly, that whatever I, candidate B is doing, A is doing the opposite of, and therefore bad. Which is bad logic in and of itself, but that's another issue.) These records are also public opinion, so it wouldn't mean much for candidate B to try and lie about A's position, he'd get called on it immediately, so we'll assume the ad actually is telling the truth.

So the ad is run for Candidate B, and, if anything, all it does is appease the B voters because they already know about A's bad records, hence adding to reasons to not have originally voted for him. Candidate A voters don't give a shit because they already support A, probably for the very reasons that B is against A for having. So nothing gets accomplished. All you have are slight ad hominem attacks against a rival candidate with no real effort to explain why A's bad records are worthy enough for you to reconsider your position and perhaps check out B's position.

Unfortunately, most candidates are smart enough to realise that people are easily swayed by a person's personal flaws rather than with what the actual argument behind anything is. So they use this as an attack and hope people will convert for the reasons that the other person is a douchebag (which may be true), rather than having douchebagish views (which may not actually be true).
__________________
"Marino could do it."
Paradise Lost is offline  
Old 10-04-2006, 02:36 PM   #7 (permalink)
Artist of Life
 
Ch'i's Avatar
 
I think they're hilarious, in a somewhat sad way.

*Screen turns Black/White* "Last year your governor murdered three thousand innocent babies. He promised a raise in school funding, but brought only death."
*Back to color. Shows candidate playing with children* "Vote Blah for governor. Stop the killing; bring sanity back to Blank."

The information on negative ad campaigns is useless.
Ch'i is offline  
Old 10-04-2006, 03:00 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Political consultants measure the effectiveness of ads in a variety of ways and for the most part, they will say that negative ads are the most effective and have a deeper and more lasting impact than ads stating their own candidate's position.

One I saw recently.....an ad by A that shows what looks like his opponent sitting by his pool at his mansion watching his "illegal" gardener mow the lawn as the "illegal" maid brings him a martini. This had no basis in reality. But what are you likely to remember most...that image or A describing his position on a guest worker program?

I distingush negative ads like that from "attack" ads where a candidate's ad highlights the opponent's record. If its factual, I dont see a problem.

The worse type of negative ads is "push polling" because it touches voters one-on-one. A purported indepdent pollling company (that is actuallya phone bank paid by a candidate) calls thousands of voters and presents misleading or outright false information in the form of poll questions.

Karl Rove is the master of push polling. The two classic examples are in Bush's first campaign for governor against Ann Richards, when the "polling company" asked...."would you be more or less likely to vote for a candidate for governor if SHE were a lesbian?" (there was only one "she" running)

And the primarty race in SC in 2000 between Bush and McCain, where it was even more direct: ""Would you be more likely or less likely to vote for John McCain for president if you knew he had fathered an illegitimate black child?" (He and his wife had in fact adopted a baby from Bangledesh).

They are called push polls because they succeed in pushing votes away from a candidate without lying outright, but by framing it in the form of a hypothetical questions.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 10-04-2006, 03:14 PM   #9 (permalink)
Asshole
 
The_Jazz's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Another party line socialist, wouldn't even make a ripple if he wasn't a well spoken black man, which is rare in the democratic party these days.
Obviously you've never sat down and spoken with the man. He's highly intelligent and very well spoken, not to mention well traveled and well read. I know, I know, he and I should get a room and I'm making it too easy for you.

Don't you have teeth to fix?
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
The_Jazz is offline  
Old 10-04-2006, 05:46 PM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
<center><img src="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:qzuY8cffjG17eM:http://www.tdrortho.com/images/herbstpic.jpg"></center>
host is offline  
Old 10-04-2006, 06:55 PM   #11 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by host
<center><img src="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:qzuY8cffjG17eM:http://www.tdrortho.com/images/herbstpic.jpg"></center>
Herbts appliance, wouldn't use it on a dog.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 10-04-2006, 07:07 PM   #12 (permalink)
Extreme moderation
 
Toaster126's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City, yo.
I think negative campaign ads are annoying, but they seem to do the job. Much like spam and whatnot, they wouldn't do it if it didn't work.

Also, we should have a thread on why Obama is making waves, if only so I can agree with Ustwo and be on topic.
__________________
"The question isn't who is going to let me, it's who is going to stop me." (Ayn Rand)
"The truth is that our finest moments are most likely to occur when we are feeling deeply uncomfortable, unhappy, or unfulfilled. For it is only in such moments, propelled by our discomfort, that we are likely to step out of our ruts and start searching for different ways or truer answers." (M. Scott Peck)
Toaster126 is offline  
Old 10-04-2006, 08:50 PM   #13 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Herbts appliance, wouldn't use it on a dog.
Get back to work, you slacker!
ratbastid is offline  
Old 10-04-2006, 09:19 PM   #14 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
Get back to work, you slacker!
Hey that appliance makes me a lot of money.

A different orthodontist recomends it, I tell the parents we don't need to use it, and they come to me instead.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 10-04-2006, 09:23 PM   #15 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
My state is a special case.

We have an incompetent, uncharismatic, semi-corrupt govenor. And we have an incompetent, uncharismatic, quite possibily corrupt challanger.

All they have are negative adds, there is nothing possitive to say about either of them.
This could probably describe the majority of elections in this country. To bad that our system is so messed up that it is easy for the currupt to get power and those who are not currupt but fortunate enought to climb the ladder get currupted by the system quickly.
Rekna is offline  
Old 10-05-2006, 06:59 AM   #16 (permalink)
Addict
 
Deltona Couple's Avatar
 
Location: Spring, Texas
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Hey that appliance makes me a lot of money.

A different orthodontist recomends it, I tell the parents we don't need to use it, and they come to me instead.

OK, since I am not a dentist, I have to ask. what the hell is that thing? and what does it do? To me it appears to be a new jaw hinge? maybe for someone with a weak jawbone at the pivot point?
__________________
"It is not that I have failed, but that I have found 10,000 ways that it DOESN'T work!" --Thomas Edison
Deltona Couple is offline  
Old 10-05-2006, 07:05 AM   #17 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deltona Couple
OK, since I am not a dentist, I have to ask. what the hell is that thing? and what does it do? To me it appears to be a new jaw hinge? maybe for someone with a weak jawbone at the pivot point?
Its pure unrefined evil, thats all you need to know.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 10-05-2006, 07:42 AM   #18 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Its pure unrefined evil, thats all you need to know.
Not everyone agrees.....
Quote:
http://www.oc-j.com/issue2/p0000189.htm
Welcome!
The Orthodontic CYBERjournal is dedicated to the exchange of information regarding the art and science of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. Please help it grow by sharing articles, research, techniques, humor, problems, and ideas.

Indications for Use:

The long-haul <b>Herbst appliance</b> is used to accomplish long-term functional responses common to Herbst appliance therapy and also to serve as the anchorage unit to hold the upper molars back following Pendulum therapy. This appliance is most commonly used in conjunction with the Pendex Appliance in Phase 1 therapy, long before the permanent upper buccal segments have erupted. The most typical case would be the brachyfacial Class II that has a short corpus length and retruded lower face. In these cases, it is not ideal to retract or orthopedically reduce the maxillary complex (� la headgear) and yet dental movements are acceptable and desirable. ....

.......Considerations:

The long-haul Herbst appliance must be in place long term (over 12 months) to garner some of the orthopedic and orthodontic results attributed to this appliance. <b>This combination of Pendex and long-term Herbst appliance is a very dynamic Phase 1 therapy that holds great potential in early treatment.</b> The results to date have been very encouraging and improvements in technique come on almost a daily basis.
host is offline  
Old 10-05-2006, 07:59 AM   #19 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by host
Not everyone agrees.....
And thank god for that. The herbts has been long proven to not make any orthopedic long term effects, breaks constantly, is very uncomfortable, and is more for lazy orthodontists who dont' want to monitor patient progress with more compliance oriented appliances. It works, but just like a bullet will end clinical depression, its not really the best way to do it.

Nothing is more fun than being the 2nd opinion after someone was recomended one of these monstrosities

Also phase I treatment is how ordontists say 'I'd like to make more money.' Again as a concept its been proven to be a waste of time in most cases but when you tell someone that what they have been doing which works and makes them more money is not really needed, how do you think they react?
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 10-05-2006, 08:22 AM   #20 (permalink)
Junkie
 
highthief's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
My state is a special case.

We have an incompetent, uncharismatic, semi-corrupt govenor. And we have an incompetent, uncharismatic, quite possibily corrupt challanger.

All they have are negative adds, there is nothing possitive to say about either of them. There is just something odd about illinois in the last few years that we just have only the dregs running.
Well, you know what they say - people get the government they deserve!

__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum.
highthief is offline  
Old 10-07-2006, 09:36 AM   #21 (permalink)
Easy Rider
 
flstf's Avatar
 
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
I will never understand why these negative ads work.

They spout out about how their opponent is the devil incarnate and wants to take all the money from working families and give it to Scrooge or my opponent wants to help terrorists kill you, etc.... They are bad, bad, bad people.

Then it will cut away to a picture of the smiling candidate sitting on the front porch with their spouse and three kids, "this message was brought to you by and approved by Jane Doe". They must be so proud.
flstf is offline  
Old 10-09-2006, 01:07 PM   #22 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
Political consultants measure the effectiveness of ads in a variety of ways and for the most part, they will say that negative ads are the most effective and have a deeper and more lasting impact than ads stating their own candidate's position.

One I saw recently.....an ad by A that shows what looks like his opponent sitting by his pool at his mansion watching his "illegal" gardener mow the lawn as the "illegal" maid brings him a martini. This had no basis in reality. But what are you likely to remember most...that image or A describing his position on a guest worker program?

I distingush negative ads like that from "attack" ads where a candidate's ad highlights the opponent's record. If its factual, I dont see a problem.

The worse type of negative ads is "push polling" because it touches voters one-on-one. A purported indepdent pollling company (that is actuallya phone bank paid by a candidate) calls thousands of voters and presents misleading or outright false information in the form of poll questions.

Karl Rove is the master of push polling. The two classic examples are in Bush's first campaign for governor against Ann Richards, when the "polling company" asked...."would you be more or less likely to vote for a candidate for governor if SHE were a lesbian?" (there was only one "she" running)

And the primarty race in SC in 2000 between Bush and McCain, where it was even more direct: ""Would you be more likely or less likely to vote for John McCain for president if you knew he had fathered an illegitimate black child?" (He and his wife had in fact adopted a baby from Bangledesh).

They are called push polls because they succeed in pushing votes away from a candidate without lying outright, but by framing it in the form of a hypothetical questions.
This type of behavior is damaging to our country. As are the negative ads. RARELY do we see a negative ad that is completely factual. The majority of them have been exaggerated, many are blatant lies. I almost feel like they are a bunch of children on a playground..."Did you see what Johnny is wearing, gross" "Well i heard he eats worms, we shouldn't talk to him".

I agree with previous poster who said they would rather hear what the candidate is going to do to HELP me rather than what their opponent will do to hurt me.
lindalove is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 03:02 PM   #23 (permalink)
I want a Plaid crayon
 
Plaid13's Avatar
 
Only thought i have about any of this is... the two party system is flawed and worthless and needs to be done away with.
Plaid13 is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 07:48 PM   #24 (permalink)
Addict
 
hiredgun's Avatar
 
Negative campaign ads are, as is all of politics, really, a reflection of us as a society. It's a sad thought, but true.

It's also an indication of the extent to which politics today is about "making" rather than "acting". The relationship between representative and constituency is one of subject and object rather than a dialogue between subjects, and the political decision is an exercise in the number crunching of social science rather than an act of genuine political will. They don't have to treat us as mature adults or as intellectual equals, and the quality of the discourse is completely irrelevant; what politicians do is simply what they find to work, i.e. the strategies that are statistically likely to tip the votes in their favor.

Quite apart from the difficulty in placing blame, I'm not sure really where one might begin to take practical steps in addressing the problem.
hiredgun is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 08:52 PM   #25 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
I am really curious as to why this threadjack is acceptable to lindalove or anyone else posting to a topic regarding negative ad campaigns:

Quote:
Herbts appliance, wouldn't use it on a dog.

Hey that appliance makes me a lot of money.

A different orthodontist recomends it, I tell the parents we don't need to use it, and they come to me instead.

Its pure unrefined evil, thats all you need to know.

"This combination of Pendex and long-term Herbst appliance is a very dynamic Phase 1 therapy that holds great potential in early treatment."

And thank god for that. The herbts has been long proven to not make any orthopedic long term effects, breaks constantly, is very uncomfortable, and is more for lazy orthodontists who dont' want to monitor patient progress with more compliance oriented appliances. It works, but just like a bullet will end clinical depression, its not really the best way to do it.

Nothing is more fun than being the 2nd opinion after someone was recomended one of these monstrosities
Is it acceptable that U2 threadjack another topic?

This topic *was* about negative ad campaigns, *not* u2's opinion regarding dental appliances. Is there moderation here to speak of?
Elphaba is offline  
Old 10-10-2006, 09:27 PM   #26 (permalink)
It's all downhill from here
 
docbungle's Avatar
 
Location: Denver
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elphaba
I am really curious as to why this threadjack is acceptable to lindalove or anyone else posting to a topic regarding negative ad campaigns:



Is it acceptable that U2 threadjack another topic?

This topic *was* about negative ad campaigns, *not* u2's opinion regarding dental appliances. Is there moderation here to speak of?
Um, everything you just quoted was "U2" (whatever that means) responding to posts that were addressed to him specifically. If anyone was threadjacking, it is those who posted the questions. I mean, seriously.
__________________
Bad Luck City
docbungle is offline  
Old 10-11-2006, 09:36 AM   #27 (permalink)
spudly
 
ubertuber's Avatar
 
Location: Ellay
It's also a threadjack that ended 6 days ago. Let it lie.
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam
ubertuber is offline  
Old 10-11-2006, 02:29 PM   #28 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elphaba
I am really curious as to why this threadjack is acceptable to lindalove or anyone else posting to a topic regarding negative ad campaigns:
I have to admit that every time I see that there's a new post in my topic only to find out it's not about my topic is a little disappointing. Well, more than a little.
lindalove is offline  
Old 10-11-2006, 10:47 PM   #29 (permalink)
Addict
 
hiredgun's Avatar
 
To answer the question succinctly, I think it's about the impact of a soundbite.

The average voter's political exposure is going to be both minimal and passive. That means your ad has to make an impact in a very short amount of time and with a very weak hold on the listener / viewer.

Political positives tend not to assert themselves as strongly in one's consciousness or memory. These things are not attention-getting: Candidate X supports so-and-so; Candidate X has such-and-such experience; Candidate X is a defender of any of a large number of shiny generalities ('fiscal responsibility', 'caring for our elderly', 'fighting the war on terror'). These terms are so common and meaningless that they become background noise, mere static. You will not really remember much of this when you enter the polling booth.

On the other hand, (and especially if we assume that most of our representatives do decent jobs) negatives do catch our attention. Candidate Y's sex scandal; Candidate Y's hideous voting record on this or that important issue; Candidate Y's failure to deal with X while in office (to which we think: "Damn! I've been plagued by X problems for the last two years!").

It's the same reason Ann Coulter has so many readers. Candidates, like columnists, must out-sensationalize each other to get our attention, and that means appealing to the lowest-common denominator and producing shocking, rather than valuable, content.
hiredgun is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 03:52 AM   #30 (permalink)
Easy Rider
 
flstf's Avatar
 
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
I guess negative ads work best when there are only two choices. With the election process rigged so that only one of two parties can realistically get elected then making the other guy look bad will probably get as many or more votes as making yourself look good.

It's probably much the same in the marketplace with consumer goods. If Ford and Honda were the only choices then we would probably see more ads with Honda emphasizing the negative aspects of Ford. With more choices available they do better by emphasizing their own positives to try and distance themselves from the field instead of attacking the other choices by name one at a time.
flstf is offline  
 

Tags
ads, campaign, negative


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:26 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360