Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Philosophy


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-12-2004, 09:34 PM   #1 (permalink)
Mencken
 
Scipio's Avatar
 
Location: College
Game Type Philosophy Thread - Euthyphro

Here's the game: you can only reply with a single short (use your judgement) sentence.


Plato posed a simple question in his dialogue Euthyphro: What is the source of what we think is good and bad, or right and wrong? Putting aside the relative truth of religion for a moment, does good and bad come from God, or is it grounded in a different standard of truth outside God? Basically, are God's commands arbitrary, or are they grounded in something? Is an act morally good because God wills it or is it good because God agrees that it is good?

IMPORTANT: Assume (correctly) that it's possible for God to exist and for good to come from another, possibly higher source. You don't need an atheist to think that right and wrong are grounded not just within God, but within the universe itself.

So, here's the question:

Do good and bad, and right and wrong come from God (or whichever deity), or are they grounded in something else, like humanity or the very structure of the universe?
__________________
"Erections lasting more than 4 hours, though rare, require immediate medical attention."
Scipio is offline  
Old 02-13-2004, 07:16 AM   #2 (permalink)
Mad Philosopher
 
asaris's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, DC
Well, I'll bite. Right and wrong both come from God and are grounded in our nature. Because God is God, he didn't have to create, and creating, he didn't have to create any specific world (i.e., there is no "best of all possible worlds"). But having created this world, he created a world with the sorts of creatures we are. Now, God is good. So he had to create a set of moral laws such that they would lead us to our natural end -- union with him. But our natures are such that there is more than set of moral laws that would lead us to union with God. So he had some choice in the matter.

So, there are three classes of moral laws: those that, given our nature, are necessary; those that are contingent, but 'well-fitting'; and those that are 'arbitrary' (that is, arbitrary in the same sense that which side of the road we drive on is arbitrary). The difficulty is an epistemological one: for any given moral law, we don't know what category it fits into. Note that, among all of the last four (or six, or five, depending on how you count) of the 10 commandments, God commands at some point a breach of the commandment, except in the case of adultery (yes, adultery, not murder (see Abraham), and not lying (It's somewhere in Kings). So either God is not good, or he can, for our benefit, set aside part of the moral law in a particular situation.

I might add two things by way of an addendum:
1. My position is essentially derived from that of the medieval thinker John Duns Scotus, though not identical to his.
2. This is a philosophical position, not a religious position. That is, while it excepts the Biblical accounts as largely true in the important ways, it is not dependant on my Christianity for my belief in it, nor is my belief in Christianity dependant on it. Similarly, it is not a position that could be proven from scripture alone.
__________________
"Die Deutschen meinen, daß die Kraft sich in Härte und Grausamkeit offenbaren müsse, sie unterwerfen sich dann gerne und mit Bewunderung:[...]. Daß es Kraft giebt in der Milde und Stille, das glauben sie nicht leicht."

"The Germans believe that power must reveal itself in hardness and cruelty and then submit themselves gladly and with admiration[...]. They do not believe readily that there is power in meekness and calm."

-- Friedrich Nietzsche

Last edited by asaris; 02-13-2004 at 07:19 AM..
asaris is offline  
Old 02-13-2004, 07:18 AM   #3 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Pennsylvania
Concepts of "good" and "evil" are societal constructions as evidenced by the observation that different societies think different things are "evil".
Giltwist is offline  
Old 02-13-2004, 10:59 AM   #4 (permalink)
Mad Philosopher
 
asaris's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, DC
I don't think that's good enough (if you'll pardon the pun) Giltwist. I want to be able to say, "What the crusaders did when they sacked Constantinople was evil", and under your definition, unless you clarify it a bit, I can't validly say that without being anachronistic.
__________________
"Die Deutschen meinen, daß die Kraft sich in Härte und Grausamkeit offenbaren müsse, sie unterwerfen sich dann gerne und mit Bewunderung:[...]. Daß es Kraft giebt in der Milde und Stille, das glauben sie nicht leicht."

"The Germans believe that power must reveal itself in hardness and cruelty and then submit themselves gladly and with admiration[...]. They do not believe readily that there is power in meekness and calm."

-- Friedrich Nietzsche
asaris is offline  
Old 02-13-2004, 11:06 AM   #5 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Pennsylvania
Heh, he said only one sentence

And it is not anachronistic, and that is the whole point. The crusaders sure as heck didn't think the crusades were evil. But you can. Thus, "evil" is relative. I go one step further and say that one's view of "evil" is based upon, first, what other people tell you is evil, then, later, by what you experience in your society. So, philosophers would call the concept of "evil" a social construction.
Giltwist is offline  
Old 02-13-2004, 02:23 PM   #6 (permalink)
On the lam
 
rsl12's Avatar
 
Location: northern va
here's the central problem. I assume you think that God is the Creator, or if not, at least in control of humanity and the structure of the universe. Then it follows that even if you belive that good and bad are grounded in humanity or the structure of the universe, then good and bad have to also be grounded in god.


In other words:

God is in control of humanity.
Humanity is in control of good and bad.
Therefore, good and bad are in control of God.

As long as you believe the 1st, you cannot believe that good and bad are grounded in humanity and not in God at the same time.
__________________
oh baby oh baby, i like gravy.
rsl12 is offline  
Old 02-13-2004, 02:32 PM   #7 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Denver, CO
Right and wrong come from my shoulders.

Or, at least, the little angel and devil that appear on my shoulders every now and again.
__________________
"We must have waffles. We must all have waffles, forthwith. Oh, we must think.
We must all have waffles and think, each and every one of us to the very best of his ability."
-- Professor Goldthwait Higginson Dorr, Ph.D.
FleaCircus is offline  
Old 02-13-2004, 04:56 PM   #8 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Good: Supporting the society by creating enviroments where individuals thrine and support that enviroment at the same time, thus perpetuating that which perpetuates society in a desirable manner, desirable being what brings happiness and intelligence to all.
Xell101 is offline  
Old 02-16-2004, 08:30 AM   #9 (permalink)
Mad Philosopher
 
asaris's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, DC
xell (and I could ask Giltwist the same question): why is that good? See, it makes sense to ask "Is what society considers good good?" But that means that good must be something other than merely what society considers to be good, otherwise the question would have no sense. (That is, it makes no sense to ask "Is x y?" if x is the same thing as y.)

Oh, and sorry, I missed the one sentence thing. Hopefully this is short enough.
__________________
"Die Deutschen meinen, daß die Kraft sich in Härte und Grausamkeit offenbaren müsse, sie unterwerfen sich dann gerne und mit Bewunderung:[...]. Daß es Kraft giebt in der Milde und Stille, das glauben sie nicht leicht."

"The Germans believe that power must reveal itself in hardness and cruelty and then submit themselves gladly and with admiration[...]. They do not believe readily that there is power in meekness and calm."

-- Friedrich Nietzsche
asaris is offline  
Old 02-16-2004, 03:40 PM   #10 (permalink)
Junkie
 
One sentance Summary: I don't really believe in good and evil, just what we humans delude ourselves in in the interests of our little organized collective's ability to self-perpetuate, being beast of society and all.

Last edited by Xell101; 02-16-2004 at 03:44 PM..
Xell101 is offline  
Old 02-16-2004, 06:32 PM   #11 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Pennsylvania
Quote:
But that means that good must be something other than merely what society considers to be good, otherwise the question would have no sense. (That is, it makes no sense to ask "Is x y?" if x is the same thing as y.)
Actually it makes perfect sense. In fact, it makes so much that there is a rule that says you can introduce a=a at any time in a proof.
Giltwist is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 09:03 AM   #12 (permalink)
Mad Philosopher
 
asaris's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, DC
Yes, but it doesn't make sense to ask "Is a=a?" And if x=y, then asking "Is x=y?" is the same thing as asking "Is x=x?" The reason you can add it into a proof at any time is because it doesn't mean anything -- it doesn't add any new information into the proof, and is precisely for this reason admissible. Would you ever ask "Is 2=2?" or "Is Aristotle Aristotle?"
__________________
"Die Deutschen meinen, daß die Kraft sich in Härte und Grausamkeit offenbaren müsse, sie unterwerfen sich dann gerne und mit Bewunderung:[...]. Daß es Kraft giebt in der Milde und Stille, das glauben sie nicht leicht."

"The Germans believe that power must reveal itself in hardness and cruelty and then submit themselves gladly and with admiration[...]. They do not believe readily that there is power in meekness and calm."

-- Friedrich Nietzsche
asaris is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 03:26 PM   #13 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Pennsylvania
Actually a more interesting question "Is Aristotle at age ten Aristotle at age twenty?"
Giltwist is offline  
Old 02-18-2004, 12:35 PM   #14 (permalink)
Mad Philosopher
 
asaris's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, DC
no
__________________
"Die Deutschen meinen, daß die Kraft sich in Härte und Grausamkeit offenbaren müsse, sie unterwerfen sich dann gerne und mit Bewunderung:[...]. Daß es Kraft giebt in der Milde und Stille, das glauben sie nicht leicht."

"The Germans believe that power must reveal itself in hardness and cruelty and then submit themselves gladly and with admiration[...]. They do not believe readily that there is power in meekness and calm."

-- Friedrich Nietzsche
asaris is offline  
 

Tags
euthyphro, game, philosophy, thread, type

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:45 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360