Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Philosophy


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-16-2003, 05:28 PM   #1 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Charlotte, N.C.
If a perfect, ideal buddhist doesn't desire...

...does he/she experience temptation?
Spritebox is offline  
Old 09-16-2003, 06:06 PM   #2 (permalink)
My future is coming on
 
lurkette's Avatar
 
Moderator Emeritus
Location: east of the sun and west of the moon
I'm not too familiar with Buddhist philosophy, but I would assume that an absence of desire would preclude temptation. What is temptation, after all, but a desire for something you think you shouldn't desire or shouldn't have/do? The moment you were tempted, you would desire a particular outcome and no longer be the perfect, desire-free Buddhist, right?
__________________
"If ten million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."

- Anatole France
lurkette is offline  
Old 09-16-2003, 06:07 PM   #3 (permalink)
Cracking the Whip
 
Lebell's Avatar
 
Location: Sexymama's arms...
If perfect, no.

That is one of the goals of the Noble 8 fold path, to extinguish desire. If you desire nothing, how can anything tempt you?

But who is perfect?

No one.

So to me, your question is a tautology.
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis

The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU!

Please Donate!

Last edited by Lebell; 09-16-2003 at 11:07 PM..
Lebell is offline  
Old 09-16-2003, 07:07 PM   #4 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Charlotte, N.C.
Theoretical question is all. Just need to know to settle and argument with myself.
__________________
it's all nice on ice alright
and it's not day
and it's not night
but it's all nice on ice alright
Spritebox is offline  
Old 09-16-2003, 07:13 PM   #5 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Indiana University of Pennsylvania
No, the perfect buddhist would not. That's pretty clear-cut, because an enlightened buddhist feels no need.
ccxcone is offline  
Old 09-16-2003, 08:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Stiltzkin's Avatar
 
"If practice makes perfect, but no one is perfect, why practice?"

I don't know who originally said this, but some chick that I really^100 like said this once, so I just had to quote it.

__________________
The most important thing in this world is love.
Stiltzkin is offline  
Old 09-17-2003, 10:20 AM   #7 (permalink)
Post-modernism meets Individualism AKA the Clash
 
anti fishstick's Avatar
 
Location: oregon
the perfect buddhist would still experience temptation because it is a human emotion, but would have the ability to control it.
__________________
And the day came when the risk to remain tight in a bud was more painful than the risk it took to blossom.
~Anais Nin
anti fishstick is offline  
Old 09-17-2003, 12:05 PM   #8 (permalink)
Banned
 
I am not trying to start a flame war, but I think Buddism is wrong fundamentally. To remove your self from desire sounds good, but if everyone did this, then the world would be a stagnant place.

Desire is neither good nor evil, and is paradoxically one of the greatest forces for either. No desire, no progress.
Food Eater Lad is offline  
Old 09-17-2003, 12:38 PM   #9 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: SE USA
How is it wrong? If everyone removed themselves from desire and the world stagnated, what would it matter? If you do not desire anything, then you would not desire progress. You would simply exist in peace with your fellow man and step off the Great Wheel when your time came.

It would not be boring, as you would not desire excitement. It would not be tasteless, as you would not desire flavour. We would all be perfectly content as we would desire nothing.

This will, of course, never happen, as man is too mired in Maya to ever reach this state, especially on grand scale, but it is a worthwhile exercise in hope.
Moonduck is offline  
Old 09-17-2003, 03:02 PM   #10 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally posted by Moonduck
How is it wrong? If everyone removed themselves from desire and the world stagnated, what would it matter? If you do not desire anything, then you would not desire progress. You would simply exist in peace with your fellow man and step off the Great Wheel when your time came.

It would not be boring, as you would not desire excitement. It would not be tasteless, as you would not desire flavour. We would all be perfectly content as we would desire nothing.

This will, of course, never happen, as man is too mired in Maya to ever reach this state, especially on grand scale, but it is a worthwhile exercise in hope.
Would you eat as you don't desire food? Would you recreate as you don't desire children/sex.
Would you get up in the morning, as you have no desire to do anything?
Would you even live, as you have no desire to do so?
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 09-18-2003, 06:17 PM   #11 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: that place with the thing
Quote:
Originally posted by CSflim
Would you eat as you don't desire food? Would you recreate as you don't desire children/sex.
Would you get up in the morning, as you have no desire to do anything?
Would you even live, as you have no desire to do so?
While my knowledge of the subject is far from noteworthy, my answers are:

yes.
yes.
yes.

Absence of desire does not mean apathetic to the idea of life; it means true and deep contentment with what existence does offer. As existence requires metabolism, the Buddhist eats; as existence requires consciousness, the buddhist rises from his bed; as existence requires life, the Buddhist lives until his time expires.
Instead of striving for something, the Buddhist accepts what he already has.

That's my take, anyway.
__________________
I'll be the one to protect you from your enemies and all your demons.
I'll be the one to protect you from a will to survive and voice of reason.
I'll be the one to protect you from your enemies and your choices, son.
They're one and the same I must isolate you, isolate and save you from yourself."
- A Perfect Circle
twotimesadingo is offline  
Old 09-19-2003, 04:35 PM   #12 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally posted by twotimesadingo
While my knowledge of the subject is far from noteworthy, my answers are:

yes.
yes.
yes.

Absence of desire does not mean apathetic to the idea of life; it means true and deep contentment with what existence does offer. As existence requires metabolism, the Buddhist eats; as existence requires consciousness, the buddhist rises from his bed; as existence requires life, the Buddhist lives until his time expires.
Instead of striving for something, the Buddhist accepts what he already has.

That's my take, anyway.
So in other words you desire existence?
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 09-19-2003, 04:53 PM   #13 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
No desire, no progress.
How does that exclude the knowledge that progress in many cases is a good thing?

Quote:
So in other words you desire existence?
To live you do not require desire.
Xell101 is offline  
Old 09-19-2003, 10:45 PM   #14 (permalink)
mepitans
Guest
 
Part of the development of Buddhists(as well as countless other spiritual practices) includes becoming one with all(and nothing). If you are one with all, you already have everything. How could you desire?
 
Old 09-20-2003, 09:37 AM   #15 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally posted by Xell101
To live you do not require desire.
I just explained how you do. With no motivation to do ANYTHING, you would quickly die.
You may act in such a way that you eat, not because you desire the sensation of taste, but simply because you want to live, but that is still a desire.

Contentment does not mean a lack of desire.
Contentment means the lack of desire for change. If you are content you desire things to stay the same. You want to keep the status quo.
Keeping the status quo requires motivation. (e.g. eating). No matter how "at one" you are with nature, doesn't change the fact that you still need to physically act in order to feed yourself.
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 09-20-2003, 11:17 AM   #16 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Since i doubt-correct me if i'm wrong- that anyone of us has met anyone who is even close to enlightened in the buddhist sense of the word, i doubt we could claim to understand their M.O.
However, with this in mind I would speculate that if you were truly content you wouldn't desire life any more than you would desire death; you would be fine either way. If you still desire to live more than you desire to die, obviously you are not truly content. I'm not saying that you can't be content and still want to live, I'm saying you can't be truly content in the buddhist sense, or atleast in my interpretation of it.
You also have to realize that reincarnation is part of buddhism. Under that belief you can't not exist. Death is not feared, it is just one step in the journey to enlightenment.
Edit: Being content is not the same as wanting to uphold the status quo. Being content is realizing that the status quo is going to change or not change regardless of what you do. Being content is realizing that struggling against what is inevitable is useless and wasteful. Being content nowhere contains the desire to be content, because you can't be content if your trying to be content.

Last edited by filtherton; 09-20-2003 at 11:25 AM..
filtherton is offline  
Old 09-20-2003, 11:58 AM   #17 (permalink)
mepitans
Guest
 
Quote:
Originally posted by CSflim
I just explained how you do. With no motivation to do ANYTHING, you would quickly die.
You may act in such a way that you eat, not because you desire the sensation of taste, but simply because you want to live, but that is still a desire.

Contentment does not mean a lack of desire.
Contentment means the lack of desire for change. If you are content you desire things to stay the same. You want to keep the status quo.
Keeping the status quo requires motivation. (e.g. eating). No matter how "at one" you are with nature, doesn't change the fact that you still need to physically act in order to feed yourself.
Just go read some texts on Buddhism. You are using language to try to make yourself look right(and in some instances not even using the language correctly). Look past the language at the idea.

Also, 'at one' isn't being 'at one' with nature. If you were just 'at one' with nature, you wouldn't be one with All.

Last edited by mepitans; 09-20-2003 at 12:02 PM..
 
Old 09-20-2003, 12:31 PM   #18 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally posted by filtherton
Being content is not the same as wanting to uphold the status quo. Being content is realizing that the status quo is going to change or not change regardless of what you do. Being content is realizing that struggling against what is inevitable is useless and wasteful. Being content nowhere contains the desire to be content, because you can't be content if your trying to be content.
Exactly. Death is inevitable. Why struggle against it? Eating is a wasteful struggle against the inevitable.

Quote:
Originally posted by mepitans
Just go read some texts on Buddhism. You are using language to try to make yourself look right(and in some instances not even using the language correctly). Look past the language at the idea.

Also, 'at one' isn't being 'at one' with nature. If you were just 'at one' with nature, you wouldn't be one with All.
I know very little about Buddhism. Granted.
I made two points. Which one is incorrect?

1. Motivation is a requirement of continued survival. You cannot survive without motivation.

2. All motivation comes from a desire of some kind. In fact, motivation and desire are practically synonymous.

In other words, a requirement of life is a desire for life.

Now someone could very easily explain all this, by stating that Buddhists have desire....but only desire in an comparatively simplified way, in that they have no "materialistic" desires. (This is how I previously understood things to be).

Also by "nature", I meant it in the broad sense of the word, not the modern restricted version of it.
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 09-20-2003, 12:50 PM   #19 (permalink)
mepitans
Guest
 
Quote:
Originally posted by CSflim


2. All motivation comes from a desire of some kind. In fact, motivation and desire are practically synonymous.

In other words, a requirement of life is a desire for life.

need: 1 : necessary duty

desire: 1 : to long or hope for

You need to eat, you need to sleep, you need to reproduce.

I think all spiritual practice revolves around fulfilling your potential as a human as much as possible. That would require a need for life in the eyes of Buddhists.

I personally think there is a very big difference between needs and desires
 
Old 09-20-2003, 01:11 PM   #20 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally posted by mepitans
need: 1 : necessary duty

desire: 1 : to long or hope for

You need to eat, you need to sleep, you need to reproduce.

I think all spiritual practice revolves around fulfilling your potential as a human as much as possible. That would require a need for life in the eyes of Buddhists.

I personally think there is a very big difference between needs and desires
You're missing my point.
"You need to eat"....that's not true. Nothing is forcing you to eat. There is of course an implicit assumption in the statement "you need to eat", and it needs to be made explicit.

"You need to eat in order to stay alive"
The question is...why stay alive?

BTW: I don't mean to offend anyone in this thread. Arguing in this manner is how I come to an understanding. I am not arguing "in order to be right".
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 09-20-2003, 01:25 PM   #21 (permalink)
mepitans
Guest
 
Quote:
Originally posted by CSflim
You're missing my point.
"You need to eat"....that's not true. Nothing is forcing you to eat. There is of course an implicit assumption in the statement "you need to eat", and it needs to be made explicit.

"You need to eat in order to stay alive"
The question is...why stay alive?

BTW: I don't mean to offend anyone in this thread. Arguing in this manner is how I come to an understanding. I am not arguing "in order to be right".
I think there is a need to stay alive. I personally find the need to become the best person I can be. And not in a narcisistic sense(hopefully), but in what I hope is a universal sense. It isn't a desire, it is a need I cannot escape.

And thank you for arguing intellegently. It is one of the best ways to find solutions. I really suggest you(and any other open minded individual) go pick up any book by Ken Wilber. I started with Integral Psychology, most people suggest A Brief History of Everything. He has a way of explaining extremely complex things in a very easy to understand manner.

The things talked about in Buddhism and other spiritual texts are for the most part not mere ideas, but very real feelings. Unfortunetly most people do not realize them. Discussion will only get you so far. Direct experience is the only way to fully realize.
 
Old 09-25-2003, 11:06 AM   #22 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Location: Madison WI
Contrary to popular belief, Buddhists can have desire. The problem is in our translation and understanding of "desire". Mahayana Buddhism (most schools we run into) holds that a Bodhisattva has crossed over the state of "worldly" desire but retains the desire to relieve the suffering of all beings, so returning to the world rather than dwelling in Nirvana. Nirvana could be considered the Buddhist "death" Csflim is approximating, although the Buddha refers to the cessation of desire, not necessarily a "heaven" after death. A realized one dwells in Nirvana here and now, not merely after death, although that means subjecting oneself to the slings and arrows of the world, so there is still some suffering involved.
One can indeed continue to function in the world without desire in the usual sense of the word, albeit not free of motivation. There are motivations besides "desire" in this world. We call them "selfless" desires. It's the difference between "My loins are on fire for her, so screw my marriage vows!" and "I see she is so beautiful, my loins are burning, but I consider her as a flower, fully realizing that the act of sex will result in suffering for myself and others." The desire will fade, which is why we practice the awareness of impermanence to get to this point of non-attachment. Eventually, we can get to the point where the desire does not even rear it's ugly head. In the mean time, if it does, we use skillful means to counter it. For example meditating on the fact that her beauty is also impermanent to the point of watching her age and wrinkle up before our very eyes. (Kind of like countering stage-fright by imagining the audience is naked.)
I think my goal as a Buddhist (how's that for a paradox?) is to enjoy life more fully through non-attachment. Another paradox. All the biggies are..
For example, I go out to dinner desiring a great meal served by a competent waiter while having an enjoyable time with my wife. If the conversaton, service, or food is lacking in some way, I am likely to feel unfulfilled, as my predetermined desire/expectation was not met. On the other hand, if I simply desire to fully experience a dinner with my wife I am freer to accept pleasurable occurences as a pleasure rather than a given. Ideally, even an argument can then be seen as an opportunity to grow and learn rather than an intrusion in "my" dinner date. It has to do with a mental stance of interest rather than a stance of entitlement or a quest for fulfillng a desire. We should all know by now that a new desire follows on the heels of each accomplishment. So why be rude or driven about it ? That's why I think it is clearer refer to "clinging" and "reliqushment" instead of "desire" and "renunciation". Semantics only, but it trips up many westerners learning to read past the literal wording, IMHO.
skinbag is offline  
Old 09-26-2003, 11:55 AM   #23 (permalink)
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Thats for the informative post skinbag.
That makes sense to me, unlike most of the other posts in this thread.

I believe it to be relatively close to my original interpretation:

Quote:
Originally posted by CSflim
Now someone could very easily explain all this, by stating that Buddhists have desire....but only desire in an comparatively simplified way, in that they have no "materialistic" desires. (This is how I previously understood things to be).
A desire is present...but only a sort of "higher level" desire?
__________________
CSflim is offline  
Old 09-26-2003, 02:07 PM   #24 (permalink)
Follower of Ner'Zhul
 
RelaX's Avatar
 
Location: Netherlands
As I understand it (I've been reading a lot about buddhism) desire is still present, just like every other emotion, you just don't identify with it. YOU are not angry, you feel anger, that is all, you can act on it or let it pass, the choice is yours. That's what I love so much about buddhism.
__________________
The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree, is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals. We cause accidents.
- Nathaniel Borenstein
RelaX is offline  
Old 09-29-2003, 03:32 PM   #25 (permalink)
Know Where!
 
MacGnG's Avatar
 
i just started learning buddhism.
from what i understand a "perfect" buddhist would have ascended this existence and would be beyond desire.

an "ideal" buddhist would be tempted only by things that would help them to react their path to enlightenment. temptation is a human emotion and they would experience it but would restrain themselves to only "useful" temptation

hope ya get what i mean
MacGnG is offline  
Old 09-29-2003, 08:29 PM   #26 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: SE USA
"The question is...why stay alive? "

For the same reason any other sentient organism continues to live - to pass on your genes and your memes. In the case of a Buddhist, the enlightened one would continue to live to pass on Buddhist teachings and thus attempt to help others leave suffering behind.

Admittedly, monks don't attempt to pass on their genes, but their is nothing that says that monks have enlightenment all to themselves. They still have a duty to pass on the Buddhist meme though.
Moonduck is offline  
 

Tags
buddhist, desire, ideal, perfect

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:52 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360