Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Philosophy


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-21-2011, 10:34 PM   #1 (permalink)
lascivious
 
Mantus's Avatar
 
Help me find this philosophical idea

I recall reading about this but the material escapes me. Can you please point me in the right direction:


When we name or label something we take away some qualities.

or

When something is given a label the true essence is lost.



Thanks!
Mantus is offline  
Old 06-22-2011, 02:23 AM   #2 (permalink)
Sober
 
GreyWolf's Avatar
 
Location: Eastern Canada
I don't think it's what you're looking for, but one thing we General Semanticists insist on IS labelling to avoid unsanity (e.g. Greywolf2011 is NOT Greywolf2010, but only the direct spatio-temporal successor to Greywolf2010 in this time-space).

On the other hand, two of the prime tenets of General Semantics are: the WORD IS NOT THE OBJECT; the MAP IS NOT THE TERRITORY.
__________________
The secret to great marksmanship is deciding what the target was AFTER you've shot.
GreyWolf is offline  
Old 06-22-2011, 07:26 AM   #3 (permalink)
still, wondering.
 
Ourcrazymodern?'s Avatar
 
Location: South Minneapolis, somewhere near the gorgeous gorge
Do I, um, "grok" you? I don't know that that's possible, but it's something to be wished for by this one. The labelling idea, even narrowed to the thought that it narrows your perception of the thing, has been expounded by so many from their own angles, that I believe the original is probably lost.
__________________
BE JUST AND FEAR NOT
Ourcrazymodern? is offline  
Old 06-22-2011, 08:57 AM   #4 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreyWolf View Post
I don't think it's what you're looking for, but one thing we General Semanticists insist on IS labelling to avoid unsanity (e.g. Greywolf2011 is NOT Greywolf2010, but only the direct spatio-temporal successor to Greywolf2010 in this time-space).

On the other hand, two of the prime tenets of General Semantics are: the WORD IS NOT THE OBJECT; the MAP IS NOT THE TERRITORY.
Wolf is that the same thing as making a catalog of all books and that you cannot include the catalog book inside the catalog? If you include it then it's not the catalog if you don't then it's not the entire catalog since that book is now outside of the catalog.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 06-22-2011, 09:16 AM   #5 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mantus View Post
I recall reading about this but the material escapes me. Can you please point me in the right direction:


When we name or label something we take away some qualities.

or

When something is given a label the true essence is lost.



Thanks!
Do you recall whether it's an ancient philosophy or a modern one?

These statements are based on a long history of thought, tracing back all the way to essentialism, based Plato's idealism and theory of forms: there is the object's form (which we label), which is distinct from the ideal (which we also label). A "tree" that we see in form is distinct from the ideal "tree," though they may have the same label.

In modern philosophy, there is Ferdinand de Saussure's theory of the sign: language is made up of two sides, 1) the signifer, and 2) the signified:

Quote:
the signifier, the "shape" of a word, its phonic component, i.e. the sequence of letters or phonemes e.g. /kæt/

the signified, the ideational component, the concept or object that appears in our minds when we hear or read the signifier e.g. a small domesticated feline (The signified is not to be confused with the "referent". The former is a "mental concept", the latter the "actual object" in the world)
Visually:


Saussure's theories worked to distinguish between language (the sign) and that to which we refer (concept + sound-image) by pointing out the disparate components.

Tree is very basic, but words such as war bring up some interesting problems. When I say "war," the concept will vary in my mind compared to when a Somalian refugee to Canada says the word.

I think maybe that's along the lines of what you are referring to: the difference between the word and the concept and how language poses a number of problems with regard to its relationship to concepts (or, basically, the essence of things).

Does any of this ring a bell?
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 06-22-2011, 09:43 AM   #6 (permalink)
Lover - Protector - Teacher
 
Jinn's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
The best I can think of is Hardy's Paradox, discovered (quite technically) in studying quantum mechanics.

Hardy's paradox - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A non-technical explanation I found: "Hardy's Paradox, the axiom that we cannot make inferences about past events that haven't been directly observed while also acknowledging that the very act of observation affects the reality we seek to unearth"

I reckon there is a layman's (philosophical) analogue to the concept, but I'm not familiar with it.
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel
Jinn is offline  
Old 06-22-2011, 10:23 AM   #7 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i don't understand the formulation of either sentence:


When we name or label something we take away some qualities.

or

When something is given a label the true essence is lost.


because both seem to presuppose some knowledge of the things themselves that's extra-linguistic (the second)...the first is less problematic, but seems a banality simply because a name is a category so a generality that groups according to certain commonalities. categories don't account for all commonalities. and the general does not account for the specific.

the most explicit walk-through of these kind of problems i know of is in husserl's transcendental phenomenology. there, the project was about getting to a level of certainty as to the meaning of categories; the procedure (the reductions) built in a phase of constructing the commonalities (edetic variation).

but i'm not sure that's what you're looking for. is it?

there are other versions of the statements you have that are more well-formed. the one that jumps to my mind is from wittgenstein's tractatus logico-philosophicus. i'll try to locate it and paste it up when i find it (i'm at work and have stuff to do at the moment)...

hope this helps.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 06-22-2011, 10:48 AM   #8 (permalink)
Sober
 
GreyWolf's Avatar
 
Location: Eastern Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq View Post
Wolf is that the same thing as making a catalog of all books and that you cannot include the catalog book inside the catalog? If you include it then it's not the catalog if you don't then it's not the entire catalog since that book is now outside of the catalog.
EXACTLY! General semantics deals with "the meaning of meaning". One of the many types of "unsanity" (as opposed to insanity) that occur in the world results from people confusing the word with the object. People who fear snakes become terrified when someone says the word... obviously not a perfectly sane reaction. A second type is such as when a person bitten by a dog a year ago on a day that dog had been badly abused, may refuse to believe the dog is not now a danger, no matter what assurances are given. Labelling the two situations with Dog-last-year, and Dog-this-year tends to help eliminate that problem.

Finally, as with your catalog (a map of your books), a perfect map would include the map itself, which would include a smaller map, ad infinitum. Obviously this cannot happen, so just as we must not confuse the word with the object or the spatio-temporal successor with its predecessor, we must not confuse the map with the territory. The two are NOT the same.
__________________
The secret to great marksmanship is deciding what the target was AFTER you've shot.
GreyWolf is offline  
Old 06-22-2011, 10:54 AM   #9 (permalink)
still, wondering.
 
Ourcrazymodern?'s Avatar
 
Location: South Minneapolis, somewhere near the gorgeous gorge
Roachboy, your being at work surely helps.
__________________
BE JUST AND FEAR NOT
Ourcrazymodern? is offline  
Old 06-22-2011, 12:14 PM   #10 (permalink)
lascivious
 
Mantus's Avatar
 
Wow you guys rock! I have much reading to do.
Mantus is offline  
Old 07-15-2011, 07:32 PM   #11 (permalink)
Upright
 
I think a lot of philosophers discussed the idea of categorization. I wrote a paper on Nietzsche's theory of language that might be what you're referring to. It's been a while but basically Nietzsche's thesis was what you said, when we categorize or label things we lose the objects true essence. Pretty much the opposite of Plato's theory which was that essences or forms are reality and their representations are less real. In the end I didn't really agree with Nietzsches philosophy although I can't remember why. Plato's philosophy is too far-fetched to be believable to me.
McDaniels is offline  
 

Tags
find, idea, philosophical


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:33 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360