Willravel

No evidence exists to suggest that any god or gods are real, therefore the absolute belief in god is unreasonable. Ir's more an argument of reason than science, but I feel it adequately explains my thoughts.
For everything that we know, there is proof. The supernatural by definition doesn't have scientific proof. Therefore, the supernatural cannot be known.

Doesn't that make sense?
Of course it is. Would you care to tell me how absolute belief in god is as logical than looking at evidence and coming to the reasonable conclusion that god probably doesn't exist?
And why is that? Why do you believe in the Judeo-Christian god and not Zeus?
Something without how is something to be skeptical about.
I was explaining my experience.
That's because while there is no evidence to suggest that god is real, there is evidence to suggest that god isn't real. Remember my first post? Avoid this all you want, but it's pretty clear.
You're wrong. I didn't take sides on the future concept of discovering god. We may prove his existence or we may discover that he's fiction. That's speculation. The point is that based on all evidence today, the only reasonable conclusion one can come to is that god probably doesn't exist. When more information becomes available, then we can change the conclusion as necessary.
How very unscientific of you. How could you be so arrogant as to say that god is unprovable? You believe god to be inexplicable....well I'm sure there were plenty of people who thought that the sun was inexplicable at one time. They were wrong.
Explain the argument's merit and reasoning or take it back.
And you have absolutely no evidence to support that racist claim.
Oh how dare I question your claim? I should naturally assume that anything that is qualified with "slightly off topic" is true beyond question.

Ourcrazymodern?

Godless thumping and bible savages: I think you're beating a dead horse and have long since been reacting to each other's words rather than your sincere thoughts! Please reconsider.

__________________
BE JUST AND FEAR NOT

Infinite_Loser

Explain to me how an absolute belief in God is unreasonable without having to resort to the "Well, there's no evidence of his existence!" argument (Which is fallacious in nature)?

...Didn't I state the same thing around thirty responses or so? I'm glad you finally came to this conclusion (Better late than never).

No, your position isn't any more 'logical' than mine is. Conversely, you'll find that I've never made a claim stating that my position is any more 'logical' than any position anyone can take regarding the non-existence of God. You, however, have (On numerous occasions) stated that a disbelief in God is more rational than a belief in God as a lack of proof for existence is apparently the same thing as proof of non-existence (Which, as I'm sure you know by now, isn't the same thing).

To make use of Wiki again, such an argument is generally classified as an argument from ignorance.

Quite simply because I do (I know what you're getting at and I've already acknowledged that they both have about the same chance of existing as the other).

It's nothing to be skeptical about because, once again, science can't qualify religious beliefs and vice versa. Doing so will inevitably lead to problems (As seen in atheists trying to rationalize God's existence based on scientific evidence-- Or a lack thereof).

No, you were trying to pass off your 'experiences' as absolutes.

There's evidence to suggest that God isn't real? Really...? Where is it? I'm really praying that your 'evidence' isn't a 'lack of evidence'.

I will continue to say this until you finally understand, but the MOST science can state regarding the God is that He might exist outside the absence of scientific evidence.

That's it. Nothing more and nothing less. Any other claims you make regarding God and science are wrong. Plain and simple. End of story. Sorry.

Ummm... Hypocrite? Didn't you just state:

Yes, I believe God to be inexplicable. You, yourself, acknowledged that God is supernatural and that the supernatural can't be explained so why are you now trying to take that statement back?

...Are you seriously serious about having no evidence? Ok... How about I make you a deal? I'll start a new topic and we can go debate it there (Since, after all, I did state it a topic for discussion in a new thread)?

And racist claim? Pffft! "Godless whites! You're all going to Hell with your devil worshiping selves!" would be a racist remark

...Right. That response makes a whole world of sense. I feel as if I'm typing responses out for my own personal viewing pleasure.

__________________
I believe in equality; Everyone is equally inferior to me.

DaveOrion

Can I bum a cig??? Anyone???

__________________
Syriana...have you ever tried liquid MDMA?....Liquid MDMA? No....Arash, when you wanna do this?.....After prayer...

Willravel

Absolute belief in something without any evidence to support it's existence is simply illogical. It's not a fallacy, it's reason.
So you're going to ignore the fact that I'm an agnostic atheist. That's super.
Yes, your position is an argumentum ad ignorantiam. Again, and for the last time, I am an agnostic atheist. I recognize that god might exist. If that's not clear enough for you, please let me know what you're native language is so we can get on the same page.
No reason, eh? Check and mate. Now king me.
There is either real or not real. Everything real has, is, or will be covered by science. As you seem to think that god will never be covered by science, that makes god not real.
Do you have anything to disprove my experience? Maybe an experience of your own, at least? No?
There's evidence that god is something else, namely fiction. Didn't you read my first post?
Freeze yourself until science is finished, then get back to me.
It must be frustrating having to resort to the "I'm right and you're wrong" argument.
You not understanding my post hardly makes me a hypocrite. I clearly meant that god is fiction.
Present evidence of your claim or take it back.
You're religious, right? So, in your mind, religious people are better than atheists, right? So you saying that most atheists are white is racist. Jeez.
You made a bullshit claim, and when I asked you to back it up you said no. Grow up. Either the claim has merit, and you can supply a source of evidence, or the claim is baseless, and you can't. I've not seen evidence, so the claim currently has no merit.

If I were to jump into a thread in politics and say, "All black people vote Democrat", I'd be called on it. People would say, "Oh yeah? Prove it!" When I couldn't prove it, which I couldn't because it's obviously not true, people would learn to ignore the claim. Actually, they might even learn to ignore me.