|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
07-14-2008, 02:50 PM | #1 (permalink) | ||||
Banned
|
Media/Government Blackout: What Goering said of 1941 Death of William Rhodes Davis
Some books covering this subject:
http://books.google.com/books?q=will...G=Search+Books Quote:
http://books.google.com/books?id=ysV...yL79BcIZkf7W7Q Quote:
Samuel F. Pryor Sr. was a founding director of both the Harriman/Bush Hamburg-Amerika shipping line, and of Union Bank (UBC), seized by the Alien property custodian, in 1943, when Prescott Bush and E. Roland Harriman were directors and stockholders.... An added intricacy is that Hermann Goering claimed, just before his own death, that William Rhodes Davis was instructed by Goering and Ribbentrop to fuse Nazi financing, if possible to defeat Roosevelt in the 1940 election, and the assistant Atty. General who revealed that, was fired by Attorney General Tom Clark (father of Ramsey Clark) for revealing these details from his report. The O. John Rogge report was not made public until 1961: http://books.google.com/books?id=82o...zi+1961&pgis=1 I am thinking that this story of murder and Nazi influenced political intrigue was suppressed, because it is true. I would be especially interested in your reaction, especially to the campaign financing of the Wilkie campaign and the implications it had for later house speaker, Joe Martin. I'm making an extra effort, since it is campaign time, to support my suspicion that it doesn't matter much, which major party presidential candidate you vote for, because they both are vetted by this cabal that actually runs things. The ones with the power to suppress what is in this thread, all the way back to Smedley Butler's 1934 Dickstein McCormack committee testimony, and even before that, back to the decade before WWI when the major US industrialized made their pacts with the German Dye Trust, et al. Last edited by host; 07-14-2008 at 02:57 PM.. |
||||
07-14-2008, 02:55 PM | #2 (permalink) |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
The evidence seems quite clear. It seems this is one among many stories of Nazi financing from wealthy US interests. Unfortunately, it's far too late to charge any of these people with the crimes they have committed. But perhaps it can serve as motivation to prevent ongoing war crimes, illegal financing of fascist regimes, and wealthy corporations and individuals from interfering in economics and politics to the detriment of the masses.
|
07-14-2008, 03:02 PM | #3 (permalink) | |
Banned
|
Quote:
He built a refinery in Germany in 1938, and he had to route the equipment and later the oil, through a Swedish port, before shipping to Germany, to get around the allied embargo of oil and refinery equipment. I suspected I was on to something when I saw that Sam F. Pryor Jr., Yale '21, and son of UBC bank director, and the "death merchant" of Remington/Dupont, and founder of the cozy little power and wealth concentration of Jupiter Island, was a principle in connecting Wilkie with Rhodes Davis. Goering's posthumous endorsement of Davis and the suppression of Rogge's speeches on college campuses, only add to my surprise.... where the eff is the press....don't we have a new reporter here....can he show this thread's OP to his editor, and still keep his job? On November 9, 1946, Walter Winchell compared details that he had reported in his own column, all the way back to 1938, that meshed with what was in O. John Rogge's report, after his interviews with 66 people in Germany: Last edited by host; 07-14-2008 at 05:03 PM.. |
|
07-14-2008, 03:07 PM | #4 (permalink) |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
The problem with the media is two fold: fear and lack of freedom. They fear retaliation and are almost always corporate funded. That combination provides for a situation where the constitutionally protected freedom of the press is lost.
Beyond that, those who don't have the fear and who can control what they report not only don't have the resources, but there are too many things for one person to cover. If I were an independent journalist, I wouldn't even know where to start because so much news is suppressed. My hope with your posts has always been that the right person will start to see the patterns and that person will be able to disseminate the verifiable information widely enough that it cannot be suppressed. |
07-14-2008, 03:43 PM | #5 (permalink) | |||
Banned
|
Quote:
I am struck with how tiny a talent pool this is....a presidency, intelligence apparatus, and military and armaments industry, all dominated by such a tiny group of men....documented from 1914 to 2008. Next up will be McCone-Bechtel, a huge can of worms there....just look up Bechtel big dig or bechtel Iraqi contracts , on google. The press is not blind...it is complicit in robbing us blind, by parasites who "hate big government", but grew fat off of it, at least since that day in 1918 when Samuel P. Bush took his seat at his desk at the War Industries Board. The word is that most of the records from his office were "later burned to save room". Am I supposed to respect people who voted for these "candidates"? ...and this, just in: Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by host; 07-14-2008 at 04:04 PM.. |
|||
07-14-2008, 04:59 PM | #6 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Fort Worth, TX
|
What's the big deal? Kennedy had parents who were in to pretty much the same thing. I've always felt the sins of the father are not to fall on the son. This is what, two generations?
If you're implying Bush Sr. was a traitor, remember he was a pilot who fought in the Pacific (being shot down actually).
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas |
07-14-2008, 05:12 PM | #7 (permalink) | ||||
Banned
|
Quote:
The Bush family has never responded to any of this evidence, and the electorate and press have not demanded it of them..... But, then again, they have plenty of company in all of this, don't they? Quote:
Counter spy Respondek, diclosed this, after the war: Quote:
Do a search of the name "Farish" via the TFP search, you'll see that William S. Farish of Standard Oil, NJ admitted to doing the same with Farben, and his grandson was chosen, in 1980, to manage GHW Bush's portfolio when he became VP. They operate right out in the open..... Seaver there appear to have been 20 members of congress, 18 of them republicans, who either took money directly from the Nazi German government, or took money passed through organizations from that government, to the 20 elected officials, and four more abused their franking privileges in the Nazi German cause. I just added a piece in post #2, that implicates rep. Hamilton Fish, from NY. John Alexander Republican Minnesota Philip Bennett Republican Missouri Usher Burdick Republican North Dakota Worth Clark Democrat Idaho Cliff Clevenger Republican Ohio Henry Dworshak Republican Idaho Clare Hoffman Republican Michigan Edwin Johnson Democrat Colorado Bartell Jonlman Republican Michigan Harold Knutson Republican Minnesota Robert LaFollette Republican Wisconsin Gerald Nye Republican North Dakota Robert Reynolds Democrat North Carolina Paul Shafer Republican Michigan Henrik Shipstead Republican Minnesota William Stratton Republican Illinois Martin Sweeney Democrat Ohio Jacob Thorkelson Republican Montana George Tinkham Republican Massachusetts Burton Wheeler Democrat Montana This is part of what the mindset was, after the war ended: Quote:
Last edited by host; 07-14-2008 at 05:47 PM.. |
||||
07-15-2008, 10:11 PM | #8 (permalink) | |
Banned
|
Seaver, it's not looking good, for the "home" team..... and.... "the Kennedys did it...." is a pretty lame reaction. "The Kennedys" didn't promote an hysterical, 65 years long and still counting....."red baiting" campaign that succeeded in destroying "the left", in the US, principally to distract from the "business class's" own treason, in the '30's and '40's.....
Quote:
What this May, 1956 article reports about the activities of Rep. Hamilton Fish (R-NY), is certainly interesting and revealing, but..."the kicker" is what the US State Dept. was revealing, during the beginning of the fifth straight year of a republican presidency (Eisenhower).... the revelations start in the second page of the article, below the sub heading, "Top Secret Messages", and they seem to confirm everything else I have posted in this thread..... Last edited by host; 07-15-2008 at 10:18 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
|
07-15-2008, 11:02 PM | #9 (permalink) |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Out of all this propaganda that you tossed down, I don't see the connections.
Wow.. Audrey Meadows got married
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
07-15-2008, 11:18 PM | #10 (permalink) | |||||||
Banned
|
Move the thread back to politics where it belongs....all of the points are fully documented... suggest you consult with the_Jazz ...... I think more respect than this....suddenly moving the thead, should be accorded, considering the effort and quality of the references and the unique way it is all tied together. It is journalism in posted form....if it doesn't belong in politics, but it is fully documented....why would it belong here, unless it is to marginalize......
Doesn't it seem that Americans allowed their political process to be compromised by hostile, foreign agents, soon to be "the enemy", in a time of war? Why has this been surpressed, how did it all get swept under the rug, unless the press and the business community was united in it's complicity to sweep these revelations, away? The Nazis worked with American politicians to try to "steal" the 1940 presidential election, for the purpose of keeping the US out of the war being waged by Britain, against Germany...... Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by host; 07-15-2008 at 11:27 PM.. |
|||||||
07-15-2008, 11:26 PM | #11 (permalink) | |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
Since you've created obviously irrefutable points, with lots of back up, there's nothing to discuss except to have someone nod their head in agreement with your statement. To state that equate your post to journalism is great, IMO pompous and arrogant and belittles those that have actually schooled and careered are actually journalists. When it's clearly more worthy of your new DailyKos format as a blog entry to state that this is a discussion is unfair to the community. This kind of behavior will no longer be tolerated.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
|
07-15-2008, 11:29 PM | #12 (permalink) | |
Banned
|
Quote:
|
|
07-15-2008, 11:33 PM | #13 (permalink) | |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
Nothing diminishes the ability to discuss it in the Paranoia forum.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
|
07-16-2008, 05:20 AM | #14 (permalink) | |
Asshole
Administrator
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Moving this to Paranoia in no way detracts from the quality of the thread or the information provided. The subject matter itself dictates that this is not a discussion of politics but one about a conspiracy 60+ years ago. As such, I find it an interesting read but not a discussion I particularly want to join, namely because I lack the energy to do the research necessary to present a rational counter-point.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin "There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush "We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo |
|
07-16-2008, 02:55 PM | #15 (permalink) | ||
Location: Washington DC
|
I was surprised to see this moved to "Paranoia" and IMO it does detract from the relevance of the discussion.
Quote:
Particularly the danger posed when the government "blacks out" relevant historical information for (perceived) political or personal reasons. And there is no better example than the practices of the Bush administration to keep "secret and classified" various historical documents of past administrations. In his first year in office, Bush issued an EO that effectively gutted the Presidential Records Act and sealed many presidential documents of the Reagan and Bush I presidencies for an extended period of time. Shouldnt historians know, for example, the details about the discussions Reagan emissaries had with the Ayatollah in Iran (re: the US hostages) prior to his election? And a recent article calls attention to the fact that the Bush admin is "failing to meet the deadline for the publication of the official historical foreign policy document of the US: Quote:
"The committee, however, is disappointed to have to report on the continuing failure to meet the 30-year requirement for the Foreign Relations series. Although there are many factors that may have contributed to this failure – the always present concern with balancing secrecy and the public’s right-to-know, possible shortages of personnel and/or resources, and recent presidential directives – they don't even think they'll be able to meet their deadline by 2010.The issue in the OP is a full and accurate history of the US government and its political leaders.....and openness and accountability are critical ...the truth, warts and all, should never be "blacked out" ...or what is to prevent it from repeating itself? IMO...this thread belongs in Politics not Paranoia.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 07-16-2008 at 06:06 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
||
07-20-2008, 02:35 PM | #16 (permalink) | ||||||||
Banned
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I have presented STRONG support for the accuracy of an intriguing set of circumstances....Nazi ties of a close associate and business partner of George H Walker and of Prescott Bush.....Samuel F Pryor, as well as his son, Sam Jr. Sam Jr. is documented to have been the go between in introducing Hermann Goering's "agent", Nazi moneyman, William Rhodes Davis, to 1940 republican presidential candidate, Wendell Wilkie. Sam Pryor Jr. was such a close friend of Goering medal recipient, and Nazi apologist Charles A Lindgbergh, that he gave Lindbergh 5 acres of his estate in Hana, Hawaii.... and the two are buried in the cemetery there, "yards apart". ....And, I can find nowhere else, the documentation that I have provided that makes a persuasive case, IMO, that William Rhodes Davis. Nazi agent and moneyman, supplier of oil to the Nazi war machine, allegedly "removed"....murdered....by British spymaster, Stephenson, aka "Intrepid", is the grandfather of recently recalled California governor, "Gray" Davis. Is any of this "news"? Where "TF", is the press? Last edited by host; 07-20-2008 at 02:38 PM.. |
||||||||
07-20-2008, 03:26 PM | #18 (permalink) |
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
|
there's a problem with this thread, but it follows i think from the particular style of dave emory--the guy behind spitfire---whose style of operating the thread mimics. what you are typically presented with by emory is a thicket of research results made up of sequences that are often of interest held together by a logic of association that seems to come mostly from immersion in the research process itself and not necessarily from anywhere else. i used to listen to emory's show when i lived in the bay area--it was always like this.
here's the problem another way, as i see it. a) if you assume that the present american political context can be characterized as neo-fascist---well, the premise is not remarkable, really--i think that the case can be made pretty easily---look around you for fucks sake---but the case hinges on a way of thinking about fascism as a recurrent possibility, and so as a kind of ideological form. in which case, as we've been through before here, fascism is a broader category than the german instance--it includes a range of political regimes--these have some tendencies in common, but are distinct or particular in other ways--as follows from a radical nationalist ideology. you'd expect that, yes? if the objective is to demonstrate that the present american political configuration can be understood as neo-fascist in many respects, the center of the demonstration would be a working model for or definition of fascism. it wouldn't make sense to reduce the category to "nazis" because in a very direct way, you'd undercut your own analysis. the demonstration would then move through aspects of american political or ideological activity and link it back to elements in the model. you'd probably use previous instantiations of fascism to both develop the model and as ground against which the figure of the american model would stand out. this doesn't really seem to be dave emory's project. he seems to want to demonstrate *direct* linkages between *nazi* party officials and american officials--which means that the center of his research pertains to the periods around world war 2 (before, during, after...you know). ok so fine. b. IF the case being made here was about the periods emory's research addresses, then this would be a historical thread with maybe some disturbing parallels that could be explored into the present---but emory does not stop with stuff like that. and so we land here: c. it is the way linkages are constructed on the basis of this material that tend to make emory's information paranoid. this presents you with a problem. you can refer to this type of work as paranoid because of the methodological problems that it is riddled with---and see for yourself--how does this stuff move from one time-frame to another? what kind of logic enables one to move via familty lineage alone, to say x is the grandfather of z so therefore... you can refer to is as paranoid in its overarching design and still find the information interesting--even as it presents you with a choice as to whether you find it interesting enough to take the time to push apart the way it is presented in emory's writing/radio shows and think about it. at the same time, there is something kind of amazing about this research work that dave emory has been doing---seemingly by himself--for a very long time. it is an remarkable edifice. but it has *fundamental* problems at the level of how it's structured. so what do you do with this? i don't see the decision to put it in paranoia as problematic BECAUSE of the way this guy--not host, but dave emory--constructs his arguments. and it is because inattention to method can do this to the evidence that emory's whole project seems to me self-defeating. in terms of getting what i take is his desired effect--an elimination of fascist tendencies in the american ideological universe, such as it is--he is his own worst enemy. he does all this work and DESPITE that work, he operates with logical connectors that are so tenuous that you can dismiss all of it. all that said, he's a bizarrely effective radio speaker. this information, presented in a way that is spread over an hour of listening, makes for a good tale. but i treat it as a tale because of what i said above. i see the objections to this being moved, but frankly i think that the emory model set it up. and it's a shame, as it always is with emory, because like i said at the outset and a couple other times i'm sure, there is a ton of interesting bits in here--factoids, sequences, etc.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear it make you sick. -kamau brathwaite |
07-20-2008, 04:31 PM | #19 (permalink) |
Banned
|
rb, I predict that the fact that the most notorious turncoat American political moneyman and provocatuer for the Nazi regime, has turned out to be the the grandfather of former California governor, Gray Davis, will be too big of a scoop to suppress, by the press and by the two major parties. My resaearch shows that it is as if there were no Davis's in Grays line, before his father, Joseph Graham Davis. Gray Davis's own brother is named "William R. Davis". Do you suppose, if Davis' granfather was....say...Leon Trotsky....that that link would be buried this long?
It is buried because any examination of William Rhodes Davis, is one step removed from examinations of Wilkie, Pryor, the RNC, the Bushes, and of the cozy little community on Jupiter Isalnd....and the establishment does not want to go there. Any link to Dave Emory in this or in the other thread, was simply to explain the scenario to avoid the laborious copying of text available in books that cannot be cut and pasted...... I have independently documented every point I've posted, as I always attempt to do..... |
07-20-2008, 05:22 PM | #20 (permalink) | |
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
|
Quote:
there has to be a hook. this isn't a matter of whether the chain of evidence is or is not accurate. it's a matter of the grounds that you can make the claim that it is relevant now and a matter of how you package the information. the problem is what i said in the post above--the central claim to relevance in the present is a genealogical one--presented as such---and that raises the "so what?" problem. it'd be stronger as a historical argument--it *is* a historical argument. and it's a disturbing story. the main reason i mentioned emory is that the case you present runs into the same problems as his cases often do---i wasn't implying anything about your independent research---as it stands, i went through the whole assemblage above and the problem i have remains--the linkage forward.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear it make you sick. -kamau brathwaite |
|
07-20-2008, 07:00 PM | #21 (permalink) |
immoral minority
Location: Back in Ohio
|
I wish there was a TV show kind of like History Detectives for stuff like this. Connect the dots to see how the people in power got there. What kind of back-room deals did they do, how did their parents make money. Stuff that is totally uncensored and can be proven true.
This is an interesting story and the business of making war or providing supplies is always better if there is a war. |
Tags |
1941, blackout, davis, death, goering, media or government, rhodes, william |
|
|