Quote:
|
I predict that the fact that the most notorious turncoat American political moneyman and provocatuer for the Nazi regime, has turned out to be the the grandfather of former California governor, Gray Davis, will be too big of a scoop to suppress, by the press and by the two major parties.
|
why?
there has to be a hook.
this isn't a matter of whether the chain of evidence is or is not accurate. it's a matter of the grounds that you can make the claim that it is relevant now and a matter of how you package the information.
the problem is what i said in the post above--the central claim to relevance in the present is a genealogical one--presented as such---and that raises the "so what?" problem.
it'd be stronger as a historical argument--it *is* a historical argument.
and it's a disturbing story.
the main reason i mentioned emory is that the case you present runs into the same problems as his cases often do---i wasn't implying anything about your independent research---as it stands, i went through the whole assemblage above and the problem i have remains--the linkage forward.