Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Motors


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-29-2003, 05:48 PM   #41 (permalink)
Insane
 
subaru > mitsubishi
evo > WRX
for the money 1st gen dsm>evo
__________________
"find what's good and make it last"
-Bouncing Souls
hahaha is offline  
Old 09-29-2003, 07:09 PM   #42 (permalink)
More Freedom, Less Bullshit
 
Location: Tulsa, OK
Quote:
Originally posted by hahaha
subaru > mitsubishi
evo > WRX
for the money 1st gen dsm>evo
You know, I've got to agree with you totally on that one, except swap STi for WRX. A used WRX might be more cost effective than an Evo, and definitely easier to find than a quality 1st gen dsm.
__________________
-Erik

Stupid people shouldn't breed.
Elitegibson is offline  
Old 09-29-2003, 07:15 PM   #43 (permalink)
I stole my boyfriends TFP, hehe !!
 
RemyLebeau97's Avatar
 
Location: Galveston, TX
If a Geo Metro was used in The Fast and the Furious everyone would be sweatin it.
RemyLebeau97 is offline  
Old 09-29-2003, 07:44 PM   #44 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: Riverside, CA
A little off topic...

I think it's pretty cool that people here can have an intellegent conversation without turning it into a "my Mustang can smoke your ricer any day" thread. This shows the intellect of the members here and what makes TFP a very special place.

Thank you
__________________
I hope life isn't a big joke, because I don't get it. - Jack Handy

Lestat is offline  
Old 09-30-2003, 06:34 AM   #45 (permalink)
More Freedom, Less Bullshit
 
Location: Tulsa, OK
Quote:
Originally posted by RemyLebeau97
If a Geo Metro was used in The Fast and the Furious everyone would be sweatin it.
I don't know man. I just saw 2F2F and it had that convertible eclipse, and I'm not drooling over it. I wouldn't kick it out of bed though.
__________________
-Erik

Stupid people shouldn't breed.
Elitegibson is offline  
Old 09-30-2003, 07:24 AM   #46 (permalink)
Lost!!
 
Scorps's Avatar
 
Location: Kingston, Ontario
A guy at work has one of them and they look sharp.
__________________
A.K.A. PainTrain
Scorps is offline  
Old 09-30-2003, 10:17 AM   #47 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Austin, Texas .. Y'all
ehhhh ...

I'll line up against any of them..... Straight line or on the twisties.
tj2001cobra is offline  
Old 10-22-2003, 08:01 PM   #48 (permalink)
Upright
 
Quote:
Originally posted by bad30th
The American Evo8 IS a hopped up Lancer (Rally Edition? Are you serious?) economy car, CONVERTED to AWD.
It makes baby jesus cry when people act as authorities on subjects on which they have NO knowledge on. Step away from the import thread and get back to your displacement fixation.

What is different from the OZ edition and the Evo?
Motor, tranny, driveline, suspension, ECU... need I continue. It shares maybe 3 parts with the OZ edition. Wanna see the CAPS on it?

The Evo is based on the infamous 4g63. Infamous for 2 reasons: 1, The DSM 2g crankwalk, in which, due to improperly designed oil squirters the crank, over time, was able to move back and fourth... often just enough to take out the Crank angle sensor rendering the car immobile (Yes I was a victim). 2, for being one of the most resilient inline 4 motors ever (1g). Withstanding 450 hp in OEM form not many motors are half as bullet proof.

And sorry mr Tj, your stang wouldnt stand a chance in the twisties with either of these cars. You might even struggle to keep up with their mid 13 second 1/4 mile times if you are in stock 14.0 second 01' cobra trim.

Mustangs turning.... that gave me a chuckle.
iwishiwascool is offline  
Old 10-23-2003, 04:15 AM   #49 (permalink)
Insane
 
Quote:
Originally posted by BooRadley
No 4wd drive or FWD car needs a wing. Period. You just are not going to get the speeds necessary to justify the extra weight for traction tradeoff. Period. Considering wings hurt FWD traction ( pulls down on the rear end) and 4WD have gobs of traction anyway, it's just factory rice.
If its just factory rice, why do WRC cars have the wings? They've gotta be good for something...
__________________
roadrazer - 300kgs, 300hp = pure fun.
Rippley is offline  
Old 10-23-2003, 06:08 AM   #50 (permalink)
I am Winter Born
 
Pragma's Avatar
 
Location: Alexandria, VA
WRC cars have wings to produce downforce, because they frequently travel at 100+ KPH through very twisty roads.

Your average streetcar, on the other hand, won't need it. Also, at least with the WRX, the factory wing and the wing used in the WRC cars is different.
__________________
Eat antimatter, Posleen-boy!
Pragma is offline  
Old 10-23-2003, 01:28 PM   #51 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: [insert witty play on location field here]
Quote:
Originally posted by iwishiwascool
It makes baby jesus cry when people act as authorities on subjects on which they have NO knowledge on. Step away from the import thread and get back to your displacement fixation.
Firstly congratulations on coming off like a complete elitist asshole.

Secondly, thank you for assuming you know something about someone that you have NO knowledge about (wait...thats what you were accusing ME of? I'm confused.....) And how the fuck do you know whether or not I am an ASE certified mechanic and have worked on hundreds of Mitsubishis??? You fucking dont.

Thirdly, I said NOTHING about displacement....you brought it up. I might say that you have displacement envy, but displacement doesnt matter at all for imports right? Or maybe it just doesnt matter to you. I dunno...I'm confused again....

Quote:
Originally posted by iwishiwascool
What is different from the OZ edition and the Evo?
Motor, tranny, driveline, suspension, ECU... need I continue. It shares maybe 3 parts with the OZ edition.
Hmm. OK. So lets just pretend for a minute that you are right and the Evo and the econo-box Lancer are NOT the same car. Does tthis also mean that the 03 Mustang GT and the 03 Mustang Cobra are NOT the same car? The Camaro V6 and Z28 are NOT the same car? The Eclipse GS and GSX are NOT the same car?

Give me a fucking break. The latter are all just bigger badder versions or THE SAME CAR. But I guess the Evo is special because you said so....

Quote:
Originally posted by iwishiwascool
The Evo is based on the infamous 4g63. Infamous for 2 reasons: 1, The DSM 2g crankwalk, in which, due to improperly designed oil squirters the crank, over time, was able to move back and fourth... often just enough to take out the Crank angle sensor rendering the car immobile (Yes I was a victim). 2, for being one of the most resilient inline 4 motors ever (1g). Withstanding 450 hp in OEM form not many motors are half as bullet proof.
I am sorry but this little speech of yours proves nothing, except the fact that you have the uncanny ability to look information up on the internet. Amazing.

You directly contradicted yourself as well. #1 is EXACTLY why the 4g62 is NOT "one of the most resilient inline 4 motors ever." Nice try tho.....

Quote:
Originally posted by iwishiwascoolAnd sorry mr Tj, your stang wouldnt stand a chance in the twisties with either of these cars. You might even struggle to keep up with their mid 13 second 1/4 mile times if you are in stock 14.0 second 01' cobra trim.

Mustangs turning.... that gave me a chuckle.
You ever been AutoCrossing?? (read: "twisties" ) Guess who owns.....Miatas and fucking F-bodies. And guess who owned EVERYONE at the last meet.... a fucking Mustang Cobra. Notice that all these cars are RWD. And why? because a well-driven RWD car is actually BETTER in the "twisties" than AWD. AWD is just easier for a novice to be decent. Pretty much the only time the AWD cars own on an AuotX course is WHEN ITS FUCKING SNOWING.....

But I must be full of shit because no car can beat the EVO!!!

I wont even mention the fact that you are obviously defending this car because you are a Mitsu lover (why I dont know....).....oh wait...I just mentioned it. Oops.

And I also love how people are so quick to jump on the EVO bandwagon....people are sheep.
bad30th is offline  
Old 10-23-2003, 08:13 PM   #52 (permalink)
More Freedom, Less Bullshit
 
Location: Tulsa, OK
If you were at an autocross where a Mustang beat an Evo, either the Mustang driver had vastly superior skill, the car was heavily modified, or you were smoking some nitrus.
__________________
-Erik

Stupid people shouldn't breed.
Elitegibson is offline  
Old 10-23-2003, 08:16 PM   #53 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: [insert witty play on location field here]
so whats your point.

yes that is true...either the car was better or the driver was better.............weird.
bad30th is offline  
Old 10-23-2003, 08:50 PM   #54 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
It looks like this thread has been thrown off course, and that certain people need to take a deep breath before clicking "Submit Reply." Keep it somewhat on topic, keep it civil.

Quote:
On a similiar note though the new ford lightning will supposedly route an air conditioning duct through the intercooler. Im pretty sure this has been done in the past but it is a pretty neat setup.
Both the Lightning and Cobra R will have this feature, which designers claim will give the car a 30-second boost of around 50HP.
MSD is offline  
Old 10-23-2003, 08:55 PM   #55 (permalink)
Upright
 
1) Youre not a certified mechanic or you would know that what I said was true: That the motor, the suspension, and the driveline and even the interior are completely different. Just as in a GS to a GST the engine, tranny, suspension is completely different. Im looking at the CAPS (mitsubishi parts look up program) for the Evo now. That washer that you use on the turbo to manifold bolt... you can use that on the stereo harness on the lancer.... so yeah I guess youre right, exactly the same.

2) Youre not a certified mechanic or you would know that it is a 4g63 motor, not a 4g62... and that the problem I mention plagued the USDM spec 4g63 for exactly 4 years. That motor was made for 11 and only a fraction of them were mfgd in Normal Illinois.

3) You dont know anything about autocross. You honeslty just said a stock fbody would beat a stock evo in an autocross event. I dont think i even need to rebuttle that.
iwishiwascool is offline  
Old 10-23-2003, 11:44 PM   #56 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: [insert witty play on location field here]
1.) You havent proven a goddm thing

2.) You still havent proven a goddam thing, except that I accidentally hit a 2 and not a 3....

3.) Where once did i say "stock"? The car is only as good as the driver.

Buuut I'm gonna go ahead and take MrSelfDestruct's advice and end this by saying....

You are right in all things you have said, are saying, and will say.

Argument over. You win.
bad30th is offline  
Old 10-24-2003, 06:59 AM   #57 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Wherever I lay my hind quarters
I love the naming of some of the current UK models.

We have the cleverly named Evo VIII FQ 300.

And now there is the FQ 330.

The numbers denote the power.

The FQ stands for farkin' quick. Which I won't argue with.

There is something almost agricultural in the sound of these things when they fly past you .... I'd love to have one. Couldn't afford the fuel bills though.
clonmult is offline  
Old 10-28-2003, 11:13 AM   #58 (permalink)
Still searching...
 
madsenj37's Avatar
 
Location: NorCal For Life
Quote:
Originally posted by Elitegibson
I find it kind of weird that you mention the water injection and then mention autoxing the STi. I believe you can get penalized quite severely for dripping any fluids onto the race track, as it can adversely affect the traction of cars following you.
It is true that fluids can not be dripped onto the track. Subaru knows this and has made the water cooled intercooler sealed so that fluids are not dripped.

Quote:
Originally posted by newman

I'd honestly rather have an Evo for the simple fact that my friend dumped $6k in mods in his WRX and got ~100 HP out of it and guess what he did? Sold every part and bought a 69 Nova, dropped a 454 in it and never looked back. If you didn't notice, he's a drag racing fan. But yes, the WRX was NOT made for the strip, hence the great horsepower-stealing AWD.

Just my opinions really. Evo > Subaru
The WRX is not the STI first of all. Second of all they all have AWD, so saying that the wrx/sti is not ready for the strip means the evo is not ready also.
__________________
"Only two things are certain: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not certain about the universe."
-- Albert Einstein
madsenj37 is offline  
Old 10-28-2003, 01:30 PM   #59 (permalink)
Upright
 
Quote:
Originally posted by bad30th
It is widely known in import enthusiast circles that Mitsubishi makes the poorest quality vehicle of any significant import manufacturer....

I would MUCH rather drive a Subaru WRX STi than an Evo. Why? Well...the Evo is a Lancer (sort of) converted to all-wheel-drive. Subie's trademark is all-wheel-drive.

Both impressive cars, but either way, make mine a Camaro
What?!? Do you know that Mitsu has a lower IQS 'Initial Quality Study' (lower is better) than Subbie? Do you know how many detonation problems are being reported on the Sti? Do you even know who had an AWD Lancer in the WRC first?

Or are you one of the public who still thinks that the Evo was derived from the US Lancer?

Bring your STi. I'll run it against my Evo any day of the week.
Blahman is offline  
Old 10-28-2003, 01:34 PM   #60 (permalink)
Upright
 
Quote:
Originally posted by bad30th
The previous gen Evo cars, not sold in America, are completely different cars. The American Evo8 IS a hopped up Lancer (Rally Edition? Are you serious?) economy car, CONVERTED to AWD.

And as far as quality is concerned, I was talking about Mitsu's ability to build a performance engine that can be modified without blowing up. They have been building economy cars forever...they should stick to that.

And cmon guys...look at the two pics above. The Subaru is a genuine car with genuine good looks....the wings is ugly, but that can be easily removed The Evo looks like some 16 yr old RICER got a hold of it and turned it into the Bat-Mobile. But I guess thats why the Evo appeals to a lot of people...the RICER look is the "in" thing to have right now....
Another one, completely clueless.

The Evo 8 is still an Evolution. It's not a suped up Lancer. It is NOT converted from 2WD to AWD. Period. End of story.

Reliabilty on performance enhancements to Mitsu's engine? Have you ever heard of the 4g63? Probably one of the most reliable, upgradable engines EVER. Know what a DSM is? Know what kind of power you can get from them? SAME ENGINE!

About the looks...well, at least our 16yr old kid knew how to put a functional hood on, and a wing that doesn't flap in the wind past 50mph.
Blahman is offline  
Old 11-12-2003, 10:13 PM   #61 (permalink)
Insane
 
The evolution is awesome i really wanna get one. According to car and driver it can be compete with cars that cost like 15k more. Also it handles well and it looks nice , and if u want to could upgrade it even more!!
ace81385 is offline  
Old 05-10-2004, 11:09 PM   #62 (permalink)
Upright
 
First of all let me state that I own a Mitsubishi Lancer(yes the eco-box) and my best friend owns a Mitsubishi Evolution.

American Lancer is based off the mirage and cedia platform. 4g94 2.0 SOHC engine, based off the 1.5 and 1.8 4g93 engine.

American Evolution is based off the 4g63 2.0 DOHC engine. This engine has gone through many changes in the the past 12+ years it has been out. The version in the Evolution has been tested to push over 550 hp with stock internals and no known engine problems. The only problem with this car (AND YES IT IS A HUGE PROBLEM) is the clutch. Mitsubishi really did a fucked up job and lined up the tranmission in a way that puts extra stress on the clutch. My best friend burned his clutch at 7500 miles, another one of my friends burned his out at 1500. Then Mitsubishi tears down the tranny looks at the blue and purple clutch and tells the customer it is due to them racing it, makes them pay for the new one(that costs over 2000 for the clutch and install), then waits until they do it again.

The only thing the two cars share is the sound system, basic body parts(the evo has aluminum fenders and hood for weight), and the interior is the same.

My friend's best times on a few mods (intake, exhaust, SAFC, boost controller, Fuel pump, 6-puck racing clutch) have been in the mid to high 11's.

I have not driven a STI, but I have heard MANY good things about them. The only problem that I have heard about is detonation problems. The transmission seems to be bulletproof though.

Either way both cars are great choices. They are both in the same price range, so why not take both for a spin. Just remember the upkeep of the car is what is going to kill you. Tires go out every year, clutches are a pain in the pocket, and Mitsubishi makes you do you oil changes with them or they void you warranty.

Last edited by Epidemic; 05-10-2004 at 11:12 PM..
Epidemic is offline  
Old 05-10-2004, 11:36 PM   #63 (permalink)
More Freedom, Less Bullshit
 
Location: Tulsa, OK
Road and Track just finished their 1 year long-term review on the Lancer Evolution. They drove it 30,000 miles and had no clutch problems. They drove it hard too. The thing is that they know how to drive hard correctly. I'm not gunna say that your friends drive crappy, but killing a clutch that quickly is their fault. Mitsubishi said he raced it, and hey look, he's been drag-racing it, you even give his times. Not good for clutch. Don't blame the car for your friends being dumb with their clutch.

http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=1296
__________________
-Erik

Stupid people shouldn't breed.
Elitegibson is offline  
Old 05-10-2004, 11:39 PM   #64 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally posted by BooRadley
No 4wd drive or FWD car needs a wing. Period. You just are not going to get the speeds necessary to justify the extra weight for traction tradeoff. Period. Considering wings hurt FWD traction ( pulls down on the rear end) and 4WD have gobs of traction anyway, it's just factory rice.
Please, correct me if I am wrong, I don't race, my high speeds are usually long highway stretches, but i've got a FWD car, i've noticed that the back end sometimes feels a bit loose when cornering, would an increased downforce in the rear not help alleviate this situation?
__________________
Where dem bitches at?
Atomic Pinkie is offline  
Old 05-11-2004, 08:49 AM   #65 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: [insert witty play on location field here]
Holy back-from-the-dead Batman!


Quote:
Originally posted by Atomic Pinkie
Please, correct me if I am wrong, I don't race, my high speeds are usually long highway stretches, but i've got a FWD car, i've noticed that the back end sometimes feels a bit loose when cornering, would an increased downforce in the rear not help alleviate this situation?
If youre cornering at 150 mph, yes.
bad30th is offline  
Old 05-11-2004, 03:37 PM   #66 (permalink)
Upright
 
I think both cars are great cars for $30k.
I read somewhere that the Evo runs a faster 1/4 than the STI. Anyone know if it's true?
lazyaznguy is offline  
Old 05-11-2004, 06:45 PM   #67 (permalink)
More Freedom, Less Bullshit
 
Location: Tulsa, OK
Quote:
Originally posted by lazyaznguy
I think both cars are great cars for $30k.
I read somewhere that the Evo runs a faster 1/4 than the STI. Anyone know if it's true?
They run it really close. The STi is quite a bit more powerful, but it has an extra gearshift to make down the quarter mile, so they're within a tenth of eachother.
__________________
-Erik

Stupid people shouldn't breed.
Elitegibson is offline  
Old 05-12-2004, 01:25 AM   #68 (permalink)
Insane
 
I like the Evo VIII but as of now I would rather have the STi. That Car and Driver comparison was so close that either could have won it. But the STi won the online contest on Road and Track for best new car in 2004 according to the voting public.

HOWEVER, I would love to get my hands on a genuine Nissan Skyline GT-R. I heard through the grapevine that Nissan is thinking of bringing it to N.A. in the next couple of years...maybe.

I saw it in Japan a few months ago and it made my mouth water...it is awesome. I am not allowed to post attachments yet but maybe somebody will do it for me. Check it out.
__________________
Life's jounney is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn-out shouting, "Holy sh*t! What a ride!" - unknown
Jackebear is offline  
Old 05-12-2004, 01:58 AM   #69 (permalink)
Tilted
 
EliteGibson, the STi can handle much more powa than the Evo can on stock internals because the engine is beefier and built a little better. while the Evo is running 20psi stock to barely make 230-250 hp at the wheels, the Sti only runs around 14-16 psi stock to make around 260-275 hp with room for much more.
__________________
ZOOM ZOOM
Zoom is offline  
Old 05-12-2004, 08:26 PM   #70 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Sydney - Australia
AFAIK the first few series of the lancer evolution were sort of based upon the lancer body, similar shape with upgraded components and the wing etc added. However, with the new series there are some body changes, different shapes, smaller size I think, etc.
Comparison is easy when you see Lancers with evo bodykits compared to the real thing.
__________________
Viva La Muerte
HunterDevourer is offline  
Old 05-12-2004, 11:15 PM   #71 (permalink)
More Freedom, Less Bullshit
 
Location: Tulsa, OK
Quote:
Originally posted by Zoom
EliteGibson, the STi can handle much more powa than the Evo can on stock internals because the engine is beefier and built a little better. while the Evo is running 20psi stock to barely make 230-250 hp at the wheels, the Sti only runs around 14-16 psi stock to make around 260-275 hp with room for much more.
I'm not sure I buy that. The 4g63 is about as beefy as 4-cylinders come. You can raise the boost to supreme levels with the stock internals and get to around 500 (just not with pump gas). The STi's advantage is it's not boosted to high heaven from the factory and can take more before detonation becomes a problem.
__________________
-Erik

Stupid people shouldn't breed.
Elitegibson is offline  
Old 05-13-2004, 10:18 AM   #72 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Canada eh?
Quote:
Originally posted by pocon1
hey etla, no race car uses a stock transmission. According to Sport Compact Car, the tranny is the most expensive piece on the car, because a typical race is about 2,000 shifts. They use sequential, custom cut dog gears like every wrc rally car.
WRC uses a dogbox or sequential shift yes. SCCA and CARS (US and Canada) don't allow them in most classes; only open in the US IIRC. Group N for sure doesn't and that was where Subaru USA was paying ProDrive to change transmissions during service.

A lot national level and lower sanctioning bodies restrict transmissions cases or gear sets or both to try and keep costs down. A good percentage of performance rally around the world is equivelent to Show room stock + Cage, Belts, Seats, and Cell.

If I had to choose I'd go with the Evo if only 'cause it's cooler to say and WRXs are everywhere up here. 'Course if I was dropping C$35G+ on a car I'd be sitting in a Hemi 300C AWD
__________________
Subvert the Dominant Paradigm
etla is offline  
Old 05-17-2004, 07:50 PM   #73 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: SE USA
Had an Evo come into the shop for some work after a collision. red one. Had the single WORST paint I have ever seen from facotry. It had so much orange peel that it looked like the whole car had been coated in rockguard.

As to the clutch comment earlier, the guys at our Mitsi dealership tell me that they put a lot of clutches in these things. Average is 10k miles. It is so bad that rumour has it they're considering loosening the warranty restrictions on em. It would follow in line with Nissan admitting that the front ends on 350z's are horribly designed and eat tires constantly.

Personally, I wouldn't touch a new Mitsi of any type. They're unreliable, have shite paint, and uninspired design. I would happily jump on a 1st gen DSM AWD turbo as they're great fun to tune. The 4g63 is one of the all-time great mills, and is easily the SBC of the import world.
Moonduck is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 11:58 AM   #74 (permalink)
Banned
 
GET A SRT-4!!!
c-dog81 is offline  
Old 05-22-2004, 07:51 PM   #75 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
Quote:
Originally posted by bad30th
If its "just" a trim level, why include it? If its just a dick measuring contest, then by including that, you're trying to stick out your hips and make your dick look just a little bit bigger.
It was included because that is the title of the car the Lancer OZ Rally Edition, where as you were just mentioning parts on your car.


Quote:
Originally posted by BooRadley
No 4wd drive or FWD car needs a wing. Period. You just are not going to get the speeds necessary to justify the extra weight for traction tradeoff. Period. Considering wings hurt FWD traction ( pulls down on the rear end) and 4WD have gobs of traction anyway, it's just factory rice.
So if the STI was RWD then the wing would be justified? Give your head a shake, I suppose that the FIA WRC cars have no need for the wings they use, or are they in a separate catageory? You seemed so sure of yourself, yet you were so wrong
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
silent_jay is offline  
Old 05-23-2004, 01:31 PM   #76 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: [insert witty play on location field here]
its unbelievable how a thread this old can be brought back from the dead, and how people keep making asenine comments about things already debated so long ago.

cmon jay...... find another car to defend/degrade. This ones been beaten to death.
bad30th is offline  
Old 05-23-2004, 01:49 PM   #77 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Don't worry about it.
Doesn't Mitsubishi claim that wing is functional like at 92 MPH?

BTW I really laughed when someone said the Evo is just a bigger and better OZ Edition Lancer, just after calling someone an elitist asshole. Too funny.




Last edited by Kurant; 05-23-2004 at 02:01 PM..
Kurant is offline  
Old 05-23-2004, 02:00 PM   #78 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: [insert witty play on location field here]

EDIT: This in response to Kurant, who edited his post above to make himself look like less of a dick.....

Quote:
Originally posted by Kurant
Japanese sport cars.
riiiiiiiiight

Quote:
Originally posted by Kurant
You should actully know somthing about what your talking about before spouting off your pie-hole about it.
As should you. But thanks I'll keep that in mind, oh mighty one.


Quote:
Originally posted by Kurant
EDIT: Holy shit, I didn't notice this thread was that old.
Yeah. It is. Go back and read the rest of the thread, realize that we have been over this topic quite extensively, and then realize that you are completely awesome for reviving a dead thread just so you can attempt to assert your knowledge over someone else's, on an internet forum. YAY!

Get off it dude.

Last edited by bad30th; 05-23-2004 at 02:06 PM..
bad30th is offline  
Old 05-23-2004, 02:06 PM   #79 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Don't worry about it.
Quote:
Originally posted by bad30th
riiiiiiiiight



As should you. But thanks I'll keep that in mind, oh mighty one.




Yeah. It is. Go back and read the rest of the thread, realize that we have been over this topic quite extensively, and then realize that you are completely awesome for reviving a dead thread just so you can attempt to assert your knowledge over someone else's, on an internet forum. YAY!

Get off it dude.


You need a serious reality check, bro.

It's not about being less of a dick. I didn't want to litter message boards with personal attacks and bullshit, which is what you praise on apparently.

Last edited by Kurant; 05-23-2004 at 02:09 PM..
Kurant is offline  
Old 05-23-2004, 02:12 PM   #80 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: [insert witty play on location field here]
To quote myself.....

Quote:
Originally posted by bad30th
Get off it dude.
Flame away. I'm done with you.
bad30th is offline  
 

Tags
evolution, lancer

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:19 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360