Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Knowledge and How-To


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-18-2009, 12:16 PM   #1 (permalink)
Banned
 
Zeraph's Avatar
 
Location: The Cosmos
grammar

Why does Asian or American or Latino need to be capitalized but not human?
Zeraph is offline  
Old 04-18-2009, 12:23 PM   #2 (permalink)
Tone.
 
shakran's Avatar
 
Because Asia, America, and Latin America are places, and Huma is not if we referred to ourselves as such, we would capitalize Earther or Earthling.
shakran is offline  
Old 04-18-2009, 12:54 PM   #3 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
More specifically, Asian, American, and Latino are proper nouns; human is a common noun.

It is the same difference with America and country.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 04-18-2009, 01:01 PM   #4 (permalink)
Banned
 
Zeraph's Avatar
 
Location: The Cosmos
Not really answering my question as Latino is not a place. It's referring to their Latin based language, not an area of living. Nor is African-American (they're places separately but together its a "race").

Or how about, even though its not PC, Indians? The native Americans I mean. And shoot is it, Native, or native...?

Or Muslims, Jews? Those are not places you can go to on a map. They're associations by belief.

So *why* is one proper and one common? They're all referring to groups of people. I'm not seeing a difference.

Last edited by Zeraph; 04-18-2009 at 01:04 PM..
Zeraph is offline  
Old 04-18-2009, 01:04 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
so are you asking what the distinction is between proper and commom nouns, or why these particular proper nouns are classified as they are?
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 04-18-2009, 01:11 PM   #6 (permalink)
Banned
 
Zeraph's Avatar
 
Location: The Cosmos
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy View Post
so are you asking what the distinction is between proper and commom nouns, or why these particular proper nouns are classified as they are?
Mostly the latter, but I wouldn't mind hearing the former too.
Zeraph is offline  
Old 04-18-2009, 03:03 PM   #7 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Proper vs. common:


Canada/country
Canadian/human
Starbucks/coffee shop
The Da Vinci Code/book
New York Times/newspaper
Venus/planet (or goddess)
God/diety

Capitalize the noun if it has a specific identity (e.g. it's Starbucks, not Tim Hortons...get your coffee shops right....or: my country is Canada, not America)

Common nouns have no specific or unique identity, as in they are a "common" thing of many varieties.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot

Last edited by Baraka_Guru; 04-18-2009 at 03:08 PM..
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 04-18-2009, 03:52 PM   #8 (permalink)
Banned
 
Zeraph's Avatar
 
Location: The Cosmos
I guess it just gets muddied when race comes into play, perhaps because there really is no such thing. But I guess they had to decide if races should be capitalized or not. Because Latino is referring to a whole bunch of people, not one specific thing. So it just doesn't make sense in my eyes. Because you could also use your same argument in, human, not monkey, or human, not ape. Human is just as unique/specific as any of those other things (IMO).
Zeraph is offline  
Old 04-18-2009, 04:05 PM   #9 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Yes, but "human" isn't referring to something unique. "Christoper Lee," on the other hand, is.

I understand the confusion. "Latino" refers to a group...but it refers to a group with a unique set of characteristics. (In this case, it is considered a proper and collective noun.)

humans (common)...Latinos (proper) (both collective nouns, but the former is a common noun, while the latter is a collective noun)

humans: no unique characteristic identified (a bunch of people of any kind)
Latinos: unique characteristics identified (people of Latin-American or Spanish-speaking descent)

I am human, but I am not Latino.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 04-18-2009, 07:20 PM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
Zeraph's Avatar
 
Location: The Cosmos
OK, so riddle me this. If aliens show up tomorrow then humans will be capitalized? Since humans will then be a distinct group of people.

Anyways, I still don't buy that logic. Humans are unique, we're separate from the dead for instance. Zombies are people too damnit!
Zeraph is offline  
Old 04-18-2009, 07:43 PM   #11 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Okay....

If aliens arrived tomorrow, we'd say things like this:
"The aliens are attacking us!"
"All of them?"
"No, just Zorgargh and his Zortonite armies."
And the aliens would say things like this:
"Zorgargh is attacking the humans!"
"All of them?"
"No, just the Americans."
And the zombies would say things like this:
"Must...eat...human....brains...."
"Have you tried alien brains?"
"Oh, gosh...no, I guess I haven't."
"Well you must; they are absolutely delightful, especially with a dab of Grey Poupon." *holds up a jar*
"Oh...that's mustard."
"Yes, quite right."
"Say, would you capitalize 'mustard' as you would 'Grey Poupon'?"
"No, of course not. 'Grey Poupon' is a proper noun, while 'mustard' is a common noun."
"I see. It's hard to think on an empty stomach."
"Yes, I suppose so. It's been a while since you ate Mr. Whitaker's brains."
"Well, I do recall reading that Zortonite brains are decent."
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot

Last edited by Baraka_Guru; 04-18-2009 at 07:46 PM..
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 04-18-2009, 11:36 PM   #12 (permalink)
She's Actual Size
 
CinnamonGirl's Avatar
 
Location: Central Republic of Where-in-the-Hell
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
Okay....

If aliens arrived tomorrow, we'd say things like this:
"The aliens are attacking us!"
"All of them?"
"No, just Zorgargh and his Zortonite armies."
And the aliens would say things like this:
"Zorgargh is attacking the humans!"
"All of them?"
"No, just the Americans."
And the zombies would say things like this:
"Must...eat...human....brains...."
"Have you tried alien brains?"
"Oh, gosh...no, I guess I haven't."
"Well you must; they are absolutely delightful, especially with a dab of Grey Poupon." *holds up a jar*
"Oh...that's mustard."
"Yes, quite right."
"Say, would you capitalize 'mustard' as you would 'Grey Poupon'?"
"No, of course not. 'Grey Poupon' is a proper noun, while 'mustard' is a common noun."
"I see. It's hard to think on an empty stomach."
"Yes, I suppose so. It's been a while since you ate Mr. Whitaker's brains."
"Well, I do recall reading that Zortonite brains are decent."
Um...you're kind of my favorite person ever after that post.
__________________
"...for though she was ordinary, she possessed health, wit, courage, charm, and cheerfulness. But because she was not beautiful, no one ever seemed to notice these other qualities, which is so often the way of the world."


"Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life?"
CinnamonGirl is offline  
Old 04-19-2009, 09:00 AM   #13 (permalink)
Banned
 
Zeraph's Avatar
 
Location: The Cosmos
Awesome BG

So I fully understand the grammatical rules for such, but I still see no real practical reason to distinguish between aforementioned nouns.

Also amusing was looking up the words, people, person, and human. The dictionary uses circular logic to define them.

I swear I'm not trying to make trouble. I've never been able to fully understand our grammar.

How is our grammar compared to other languages in elegance? Like how English is one of the hardest languages to learn. Is our grammar the same? I know spelling and pronunciation is part of the problem, is grammar the other half?

Ohhhh, also, one more silly scenario. Say the aliens come to live with us, we're friends. So they're no longer aliens. They're considered people, but not humans. Is human now capitalized?

And if human still isn't capitalized is there ever a scenario where it would be? I'm trying to use these scenarios to figure out if there's a reason for not capitalizing human or if it's just because some old white dudes in the 1600s said so.

Last edited by Zeraph; 04-19-2009 at 09:07 AM..
Zeraph is offline  
Old 04-19-2009, 09:11 AM   #14 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i was going to make something but after baraka's post above, it seems hopeless.

what you seem to be stuck on, zeraph, is that the distinction between proper and common nouns seems to be a matter of a strict rule of some kind, but when you start thinking about it, the appearance of a strict rules gets erased and convention replaces it. this is a matter of convention. english is full of them--it's not a terribly systematic language.


in a way, it's like the lunacy of trying to draw a straight line on land over an extended distance--something like what mason & dixon did. it makes sense on a map, but to trace it on the ground...? it's a very strange thing to do, if you think about it. boundaries look like they result from the application of a rule, but that rule only holds together as a rule if you assume a remove.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 04-19-2009, 09:27 AM   #15 (permalink)
Banned
 
Zeraph's Avatar
 
Location: The Cosmos
Hmmm. I was always taught (maybe wrongly?) that grammar *was* a system of rules, like algebra. Yeah some are complicated and can be an "i before e except after c" kind of contingency, but they were still a hard system of rules. If its not, then that would explain why I've never been able to "get it," getting it under my current perception would be impossible.
Zeraph is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 11:12 AM   #16 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Wrexify's Avatar
 
Location: Kramerica
I think roachboy's response is the closest you're going to get to an answer here. While there is a set of hard rules that define basic grammar, there are so many exceptions that there's no such thing as a complete English rulebook.

If only I had had baraka as an English teacher in high school, everything would have been so much clearer
__________________
"Nitwit! Oddment! Blubber! Tweak!"
Wrexify is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 11:35 AM   #17 (permalink)
Banned
 
Zeraph's Avatar
 
Location: The Cosmos
I know, BG has a way of explaining things.

So BG, agree with them? I'm waiting for your final word.
Zeraph is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 01:05 PM   #18 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
roachboy is correct. Convention will always trump rules. The rules are always changing for this reason.

But I will point out that the conventions I outlined above still stand.

It's my job to keep track of these things.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 01:49 PM   #19 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
see, you know stand before the curious tunnel that is trying to determine what a rule is.
wittgenstein pulled on this string to great effect in philosophical investigations. if you're feeling inclined to head down the rabbithole for a while, that's a lovely ride. not easy though--it requires attention. and it messes with your head.

what holds proper nouns together as a class is more what wittgenstein calls a family resemblance than the application of a particular rule.

this is maybe a general hand-waving in the direction of an introduction.


what the good comrade b-g outlined above is a sequence of oppositions that delimits (by showing) the boundary that separates inside/outside for the class "proper noun."

you can grasp the distinction intuitively by looking at the list, which means the resemblance are most powerful when there's a sequence--you can see the regularity, and what you're talking about really with a class like "proper noun" is a resemblance.

but when you go from description to generating--in other words when you abstract a rule from a sequence unified through a family resemblance--you get in to trouble.

does that mean there is no rule?

uh..

no. but does the fact of a rule explain the resemblance?

uh....

no. but proper nouns as a class does seem to hold together....

but maybe the problem follows from a too-narrow interpretation of what a rule is.

how would you bend the notion of a rule to incorporate the production(?) or reproduction (?) of a particular type of similarity? this is how wittgenstein ends up with the notion of family resemblance.

but the underlying question is: so what exactly is a rule?

and it's down the rabbithole.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite

Last edited by roachboy; 04-20-2009 at 01:52 PM..
roachboy is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 04:38 PM   #20 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
BG... that was an awesome explanation. There ought to be an award for that...
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
 

Tags
grammar


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:54 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360