Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-06-2005, 12:31 PM   #1 (permalink)
Lover - Protector - Teacher
 
Jinn's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
Is a Devil's Advocate a "troll"...?

I've always resented the "troll" labels casually used in forums alike because the label itself seems to be vague or somehow misleading. What is a troll exactly?

Quote:
From the fishing term. As a noun, synonymous with flamebait. As a verb, to post controversial or provocative messages in a deliberate attempt to provoke flames.
That is about the best definition I can find online. Through this definition, I would argue that a troll is a very effective communicator, if he can compose a thread or post so craftily that it incites anger in many other board members. A poor communicator, on the other hand, would be summarily ignored. A post that "provokes flames" obviously contains subtance that merits discussion, even if angrily discussed.

Oftentimes in TFP and other forums, I hear the word 'troll' used to identify someone defending a position they do not believe. In the formal Debates I've participated in, the best way to prepare for a "meet" was to present the opposition's case. Through doing this, your personal bias of "being right" destroys your hatred for the opposition's position. You also more clearly see their weaknesses and can use them in presenting your original case. While I wouldn't compare TFP to the structured rigor of a debate, there is a certain value to being the "devil's advocate." I personally believe that everything I have learned, I've done so by challenging my own beliefs. I do this by attempting to validate the beliefs directly contrary to my own. For someone who is pro-abortion, attempting to argue a pro-life standpoint is very valuable in seeing the other sides' position -- and solidifying their own.

Similarly, I pondered posting a thread in Philosophy or Politics vehemently defending a belief not held by myself, but the last person to do so was labeled a troll. Is it the motivation for the thread that seperates a troll from a devil's advocate? I personally enjoy defending something I do not believe in, because it gives me a valuable perspective -- but I do not wish to be labeled a troll. My vacous explanation aside, what qualities seperate a troll from someone who is playing a "devil's advocate?"
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel
Jinn is offline  
Old 07-06-2005, 12:34 PM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
A troll is simply someone who seeks out sensitive areas and makes comments that he knows will get a huge reaction.
Glory's Sun is offline  
Old 07-06-2005, 12:40 PM   #3 (permalink)
Lover - Protector - Teacher
 
Jinn's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
I realize this, but I fail to see how one can distinguish between an attempt at reminding the viewers that another position exists and being a "troll".

Why are the areas sensitive? Is it not a fear of the critical assessment key for making a board like this operate?
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel
Jinn is offline  
Old 07-06-2005, 12:45 PM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
the distinction is usually in the way the poster portrays his/her self and how they pose their feelings/thoughts. A troll will usually make a snide comment or a one sentence observation without any sort of backing or rationale. The Devil's Advocate has the media to back up his claim.
Glory's Sun is offline  
Old 07-06-2005, 01:16 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i dont see any basis on a message board for assuming that the people posting are not always acting as devil's advocate--or the contrary, really: both assumptions seem to me equal in their arbitrariness.

i mean, these spaces function to the side of most types of social interaction and are not substitutes for them--they are obviously pretty abstract--it would seem to me that a messageboard is an open field for experimenting with identity (authorfiction) and positions. and i assume that most posters i read here are, to one extent or another, experimenting when they write. that tfp, for example, has developed some dimensions of community that would be kinda absurd if you didnt assume that what people wrote says something about who they are is simply a choice that segments of the folk who post here have made. think about moe's taven in the trampoline forum, for example. we get to go to the thread and act as though we are getting trashed in a tavern, and, like most taverns for many folk, a significant motive for being there in the first place is sex. so you get that there too. so long as there is a general agreement amongst the people who post there about what they are doing, it is fine--but at the same time, if you think about it, it is a very strange idea.

what do any of us know about anyone else, really, in this place?
i know the dominant mode of interacting through a messageboard works with the illusion of transparency at their center--but i have never believed that this transparency was operational--more that it was something that folk simply preferred to believe about it that may be binding on them but which says nothing about the nature of this kind of space. you can see these assumptions working in how many of the journals are written here too--most are written as though they were telephone calls--not by replicating the form, but by replicating the assumption that a disembodied voice at one end of the line can let a second disembodied voice at the far end of the line into the detail of their life simply by talking as though that detail was available. now this is not a criticism, and maybe the problem is mine--when other folk post, maybe the think they really are talking to friends here who are friends in the same way as 3-d friends are--and maybe they're right--because they happen within particular speech communities that form within this board. either way, i simply notice that this stuff happens all the time.
when i post, i see a white square inside a green square.
when i send the post, i see a green square scratched up with white letters. and those scratches are all that anyone here knows of me.
and i can manipulate those stratches as i like.
so you know what i want you to know.
or what i decide would be interesting to float, to add to a mix of what you know.
or whatever--you cant account for motive here at all.
so i am not sure that there is a distinction in principle in a space like this between devil's advocate any any post, since all posts are equally experiments with identity, with staging experience in a curious written format, etc.

so if there is a difference between d.a. and troll, it is rhetorical--a troll is a form of devil's advocacy that you dont like. for whatever reason. or that the mods dont like, for whatever reason.
there is a rhetoric of sincerity and there is a rhetoric of experimentation, maybe--and there are folk who use the first to do the second or whose mode is to move from the second and give the impression of moving from the first.
and you cant tell.
one can always flip into the other.
in fact, posts probably are characterized by a continuous shuttle between the two. abstraction makes such things safe.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite

Last edited by roachboy; 07-06-2005 at 01:20 PM..
roachboy is offline  
Old 07-06-2005, 01:35 PM   #6 (permalink)
Too Awesome for Aardvarks
 
stevie667's Avatar
 
Location: Angloland
A troll deliberatly goes out of their way to stir up trouble by posting or replying to subjects in a way they know will cause a reaction.
Someone arguing a position doesnt (at least not usually).

Theres a malicious part to trolling.
__________________
Office hours have changed. Please call during office hours for more information.
stevie667 is offline  
Old 07-06-2005, 01:42 PM   #7 (permalink)
Lover - Protector - Teacher
 
Jinn's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
wow roach, I wasn't expecting a Philosophical explanation.. but damn.. well said. I liked this part best:

Quote:
so if there is a difference between d.a. and troll, it is rhetorical--a troll is a form of devil's advocacy that you dont like. for whatever reason. or that the mods dont like, for whatever reason.
there is a rhetoric of sincerity and there is a rhetoric of experimentation, maybe--and there are folk who use the first to do the second or whose mode is to move from the second and give the impression of moving from the first.
and you cant tell.
one can always flip into the other.
in fact, posts probably are characterized by a continuous shuttle between the two. abstraction makes such things safe.
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel
Jinn is offline  
Old 07-06-2005, 02:00 PM   #8 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Minx's Avatar
 
Location: Up yonder
IMHO a troll is someone who deliberately stirs up sh*t (aka....poking the Grizzly bear in spring). They do it just to get a rise out of people, regardless of the ensuing conversation.

Someone playing the Devil's Advocate role (which is something I like to do) is a person who can stand back in a debate, see both sides of the story, the pro's and con's of each and then pick and argue a side (even if it is not the one you would normally agree with). I love debates because you are dealing with another intelligent person. Someone who can suppress their emotions long enough to look at the whole story - both sides - and then comment on it. Trolls are either people that are so stubborn that they refuse to see a different view of the matter, or they are just trying to stir the pot.

I have a few acquaintances who will be receiving a ladle for Christsmas for they fall into the latter category.
__________________
You've been a naughty boy....go to my room!
Minx is offline  
Old 07-06-2005, 02:07 PM   #9 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Perhaps announcing your intention to play devil's advocate would prevent a troll accusation.
Elphaba is offline  
Old 07-06-2005, 02:08 PM   #10 (permalink)
pow!
 
clavus's Avatar
 
Location: NorCal
Devil's advocate:
"Envirnmentalists may not know or care that their positions have real human consquences"

Troll:
"Envronmentalists don't care about people"

Devil's Advocate:
"I hate hip-hop. How can people consider that stuff music?"

Troll
"People who listen to hip-hop don't know anything about music."
__________________
Ass, gas or grass. Nobody rides for free.
clavus is offline  
Old 07-06-2005, 03:36 PM   #11 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Moderator Emeritus
Location: Chicago
Here's a little known fact about maleficent... She LOVES to argue... (Yeah, I know y'all thought she was nice or something...)

NOT here, because it's be against the rules... besides I wouldn't want to have to warn myself... There are places I've been known to play (though not for a while) where I could get out some of my hostilities and play devils advocate... I spent too many years debating in high school and college, when motivated, I can argue any side of any subject, and I don't have to believe it, and I can do it pretty convincingly.

As long as I don't resort to name calling or making it personal... I don't consider it trolling, if I am arguing an unpopular stance on something (Yes, I do beleive that it should be mandatory to clear the airports of tourists between the hours of 6am and 10am mon - fri because I don't want to have to deal with amateur travellers,) as long as I stick to the facts and my personal beliefs then it's OK.

Trolls tend to hit and run - and don't stick around... Devil's advocates roll up thier sleeves and settle in for the fight, and it' usually pretty fun to watch especially those that will fight to the death...

I really need to find that part of my personality again...
__________________
Free your heart from hatred. Free your mind from worries. Live simply. Give more. Expect less.
maleficent is offline  
Old 07-06-2005, 03:57 PM   #12 (permalink)
Junkie
 
The problem is not with those acting as Devil's Advocates, but those who throw around the label of troll when they feel threatened by the valid points raised in the debate.

You see an awful lot of this in the Politics Board.

Accusations such as "troll", "Bush-hater", "War-mongerer", "liberal", "conservative" etc all used as insults. It's sad to see valid discourse devalued by a refusal to engage in debate, but rather knee-jerk reaction and insult of your opponent.

Trolls exist, but like winning lottery tickets, they are not as common as some would have us assume.


Mr Mephisto
Mephisto2 is offline  
Old 07-06-2005, 04:08 PM   #13 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Ms. M, it's that you wish to clear the airport with an Uzi that I object to.
Elphaba is offline  
Old 07-06-2005, 04:13 PM   #14 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elphaba
Perhaps announcing your intention to play devil's advocate would prevent a troll accusation.
Let me amend this. I remember a fellow who claimed to be playing the role of devil's advocate, who was merely being an insistant asshole negating every other position than his. Sometimes claiming DA is just a cop-out.
Elphaba is offline  
Old 07-06-2005, 05:01 PM   #15 (permalink)
32 flavors and then some
 
Gilda's Avatar
 
Location: Out on a wire.
I think it isn't so much about what position you take up so much as it is in how you choose to defend it. People who consistently engage in name-calling, insulting others or belittling their opinions or ideas, who deliberately use fallacious arguments may be trolling. It's about attitude and intent. You can advocate a positon without being disrespectful and disingenuous.
__________________
I'm against ending blackness. I believe that everyone has a right to be black, it's a choice, and I support that.

~Steven Colbert
Gilda is offline  
Old 07-06-2005, 05:41 PM   #16 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Exactly.
Elphaba is offline  
Old 07-06-2005, 06:10 PM   #17 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Once you "insult" anyone, or use any term in a pejorative sense, you cease to be a Devil's Advocate. Maybe a lot of people simply don't understand what the term really means?

Mr Mephisto
Mephisto2 is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 06:13 AM   #18 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by guccilvr
A troll is simply someone who seeks out sensitive areas and makes comments that he knows will get a huge reaction.
Quote:
Originally Posted by guccilvr
the distinction is usually in the way the poster portrays his/her self and how they pose their feelings/thoughts. A troll will usually make a snide comment or a one sentence observation without any sort of backing or rationale. The Devil's Advocate has the media to back up his claim.
I love how you know-it-all American fuckers, especially North Carolina are always the first ones into the discussion trying to act like you know better than everyone else and we need to be educated by you. What's your fucking problem?

That's a troll, and cannot be confused with Devil's Advocate. Devil's Advocate was when I stretched the boundaries of ethics in politics to justify the Supreme Court's decision to ban medical merijuana that does not cross state lines on the grounds that it affects interstate commerce. (My argument was that a cheap, home-grown remedy negatively affects the profits of out-of-state pharmaceutical manufacturers and therefore has a substantial impact on interstate commerce and can be regulated by the federal government.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elphaba
Ms. M, it's that you wish to clear the airport with an Uzi that I object to.
It seems likely that you haven't spent a great deal of time in airports between 6am and 10am.

Last edited by MSD; 07-08-2005 at 06:15 AM..
MSD is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 10:13 AM   #19 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSelfDestruct
It seems likely that you haven't spent a great deal of time in airports between 6am and 10am.
Yep, only once or twice a year. I'm one of those amateur flyers that she would be taking aim at.
Elphaba is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 10:22 AM   #20 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Moderator Emeritus
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elphaba
Yep, only once or twice a year. I'm one of those amateur flyers that she would be taking aim at.

Ah - but I'm not sure at any point I ever said that the clearing should be done with an Uzi... are you perhaps, putting words into my mouth -- erm - posts?

While I may be in favor of using said Uzi's I never said it... so could trolling also be implying something that isn't there
__________________
Free your heart from hatred. Free your mind from worries. Live simply. Give more. Expect less.
maleficent is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 01:28 PM   #21 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by maleficent
Ah - but I'm not sure at any point I ever said that the clearing should be done with an Uzi... are you perhaps, putting words into my mouth -- erm - posts?

While I may be in favor of using said Uzi's I never said it... so could trolling also be implying something that isn't there
I simply lied about your uzi intentions. Far worse than a troll IMO.
Elphaba is offline  
 

Tags
advocate, devil, troll

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:36 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360