Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-02-2004, 08:03 PM   #1 (permalink)
Watcher
 
billege's Avatar
 
Location: Ohio
Is a spouse entitled, after the divorce?

So, Miss Richie, wife of Lionel, is suing for divorce. She wants $300,000/month in support payments.

That's not a typo. Three-hundred thousand US dollars, per month.

Now, here is some text from the "explanation" she has for her "need."

(freakishly--these are per/month!! expenses. I don't even get the $1G/month laser hair removal. I thought that made it not grow back. Is she a wildabeast?)

Quote:
...particular monthly expenses that Lionel, 54, needs to cover: clothing, shoes, and accessories ($15,000); dermatology ($3000); laser hair removal ($1000); massages ($600); jewelry ($5000); gifts ($5000); and vitamins ($500). There are plenty of other costs Richie listed--like $20,000 annually for plastic surgery and her nine-year-old son's $125,000 boarding school tuition--
The full set of paperwork explains in bragging detail what she spends.


From what I gather she met and married Lionel when she was an 18 year old. From her claims in the paperwork she ran a clothes designing business. It doesn't sound like she's claiming lost wages she didn't make while married, but she does say he had her quit. I guess that makes it implied.

While she is an extreeme example of what a spouse might demand, is a spouse entitled to the cash, post divorce?

That's not my whole question...
She may be entitled to a place to live, and an income in the short-to-medium term, and the kids should be taken care of, but does a divorced spouse deserve the rich lifestyle just because of the time spent married?

I can see him being responsible for paying while she regains her footing. I feel if they, as a couple, chose for her to not work, then she is entitled to support until she re-enters the workforce. Mothering is a job, which she supposedly did. I question how much "mommy" work she did with a full time staff of nannies and housekeepers, but I'll give the benefit of the doubt.

How do you feel about a spouse getting P.A.I.D after a divorce?
__________________
I can sum up the clash of religion in one sentence:
"My Invisible Friend is better than your Invisible Friend."

Last edited by billege; 03-02-2004 at 08:12 PM..
billege is offline  
Old 03-02-2004, 08:07 PM   #2 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
damn. thats really screwed up. bling bling.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 03-02-2004, 08:09 PM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: Vegas/So. Cal
She's entitled to a life of hard work instead of grand theft from someone who earned it.
Zander is offline  
Old 03-02-2004, 08:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
An embarrassment to myself and those around me...
 
VitaminH's Avatar
 
Location: Pants
To put it short, I am disguested by her. I bust my ass everyday to earn tuition money and she expects a free ride. I'd be overwhelmed to get $300,000 ONCE let alone MONTHLY. Grrrr.
__________________
"Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever."
- Napoleon Bonaparte
VitaminH is offline  
Old 03-02-2004, 08:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
Tilted F*ckhead
 
Church's Avatar
 
Location: New Jersey
Simple solution. Just have their daughter shape up. Right now she's a spoiled prissy little bitch who's leeching off of her father's fame. Tell her to leech of Paris, I think she can afford to support her instead of good old Lionel.
__________________
Through counter-intelligence, it should be possible to pinpoint potential trouble makers, and neutralize them.
Church is offline  
Old 03-02-2004, 08:52 PM   #6 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: Ouuuterrrr Spaaaaacccceeee
Yeah, I agree. If you want to leech off an ex-husband/wife for money while you did little after the marriage to earn anything, you seem like a money grubber. More and more these days, people seem to be more about the money than any sort of morality.
RoboBlaster is offline  
Old 03-03-2004, 12:44 AM   #7 (permalink)
Cracking the Whip
 
Lebell's Avatar
 
Location: Sexymama's arms...
I could live on that for a couple of years.

Comfortably.

I guess everyone decides where their priorities are and hers are apparently solidly in the "material" world.
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis

The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU!

Please Donate!
Lebell is offline  
Old 03-03-2004, 01:17 AM   #8 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
She should get real-life living expenses (laser hair removal? buy a razor, you spoiled bitch) until she gets back on her feet, gets a job, and maybe a bit of child support until she remarries. Make her prove that she spends the child support money on the child.
MSD is offline  
Old 03-03-2004, 03:25 AM   #9 (permalink)
With a mustache, the cool factor would be too much
 
Fremen's Avatar
 
Location: left side of my couch, East Texas
Quote:
...and her nine-year-old son's $125,000 boarding school tuition--
$125,000 for boarding school?!?!?

You could get a damn good college edumacation for that!
__________________
Google
Fremen is offline  
Old 03-03-2004, 04:02 AM   #10 (permalink)
.
 
bundy's Avatar
 
Location: Tokyo
surely that figure is an ambit claim. i mean, she can't honestly be serious about that.
i know nothing of the american divorce laws etc... but i would think that shes treating the issue the same way you'd sell your car.
aim really high (well above its worth), and then be happy with a figure thats close enough.

but still, those are some ridiculous demands.
__________________
Ohayo!!!
bundy is offline  
Old 03-03-2004, 05:40 AM   #11 (permalink)
I'm not a blonde! I'm knot! I'm knot! I'm knot!
 
raeanna74's Avatar
 
Location: Upper Michigan
If he asked her not to work and she did as he requested then sje has not had those years of experience to increase her wages. If he allowed her to do all those things while married then legally she is entitled to a percentage of income sufficient to keep her in the level of living that she is accoustomed to. It's normal for her to itemize all the expenses to substantiate that.

Personally though I think it's a bit much to ask for all that. It wouldn't hurt her or any other person to spend a little time living below their usual income. It teaches an appreciation of little things and of their usual lap of luxury. Her son will pick up that attitude of expecting luxury and won't appreciate it as much as he should. She is doing herself and her son a disservice.
__________________
"Always learn the rules so that you can break them properly." Dalai Lama
My Karma just ran over your Dogma.
raeanna74 is offline  
Old 03-03-2004, 06:00 AM   #12 (permalink)
My future is coming on
 
lurkette's Avatar
 
Moderator Emeritus
Location: east of the sun and west of the moon
Ignoring the scale of the request ($300K/month?!? ) and just addressing the question of whether a spouse is "entitled" to support after a divorce...I'd have to say it was dependent on what the relationship looked like. I'm gonna resist my impulse to gender-neutralize the discussion and just acknowledge the fact that it's usually the wife who's asking for support. If she worked and earned her own money and was able to develop salable skills that would allow her to support herself, then I'd say nope - she can support herself. But if the couple made the choice for the woman to stay home and raise children and support the husband in his career, I'd say absolutely she's entitled to some support - either for as long as she's still raising the kids, or for a period of time that would allow her to get an education and start a career.

This kind of shit, though, where a spoiled rich woman could have gone out and done whatever the hell she wanted and chose not to have a career...hard to muster any sympathy for her when you see what a real single/divorced mother has to go through on a daily basis.
__________________
"If ten million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."

- Anatole France
lurkette is offline  
Old 03-03-2004, 06:34 AM   #13 (permalink)
Crazy
 
That's like 5 years of boarding school education....she's not even taking care of her kids if she is shipping her 9 year old son off to boarding school.
pinklily is offline  
Old 03-03-2004, 06:39 AM   #14 (permalink)
Apocalypse Nerd
 
Astrocloud's Avatar
 
Perhaps she needs reparations for actually listening to some of his "music".
Astrocloud is offline  
Old 03-03-2004, 07:23 AM   #15 (permalink)
Registered User
 
sixate's Avatar
 
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
Once in a great while I almost wish I had a vagina so I could go bang a rich dude and rape him for everything he's worked for, but them I come to my senses and I realize I'd never want to be such a lowlife reptile.

When people get a divorce the one who makes an assload of money shouldn't have to give up a fucking thing.

Child support is one thing, but this is complete horseshit.
sixate is offline  
Old 03-03-2004, 08:56 AM   #16 (permalink)
Shade
 
Nisses's Avatar
 
Location: Belgium
This is sickening. She can't live with him anymore? Then she shouldn't live with the benefits of their union anymore either. Quite that simple. Sustenance while she gets back on her feet, sure, help support the kid, sure, but what on earth is she gonna do with 300k a MONTH? (yeah, I read the post, I know what she listed, it's just too surreal to believe)

It's times like these that make me wish I was a judge
__________________
Moderation should be moderately moderated.
Nisses is offline  
Old 03-03-2004, 10:54 AM   #17 (permalink)
Wehret Den Anfängen!
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Nisses, judges are not about justice, they are about interpriting the letter of the law/constitution and predicents and implications of previous cases.

If you want to do something about this, don't be a judge, be a politician.
__________________
Last edited by JHVH : 10-29-4004 BC at 09:00 PM. Reason: Time for a rest.
Yakk is offline  
Old 03-03-2004, 10:59 AM   #18 (permalink)
Fly em straight!
 
water_boy1999's Avatar
 
Location: Above and Beyond
Unfuckingbelievable!!!!!

Lurkette, I appreciate your resistence to gender-neutralize the discussion, but I can't resist. This type of situation makes me sick. I run into stay at home women everyday in this swanky part of Sacramento. A majority of them are very good looking, wear very trendy skins, furs (in summer), and gaudy jewelry. However, most of the are dumb as a football bat, don't work, don't ever plan on working, and spend the afternoons tanning and working out with their other rich, spoiled friends. Now, I have also heard of many divorces ending where the man loses a majority of his finances because she has to continue getting her nails done on a weekly basis, has to keep up with the botox treatments, has to continue the $10,000 per week shoe shopping sprees. If pisses me off because, as a society, we are trying to move towards a gender equal society and it is women like this that continue to keep us apart. Get up off your asses, learn a trade, and stop taking life for granted.
__________________
Doh!!!!


-Homer Simpson
water_boy1999 is offline  
Old 03-03-2004, 12:47 PM   #19 (permalink)
smithja0423
Guest
 
Personally i think she's probably entitled to some form of maintainence income, but sure as balls not 300k/month!!!!!

In Indiana, a divorce decree is a 50/50 split of marital assets and you'll be hard pressed to find a maintaince agreement that was ordered by a judge. Most alimony that is paid is through a settlement between the parties involved outside of the court system. Seems completely fair to me. Of course i'm not worth hundreds of millions of dollars either. If my g/f and i were married, she'd be paying ME off after the divorce.
 
Old 03-03-2004, 03:38 PM   #20 (permalink)
Naughty Just Right
 
Angel's Avatar
 
Location: Euphoria
I cannot for the life of me see why any person should be responsibe for any other person after they are divorced. Child support is one thing, that is a shared responsibility and should be treated as such financially. But alimony is just another word for "here, bend over and let me get you really good" IMHO

This is the kind of shit that makes those of us who have some dignity and self respect wear the bad rap. What is it that makes anybody think someone "owes" them for time spent together? You don't get paid to be in a relationship, why should you get paid when the relationship ends???? And gifts 5K??? WTF??? Why would he be responsible to buy gifts for others from her???

This just infuriates the hell out of me! I work damned hard for what I have, I earn my way, and I am proud of that. The only person who is responsible for my well being and lifestyle is ME. (wow! what a concept!) I didn't stand in front of a judge and in a prissy whiney voice say "but sir, I just HAVE to have my spa treatment once a month" PULEEESE! Get off your lazy uptown ass and get a job!

Rant complete....
__________________


In the depth of winter, I finally learned that there was within me an invincible summer.
~Albert Camus
Angel is offline  
Old 03-03-2004, 04:50 PM   #21 (permalink)
Insane
 
moot1337's Avatar
 
Location: Learning to Fly...
I shouldn't have read this just before dinner...

lowlife irrational behavior such as this makes me absolutely sick.
moot1337 is offline  
Old 03-03-2004, 05:09 PM   #22 (permalink)
Fly em straight!
 
water_boy1999's Avatar
 
Location: Above and Beyond
So angel, is a prenup out of the question for you then?
__________________
Doh!!!!


-Homer Simpson
water_boy1999 is offline  
Old 03-04-2004, 04:29 AM   #23 (permalink)
Naughty Just Right
 
Angel's Avatar
 
Location: Euphoria
Quote:
Originally posted by water_boy1999
So angel, is a prenup out of the question for you then?
If you are going into a marriage making arrangements on what you are going to do when it ends...you have already failed it in my opinion. Prenups are a very personal decision and agreement and I believe it varies from person to person. It is not something I would personally consider. But then again, I don't have millions to consider losing because of bitches like her. *shrugs*
__________________


In the depth of winter, I finally learned that there was within me an invincible summer.
~Albert Camus
Angel is offline  
Old 03-04-2004, 09:38 AM   #24 (permalink)
Fly em straight!
 
water_boy1999's Avatar
 
Location: Above and Beyond
Quote:
Originally posted by Angel
If you are going into a marriage making arrangements on what you are going to do when it ends...you have already failed it in my opinion. Prenups are a very personal decision and agreement and I believe it varies from person to person. It is not something I would personally consider. But then again, I don't have millions to consider losing because of bitches like her. *shrugs*
My thoughts exactly. I believe there is something wrong with the institution of marraige if "prenup" is even a consederation between two people. What happened to the gool 'ol days when people stuck together through thick and thin?
water_boy1999 is offline  
Old 03-04-2004, 09:57 AM   #25 (permalink)
A Real American
 
Holo's Avatar
 
Starfucking pays.

I really agreee with Chris Rock:

A large part of Rock's act deals with alimony - and the bad deals he thinks most men get in divorces because their wives are "accustomed" to a certain lifestyle.

"You go to a restaurant," he says. "You're accustomed to eatin'. You leave, you ain't eatin' no more. They don't owe you a steak."
__________________
I happen to like the words "fuck", "cock", "pussy", "tits", "cunt", "twat", "shit" and even "bitch". As long as I am not using them to describe you, don't go telling me whether or not I can/should use them...that is, if you want me to continue refraining from using them to describe you. ~Prince
Holo is offline  
Old 03-12-2004, 12:42 PM   #26 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Canada eh?
Quote:
Originally posted by Angel
I cannot for the life of me see why any person should be responsibe for any other person after they are divorced. Child support is one thing, that is a shared responsibility and should be treated as such financially.
I can. Marriage is supposed to be a life long partnership and you make decisions based on that and you should be entitled to the benifits of that partnership. We have no idea how much of Lionel's success if because of his Ex. I know I wouldn't have the job I have now if it wasn't for my then girlfriend now wife.

On the flip side I'm A-OK with prenups. Just another clause in the partnership contract and they should be used to protect Family and Heritage property that happens to be official owned by one person but actaully belongs to an entire family.
__________________
Subvert the Dominant Paradigm
etla is offline  
Old 03-12-2004, 04:58 PM   #27 (permalink)
Loser
 
This is why I'm never fucking getting married.
WarWagon is offline  
Old 03-12-2004, 06:15 PM   #28 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Clifton Park, NY
Christ... just because someone someone was accustomed to living off the money of their spouse does not grant them the right to that money after the marriage is nulled. Let his wife take a real job and earn her own cash.
crony is offline  
 

Tags
divorce, entitled, spouse


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:07 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360