Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-31-2004, 01:48 PM   #1 (permalink)
Upright
 
A simple legal question

Hi, everybody

Here is the scenerio : A couple bought a brand new house. Six months after moving in, the marriage fell apart, the husband got kicked out ( restraint order ). Before he left, he threated his wife that he will burn the house down. Sure enough, a couple of week later, it burned down! Fire marshalls concluded that it is an arson. The wife never mentioned her husband's threat to the authority. The Husband, on the other hand, had an iron clad alibi (according to the Police department ). The investigation ran to a dead end and nobody is charged for the crime. ( By the way, the wife is at her workplace during the fire ).
My question is: Does the insurance company have to pay them ( about $500,000) knowing full well that this is an arson even though nobody got caught???
kimmytr is offline  
Old 01-31-2004, 03:29 PM   #2 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Most likely that would depend on the terms of the insurance. When you sign the insurance contract, it lays out very specifically what is covered and what is not. I would imagine that the insurance company would cover the arson if it was not committed by the occupants. If it cannot be proven that the occupants are guilty, then they are in fact innocent with respect to our legal system and I would expect the insurance company should have to pay. (Note that I am not a lawyer and this should not be construed as legal advice. Just an opinion.)
jwells777 is offline  
Old 01-31-2004, 06:36 PM   #3 (permalink)
Psycho
 
sometimes the insurance company investiages on their own and if they turn up information that they suspect it was the wife or the husband they could, extend the investiage until they know for sure either way and delay payments that way.
Psivage is offline  
Old 01-31-2004, 06:51 PM   #4 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: New Zealand
it entirely depends on the insurance policy and its terms regarding -

A) Arson
B) Police vs. Internal Investigations

Also, was the policy under his name, her name or joint? If under his or joint, then if the internal insurance investigation concluded he was responsible, most likely no payment. If under her name, him being responsible could be irrelevant.
bobson is offline  
Old 01-31-2004, 07:07 PM   #5 (permalink)
Upright
 
Bobson, the policy in the both name. They've already concluded that he cannot commit the act ( He stayed in a motel, and he called and talked to his teenager daughter just before she left the house the fire started, and phone record proved that ).
So, you are saying there is easy answer, right?
kimmytr is offline  
Old 01-31-2004, 09:26 PM   #6 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
They get the insurance money unless they got royally fucked over on the terms of the policy.

Also, let us know if they figure out who he had do it. You have me wondering.
MSD is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 08:50 AM   #7 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Quote:
Originally posted by kimmytr
Bobson, the policy in the both name. They've already concluded that he cannot commit the act ( He stayed in a motel, and he called and talked to his teenager daughter just before she left the house the fire started, and phone record proved that ).
So, you are saying there is easy answer, right?

He could of hired somebody to do it, and with him on the phone is a good alibi.
Psivage is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 09:32 AM   #8 (permalink)
Lost
 
tenchi069's Avatar
 
Location: One step closer to the padded cell...
If the arsonist is a beneficiary of the policy then the insurance company will not pay.

Hypothetical situation. Guy and his gf break up, he is on the policy, she is not. She gets upset and trashes his car. The insurance company will cover it.

Hypo Sit #2. Man and Wife have a car, brand new sports car, "his" for all intents and purposes. He cheats on his wife, and she smashes his car. She can benefit from the insurance since the policy is in her name as well and the insurance company won't pay.
__________________
ERROR- PLBSAK
Problem Lies Between Seat and Keyboard.
tenchi069 is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 05:30 PM   #9 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: Bakersfield, CA
1) Contact an attorney to schedule an appointment.

2) Don't ask for legal advice on an Internet forum. I know you want a general idea, but all we can do is just say "well this happened to us and we got this and yeah"

TALK TO AN ATTORNEY
Bivens is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 06:30 PM   #10 (permalink)
Rawr!
 
skier's Avatar
 
Location: Edmontania
I suspect the wife.
__________________
"Asking a bomb squad if an old bomb is still "real" is not the best thing to do if you want to save it." - denim
skier is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 07:24 PM   #11 (permalink)
Upright
 
Skier, it won't be the wife.
She was at work, there are hundreds people vowed for her
kimmytr is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 08:42 PM   #12 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Denver, CO
It was the butler, in the conservatory, with the candlestick.
__________________
"We must have waffles. We must all have waffles, forthwith. Oh, we must think.
We must all have waffles and think, each and every one of us to the very best of his ability."
-- Professor Goldthwait Higginson Dorr, Ph.D.
FleaCircus is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 10:09 PM   #13 (permalink)
Misanthropic
 
Crack's Avatar
 
Location: Ohio! yay!
Quote:
Originally posted by FleaCircus
It was the butler, in the conservatory, with the candlestick.
Mr. Green...not the butler, the butler is always the fall guy for everything lately...
__________________
Crack, you and I are long overdue for a vicious bout of mansex.

~Halx
Crack is offline  
Old 02-02-2004, 08:08 AM   #14 (permalink)
Registered User
 
skysooner's Avatar
 
Location: Oklahoma
My guess is the insurance company will investigate and could withhold payment just on suspicion. It would then be up to the couple to fight them in court to get payment. This could turn out to be a big mess.
skysooner is offline  
Old 02-02-2004, 08:23 AM   #15 (permalink)
Rebourne - God, I love life, so, thanks!
 
spiderman's Avatar
 
Location: Up your nose with a rubber hose
Seems like most home insurance policies won't pay if arson is involved at all. It may be up to the victim to sue the arsonist to get compensation.

just a guess.
__________________
Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here.
spiderman is offline  
Old 02-02-2004, 11:59 AM   #16 (permalink)
I'm not a blonde! I'm knot! I'm knot! I'm knot!
 
raeanna74's Avatar
 
Location: Upper Michigan
A kid we knew got caught setting fire to a friends trailer so that they could collect the insurance money. They had promised to pay him a significant amount when they got the insurance money. He got caught - they both got jailed. No one got any money.

Even if the husband or wife paid someone to do it if it can be proven then it's likely no one will get any money.

Maybe it was the daughter?
__________________
"Always learn the rules so that you can break them properly." Dalai Lama
My Karma just ran over your Dogma.
raeanna74 is offline  
Old 02-02-2004, 03:03 PM   #17 (permalink)
Tilted
 
TNJ4555's Avatar
 
Location: Jersey
In my 49 years (13 as a small factory owner) one thing I have learned is true:

Don't take legal advise from your buddy unless your buddy is an attorney! Spend the dough, hire a lawyer.
TNJ4555 is offline  
Old 02-02-2004, 03:08 PM   #18 (permalink)
Warrior Smith
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Location: missouri
Lawyer-
the only way to go in this case- laws vary by state, and policy-

otherwise you will get fucked (and not in a good way)
__________________
Thought the harder, Heart the bolder,
Mood the more as our might lessens
Fire is offline  
Old 02-02-2004, 10:40 PM   #19 (permalink)
Upright
 
Did somebody mention the daughter? well, actually, the police were looking at her right away (after all, she was the last person to leave the house) but that is going nowhere.
As far as lawyers, she talked to a few.
This the best deal she come off with: $8,000 retaining fee, 40% of what she is going to receive from the insurance. Let's suppose she'll get what she wants: $500,000 minus 40% will leave her with $300,000, split that with her soon- to- be divorced husband, she'll about $150,000. (Not much consider she'd been working and saving all her life, she is in her '50)
Isn't there anything spelling Black and White: Arson, Nobody charged, Insurance pay ( Yes, No)
kimmytr is offline  
Old 02-03-2004, 12:05 PM   #20 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally posted by kimmytr
Did somebody mention the daughter? well, actually, the police were looking at her right away (after all, she was the last person to leave the house) but that is going nowhere.
As far as lawyers, she talked to a few.
This the best deal she come off with: $8,000 retaining fee, 40% of what she is going to receive from the insurance. Let's suppose she'll get what she wants: $500,000 minus 40% will leave her with $300,000, split that with her soon- to- be divorced husband, she'll about $150,000. (Not much consider she'd been working and saving all her life, she is in her '50)
Isn't there anything spelling Black and White: Arson, Nobody charged, Insurance pay ( Yes, No)
life is life there is nothing that is black and white, that's why judges are there to help decide the grey areas.

IMHO insurance companies will do like all companies and refuse or drag feet to pay based on the fact that a crime caused the loss. Shop for other lawyers, contact the state bar and find one that isn't so expensive.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
 

Tags
legal, question, simple

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:13 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360