Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-08-2008, 12:07 PM   #41 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Quote:
The problem with buying a car is that you need one that does 100% of your requirements. It used to be impractical to have your truck/suv to tow your boat/camper/utility trailer and then a separate car for day to day commuting. That era may be over soon. I wonder where the tipping point is re: gasoline for the truck/insurance for the second car.
Great point, I was heading back to this thread to state that exactly.

As for saying people who drive fuel efficient cars are cheap whiskey drinkers, you're missing the point. I was drawing the comparison to how people will spend more money (or waste more depending on who you ask) for things that matter to them.

For (another) example. Should I get angered at someone for paying $X-thousand for their house when they could buy a smaller house which is cheaper to cool/heat? I could freaking care less, the house is more important to them then the investment/upkeep cost. There, you're not cheap whiskey drinkers.

As for the Crossover - Japanese vehicle discussion. I've driven 4 different new cars in the last 4 months (company vehicles). I drive probably 4-5 hours a day, I'm a territory manager and visit customers/sell/etc. Of the vehicles I've driven, the Ford Edge is my favorite. I thought it was ugly at first. It, however, drives amazingly smooth and gets 20 City - 25ish highway. Longevity I can't say, but don't write off the domestics.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas

Last edited by Seaver; 06-08-2008 at 12:10 PM..
Seaver is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 12:09 PM   #42 (permalink)
Upright
 
lotsofmagnets's Avatar
 
Location: reykjavík, iceland
i don´t understand people patting themselves on the back when they talk about fuel efficiency of 25mpg. my golf was getting 40mpg (6 l/100km) on the freeway and 30mpg (8 l/100km) in city running. the worst car i´ve ever owned in terms of fuel efficiency was a ´74 volvo 164TE which has a 3l straight six and manual overdrive box and the worst i´d get from that car was 21 mpg (11 l/100km) and on the freeway it would get 26mpg (9 l/100km) and this was from an 18 year old driver (1st car i drove with my license) who obviously wasn´t driving for efficiency.
__________________
mother nature made the aeroplane, and the submarine sandwich, with the steady hands and dead eye of a remarkable sculptor.
she shed her mountain turning training wheels, for the convenience of the moving sidewalk, that delivers the magnetic monkey children through the mouth of impossible calendar clock, into the devil's manhole cauldron.
physics of a bicycle, isn't it remarkable?
lotsofmagnets is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 12:11 PM   #43 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Quote:
don´t understand people patting themselves on the back when they talk about fuel efficiency of 25mpg. my golf ....
My buddy had a Golf, I had to recline fully or tilt my head to the side the entire time riding with him. He got REALLY good fuel efficiency because no one would ever ride with him.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas
Seaver is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 12:11 PM   #44 (permalink)
Upright
 
lotsofmagnets's Avatar
 
Location: reykjavík, iceland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver
As for saying people who drive fuel efficient cars are cheap whiskey drinkers, you're missing the point. I was drawing the comparison to how people will spend more money (or waste more depending on who you ask) for things that matter to them.
no, you´ve just made the same point again

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver
My buddy had a Golf, I had to recline fully or tilt my head to the side the entire time riding with him. He got REALLY good fuel efficiency because no one would ever ride with him.
are you 8 foot tall?
__________________
mother nature made the aeroplane, and the submarine sandwich, with the steady hands and dead eye of a remarkable sculptor.
she shed her mountain turning training wheels, for the convenience of the moving sidewalk, that delivers the magnetic monkey children through the mouth of impossible calendar clock, into the devil's manhole cauldron.
physics of a bicycle, isn't it remarkable?

Last edited by lotsofmagnets; 06-08-2008 at 12:12 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
lotsofmagnets is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 12:19 PM   #45 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
A Geo Metro (remember those) got as high as 43/51 mpg. A modern Mini Cooper gets 25/32. A Smart Fortwo gets 62 mpg.... but this Geo gets 75!!!
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 12:21 PM   #46 (permalink)
Upright
 
lotsofmagnets's Avatar
 
Location: reykjavík, iceland
it´s funny, because the problem of adding to mod-cons of electric everything and all the latest safety equipment has seen the weight of modern cars skyrocket and thus efficiency suffers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
A Geo Metro (remember those) got as high as 43/51 mpg. A modern Mini Cooper gets 25/32. A Smart Fortwo gets 62 mpg.... but this Geo gets 75!!!
hehe i´d feel a bit like a weirdo driving that thing around. wonder if it takes a 2nd/3rd passenger lying down.
__________________
mother nature made the aeroplane, and the submarine sandwich, with the steady hands and dead eye of a remarkable sculptor.
she shed her mountain turning training wheels, for the convenience of the moving sidewalk, that delivers the magnetic monkey children through the mouth of impossible calendar clock, into the devil's manhole cauldron.
physics of a bicycle, isn't it remarkable?

Last edited by lotsofmagnets; 06-08-2008 at 12:24 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
lotsofmagnets is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 12:26 PM   #47 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by lotsofmagnets
it´s funny, because the problem of adding to mod-cons of electric everything and all the latest safety equipment has seen the weight of modern cars skyrocket and thus efficiency suffers.
It's not the only problem. This is why I think hybrids are merely transitional:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wired Magazine
In 2006, an Oregon market research firm released an incendiary 500-page report. Its claim: A Humvee (13 miles per gallon city, 16 highway) uses less energy than a Prius (48 city, 45 highway). Scientists quickly debunked the study, but the Hummer lovers got one thing right. Pound for pound, making a Prius contributes more carbon to the atmosphere than making a Hummer, largely due to the environmental cost of the 30 pounds of nickel in the hybrid's battery. Of course, the hybrid quickly erases that carbon deficit on the road, thanks to its vastly superior fuel economy.

Still, the comparison suggests a more sensible question. If a new Prius were placed head-to-head with a used car, would the Prius win? Don't bet on it. Making a Prius consumes 113 million BTUs, according to sustainability engineer Pablo Päster. A single gallon of gas contains about 113,000 Btus, so Toyota's green wonder guzzles the equivalent of 1,000 gallons before it clocks its first mile. A used car, on the other hand, starts with a significant advantage: The first owner has already paid off its carbon debt. Buy a decade-old Toyota Tercel, which gets a respectable 35 mpg, and the Prius will have to drive 100,000 miles to catch up.

Better yet, buy a three-cylinder, 49-horsepower 1994 Geo Metro XFi, one of the most fuel-efficient cars ever built. It gets the same average mileage as a 2008 Prius, so a new hybrid would never close the carbon gap. Sure, the XFi has no AC or airbags — but nobody said saving the planet would be comfortable, or even safe.
Link

This is what made me think of the Geos in my earlier post.

Don't go hybrid--go used!
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 12:49 PM   #48 (permalink)
Upright
 
lotsofmagnets's Avatar
 
Location: reykjavík, iceland
it´s true but unfortunately capitalism isn´t driven by the used car market. guess i´ve done my bit for the environment by always buying 2nd hand.

on a side note, my 164 proved itself a brilliant tow car even with only 120kW and 235Nm. i raised a few eyebrows with what i occasionally had attached to the back of that car.
__________________
mother nature made the aeroplane, and the submarine sandwich, with the steady hands and dead eye of a remarkable sculptor.
she shed her mountain turning training wheels, for the convenience of the moving sidewalk, that delivers the magnetic monkey children through the mouth of impossible calendar clock, into the devil's manhole cauldron.
physics of a bicycle, isn't it remarkable?
lotsofmagnets is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 01:33 PM   #49 (permalink)
Crazy
 
smoore's Avatar
 
Location: West of Denver
Quote:
Originally Posted by lotsofmagnets
i don´t understand people patting themselves on the back when they talk about fuel efficiency of 25mpg. my golf was getting 40mpg (6 l/100km) on the freeway and 30mpg (8 l/100km) in city running. the worst car i´ve ever owned in terms of fuel efficiency was a ´74 volvo 164TE which has a 3l straight six and manual overdrive box and the worst i´d get from that car was 21 mpg (11 l/100km) and on the freeway it would get 26mpg (9 l/100km) and this was from an 18 year old driver (1st car i drove with my license) who obviously wasn´t driving for efficiency.
I think this was directed at me.

I'm NOT going to enter a game of interstate pinball with a grip of SUVs in a Golf. Safety features are nice but you can't countermand the laws of physics. A golf wouldn't hold everything we need to hold on occasion (the 100% of requirements rule). Compact cars are not as appointed as we would like.

Your old Golf will not get 40mpg climbing Lookout Mountain, Floyd Hill and the Central City Parkway. I think most compact car owners realize 30mpg or so. Mini Coopers making the same commute are managing almost 40mpg. When you commute in the mountains you basically are getting city mpg. To me, there is very little difference between 30mpg and 22.5mpg. Certainly not enough of a difference to justify driving a small, uncomfortable car.

I mean, we're getting the same kind of mileage that a Subaru Outback gets in the real world under our conditions. Excuse me if I pat myself on the back for doing research and coming up with a nice, big, all wheel drive car that will get my wife safely to and from work in the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains while consuming half the fuel of the typical modern SUV.
__________________
smoore
smoore is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 01:44 PM   #50 (permalink)
Junkie
 
sapiens's Avatar
 
Location: Some place windy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
Link

This is what made me think of the Geos in my earlier post.

Don't go hybrid--go used!
Thanks for the link. I don't think that all hybrid owners are trendy, but I do know some who sold their functioning, relatively new cars to "save the environment". I'm guessing that they didn't consider the environmental impact of building a new car.
sapiens is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 01:59 PM   #51 (permalink)
Upright
 
lotsofmagnets's Avatar
 
Location: reykjavík, iceland
Quote:
Originally Posted by smoore
I think this was directed at me.
no. if you look through the rest of this thread and heaps of other threads you´ll see plenty of people boasting about how their car gets 21mpg. if any car of mine was getting that i´d be looking underneath expecting to see petrol leaking out.

but the rest of the post is

Quote:
Originally Posted by smoore
I'm NOT going to enter a game of interstate pinball with a grip of SUVs in a Golf. Safety features are nice but you can't countermand the laws of physics.
and thanks to your attitude and that of many around you i have to deal with a road full of suvs in my golf and volvo. thank you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by smoore
A golf wouldn't hold everything we need to hold on occasion (the 100% of requirements rule). Compact cars are not as appointed as we would like.
so for the once in a while where the load capacity of an suv (which is matched by a normal wagon anyway) you will drive one around most of the time with 4 empty seats and lots of air in the cargo space. i hardly think the "100% of requirements" rule is logical, let alone sane.



Quote:
Originally Posted by smoore
Your old Golf will not get 40mpg climbing Lookout Mountain, Floyd Hill and the Central City Parkway. I think most compact car owners realize 30mpg or so. Mini Coopers making the same commute are managing almost 40mpg. When you commute in the mountains you basically are getting city mpg. To me, there is very little difference between 30mpg and 22.5mpg. Certainly not enough of a difference to justify driving a small, uncomfortable car.
and your point? will your suv get 40mpg going up that hill, thus nullifying that my golf will get 39.9? be serious! and as for "comfort," the golf has everything i need to get from a to b in comfort, including comfort itself. define "comfort" please.

Quote:
Originally Posted by smoore
I mean, we're getting the same kind of mileage that a Subaru Outback gets in the real world under our conditions. Excuse me if I pat myself on the back for doing research and coming up with a nice, big, all wheel drive car that will get my wife safely to and from work in the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains while consuming half the fuel of the typical modern SUV.
good on you. i´m sure you made the best choice based on what you wanted.
__________________
mother nature made the aeroplane, and the submarine sandwich, with the steady hands and dead eye of a remarkable sculptor.
she shed her mountain turning training wheels, for the convenience of the moving sidewalk, that delivers the magnetic monkey children through the mouth of impossible calendar clock, into the devil's manhole cauldron.
physics of a bicycle, isn't it remarkable?
lotsofmagnets is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 02:16 PM   #52 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Quote:
and thanks to your attitude and that of many around you i have to deal with a road full of suvs in my golf and volvo. thank you.
That kind of logic makes no sense. If we follow that rule of logic no one should drive cars because bicycles are less safe with a road full of cars.

Quote:
so for the once in a while where the load capacity of an suv (which is matched by a normal wagon anyway) you will drive one around most of the time with 4 empty seats and lots of air in the cargo space. i hardly think the "100% of requirements" rule is logical, let alone sane.
Your reasoning only works if we are to have multiple cars. If I haul enough stuff to need a larger vehicle only 1/8th of the time, then the economic sense would be to have 1 larger vehicle, not 1 large/1 small. It makes no economic or logical sense to have a small car and a larger one so I can pick the best for the individual day. The difference in gas usage is minimal compared to the insurance/car statement/depreciation/etc of 2 cars.

Quote:
and your point? will your suv get 40mpg going up that hill, thus nullifying that my golf will get 39.9? be serious! and as for "comfort," the golf has everything i need to get from a to b in comfort, including comfort itself. define "comfort" please.
If you're that happy with your Golf/Volvo why do you get so angry at SUVs?
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas
Seaver is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 02:23 PM   #53 (permalink)
Upright
 
lotsofmagnets's Avatar
 
Location: reykjavík, iceland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver
That kind of logic makes no sense. If we follow that rule of logic no one should drive cars because bicycles are less safe with a road full of cars.
extrapolating your logic: humans shouldn´t exists since we are bad for the planet. should i kill myself now? ps. i´d rather be hit by a car than an suv while riding my bike so oops, my logic still stands

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver
Your reasoning only works if we are to have multiple cars. If I haul enough stuff to need a larger vehicle only 1/8th of the time, then the economic sense would be to have 1 larger vehicle, not 1 large/1 small. It makes no economic or logical sense to have a small car and a larger one so I can pick the best for the individual day. The difference in gas usage is minimal compared to the insurance/car statement/depreciation/etc of 2 cars.
or you could borrow someone´s car when you need that sort of capacity. like i´ve done. on several occasions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver
If you're that happy with your Golf/Volvo why do you get so angry at SUVs?
if you actually read my posts in this thread you would know


edit: this thread is now going nowhere. i´m out.

ps apologies for the aggressive tone: i get worked up about this subject pretty easily.....
__________________
mother nature made the aeroplane, and the submarine sandwich, with the steady hands and dead eye of a remarkable sculptor.
she shed her mountain turning training wheels, for the convenience of the moving sidewalk, that delivers the magnetic monkey children through the mouth of impossible calendar clock, into the devil's manhole cauldron.
physics of a bicycle, isn't it remarkable?

Last edited by lotsofmagnets; 06-08-2008 at 02:28 PM..
lotsofmagnets is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 02:28 PM   #54 (permalink)
Young Crumudgeon
 
Martian's Avatar
 
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by lotsofmagnets
also love the habit of taking up 2 spaces to give themselves more door swinging room and making sure the car next to them doesn´t scratch the paint. i know not only suv drivers do this but they seem to be the clear majority. i love parking my car hard up against the driver´s door when this situation arises
Guys with classics often do this as well. Please don't abuse classic cars. It's not nice.

The whole SUV fad was an aberration. For most applications, there are vehicles better suited than SUV's. Minivans are better for people and small cargo applications, trucks are better for large cargo and towing, sports cars are better at going fast and compacts are better for mileage and maneuverability. The one thing SUV's excel at is the one thing they almost never get used for.

There's always going to be a market for SUV's but the years of them being a popular vehicle choice for applications they're suited to are hopefully behind us.

The Toyota Prius is a scam.
__________________
I wake up in the morning more tired than before I slept
I get through cryin' and I'm sadder than before I wept
I get through thinkin' now, and the thoughts have left my head
I get through speakin' and I can't remember, not a word that I said

- Ben Harper, Show Me A Little Shame
Martian is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 02:35 PM   #55 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
quasimondo, that's a great article that shows a bit more of the reasons that people do what they do.

I've been wanting to buy a sportscar for many years, and well there's a couple things that come with such ownership, maintenance and gas. It's part of the purchase and total cost of ownership. The same is said for gasoline for any vehicle.

Quote:
View: SUV owners keep on truckin' despite gas prices
Source: CNN
posted with the TFP thread generator

SUV owners keep on truckin' despite gas prices
SUV owners keep on truckin' despite gas prices
Story Highlights
Ohio woman says Trailblazer provides her safety without "soccer mom" stigma

Some owners are cutting back on or combining SUV trips to save gas

Man bought Pontiac on eBay after shelling out $1,400-$1,800 a month in gas

Gas guzzlers becoming increasingly unpopular, but some people still need them

By Eliott C. McLaughlin
CNN
ATLANTA, Georgia (CNN) -- Oil prices have some drivers looking for new rides, but some truck and sport-utility vehicles owners are remaining true to their gas guzzlers. They say, $4-a-gallon gas be damned; they need the space.

"You've got to have that room when you're moving around," said Steve Sharp, who has three active children and whose wife owns a dance studio. "It would be impractical for us to own a Prius with everything we've got going on."

Toyota's hybrid sedan just wouldn't work, said Sharp, 36. In addition to hauling their 11-year-old boy to soccer games and their 10- and 7-year-old daughters to dance recitals, Sharp's wife, Caren, also totes large props and background displays for her studio.

In March, as consumer cynicism toward SUVs soared alongside gas prices, the Sharpsburg, Georgia, family purchased a new Chevy Avalanche truck, which gets between 17 and 20 miles per gallon on the highway.

When GM chief Rick Wagoner announced Tuesday his company would close four North American plants by 2010, he cited skyrocketing gas prices as a factor in the automobile giant's decision. Watch how gas prices drove the move »

"These higher gasoline prices are changing consumer behavior, and rapidly," Wagoner said. "We don't think this is a temporary spike or shift. We think it is permanent."

Peter Brown, the executive director of the trade publication Automotive News, said in an interview last month that SUV sales were down almost 33 percent this year, and sales of pickups were down almost 20 percent. He likened the behemoths to dinosaurs on the fast path to extinction. iReport.com: Still driving that gas guzzler, and loving it?

"If gas prices stay where they are at or continue to rise, the body-on-frame SUV is an endangered species and the pickup truck as a personal car is an endangered species," he said.

But some consumers say they'll strive to keep the beasts alive, even if it costs $100 or more to fill the tanks. See gas prices across the country »

Stephanie Torgerson, 32, of Pataskala, Ohio, said she simply can't put her three boys in her husband's Mazda 626. The 1-year-old needs a car seat, the 5-year-old needs a booster chair and she doesn't feel comfortable wedging her 8-year-old between the two.

Sure, she could probably get better mileage in a minivan, but she doesn't like the stigma.

"I don't want to be labeled as a soccer mom," she said.

Torgerson said her 2006 Chevy Trailblazer, which gets about 20 mpg, affords her and her kids protection -- not to mention four-wheel drive traction in the snowy winter months. But security comes with a price.

Torgerson's daily commute to Hilliard -- another Columbus suburb -- is 72 miles roundtrip. She spends about $82 a week on gas, she said. Watch a Florida driver document gas prices »

Asked if she had considered a hybrid SUV with four-wheel drive, she promptly said no.

"They're all brand-new vehicles, and I can't afford a $500-a-month car payment," she said.

Orlando Tapia, of Cabot, Arkansas, said he considered trading in his 2001 Chevy Suburban to buy his wife a new car. The 45-year-old U.S. Air Force education manager said he reconsidered after learning he'd get about one-seventh of the vehicle's market value. See how SUV sales are on the decline »

"They want to give you nothing for it," he said, lamenting the low demand and high supply of such vehicles.

Tapia, who also owns a 1988 Chevy Silverado pickup (his wife drives a Toyota Camry), said his family uses the Suburban only about 10 times a year, for vacations, hauling his flatbed trailer and when piling friends and relatives into the Suburban saves driving two cars.

Tapia decided to keep his cars simply because they're paid for.

"Do I pay $5,000 a year in car payments, or do I put $5,000 of gas in the Suburban?" he asked. "Right now it's cheaper for me to just put gas in the Suburban."

Tapia has felt the pinch of high gas prices, he said, but he has ways to alleviate the burden on his wallet without hocking his truck or SUV.

"If I'm running to the store and the Camry's out there and the Suburban and pickup are out there, I definitely jump in the Camry," he said.

Sharp said his family looks for similar ways to save money on gas. For instance, his wife will time trips to the bank or grocery store so she can pick up the children from school while she's out running errands. Extra trips mean extra gas, Sharp said. See how Lamborghinis, Bentleys fare on gas mileage »

But simple solutions don't work for everyone.

"I've got several of these things that I've been pouring liquid gold in the tank of," said Mark Antley, 47, of Sharpsburg, Georgia.

The computer and technology contractor used to drive his 1999 Suburban from Sharpsburg through Atlanta to the northern suburb of Alpharetta. The 145-mile roundtrip to work put a dent in his 45-gallon gas tank.

Making matters more costly were his wife's car -- another '99 Suburban -- and his diesel 2002 Ford F250 pickup.

So last month, Antley got on eBay, where he found a 1996 Pontiac Sunfire for $1,000. The car is a "piece of junk," he said, but it gets about 37 mpg, almost tripling his Suburban's mileage. He has already put 5,000 miles on it, which has saved him about the cost of the car in gas, he said.

"Last month, before I bought this car, it was running in the neighborhood of $1,400 to $1,800 a month," Antley said of his family's gasoline budget.

Though Antley has left his F250 parked since Christmas, his wife still needs her Suburban for carpooling to school and school events. The Antleys' daughter just turned 16, and is driving her own Toyota Corolla, but the couple's boys need rides to soccer practice and their sister's gymnastics meets.

Antley said he doesn't think the SUV is on the verge of extinction. He laughs at folks willing to pay $1.25 for a pint of bottled water -- $10 a gallon -- but who gripe about $4-a-gallon gas.

All products go up in price, he said. Gas prices eventually will level off and families will adjust their budgets accordingly. SUVs will either become luxuries for those who can afford the gas or necessities for those who need what SUVs have to offer, he predicts.

"There will still be a niche market for them," he said. "I don't know what other vehicle affords you the luxury of carrying as much as they do."
Quote:
"You've got to have that room when you're moving around," said Steve Sharp, who has three active children and whose wife owns a dance studio. "It would be impractical for us to own a Prius with everything we've got going on."

Toyota's hybrid sedan just wouldn't work, said Sharp, 36. In addition to hauling their 11-year-old boy to soccer games and their 10- and 7-year-old daughters to dance recitals, Sharp's wife, Caren, also totes large props and background displays for her studio.
This is their "Highway 17"

Quote:
"They're all brand-new vehicles, and I can't afford a $500-a-month car payment," she said.
Quote:
"Do I pay $5,000 a year in car payments, or do I put $5,000 of gas in the Suburban?" he asked. "Right now it's cheaper for me to just put gas in the Suburban."
What some SUV haters seem to forget is that buying a new car has a premium... car payments. Owners get to choose, to spend the money on a new vehicle, or gas in the current one.

I'd love to buy the sportscar, but my car is paid in full and well I only drive <8,000 miles a month.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 02:42 PM   #56 (permalink)
Young Crumudgeon
 
Martian's Avatar
 
Location: Canada
The thing that SUV owners seem to be conveniently forgetting is that it's not a boolean choice. It's not either SUV or Prius; there's a whole range of vehicles available to suit varying needs, from trucks to minivans to mid-size sedans. The big new thing is XUV's (aka crossovers), which are intended to provide the cargo and passenger capabilities of a full-size SUV without all the extra weight and power that very few people need.

If you need an SUV because of driving conditions, then go ahead and get one. If you don't need it for that specific reason, then there's almost certainly a better vehicle available. Sure you have the right to drive one if you want to pay for it. And I have the right to think that you're making a stupid choice.
__________________
I wake up in the morning more tired than before I slept
I get through cryin' and I'm sadder than before I wept
I get through thinkin' now, and the thoughts have left my head
I get through speakin' and I can't remember, not a word that I said

- Ben Harper, Show Me A Little Shame
Martian is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 02:53 PM   #57 (permalink)
<3 TFP
 
xepherys's Avatar
 
Location: 17TLH2445607250
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver
I've always been baffled at SUV haters. Some people get so angry at the fuel efficiency of the cars of other people. The people whom are willing to pay for the pleasure of it.

If you make the economic decision to buy cheap whiskey, and I make the decision to buy Crown or Walker, then the enjoyment of said device means more to me than the difference in price. If gas factors more for you than space or power, then that is your decision and you'll be happy with a Prius. If I want a car with some power and space for pulling a boat and a full family in one car more than gas, then that is my decision.

As for economics, no it's not the end. Crossovers are already becoming more popular, and with higher technology improving mileage it will be with equal power of the old giants.

In addition, the average ownership of a car new is only 2-5 years. It takes something like 80k miles to just break even on gas between hybrids and their non-hybrid equivilant. Very few people drive that much.
You've never been to Mexico, have you? They take a mid-sized car and shove a family of 8 in it. And it's 20 years old. And there's a dog. And groceries. And a car seat. *shrug* You don't need a huge SUV, with DVD players behind each seat, raised 8" with no muffler. Sure, that's an extreme, but it's also primarily cultural. Go to Europe and you don't see shit on the roads like you do here. And they still have families. Often larger than what you see in the States.

It's just a matter of being reasonable. Sure, do whatever you want. Freedom and all. But, why be wasteful unnecessarily?
__________________
The prospect of achieving a peace agreement with the extremist group of MILF is almost impossible...
-- Emmanuel Pinol, Governor of Cotobato


My Homepage
xepherys is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 02:55 PM   #58 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
I bought a Ford F-150 4X4 Crew Cab right before moving down here. I wanted to buy a Toyota, even though it's nearly the same size and the MPG is basically the same. But Ford was giving a ton of rebates and cash back and Toyota wouldn't honor the warranty here in Mexico. I felt like I had to go with the Ford. Had to pay cash. Mexico won't let you bring a vehicle in, long term, if you don't own it out right. Well you can if your bank will sign a notorized letter stating they know you're bring it into the country. Not a conversation I wanted to have , nor needed to, have with my credit union.

I wanted something big enough to carry all the stuff I wanted to bring with me as well as two very large dogs. Now that I'm here it stays parked most days. Unless I'm doing a Costco run there's really no need for it. The gas mileage sucks (though gas here is under $3 a gallon), it's too damn big for the streets and parking spaces. Much easier to take the bus or walk.

I'd sell it if I could and buy a "smart car" type vehicle or even a VW Bug, Golf etc... My Ford's a POS. The seats started unraveling at about 10K, Not even the drivers seat the unused passenger seat. The CD players been replaced twice and still doesn't work. I had numerous issues with the engine. The latest "event" being a spark plug wire that fried out in the middle of the jungle. And the alignment has never been right, the steering wheel feels like it's vibrating in your hand and the tires wear much quicker on the front outside edge on the passenger side.

Again POS- I recommend anything over a new Ford.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 03:36 PM   #59 (permalink)
 
abaya's Avatar
 
Location: Iceland
Quote:
Originally Posted by lotsofmagnets
no. if you look through the rest of this thread and heaps of other threads you´ll see plenty of people boasting about how their car gets 21mpg. if any car of mine was getting that i´d be looking underneath expecting to see petrol leaking out.
Man, that is ACTUALLY what happened to MY 1997 Golf here in Iceland!!! I love that car... it gets around 30 mpg around town, and more like 35 in highways, but sometime this spring I started noticing what looked like an oil slick coming from the passenger side of the car. It wasn't oil... the fuel filter was all rusted to hell (don'tcha love the Icelandic roads in winter?), and once that was replaced, she was running good as new.

I echo the call to buy used!! And drive 'em into the ground.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
I don't know where he got them from but lease turnovers, which drove a good portion of the market in the 90s and today, are that term.

Only people I know who outright purchased their car has kept them for longer durations.
Well, that would be everyone I know. Lease turnovers? I've heard of those in Iceland (they loooooooove to buy new, throw 'em out the next year, buy new again), but in the US, not in my crowd apparently. Go figure.
__________________
And think not you can direct the course of Love;
for Love, if it finds you worthy, directs your course.

--Khalil Gibran

Last edited by abaya; 06-08-2008 at 03:38 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
abaya is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 03:51 PM   #60 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
My original plan was to buy used. But Ford was giving so much cash back, new was cheaper. I called a couple people that were running ads and tried to get a newer used truck but they wanted more then the dealer for new. Seems Ford was having trouble getting rid of their inventory. Having owned this one for a while I now know why.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 04:00 PM   #61 (permalink)
Crazy
 
smoore's Avatar
 
Location: West of Denver
Quote:
Originally Posted by lotsofmagnets
no. if you look through the rest of this thread and heaps of other threads you´ll see plenty of people boasting about how their car gets 21mpg. if any car of mine was getting that i´d be looking underneath expecting to see petrol leaking out.

but the rest of the post is



and thanks to your attitude and that of many around you i have to deal with a road full of suvs in my golf and volvo. thank you.



so for the once in a while where the load capacity of an suv (which is matched by a normal wagon anyway) you will drive one around most of the time with 4 empty seats and lots of air in the cargo space. i hardly think the "100% of requirements" rule is logical, let alone sane.





and your point? will your suv get 40mpg going up that hill, thus nullifying that my golf will get 39.9? be serious! and as for "comfort," the golf has everything i need to get from a to b in comfort, including comfort itself. define "comfort" please.



good on you. i´m sure you made the best choice based on what you wanted.
Usually I just disregard people who chop posts up to nit-pick each point.

1) Reading is fundamental. I get more gas mileage in this CAR than the SUVs around us.
2) No way in hell your golf will get 40 in the mountains. Most people with that class of compact get 30 in the conditions we use our car.
3) 30 is a lot closer to 22.5 than 40 is to 21.

Without a vehicle fulfilling 100% of our requirements we would have to have more vehicles. No thank you.

Again, it's not an SUV, it's a car.

I define comfort as being comfortable. IE not jimmying my 6 foot 180lb frame into a subcompact car. Not sitting elbow to elbow with the front seat passenger. Being able to actually sit in the back for more than an hour. Those things are comfort.

Feel free to be smug all you like but not everyone can use a subcompact car. Don't forget, all of my <5 mile trips are made by bicycle unless I have to haul more than 30lb or so. My next cargo bike will change that.
__________________
smoore
smoore is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 04:01 PM   #62 (permalink)
Crazy
 
I used to think SUVs were obnoxious and ostentatious until I drove one, the grand cherokees I had are very roomy and comfortable compared to a car. It's not just pampered soccer moms who drive these things, I can say firsthand that they are genuinely pleasurable to drive and live with.
Skutch is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 04:43 PM   #63 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
What some SUV haters seem to forget is that buying a new car has a premium... car payments. Owners get to choose, to spend the money on a new vehicle, or gas in the current one.
Or, as is the case for a couple of the people in the article, three.

What? Two drivers and three vehicles?
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 06:01 PM   #64 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
Or, as is the case for a couple of the people in the article, three.

What? Two drivers and three vehicles?
Quote:
Tapia, who also owns a 1988 Chevy Silverado pickup (his wife drives a Toyota Camry), said his family uses the Suburban only about 10 times a year, for vacations, hauling his flatbed trailer and when piling friends and relatives into the Suburban saves driving two cars.
Quote:
"If I'm running to the store and the Camry's out there and the Suburban and pickup are out there, I definitely jump in the Camry," he said.
It's not like they have 3 SUVs. It seems also that they are practical about their usage, 10 times a year for the Suburban for vacations, hauling his flatbed trailer and when piling friends and relatives into the Suburban saves driving two cars.

Seems pretty reasonable if you can afford it.

If I could afford to have 3 vehicles. I would.

One for towing my boat and outdoor activity vehicles, which would get the least amount of use.

One sports car, second least amount of use.

One regular runabout, most use.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 06:02 PM   #65 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Quote:
or you could borrow someone´s car when you need that sort of capacity. like i´ve done. on several occasions.
Yeah... I have a truck. You don't know how annoying it is to have those people who brag constantly about their mileage to then turn right around and ask for your help when their car isn't so great.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas
Seaver is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 08:39 PM   #66 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Chicago
One of the questions I've always asked myself is: why are people so defensive about their cars?

Okay, I haven't always asked it, but I do whenever I read threads like this.
__________________
"I can normally tell how intelligent a man is by how stupid he thinks I am" - Cormac McCarthy, All The Pretty Horses

Last edited by JumpinJesus; 06-08-2008 at 08:41 PM..
JumpinJesus is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 10:25 PM   #67 (permalink)
Confused Adult
 
Shauk's Avatar
 
Location: Spokane, WA
I drive a Tiburon, it gets good mileage and lets me run over willravel




although I wish it was this

http://www.newtiburon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=89297

Last edited by Shauk; 06-08-2008 at 10:36 PM..
Shauk is offline  
Old 06-09-2008, 03:06 AM   #68 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by JumpinJesus
One of the questions I've always asked myself is: why are people so defensive about their cars?

Okay, I haven't always asked it, but I do whenever I read threads like this.
I think when it comes to SUV's it's about size. It's hard to drive them and stay in a lane designed for horse buggy, so many downtown streets are difficult. It's usually impossible to park and take one space. They suck up gas, so if the whole supply and demand thing is true they are contributing to rising fuel cost. As I said I have a F-150, not really an SUV- it's technically a truck. But with the canopy it's really not much different really. When I'm driving in urban areas I find myself in two lanes and when I park I almost always end up taking up two spaces. Though I do try to find an empty area of the lot as far from the store as possible. Otherwise I end up returning to my truck and find I can't get it, several posts here confirm my suspicion that that may not always be an accident on the part of other drivers. It's not like I think to myself "fuck everyone else I want two spaces" or "screw the people behind me, I'm a two lane kinda guy." No, I end up doing these things because it's too big to do anything else. People see these things, notice one guy driving and it pisses them off. Honestly I see their point. Then you have people giving crap to large vehicle drivers and it causes them to become defensive.

I saw a comedian once who asked "Will the owner of the Hummer please raise your hand so the rest of us can beat the crap out of you." There was lot of applause.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 06-09-2008, 04:57 AM   #69 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Huh, I've driven a truck since I was 16... I've never taken more than 1 lane or parking space.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas
Seaver is offline  
Old 06-09-2008, 06:11 AM   #70 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
you guys need to stop talking like every SUV on the road is an army-issue Hum-V. Yes, the GMC Yukon or Cadillac Escalade are huge automobiles. But CRV's, Rav-R's, etc. are no bigger than 4-door sedans. In fact, my CRV is shorter in length than my dad's 2-door Chrysler Sebring.

The vehicles that really take up too much room in parking lots are the jacked up, extended cab pickup trucks.
Derwood is offline  
Old 06-09-2008, 06:14 AM   #71 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver
Huh, I've driven a truck since I was 16... I've never taken more than 1 lane or parking space.
I think a lot of that maybe where your at. I know in rural Oregon I never had a problem, also never had a problem prior to getting a four door crew cab. But in downtown Portland it was a bit of a problem, both parking and lane width. Down here it's a major problem most places. Merida is one of the oldest cities in North America, the streets simply were not designed for automobiles, yet alone a long truck. Drivings a pain but can be done. Buses do it. But parking is not easy.

I've had a truck most of my adult life too. I had a standard cab and an extended cab prior to this truck. They were both easier to park. This thing so long it's a problem. I have a back up alarm that tells me when I'm within 3, then 2 and finally a foot from something behind me. The turning radius is so large it's hard to pull in or out of spaces.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 06-09-2008, 06:16 AM   #72 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Leto's Avatar
 
Location: The Danforth
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
I'm guessing it's Japanese.

I just bought my toyata Rav4 (May of 2007) and while gas was relatively inexpensive back then (around 80 cents) It was one of my motivating factors. This vehicle has a 269 HP V6 in it that has better gas consumption than my VW Jetta. Size fits my family of 5 comfortably. It is solid, and the style is way ahead of anything that GM put/s out. I tried to look for a comparable GM, but there was nothing.

I can park this thing anywhere, due to its compact size, and I'm not complaining about hte cost of running it.

My sister works at the GM plant in Oshawa, and is a QA engineer on the Silverado line. Beautifully executed, top quality vehicles. But nobody is going to buy them.
Leto is offline  
Old 06-09-2008, 12:39 PM   #73 (permalink)
let me be clear
 
ottopilot's Avatar
 
Location: Waddy Peytona
The Jeep Cherokee (not grand) is a great true small SUV. We still use our 1997 Jeep to haul equipment for my business and pull our 23.5 ft. Caravelle Interceptor. Something this size as a hybrid with enough HP and torque is highly feasible. At 23 mpg, it's already a very reasonable and functional work vehicle.

On the other hand, boats are not fuel efficient and we've seen a great reduction of traffic on the waterways. We filled up the tank for $120 last weekend, drove the boat under 25 mph. (65 mph top-speed) for about a mile, anchored and stayed in one spot all day. weee! At least we have enough gas for a few more floats this summer. No cruising.



Boats and RV's are selling at low - low prices!

Last edited by ottopilot; 06-12-2008 at 06:50 PM..
ottopilot is offline  
Old 06-09-2008, 12:42 PM   #74 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Otto, can liberals ride on the boat? I promise not to say "Bush" once, at least in relation to politics.
Willravel is offline  
Old 06-09-2008, 12:46 PM   #75 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot
The Jeep Cherokee (not grand) is a great true small SUV. We still use our 1997 Jeep to haul equipment for my business and pull our 23.5 ft. Caravelle Interceptor. Something this size as a hybrid with enough HP and torque is highly feasible. At 23 mpg, it's already a very reasonable and functional work vehicle.

On the other hand, boats are not fuel efficient and we've seen a great reduction of traffic on the waterways. We filled up the tank for $120 last weekend, drove the boat under 25 mph. (65 mph top-speed) for about a mile, anchored and stayed in one spot all day. weee! At least we have enough gas for a few more floats this summer. No cruising.

Nice boat.




Boats and RV's are selling at low - low prices!

Nice boat.

/end thread jack.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 06-09-2008, 12:53 PM   #76 (permalink)
let me be clear
 
ottopilot's Avatar
 
Location: Waddy Peytona
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
Otto, can liberals ride on the boat? I promise not to say "Bush" once, at least in relation to politics.
If you have a Bush inflatable, we can load it up with fireworks, light it and set it afloat.

All are welcome as long as you bring a little gas money for the cause. We've got beer, tunes, sunscreen and assorted floaties. Leave politics in your car at the marina... be sure to crack the windows to prevent heat stroke.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tully Mars
Nice boat.

/end thread jack.
Thanks!

Last edited by ottopilot; 06-09-2008 at 12:55 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
ottopilot is offline  
Old 06-09-2008, 01:00 PM   #77 (permalink)
Upright
 
lotsofmagnets's Avatar
 
Location: reykjavík, iceland
.....and back in

Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot
If you have a Bush inflatable, we can load it up with fireworks, light it and set it afloat.
giving bush a viking funeral? that´s a new one
__________________
mother nature made the aeroplane, and the submarine sandwich, with the steady hands and dead eye of a remarkable sculptor.
she shed her mountain turning training wheels, for the convenience of the moving sidewalk, that delivers the magnetic monkey children through the mouth of impossible calendar clock, into the devil's manhole cauldron.
physics of a bicycle, isn't it remarkable?
lotsofmagnets is offline  
 

Tags
death, knell, suv


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:20 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360