04-29-2003, 09:30 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Psycho
|
Reliable duplicate image finder?
Ok, I'm sitting here with about 45 GB of
images on my hard drive. You know, landscapes, portraits of inspiring people, that sort of thing. Definitely no porn, oh no no no. About half of it is nicely sorted into thematic and topical galleries. About half is a complete hodgepodge. I've used some shareware/freeware duplicate image detectors in the past, but none of them have been able to cope with this many thousands of files. I'm talking about the programs that don't just look for exact matches, but detect duplicates that have been cropped, resized, resampled, and/or captioned. Does anyone know of a dup finder that can handle gigabytes at a time? Commercial, freeware, shareware, anything. Recommendations appreciated. |
04-29-2003, 10:24 AM | #2 (permalink) |
Upright
|
Might not be realistic?
I was thinking along the lines of a perl script comparing MD5 hashes until I read your requirement that it should be able to cope with cropped and resized images...
This might be too much to ask. When you crop or resize an image you lose the information that makes such a comparison possible. If there was software that did this it would surely be based on some kind of heuristic and would only be an educated guess at best. To understand how difficult this is, try to imagine how you would say FOR CERTAIN that two pictures were "the same" even though one had been cropped or resized... they might look roughly the same, but what about the palette, the brightness adjustment, colour filters, skewing, etc etc etc... Not to mention site branding... |
04-29-2003, 10:45 AM | #3 (permalink) |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
I use ACDsee 4.0 and 5.0 has a dupe image finder.. works great!!!
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
04-29-2003, 10:49 AM | #4 (permalink) | |
Psycho
|
Re: Might not be realistic?
Quote:
such programs (sorry, don't have pointers here at work, might be able to dig up a name or two when I go home). I believe they operate by taking color samples at various positions relative to the size of the image, and calculate some measure of closeness (perhaps weighting toward the center?) Usually there's some way to tune the sensitivity. They actually work pretty well. Occasionally you'll get a false positive if there are two shots of the same chick in the same pose -- er, that is, of the same beautiful natural vista. The only trouble is that the ones I've tried start to choke when the file count hits a few thousand. I'm hoping there's one that doesn't. |
|
04-29-2003, 11:03 AM | #6 (permalink) | |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
|
05-01-2003, 02:10 AM | #9 (permalink) |
Addict
|
ImageDupe does quite a good job. It can take quite a while to search through thousands of images so I broke it down into sections to scan (I had a pretty good idea where the duplicates were) and once all sections were complete I ran it on all files to double check
Last edited by txd; 05-01-2003 at 02:12 AM.. |
05-01-2003, 06:24 AM | #11 (permalink) | |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
|
09-15-2003, 06:57 PM | #12 (permalink) |
Insane
|
I needed to clean up my picture collection and searched to find this thread...glad to see I'm not the only one with some catching up to do!
ACDsee crashed on my 35,000+ collection...I Googled around and found Dup Detector, a freeware utility that finds dups and similar files - it successfully detected, for example, that a picture with a watermark was actually the same as a picture without one. |
09-16-2003, 06:03 AM | #13 (permalink) | |
Psycho
|
Quote:
posting this tip. I just grabbed it and am giving it a try. I pointed it at one of my facials directories -- 17,857 images -- and it's chugging away. We'll see what happens. Facials? I meant historic monuments. Sorry. |
|
09-16-2003, 12:01 PM | #15 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: North Hollywood
|
have you tried imatch 3 ?
http://www.photools.com/ |
09-17-2003, 11:02 AM | #16 (permalink) | |
Psycho
|
Quote:
probably owe you a beer. I ran the visual similarity search on about 4,700 images. The results were overly generous, but there are about half a dozen algorithm tweaks that I haven't tried playing with yet. It did a good job finding cropped, resized, and color-adjusted similarities; it did a bad job identifying images with captions or logos added/removed. I also ran the exact duplicate search on 17,000+ images, and the program, just like Tiny Tim on the last page of A Christmas Carol, did NOT die. A tip of the hat to charliex! |
|
Tags |
duplicate, finder, image, reliable |
|
|