Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Technology


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-11-2007, 09:58 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junkie
 
NTFS formatted harddrive with a FAT32 operating system?

I recently purchased a external harddrive for use with my old Windows ME (FAT32) driven PC. The harddrive came pre-formatted in FAT32 format, but I was curious if I would be able to use a NTFS formatted harddrive with my Windows ME operating system? Would my computer recognize the harddrive and allow me to transfer files back and (mostly) forth?

I know Windows ME is old, and always has been garbage, but that's where I'm at and I bought the harddrive as a means for storing my files and media, and likely transferring it to another, newer, PC some time down the road.

I really dislike the file size limitation imposed by FAT32, and thus would really like to be able to convert my external harddrive to NTFS, providing it would still be recognized by my PC.

Thanks!
__________________
Desperation is no excuse for lowering one's standards.
Jimellow is offline  
Old 06-11-2007, 10:16 PM   #2 (permalink)
The Computer Kid :D
 
Location: 127.0.0.1
Well, if the PC is running FAT32, and you want the external disk to be NTFS to avoid file size limit ... you shouldn't have any files on the machine that would break the limit?

But other than me being a smartass (not really because I bet you already considered that), and focusing on the idea that you want to use it in the future (where there is no such restriction), it looks like 9x Kernel (95/98/ME) needs 3rd-party support to run NTFS.

A google search of "windows ME NTFS" yields this as the first result:

http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilitie...Windows98.html

It might really not help you at all, but I'm exhausted and I need to sleep. Hope that helps!

EDIT: I like your signature by the way, it meant something to me last night :P
MikeSty is offline  
Old 06-12-2007, 12:49 AM   #3 (permalink)
Mine is an evil laugh
 
spindles's Avatar
 
Location: Sydney, Australia
that sysinternals thing is not really that useful being read only

Personally, I'd just format it as fat32 and when/if you ever get a computer that can do ntfs natively, you could always reformat it then. It is also possible to convert it without reformating:

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l.../bb456984.aspx
__________________
who hid my keyboard's PANIC button?
spindles is offline  
Old 06-12-2007, 05:15 AM   #4 (permalink)
Devils Cabana Boy
 
Dilbert1234567's Avatar
 
Location: Central Coast CA
to get around the size limitation, you can partition it in to several volumes.
__________________
Donate Blood!

"Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen
Dilbert1234567 is offline  
Old 06-25-2007, 05:59 PM   #5 (permalink)
Desert Rat
 
spived2's Avatar
 
Location: Arizona
As far as I know, there is no way to read an NTFS drive from a FAT32 partitioned drive. An NTFS drive can see fat32, but not the other way around. This is due to the more robust and complex nature of NTFS.
__________________

"This visage, no mere veneer of vanity, is it vestige of the vox populi, now vacant, vanished, as the once vital voice of the verisimilitude now venerates what they once vilified. However, this valorous visitation of a by-gone vexation, stands vivified, and has vowed to vanquish these venal and virulent vermin vanguarding vice and vouchsafing the violently vicious and voracious violation of volition. The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous. Verily, this vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose vis-à-vis an introduction, and so it is my very good honor to meet you and you may call me V."
- V
spived2 is offline  
Old 06-25-2007, 06:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
you should be able to use something like partition magic to get over the file size limitation if I recall correctly I had my last machine in FAT32 and it was well over the limit. I did the same thing with NTFS.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 06-25-2007, 07:06 PM   #7 (permalink)
Devils Cabana Boy
 
Dilbert1234567's Avatar
 
Location: Central Coast CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by spived2
As far as I know, there is no way to read an NTFS drive from a FAT32 partitioned drive. An NTFS drive can see fat32, but not the other way around. This is due to the more robust and complex nature of NTFS.
if by fat32 drive, you mean a windows 9x system, no, you actually can. (you can also install an ntfs compatible system on fat 32)

sysinternals made a program that could do it for you, sysinternals no longer exists though, but you can still get it.

http://www.softlookup.com/display.asp?id=25391
__________________
Donate Blood!

"Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen
Dilbert1234567 is offline  
Old 06-25-2007, 10:23 PM   #8 (permalink)
<3 TFP
 
xepherys's Avatar
 
Location: 17TLH2445607250
Erm, well... there are some half-truths here that need to be dispelled. First of all, NTFS and FAT32 are different items in the same category. I'm pretty sure you all get that and it's more likely that I'm misinterpreting some of these responses, but I just wan to make sure.

From a system installed on a FAT32 partition, you can not, by default, work with an NTFS partition. The primary reason for this is security. The security features available on NTFS are not on FAT32, and the FAT32-installed operating system does not have an y default measures to work with it.

That being said, there are third party utilities that can allow you to access it. They work, but also have a higher risk of failure, and thus data corruption, so unless your data is rather unimportant, I'd forego it.

The items I notice here are... why are you running Windows ME? You should be able to pick up Win98SE for like... pennies on the dollar these days. Windows ME was, by and large, the worst OS that Microsoft has ever put out. It's buggy and data corruption runs rampant on it. I'm shocked that anyone still HAS A WORKING ME install. Hell, MS themselves disavowed ME within months of it's release, and cut support for it as soon as they possibly could. Window 2000 has pretty easy hardware requirements to fill (not much tougher than ME), should be found pretty cheap, and works much better. I also believe that 2000 has NTFS support.
__________________
The prospect of achieving a peace agreement with the extremist group of MILF is almost impossible...
-- Emmanuel Pinol, Governor of Cotobato


My Homepage
xepherys is offline  
Old 06-26-2007, 01:26 AM   #9 (permalink)
Young Crumudgeon
 
Martian's Avatar
 
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by xepherys
Window 2000 has pretty easy hardware requirements to fill (not much tougher than ME), should be found pretty cheap, and works much better. I also believe that 2000 has NTFS support.
Seconding the 2k recommendation. Being built on the NT kernel, 2000 is native NTFS. It will read FAT32, but the 9x based Windows versions are incapable of working with NTFS natively.

Basically, if you're running FAT32 on your ME system, you're better off running FAT32 on your external drive as well. This is the solution that will cause you the least amount of headaches. Seeing as how you're unlikely to encounter an NT 4.0 install these days (I haven't seen one in years) and 2000 and XP both read FAT32, that's the file system that will provide the greatest amount of compatibility. The 4 GiB limit on file sizes might cause issues if you're working with dvd rips or something of that nature, but even then it's possible to work around it.
__________________
I wake up in the morning more tired than before I slept
I get through cryin' and I'm sadder than before I wept
I get through thinkin' now, and the thoughts have left my head
I get through speakin' and I can't remember, not a word that I said

- Ben Harper, Show Me A Little Shame
Martian is offline  
Old 06-26-2007, 06:03 AM   #10 (permalink)
Devils Cabana Boy
 
Dilbert1234567's Avatar
 
Location: Central Coast CA
win2k has some major flaws for the corporate environment... any user account can grab system privileges in about 2 minutes, and from there escalate to local admin. go with XP, you can get a cheep copy of pro for $140 or less.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xepherys
From a system installed on a FAT32 partition, you can not, by default, work with an NTFS partition. The primary reason for this is security. The security features available on NTFS are not on FAT32, and the FAT32-installed operating system does not have an y default measures to work with it.
You can mount an ntfs volume on a system installed on fat32. no jury rigging, this took me 10 minutes to install windows, on the fat32 drive, then i mounted an ntfs partition and a fat 12 partition too.



Quote:
Originally Posted by xepherys
That being said, there are third party utilities that can allow you to access it. They work, but also have a higher risk of failure, and thus data corruption, so unless your data is rather unimportant, I'd forego it.
the utility i recommended is virtually flawless, it's not some hack job, the people over at sysinternals do quality work, so good i used there utilities over Microsoft's on a daily basis, so good, Microsoft bought them out. hell it uses the same driver the nt kernel uses.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sysinternals
NTFS for Windows 98 wraps the Windows NT/2000/XP NTFS driver in a run-time environment that simulates the Windows NT environment the NTFS driver is written to use. Thus, NTFS for Windows 98 does not rely on potentially unreliable reverse-engineered information about NTFS, provides ultimate compatibility with NTFS, and takes advantage of Microsoft NTFS bug fixes whenever you update the NTFS driver file NTFS for Windows 98 uses to a more recent version.

back to the original problem at hand, just partition the drive in to many fat32 partitions, it will be messy but it will work just fine.
__________________
Donate Blood!

"Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen
Dilbert1234567 is offline  
Old 06-27-2007, 08:51 PM   #11 (permalink)
Young Crumudgeon
 
Martian's Avatar
 
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
win2k has some major flaws for the corporate environment... any user account can grab system privileges in about 2 minutes, and from there escalate to local admin. go with XP, you can get a cheep copy of pro for $140 or less.
I may have misunderstood, I didn't think we were diagnosing for a corporate environment. And for home use, Win 2k works just fine. It's less demanding than XP, so for a slower PC would probably be the better option.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
the utility i recommended is virtually flawless, it's not some hack job, the people over at sysinternals do quality work, so good i used there utilities over Microsoft's on a daily basis, so good, Microsoft bought them out. hell it uses the same driver the nt kernel uses.
Sysinternals is good software, yes. But it would probably be easier just to work in FAT32, since every Windows version but 95 OSR1 and NT 4.0 can read it natively. The only time I'd foresee the file size limitation being an issue is if you're storing DVD images. At least, I know that's the only time I've ever encountered a 4GiB file; and even then, you could always break it down into a spanned archive.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
back to the original problem at hand, just partition the drive in to many fat32 partitions, it will be messy but it will work just fine.
I fail to see why this is necessary. FAT 16 was limited to a 2GiB volume size in most cases, but FAT 32 has an allocation table orders of magnitude larger and can support volume sizes up into the TiB range. I believe Jimellow's issue was with the 4GiB filesize limitation, which would be an issue with exceptionally large files. However, just about any off the shelf archiving program is capable of creating spanned archives these days, which means if the drive is only being used for back-up storage there's a simple work-around.
__________________
I wake up in the morning more tired than before I slept
I get through cryin' and I'm sadder than before I wept
I get through thinkin' now, and the thoughts have left my head
I get through speakin' and I can't remember, not a word that I said

- Ben Harper, Show Me A Little Shame
Martian is offline  
Old 06-28-2007, 06:39 AM   #12 (permalink)
Devils Cabana Boy
 
Dilbert1234567's Avatar
 
Location: Central Coast CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martian
I may have misunderstood, I didn't think we were diagnosing for a corporate environment. And for home use, Win 2k works just fine. It's less demanding than XP, so for a slower PC would probably be the better option.
that was an aside more then anything. win2k is a thorn in my side, it's virtually impossible to lock down like winxp.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martian

I fail to see why this is necessary. FAT 16 was limited to a 2GiB volume size in most cases, but FAT 32 has an allocation table orders of magnitude larger and can support volume sizes up into the TiB range. I believe Jimellow's issue was with the 4GiB filesize limitation, which would be an issue with exceptionally large files. However, just about any off the shelf archiving program is capable of creating spanned archives these days, which means if the drive is only being used for back-up storage there's a simple work-around.
if you crank the cluster size up, you can make it one partition, but you waste a lot of space, about 16KB per file. f and after a reread of the OP, the 4 GB file size was the issue, not the partition size...
__________________
Donate Blood!

"Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen
Dilbert1234567 is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 04:00 PM   #13 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Yup. I think he's got it.

Some utilities will read/write NTFS from Dos/Win98 etc, but I wouldn't rely on them. Believe me, I've tried.
Nimetic is offline  
 

Tags
fat32, formatted, harddrive, ntfs, operating, system

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:53 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360