Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-26-2005, 08:42 AM   #1 (permalink)
<3 TFP
 
xepherys's Avatar
 
Location: 17TLH2445607250
National DNA database?

Link Here (Washington Post)

Quote:
Originally Posted by From the Article
Bill Would Permit DNA Collection From All Those Arrested

By Jonathan Krim
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, September 24, 2005; A03

Suspects arrested or detained by federal authorities could be forced to provide samples of their DNA that would be recorded in a central database under a provision of a Senate bill to expand government collection of personal data.

The controversial measure was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee last week and is supported by the White House, but has not gone to the floor for a vote. It goes beyond current law, which allows federal authorities to collect and record samples of DNA only from those convicted of crimes. The data are stored in an FBI-maintained national registry that law enforcement officials use to aid investigations, by comparing DNA from criminals with evidence found at crime scenes.

Sponsors insist that adding DNA from people arrested or detained would lead to prevention of some crimes, and help solve others more quickly.

"When police retrace the history of a serial predator after he is finally caught, they often find that he never had a prior criminal conviction, but did have a prior arrest," Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) said in a statement. "That means the only way they are likely to catch such a perpetrator after his first crime -- rather than his 10th -- is if authorities can maintain a comprehensive database of all those who are arrested, just as we do with fingerprints."

Privacy advocates across the political spectrum say the proposal is another step in expanding government intrusion.

"DNA is not like fingerprinting," said Jesselyn McCurdy, a legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union. "It contains genetic information and information about diseases." She added that the ACLU questions whether it is constitutional to put data from those who have not been convicted into a database of convicted criminals.

The provision, co-sponsored by Kyl and Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.), does not require the government to automatically remove the DNA data of people who are never convicted. Instead, those arrested or detained would have to petition to have their information removed from the database after their cases were resolved.

Privacy advocates are especially concerned about possible abuses such as profiling based on genetic characteristics.

"This clearly opens the door to all kinds of race- or ethnic-based stops" by police, said Jim Dempsey, executive director of the Center for Democracy and Technology, a digital policy think tank.

Originally, the federal DNA database was limited to convicted sex offenders, who often repeat their crimes. Then it was expanded to include violent felons. Several states, including Virginia, also collect DNA from those arrested for violent crimes.

"It's a classic mission-creep situation," said Jim Harper, a privacy specialist with the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. "These guys are playing a great law and order game . . . and in the process creating a database that could be converted into something quite dangerous."

Typically, DNA is taken from suspects via a swab of saliva. A DNA "profile" -- or unique numeric signature -- is generated, which can be stored without including private genetic information.

But privacy advocates say they are unclear how the growing number of state and federal samples are being handled, recorded and secured.

The Kyl measure was added to a bill to strengthen penalties for violent acts against women and was approved without a roll-call vote. McCurdy said she hopes that negotiations among Judiciary Committee members result in changes before the legislation is voted on by the Senate.
© 2005 The Washington Post Company
xepherys is offline  
Old 09-26-2005, 08:49 AM   #2 (permalink)
<3 TFP
 
xepherys's Avatar
 
Location: 17TLH2445607250
Now, personally I don't see this as being such a big deal. I orignally read the story on Slashdot which, of course, had a lot of comments regarding invasion of privacy and loss of rights and such. One person even compared it to the US PATRIOT act, which I think is ridiculous. The US PATRIOT act is an afront to American freedom, and the writers and supporters of the bill, IMHO, should be tried for treason.

At any rate, a national or global DNA database has so many benefits that it easily outweighs and realistically possible abuses.


a) Use in solving crimes (including pre-existing crimes) could be amazing. Fingerprints slightly change over years, and can be removed (acid) or hidden (gloves). DNA, currently, cannot be changed (except by extreme medical conditions such as Chimerae Syndrome and even then it isn't really changing, per se).

b) This is much different than fingerprints, is not really much more abusable, and is far more sophisticated and accurate.

c) One person on /. mentioned that a national DNA database could be used psuedo-anonymously be researchers and if something was noticed, like a high risk of alzheimers, the DNA owner could be notified in an automated fashion (thus psuedo-anon) about the condition so as not to be blindsided.

d) Also mentioned on /. that insurance companies, as long as they were not legally allowed to discriminate against potentially less healthy people, could hedge their money correctly, and possibly lower health care costs while also still turning a damned good profit. If used properly, this could be good for us all.

e) Extensive genetics research could be done if non-specific donor information was stored with the sampling. Race, age, origin, parents DNA (for heredity) and such on a large scale like that could help genetics really launch forward.
xepherys is offline  
Old 09-26-2005, 09:14 AM   #3 (permalink)
Easy Rider
 
flstf's Avatar
 
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by xepherys
d) Also mentioned on /. that insurance companies, as long as they were not legally allowed to discriminate against potentially less healthy people, could hedge their money correctly, and possibly lower health care costs while also still turning a damned good profit. If used properly, this could be good for us all.
Let me play devil's advocate here and ask why insurance companiies shouldn't be able to use the DNA (genetic) information to determine insurability and rate structure? Don't they discriminate already? My wife's life insurance costs less than mine for example.

Or to put it another way, why shouldn't people with higher risk pay more?
flstf is offline  
Old 09-26-2005, 09:18 AM   #4 (permalink)
<3 TFP
 
xepherys's Avatar
 
Location: 17TLH2445607250
Well, I'm not saying that they should or shouldn't, only that the government, for the well being of its people, need to enact laws that protect the individual regarding such data. Sure, they discriminate already. They also lie. They also have various industry components in their pockets. Remember, in America, insurance is a business, not a social benefit. If they were allowed to, they'd misuse the hell out of it.
xepherys is offline  
Old 09-26-2005, 09:52 AM   #5 (permalink)
Easy Rider
 
flstf's Avatar
 
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
I'm well aware that insurance is a big business in this country and the lack of privacy in having our DNA on record goes against my sense of having big brother know everything about us.

But I have a problem with requiring insurance companies to turn a blind eye to information regarding our insurability. If they can determine that I have a 50% chance of dieing before I'm 40 and you only have a .001% chance then it seems only fair that they should be able to charge you less for life and health insurance.

Of course maybe we should just nationalize the insurance industry and treat everyone like they have the same genetic makeup and risk.
flstf is offline  
 

Tags
database, dna, national

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:07 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360