|
View Poll Results: Would you make sacrifices for the war effort? | |||
I support the war in Iraq, and would support rationing | 22 | 23.40% | |
I support the war in Iraq, but I'm not rationing | 3 | 3.19% | |
I do not support the war, but would support rationing | 20 | 21.28% | |
I do not support the war, nor would I support rationing | 40 | 42.55% | |
Bill...you've got way too much time on your hands | 9 | 9.57% | |
Voters: 94. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
08-14-2005, 11:03 AM | #41 (permalink) | |
Banned
Location: BFE
|
Quote:
This user was also known as moosenose Last edited by tecoyah; 08-15-2005 at 11:27 AM.. |
|
08-14-2005, 01:48 PM | #42 (permalink) | |
A boy and his dog
Location: EU!
|
Quote:
|
|
08-14-2005, 11:54 PM | #43 (permalink) | ||
Banned
|
Quote:
Cindy believes her son died for nothing. She is asking Bush to explain the "noble cause" that justifies other mothers going through the loss of their children in "his" war. Take stock of how you look, daswig....criticizing a woman who is trying to deal with the belief that her son died for nothing. I see nothing that inclines me to disagree with Cindy's conclusion. I see you bashing her, instead of examining how pathetically wrong and misleading and incompetent the president you defend, has actually been....on fiscal policy, foreign policy, defense strategy, intelligence, and in his penchant to promote incompetence and discourage any challenges to his administration's decision making, let alone any dissent from ordinary Americans. If it takes a comment about Ms. Sheehan like you made above, or this one you made on another thread, to bolster your undocumented arguments here, I take no pleasure in watching the level you lower yourself towards. If your cause is so fragile, that it requires verbal broadsides aimed at a grieving mother, and cannot stand the scrutiny of Americans who want truthful statements, candor, and defense of our civil liberty as a minimum, from our elected federal executive branch leaders, it is neither legitimate or American. Quote:
|
||
08-15-2005, 03:26 AM | #44 (permalink) |
Illusionary
|
Policy Clarification
I am placing this in here as an explanation, and clarification of a policy in TFP that may be unclear. We are all allowed one persona in here....and the use of multiple accounts is not accepted. This has become an issue with us as of late and needs to be understood.
If you have a secondary account within these forums, please notify an Administrator or Moderator BEFORE we find it....it can be deleted without any problem whatsoever. If instead we find it in the upcoming weeks, we may need to ban all accounts tied to the user. Thanx
__________________
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha |
08-15-2005, 09:18 PM | #45 (permalink) |
Human
Administrator
Location: Chicago
|
Let me make another clarification here. As tecoyah said, let us know if you have two accounts here so we can get rid of your inactive one(s). You shouldn't feel a threat of being banned or anything if you signed up once, forgot the password (or never received the confirmation e-mail) and signed up again. It happens, and we can generally tell when that is what happened. You *should* be worried (and "come clean" now) if you have multiple personalities that you actively use on the forums or if you were once banned for treating other TFP members with disrespect and came back with a new username (as was uncovered in the most recent case).
__________________
Le temps détruit tout "Musicians are the carriers and communicators of spirit in the most immediate sense." - Kurt Elling |
Tags |
happened, homefront |
|
|