Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-21-2004, 03:53 PM   #1 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
So you wanted good news from Iraq?

http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/s...11739307c.html

Quote:

Diana Griego Erwin: Iraqi women try to help Americans see the country through their eyes
By Diana Griego Erwin -- Bee Columnist
Published 2:15 am PDT Tuesday, September 21, 2004

Before Iraq's liberation, Ahood al-Fadhal spent her days preoccupied with how she and her husband would feed their three children.

The rice and flour they could get was buggy. Three brothers were killed by the regime of Saddam Hussein, and her husband was imprisoned for three years. In her lifetime, she never expected to see a free Iraq.

Since Saddam's overthrow, al-Fadhal finds life moving in directions previously unimaginable. She teaches literacy classes and writes a biweekly newsletter for women; she was elected to a district council seat in Basra as an advocate for women's rights.

Al-Fadhal sat at Cafe Bernardo in Sacramento on Monday morning, describing how her life has changed since the war in Iraq began in March 2003.

"You (Americans) see (television images of) a lot of violence" in Iraq, and there is violence, she said. "But a lot of good things are happening to us. ... Un der Saddam, we had no rights, especially women. Women could not speak openly, even to their children, not even in their own homes."

Al-Fadhal is part of a group from Iraq touring the United States to tell Americans about the democratic "transformation," albeit slow, in their country. Their opportunity to give voice to the Iraqi experience comes at the invitation of the Iraq-American Freedom Alliance, a project of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. Founded two days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, FDD is a conservative nonprofit providing research and education on the war on terrorism.

Al-Fadhal, a real Iraqi woman speaking to the situation in her homeland, says most Iraqis are overwhelmingly grateful to the United States for freeing their country from tyranny.

With her is Zainab Al-Suwaij, executive director of the American Islamic Congress, and a frequent contributor to op-ed pages in her adopted country, America.

At age 19, Al-Suwaij was forced to flee Iraq after participating in a 1991 failed uprising against Saddam and resettled in the United States. Now she writes to try to explain to Americans why their presence in Iraq is needed.

Because television images focus on the negative, Americans have a distorted view of what's happening in Iraq, both women said.

"When I come here and watch TV, I think this is the end of Iraq. It's over," al-Suwaij said. In Iraq, however, she sees a country "taking baby steps" toward democracy. She says the economy is booming. Schools are improving. Women fill 25 percent of elected positions, a milestone not seen even in the United States.

"Yes, security is a problem and sometimes there is no electricity and no water," al-Suwaij said, "but at the end of the day when we put our head on the pillow, Saddam is gone and that alone brings us great satisfaction. That allows us hope."

Much of the anti-American sentiment is by those who lost power, together with foreign terrorists who've come into the country through unsecured borders, and the disenfranchised young, the women said. "There is a large population of young Iraqis who don't have jobs, didn't receive schooling and now they are getting money to fight against the Americans and the new democracy," al-Suwaij said.

One of the United States' biggest mistakes, they said, was not securing the borders to keep radical extremists out. To hear them tell it, America's presence is not a mistake.

"A lot of (Iraqi) mothers come to me and say to tell the mothers in America thank you for sending us your sons and daughters, the soldiers, to help us," she said. "We pray for them, the soldiers."

The changes are nearly impossible to comprehend by someone whose country is free, they said. As a young oppressed woman, al-Suwaij recalled wondering, "When is my life going to start?"

Al-Fadhal's three children no longer struggle with the same question. Their father owns a small kitchen and appliance store. The children are mesmerized by computers and the Internet.

More evidence of how their world has changed: Today, their mother meets face-to-face with California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Now I'm sure some of you will think this is all republican lies, but just for a minute wonder if you were wrong. Wonder if perhaps this democracy won't fail and wonder what that would mean to an Arab world which has been locked into a 15th century mind set with 20th century weapons.

You can argue that we had no pressing interest in Iraq and that’s fine, I'd argue against you but its a point to argue, but I don't know how anyone with any shred of decency could argue that Iraqi's were better off with Saddam Hussein.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 04:10 PM   #2 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
I hope for the best-case scenario in Iraq....politics should never trump life and death issues. However, even Bush's own intelligence estimates are painting bleaker and bleaker prospects for Iraq. The well-being of the people there is far from assured.
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 04:34 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
it figures that the woman cited througout the article was also a speaker at the rnc.

an interview with al-suwaij:
http://www.redstate.org/story/2004/9/2/16227/78386

a link to the "classically liberal" american islamic congress:
http://www.aicongress.org/

read some of her writings (linked via the who are we?) and you'll get a good sense of where she stands politically.
she is really not representative of much of anything.
but i can see why republicans would like her.

i have no idea who she is talking to in iraq--but i am sure that there are people who feel as she does--just as there are lots who feel otherwise. what i really do not understand is what gives her the ability to puport to speak for the iraqi people.

she seems to be making the rounds in republican circles to participate in a kind of travelling pep rally aimed at propping up spirits flagging after too much reality about the justifications for war have set in.

she works out nicely to prop up the "it doesnt matter if the war was legal or not, we were still justified" line, which i suppose is all the right has left in the wake of this debacle.

seems about par for the course....
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 04:40 PM   #4 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Roachboy,

Given the credibility that Ahmed Chalibi was given by our government/media (liberal media? Hah!), this is hardly surprising. Who needs truth when you say the right thing?
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 04:55 PM   #5 (permalink)
Junkie
 
powerclown's Avatar
 
Location: Detroit, MI
Its obvious some of you don't like her because she sides with the Republicans and see's the war in a different way then you, but, is she lying?
powerclown is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 05:06 PM   #6 (permalink)
Loser
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerclown
Its obvious some of you don't like her because she sides with the Republicans and see's the war in a different way then you, but, is she lying?
It's not a question of whether she is lying. It's a question, and answer, of whether this individual can be categorized as the "average" Iraqi. The average Iraqi is not touring the U.S., so it would be disingenuous to attribute her perceptions to the perceptions of the average Iraqi. When she makes statements like "most Iraqis are overwhelmingly grateful to the United States for freeing their country from tyranny" - I have to consider that meaningless. In my direct circle of acquaintances, almost none of the are conservatives - does that mean most American's are overwhelmingly displeased with Bush? Hardly.

Now apply the logic of questioning her motives for her statements - she is currently 'jet-setting' around the U.S. instead of dealing with the constant violence, power outages, health issues, etc of the people living in Iraq. It is not difficult to imagine that articulating the right things will attract attention from people who want to put you on display, regardless of the depth of what you are saying.

Is she lying? I don't have any reason to presume that. But I see no reason to take any of this as a "good" sign that Iraq is any closer to a Democracy today than it was yesterday.
OpieCunningham is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 05:27 PM   #7 (permalink)
can't help but laugh
 
irateplatypus's Avatar
 
Location: dar al-harb
well... you can't discount the possibility that she is an average (or in this case, i think representative is a better word.) iraqi based on the fact that she is traveling abroad. if that were so, then you could only accept that an iraqi was average if all iraqi's were traveling abroad. i get your meaning though.

this woman's experience is in all likelihood not representative of the overall experience in iraq... but i'm willing to bet that there are many who are like her. my guess is that most of iraqis are riding the fence because they still aren't sure if the fundamentalists will take power or if the US will tought it out till the job is done. why take sides and visibly help the US if they might be gone tomorrow leaving you to the dogs?

what gives me hope is this: every roadside bomb and every death is counted back home. the situation is still on a scale where individual tragedies still matter. while reporting every single little thing that goes wrong might discourage some... at least even our failures are counted in small (but no less meaningful) figures.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.

~ Winston Churchill
irateplatypus is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 06:13 PM   #8 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by irateplatypus
what gives me hope is this: every roadside bomb and every death is counted back home. the situation is still on a scale where individual tragedies still matter. while reporting every single little thing that goes wrong might discourage some... at least even our failures are counted in small (but no less meaningful) figures.
We hear about every "little" AMERICAN death. How many Iraqis have died in this invasion so far? I would hazard a guess that most Americans have no clue, and our media isn't interested in reporting that. This might explain why some of my fellow citizens seem mystified why anyone could reject our cultural hegemony over that of Saddam's.
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 07:26 PM   #9 (permalink)
jconnolly
Guest
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cthulu23
We hear about every "little" AMERICAN death. How many Iraqis have died in this invasion so far? I would hazard a guess that most Americans have no clue, and our media isn't interested in reporting that. This might explain why some of my fellow citizens seem mystified why anyone could reject our cultural hegemony over that of Saddam's.
As opposed to the how many that died under the sanctions, the same sanctions that Osama used to stir up hate against the US in his famous kill-all-Americans speech?

How many more would have died under the sanctions had they continued? Would you have dared to lift them?
 
Old 09-21-2004, 07:29 PM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jconnolly
As opposed to the how many that died under the sanctions, the same sanctions that Osama used to stir up hate against the US in his famous kill-all-Americans speech?

How many more would have died under the sanctions had they continued? Would you have dared to lift them?
Actually, I was directly involved in several campaigns with Voices in the Wilderness, a largely Catholic organization that protested the sanctions due to the suffering of the Iraqis. I was insultedby others the same then as I am now for my concern for the Iraqi people. Please don't assume so much....we all know what happens then, right?
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 07:32 PM   #11 (permalink)
Banned
 
do you have a big brother cthulu?
matthew330 is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 07:35 PM   #12 (permalink)
jconnolly
Guest
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cthulu23
Actually, I was directly involved in several campaigns with Voices in the Wilderness, a largely Catholic organization that protested the sanctions due to the suffering of the Iraqis. I was insultedby others the same then as I am now for my concern for the Iraqi people. Please don't assume so much....we all know what happens then, right?
Guess I can't argue against that.

How did you feel about the no-fly zones over the north and south of Iraq? Did you protest the civilian deaths as a result of that too?

Are you completely opposed to American involvement in the world stage?

Edit: Also, if you believe you are the only one concerned over the deaths of Iraqis, you're flat out wrong.
 
Old 09-21-2004, 07:35 PM   #13 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by matthew330
do you have a big brother cthulu?
Sigh...no, and I don't get the joke. Why?
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 07:42 PM   #14 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jconnolly
Guess I can't argue against that.

How did you feel about the no-fly zones over the north and south of Iraq? Did you protest the civilian deaths as a result of that too?

Are you completely opposed to American involvement in the world stage?
Of course not. I just have a problem with the "destroy a village to save it" mentality. the sanctions seemed to do little other than torture the Iraqi people and our invasion has also had dubious benefits. As I said before, I hope for the best regardless of politics, but it seems like our country is playing into the same mistakes that have shaped western policy towards the Middle East for the last century...namely the misconception that they would rather be ruled by a "civilized" western force rather than a tyrant of their own. When you invade a country, you can't expect too much good will.

Edit: and let's not forget the shifting justifications for this war. the plight of the Iraqi people only came after all the other reasons evaporated.

Last edited by cthulu23; 09-21-2004 at 07:54 PM..
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 07:43 PM   #15 (permalink)
Banned
 
i just remember you from awhile ago and thought you sounded like two different people.
matthew330 is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 07:45 PM   #16 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by matthew330
i just remember you from awhile ago and thought you sounded like two different people.
I haven't posted in a while, but I thought my voice was consistent. Do I sound more or less rationale
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 07:53 PM   #17 (permalink)
jconnolly
Guest
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cthulu23
Of course not. I just have a problem with the "destroy a village to save it" mentality. the sanctions seemed to do little other than torture the Iraqi people and our invasion has also had dubious benefits. As I said before, I hope for the best regardless of politics, but it seems like our country is playing into the same mistakes that have shaped western policy towards the Middle East for the last century...namely that they would rather be ruled by a "civilized" western force rather than a tyrant of their own. When you invade a country, you can't expect too much good will.
I don't think that's the case at all. Possibly, but doubtful.

It's the habit of people such as yourself to say that we are attempting to impose our rule on them for their own good, screeching about white man's burden.

It's my theory, however, that this is also a self-defense maneuver - the only rational counter to terrorism is to make the countries that harbour them crack down. And, no, Iraq didn't have terrorists within its borders. But Iraq was an easy target, and once consolidated will provide projected power in the Middle East

Or we could just let them ferment and build up until they attack again.
 
Old 09-21-2004, 08:04 PM   #18 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jconnolly
I don't think that's the case at all. Possibly, but doubtful.

It's the habit of people such as yourself to say that we are attempting to impose our rule on them for their own good, screeching about white man's burden.

It's my theory, however, that this is also a self-defense maneuver - the only rational counter to terrorism is to make the countries that harbour them crack down. And, no, Iraq didn't have terrorists within its borders. But Iraq was an easy target, and once consolidated will provide projected power in the Middle East

Or we could just let them ferment and build up until they attack again.
Self-defense? From a country that had been torn apart by sanctions? Our own and the UN's analysts didn't see Iraq as a threat, so where is it? Where is the "self-defense?" You admit that this is a pure realpolitik war, so can't you see how the neocon's wrong headed thinking has only weakened our position in the Middle East? We are more hated globally than when this thing started. Wolfowitz, Perl and the rest really did believe that this would solidify our position in the regoin, but boy were they wrong. Of course, it was "screeching" people such as myself that warned of just this eventuality, but we're crazy, right? Who cares if Bush has been wrong about everything so far? How can rationality compare to empty arguments and emoticons?
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 08:09 PM   #19 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Right here
Have you considered that "they" don't need to attack again because their goals have been achieved?

If their goal is to impose a government similar to the one they want in their own land (a conservative, religious political order), and if our current political landscape is shaping up that way, what motivation would anyone have for attacking again?


I would think that the claim that they will attack again shortly stems from the belief that terrorists are irrational killers. I already stated in other threads that I believe them to kill for concrete objectives--they have reasons.

Put that aside for a moment, along with your notions of what I politically support, and entertain these notions for a sec:

1. The current political order is altering to become more conservative and more christian based than it has been in the past 50 years (I'm not going back further than that for this analysis).

2. This is due to a number of things: the machinations of a vocal minority that was able to wrestle the reigns of its party (but maybe not this election cycle, the extent of their power actually remains to be seen) from corporate and individualistic planks; the desire of people to hunker down and repudiate risky endeavors in the face of external threats (they would rather do what is known to work rather than risk something that might have better results but, if it fails, possibly create greater harm.

3. An attack would reverse this trend, after demonstrating that the current admin didn't achieve what it claimed to--safety.


Basically, our current government, currently increasingly controlled by radical christians, is sliding toward the same values of intolerance as the Muslim radicals.

Why would they want to unravel that?
__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann

"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman
smooth is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 08:13 PM   #20 (permalink)
can't help but laugh
 
irateplatypus's Avatar
 
Location: dar al-harb
to be perfectly honest... i'm really not as concerned about iraqi death counts. this is to to the reality that you can never have a realistic picture of what those figures mean. what constitutes an innocent civilian casualty? from the perspective of the soldier on the ground... they're all civilians. no uniforms, no badges, concealed weapons, shady or nonexistent chain of command.

if you're talking about innocent people caught in the cross-fire... i mourn their deaths as much as a US soldier. if you're talking about someone who straps bombs to children or picks of their fellow iraqis waiting in a bread line... i say stack'em high and stack'em deep. the more we kill of them the better.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.

~ Winston Churchill
irateplatypus is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 08:28 PM   #21 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by irateplatypus
to be perfectly honest... i'm really not as concerned about iraqi death counts. this is to to the reality that you can never have a realistic picture of what those figures mean. what constitutes an innocent civilian casualty? from the perspective of the soldier on the ground... they're all civilians. no uniforms, no badges, concealed weapons, shady or nonexistent chain of command.

if you're talking about innocent people caught in the cross-fire... i mourn their deaths as much as a US soldier. if you're talking about someone who straps bombs to children or picks of their fellow iraqis waiting in a bread line... i say stack'em high and stack'em deep. the more we kill of them the better.
Bombs have no way of discriminating between civilian and military. I'm not blaming our soldiers for anything, so let's get that out of the way.

You admittedly don't know how many civilians versus insurgents have died. How many civilians does it take before you become concerned? Aren't we supposed to be the civilized ones?

Edit: if the latest justification for the war is the well-being of the Iraqi people, shouldn't we be a little concerned about how many of them die? Why else are we sacrificing our own for them? Why save someone if you aren't concerned about whether they live or die?

Last edited by cthulu23; 09-21-2004 at 08:32 PM..
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 08:42 PM   #22 (permalink)
Junkie
 
powerclown's Avatar
 
Location: Detroit, MI
Quote:
Originally Posted by jconnolly
And, no, Iraq didn't have terrorists within its borders.
Just for the record, yes they did.
His name was ABU ABBAS.
Carry on...
powerclown is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 08:50 PM   #23 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerclown
Just for the record, yes they did.
His name was ABU ABBAS.
Carry on...
Iraq may have had a smattering of terrorists within their borders, but they were not enthusiastic supporters of Islamic fundamentalism. As secular leaders, the Iraqi tyrants had nothing to gain from Al Qaeda. Our own 9-11 commision has substantiated that point.
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 09:37 PM   #24 (permalink)
can't help but laugh
 
irateplatypus's Avatar
 
Location: dar al-harb
actually, our bombs do a pretty damn good job of discriminating... we can put one through a window. i'd trust our air force with a precision guided munition from miles away and 20,000 ft in the air more than i would trust iraqi mortar rounds to mitigate civilian causualties. and we're not really dropping many of them now. most of the high value military targets that were accessible by air delivery have long since been destroyed or converted into something else. most of the life and death decisions are made these days are being made by soldiers on the ground.

i said i wasn't concerned about civilian casualty figures because it is impossible to have figures that reflect the reality of the circumstances each death. and we are being the civilized ones. WE are wearing uniforms. WE aren't planting roadside bombs. WE aren't opening fire on unarmed iraqis waiting to sign up for governmental employment. the moral miasma is frustrating.

if you'll read my post earlier you'll see that i consider every innocent iraqi's death to be just as tragic as the death of a US soldier. however, deaths of those who are terrorizing their fellow civilians and our soldiers are indistinguishable from those of the innocent. that is why figures of total deaths hold little value for me.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.

~ Winston Churchill
irateplatypus is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 10:02 PM   #25 (permalink)
Junkie
 
hannukah harry's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerclown
Its obvious some of you don't like her because she sides with the Republicans and see's the war in a different way then you, but, is she lying?
i'm not sure, maybe you should check her fonts?
__________________
shabbat shalom, mother fucker! - the hebrew hammer
hannukah harry is offline  
Old 09-22-2004, 02:51 AM   #26 (permalink)
Psycho
 
DJ Happy's Avatar
 
If Iraq is so great right now, what's she doing in California?
DJ Happy is offline  
Old 09-22-2004, 03:07 AM   #27 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
Thanks for the good item, Ustwo - and for the positive thread.
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 09-22-2004, 04:53 AM   #28 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by irateplatypus
i said i wasn't concerned about civilian casualty figures because it is impossible to have figures that reflect the reality of the circumstances each death. and we are being the civilized ones. WE are wearing uniforms. WE aren't planting roadside bombs. WE aren't opening fire on unarmed iraqis waiting to sign up for governmental employment. the moral miasma is frustrating.

if you'll read my post earlier you'll see that i consider every innocent iraqi's death to be just as tragic as the death of a US soldier. however, deaths of those who are terrorizing their fellow civilians and our soldiers are indistinguishable from those of the innocent. that is why figures of total deaths hold little value for me.
We should all be concerned with the total body count because the insurgents are definitely concerned about it. As it grows, it only strengthens their cause. Unlike Mr Rumsfeld, I don't think that the Iraqis will get sick of dying any time soon (that's his latest brilliant strategy....kill 'em 'til they stop coming....worked great in Vietnam, right?).

There have been some definite abuses by the US military in Iraq. For instance, a few weeks ago a Bradley was disabled in fighting. The crew fled without destroying it, so an Apache rained down fire on it to finish it off. Unfortunately, it was surrounded by Iraqi civilians. I saw US estimates of 60 killed....who are we supposed to be saving here? I'm not trying to morally equivocate between our soliders and the insurgents, but let's not pretend that our hands are completely clean here. War is filthy business, particularly war with guerilla combatants.
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 09-22-2004, 07:30 AM   #29 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Indianapolis
Indeed it is a dirty business, but in the minds of many this war was justified and the right thing to do. If you accept that then you also have to expect that some civilians will die. No one is happy about it, but a large portion of people are willing to accept that as the price that must be paid. As the saying goes: Freedom isn't free.

It's also important to note the context in which the action takes place. You could draw comparisons between the prisons of old Iraq and the new US prisons, but they would be superficial. Torturing and rape as santioned policy and what happened in Abu Ghraib recently is quite a bit different.
__________________
From the day of his birth Gilgamesh was called by name.
gcbrowni is offline  
Old 09-22-2004, 08:00 AM   #30 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Well, there have been allegations of rape at Abu Ghraib, so maybe the differences aren't all that clear, but that isn't a point I was trying to make.

As for the American feelings of justification for this war, almost 50% of Americans still believe that there were Iraqis involved in 9-11, down from around 70% around the time of the build up to war. Perhaps this little bit of misinformation helps explain those feelings. Makes me want to weep with frustration.
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 09-22-2004, 08:26 AM   #31 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
anecdote:

there was a cnn online poll yesterday that asked whether the invasion of iraq was a mistake or not, given what is now known about the adminsitrations "case" for war: when i checked it last night, the results were: 2/3 of respondents think it was a mistake, 1/3 that it was not.

i do not think the right's information circle-jerk is holding in the wider world.

maybe that is why ustwo compulsively posts fragments of it for collective delectation here.
maybe he understands these fragments as the "truth of the matter" buried within the "liberal media"

i see it as a the workings of a kind of boundary maintenance, indices of the mechanisms used to seperate how the right sees things from how everyone else sees things.

you can see the same gap exposed, in a bizarre manner, if you juxtapose the bush speech before the un yesterday with what kofi annan said just before bush did his thing. annan argued for the rule of law--bush the voluntarist line that is his specialty these days--when all else fails, you argue in the register of will.

[[you also get a fair index of the sycophantic relation of the american press to whomever is in power in the relative nonreporting of annan's speech--if you see the two side by side, it is as if bush is from a strange alternate universe.]]

information limitation, distortion--the accumulation of "sources" who are already in the pocket of the right--wild, unfounded claims to representativeness made on behalf of these sources--in a context in which it can be assumed that no-one in agrreement with the desires expressed will make any effort to research the matter--some of the keys to conservative media culture....

and you can see in threads like this the function of the rights revisionist line on vietnam:

no war carried out by the american state could possibly not be legitimate.
critique can be replaced with therapeutic narratives which are reinforced/given content by crap like the article that began the thread.

the only way such acts of intellectual self-immolation are possible is within a context that provides not only no recognition of the act, but every reason to misrecognize it as support for the (necessarily legitimate, a priori legitimate) actions by the american state.

dont worry, be happy.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 09-22-2004, 08:43 AM   #32 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
No one would dispute that the world is a better place without Saddam Hussain... What most are disputing is the method in which he was removed and the fallout from those actions.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
 

Tags
good, iraq, news, wanted

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:41 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360