Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-14-2004, 07:20 AM   #1 (permalink)
This vexes me. I am terribly vexed.
 
Superbelt's Avatar
 
Location: Grantville, Pa
Flag Desecration Bill

What does everyone think? Is it a good thing, or a waste of time?

Personally I think it's a waste of time. I don't think we should be BANNING people from showing their displeasure with the Government or this country. We may not like it but the freedoms that flag represents are to make statements like that. Personally I look down with disgust at any american who would desecrate the flag in any way. Be it letting it droop unceremonious, leave it fly and tatter hanging from your car etc... But just like, "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." I have to defend that right.

Secondly, if you agree with the ban on flag desecration, should it be implemented retroactively?


See, I can be bi-partisan.
Superbelt is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 07:37 AM   #2 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: NJ
Can you supply a link to the bill itself? I'm not clear on its details but they are unlikely to persuade me that it is appropriate.

My reasons? Not so much because I think people have a right to desecrate the flag by burning, mutilating, urinating, etc on it but that many people "desecrate" it without intent. As you've noted there are many ways to "desecrate" it. Signing it, improper display, not lighting it at night, not replacing it when worn, wearing it in the form of a t-shirt, bikini, jeans, or other type of clothing, etc, etc, etc. We don't need legislation for it.
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.
onetime2 is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 07:55 AM   #3 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: Rhode Island biatches!
Personally seeing an american flag doesn't offend me in any way so its hard for me to really care about this. I guess I'm against this bill just because I see it more as another thing people aren't allowed to do in this country now (if passed).
__________________
"We do what we like and we like what we do!"~andrew Wk

Procrastinate now, don't put off to the last minute.
The_wall is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 07:59 AM   #4 (permalink)
Is In Love
 
Averett's Avatar
 
Location: I'm workin' on it
I think those stupid ribbon magnets on cars is desceretating the flag. God, they're annoying.

So yeah, this bill is stupid and a complete waste of time.
__________________
Absence is to love what wind is to fire. It extinguishes the small, it enkindles the great.
Averett is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 08:01 AM   #5 (permalink)
This vexes me. I am terribly vexed.
 
Superbelt's Avatar
 
Location: Grantville, Pa
The bill itself? Still looking. But here are some news stories on it.
http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_np=...&u_sid=1202673

http://springfield.news-leader.com/o...st-174571.html

This is a very good, critical, analysis of this bill
http://www.cincypost.com/2004/09/14/editb091404.html

Justice Antonin Scalia [There is not]"a flag exception for the First Amendment."
Superbelt is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 09:58 AM   #6 (permalink)
Betitled
 
To me, the flag is just a piece of cloth. Maybe the principles behind the flag (whatever they are) are significant, but the flag is most certainly not their physical manifestation. Like it or not, it is just a piece of cloth with a bunch of stars and stripes. If you think you're making a statement by burning it, then go ahead (unless it's a fire hazard). But don't think you're going to change anyone's mind about America one way or another by doing so.

No, this bill should not be passed.
Glava is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 10:07 AM   #7 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superbelt
Justice Antonin Scalia [There is not]"a flag exception for the First Amendment."
Funny, the GOP says they want smaller government but they want to make ignorant laws taking away more freedoms.

I personally don't care what someone does to the flag if the purpose is to make a statement. That is their right and statements are needed at times to make our government take notice and do their jobs.

However, what pisses me off are the people after 9/11 who believe having a flag no matter what condition in their car window is patriotic. Or people who leave flags on their porches or poles during rainstorms, or touching some plant because they don't garden well.

To me that is showing far more disrespect to the flag than someone burning it for a cause they feel deeply over.

As for patches or t-shirts I don't care because those are not flags but replicas of such and hey, if I could find a flag patch and had a holey pair of jeans I might put one on.

As for signing a flag (ala the pics above), I'd be fucking honored to have a presidential signature on a flag, no matter what president. That would be framed and hung in my home. To me that is a symbol of respect for country and the office of the president. You cannot seperate the office from the flag so why should a signature on the flag be different.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
pan6467 is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 10:10 AM   #8 (permalink)
Betitled
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan6467
Funny, the GOP says they want smaller government but they want to make ignorant laws taking away more freedoms.
That only applies to capitalism and weapons.
Glava is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 10:16 AM   #9 (permalink)
This vexes me. I am terribly vexed.
 
Superbelt's Avatar
 
Location: Grantville, Pa
I don't agree with that. It is specifically written in the flag ettiquet rules that no writing be on the flag.

(g) The flag should never have placed upon it, nor on any part of it, nor attached to it any mark, insignia, letter, word, figure, design, picture, or drawing of any nature.

Of any nature. Presidents are just men. They are not above a rule like this. The flag is a symbol for the nation that shouldn't be used in such a manner. Get a pic of the Preznit with his autograph, but not on our national symbol.

Also: (d) The flag should never be used as wearing apparel, bedding, or drapery. It should never be festooned, drawn back, nor up, in folds, but always allowed to fall free.

flag patch on jeans a no-no.

These articles are not LAWS, but they are the proper manner of etiquet that one should follow. To do otherwise shows disrespect for what it stands for IMO. And Presidents above all should be versed in this and follow it.
Superbelt is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 10:22 AM   #10 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
Super,

I agree with a lot of what you say, but our opinions differ here. I understand the ettiquette but like I said a president signed flag would mean something to me personally. As for drapery and bed sheets and such, I've seen half flag material or overlapping flag material and while I find it tacky, it may be a person's way of being patriotic and who am I to say differently.

To me the only disrespect of the flag is not taking care of it.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
pan6467 is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 10:59 AM   #11 (permalink)
Paq
Junkie
 
Paq's Avatar
 
Location: South Carolina
a friend of mine put it nicely in an article. If you cannot harm a flag, you take away its fundamental meaning. It is cloth, it has colors, it is material. When you put meaning behind it, you must be willing to put meaning behind the actions performed on that flag. We put freedom, liberty, trust, love, whatever behind the flag, we must be willing to accept that the freedom to have and wave the flag is just the same as the freedom to show displeasure at the gov't by burning the flag. it is not something i personally would do, but i also would not stop someone from doing it.

Soooo, legislation to restrict actions against that flag undermines the very meaning of the flag and makes it a worthless piece of cloth.

as a russian man and an american were talking, the american bragged about his freedoms. He said he could stand in front of the whitehouse and scream out the GWBUSH was a moron. The russian said his country was free too, He coudl stand in front of hte kremlin and scream that GWBUSH was a moron as well...

not to mention, it is a HUGE waste of lawmakers time at a time when there is no time

Alsoooo...i predict that the SECOND this passes, there will be people burning flags all over in protest of the law.
__________________
Live.

Chris

Last edited by Paq; 09-14-2004 at 11:02 AM..
Paq is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 11:00 AM   #12 (permalink)
Cracking the Whip
 
Lebell's Avatar
 
Location: Sexymama's arms...
My personal opinion is that part of the freedom the flag stands for is the right to desecrate it (provided you paid for it, of course).
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis

The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU!

Please Donate!
Lebell is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 11:19 AM   #13 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Isn't there some clause in the Constitution stating that Congress cannot make a law that can be enforced ex post facto/retroactively?
MSD is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 11:41 AM   #14 (permalink)
follower of the child's crusade?
 
retro active law is fundamentally illegal.

And burning a flag is an expression of free speech.

As a gesture I find it fairly empty and silly, but if someone wants to deface or burn a flag, as long as they dont harm anyone else, as far as I am concerned its their own business.

If someone wanted to burn a Union Jack and I saw them I wouldnt care less, but I am not very patriotic (in fact, a lot of times I am kind of unpatriotic.. I nearly always want English sports teams to lose, I dont know, ever since I was a child I always have)
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate,
for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing
hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain
without being uncovered."

The Gospel of Thomas
Strange Famous is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 01:08 PM   #15 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
As said above, retroactive laws are unconstitutional.

Burning a flag, no matter how disrespectful, is protected by our right of free speech.

Besides, burning of a flag is a sign of higher respect than flying tattered ass flags for years at a time without taking it down. It's a higher form of respect than flying a flag that's too large for their tiny garden poles and it dragging in the mud. It's a higher form of respect than a LOT of thing I've seen people do because of ignorance even if they intend well. So it doesnt bother me all that much.
Seaver is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 01:13 PM   #16 (permalink)
Huggles, sir?
 
seretogis's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle
Our flag is an important symbol and there is no way that I would agree with a law or constitutional amendment to bar the burning/desecration of it.
__________________
seretogis - sieg heil
perfect little dream the kind that hurts the most, forgot how it feels well almost
no one to blame always the same, open my eyes wake up in flames
seretogis is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 01:43 PM   #17 (permalink)
Like John Goodman, but not.
 
Journeyman's Avatar
 
Location: SFBA, California
Hey, feel free to burn this flag, cause you sure as shit can't destroy what it represents.

That's how I look at it, anyway.
Journeyman is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 03:15 PM   #18 (permalink)
Muffled
 
Kadath's Avatar
 
Location: Camazotz
With so many more important things to care about, it would be criminal for our legislators to waste time on this.
__________________
it's quiet in here
Kadath is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 04:15 PM   #19 (permalink)
This vexes me. I am terribly vexed.
 
Superbelt's Avatar
 
Location: Grantville, Pa
heh, the retroactivity was just a joke done to point out that even our elected officials have been known to desecrate the flag.
Superbelt is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 05:21 PM   #20 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kadath
With so many more important things to care about, it would be criminal for our legislators to waste time on this.
Yet not criminal to spend millions of taxpayers dollars to try to make an amendmant defining marriage?

Not saying you said that just pointing out how ridiculous and how Washington doesn't seem to care what laws they pass, as long as they can define how we live our lives.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
pan6467 is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 05:29 PM   #21 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
I'd never support a law that prevents flag desecration.

I would support one that would make beating up a flag desecrator a $50 fine
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 07:30 PM   #22 (permalink)
spudly
 
ubertuber's Avatar
 
Location: Ellay
Taking away freedoms to protect the symbol of freedoms doesn't really make sense to me. Flag desecration will remain an allowed form of speech.

Flag etiquette does matter to me - living on military bases with military culture as a kid really ingrained a lot of that stuff. It does bother me to see the flag demeaned, as it stands for some very noble ideas. In fact, I make a point to observe protocal myself. However, I think of flag protocals as being like table manners. I display my good manners and leave others to themselves. When someone is breaking etiquette, I usually assume that they are either ignorant of good manners or don't care enough to pay attention to their actions. Either one puts you in the same category with me...
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam
ubertuber is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 07:44 PM   #23 (permalink)
Eh?
 
Stare At The Sun's Avatar
 
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lebell
My personal opinion is that part of the freedom the flag stands for is the right to desecrate it (provided you paid for it, of course).
Damn skippy. It is to me, an open and shut case. It's free speech, simple as that.
Stare At The Sun is offline  
 

Tags
bill, desecration, flag

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:54 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360