Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-30-2004, 07:40 AM   #1 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: NJ
"Evidence" of Bush's support of Swift Boat group

Quote:
First lady criticized for swift boat remark
Monday, August 30, 2004 Posted: 10:18 AM EDT (1418 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Kerry campaign Sunday criticized first lady Laura Bush for what the campaign called her "statement in support of the swift boat smear ads."

The campaign was referring to a new Time magazine interview in which Mrs. Bush is asked about the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth ads attacking Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry's war record and his comments upon return from Vietnam.

In the interview she is asked, "Do you think these swift boat ads are unfair to John Kerry?"

"Not really," she replies. "There have been millions of terrible ads against my husband."

President Bush has praised Kerry's war record but has refused to condemn the attacks in the group's ads.

The Kerry campaign has alleged the Bush campaign illegally cooperated with the group in producing the ads -- a charge the campaign and the group vigorously deny.

Bush-Cheney legal adviser Benjamin Ginsberg and retired Air Force Col. Ken Cordier, an unpaid adviser to the campaign on veterans' issues, resigned the campaign this week over their involvement with the swift boat group.

"Mrs. Bush's statement in support of the swift boat smear ads is more sad evidence that these attacks have been coordinated from the top down at the White House," Kerry campaign spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter said in a statement.

Several statements by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth directly contradict the Navy record of events and in some cases their own previous statements. Other statements are more opinion than fact based.

"The president still stubbornly refuses to repudiate these lies. [Senator] John McCain knows from personal experience that these attacks are shameful and wrong. The president should answer McCain's call to renounce these lies once and for all."

McCain, R-Arizona, one of the Republican National Convention's main speakers and a Vietnam veteran who was a POW for five-and-a-half years, has called the ads "dishonest and dishonorable." McCain ran against Bush in 2000 during a bruising fight for the Republican presidential nomination. (Bush asks McCain to help block 527s)

Bush's policies have been the subject of attacks by other independent groups known as 527s.

Bush has called for an end to all political ads by the so-called 527 groups -- so named for the part of the law that addresses them -- and has challenged Kerry to join him in that call. Kerry condemned an ad attacking Bush's war record.
"Mrs. Bush's statement in support of the swift boat smear ads is more sad evidence that these attacks have been coordinated from the top down at the White House," Kerry campaign spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter said in a statement.

Oh please. The first lady was asked if the ads by the Swift boat group were unfair to Kerry and her response was "no" because there have been plenty of ads targeting her husband making claims at least as outrageous. This somehow is "EVIDENCE" of Bush's control of the group!?!
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.
onetime2 is offline  
Old 08-30-2004, 08:40 AM   #2 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
look, there is ample evidence of cross-connections between the swiftboat guys and the bush campaign--i do not understand why you continue to post these articles as if somehow, at some point, these connections will vanish. or as if you could figure out some way to relativize the problem to such an extent that conversation on the matter would become paralyzed.

i am interested the division between media spaces that this kind of argument reflects--you can live in a conservative media universe it seems, or you can live in another, or a whole series of other, media universes, each with its own premises, each with its own modes of argument, each with its own systems of reinforcement. this seems to make conversation across positions quite difficult, because i assume that people with differing political positions would simply talk past each other.

i dont think this division/these divisions would be simply a matter of sources in a one-for-one kind of way, either: rather the primary media spaces one inhabits would operate as a kind of interpretive filter that would extend across other sources, screening out some information, including other types.

do you think the above accurate?
and if so, what might we do about it? (not so much in terms of dismantling institutions--but at the level of conversation)---if i am right, then this series of threads about the swiftboat people might be seen as an index of this bigger problem.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 08-30-2004, 08:44 AM   #3 (permalink)
Insane
 
TheKak's Avatar
 
Location: Virginia
*grabs a stick and helps beat down that dead horse!*

Its not evidence. I don't even see where someone called it evidence. The title isn't "Evidence of Bush involvment in Swift Boat ads", its "First Lady criticized for...".

Neither side of this fight has any ammunition. Kerry went to Vietnam and may or may not have earned his medals in the way he said he did. He came back and talked bad about the people he served with.

Bush skipped out on Vietnam.

They both suck, and this horse couldn't get any deader.
__________________
Roses are red, violets are blue, I'm a schizophrenic and so am I.
TheKak is offline  
Old 08-30-2004, 08:50 AM   #4 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: NJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheKak
Its not evidence. I don't even see where someone called it evidence. .
Apparently you missed it not only in the article but in the bolded quote I pulled from the article. For the third time here it goes again:

Quote:
"Mrs. Bush's statement in support of the swift boat smear ads is more sad evidence that these attacks have been coordinated from the top down at the White House," Kerry campaign spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter said in a statement.
That is the official statement from the Kerry campaign on the matter. It clearly points to this statement from Laura Bush as being EVIDENCE of links.
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.
onetime2 is offline  
Old 08-30-2004, 08:59 AM   #5 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: NJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
look, there is ample evidence of cross-connections between the swiftboat guys and the bush campaign--i do not understand why you continue to post these articles as if somehow, at some point, these connections will vanish. or as if you could figure out some way to relativize the problem to such an extent that conversation on the matter would become paralyzed.

i am interested the division between media spaces that this kind of argument reflects--you can live in a conservative media universe it seems, or you can live in another, or a whole series of other, media universes, each with its own premises, each with its own modes of argument, each with its own systems of reinforcement. this seems to make conversation across positions quite difficult, because i assume that people with differing political positions would simply talk past each other.

i dont think this division/these divisions would be simply a matter of sources in a one-for-one kind of way, either: rather the primary media spaces one inhabits would operate as a kind of interpretive filter that would extend across other sources, screening out some information, including other types.

do you think the above accurate?
and if so, what might we do about it? (not so much in terms of dismantling institutions--but at the level of conversation)---if i am right, then this series of threads about the swiftboat people might be seen as an index of this bigger problem.
Ample evidence of links? Fine if you count the two people (one appearing in an ad and one giving professional advice as a client) and Laura Bush's statement as ample evidence of links that's fine. I don't count the "links" between Kerry and the other 527s as significant either but I have no doubt that these organizations are acting as a de facto representative of both campaigns. The sticking point is trying to prove coordination between the campaigns and the 527s. There is no significant evidence that the campaigns are coordinating their efforts with these groups.

What the Kerry campaign is trying to do is prove such coordination by pointing to Laura Bush's statement of the ads not being unfair.

If you'd care to tell me how this statement by the First Lady is evidence of the administration's support of the Swift Boat Groups I'm more than happy to discuss it. Otherwise, I have no interest in discussing alternative media universes in this thread. Feel free to start another on that topic if you wish.
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.
onetime2 is offline  
Old 08-30-2004, 09:30 AM   #6 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i do not have time today to do much beyond pointing you at a series of sources, most of which have a wide range of documentary links.
check the articles, follow the links to sources, look at the organizations that post this material too if you like. we'll see what if anything comes of it.

have fun.


on the sbvt adverts themselves:

http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=244

on the swift boat veterans:

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.pht...rans_for_Truth

on the linkages:

http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/19695/

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.pht...=Merrie_Spaeth

general:

http://mediatransparency.org/stories/apparat.html
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 08-30-2004, 10:10 AM   #7 (permalink)
can't help but laugh
 
irateplatypus's Avatar
 
Location: dar al-harb
i wish kerry spinster stephanie cutter would realize the distinction between supporting an ad and not considering them unfair.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.

~ Winston Churchill
irateplatypus is offline  
Old 08-30-2004, 10:40 AM   #8 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Right here
double-post
__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann

"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman

Last edited by smooth; 08-30-2004 at 10:44 AM..
smooth is offline  
Old 08-30-2004, 10:41 AM   #9 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Right here
Quote:
Originally Posted by irateplatypus
i wish kerry spinster stephanie cutter would realize the distinction between supporting an ad and not considering them unfair.
Well, I mean, wasn't it Laura's husband that said, "you're either for us or against us?"
__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann

"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman
smooth is offline  
Old 08-30-2004, 11:19 AM   #10 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: NJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
i do not have time today to do much beyond pointing you at a series of sources, most of which have a wide range of documentary links.
check the articles, follow the links to sources, look at the organizations that post this material too if you like. we'll see what if anything comes of it.

have fun.


on the sbvt adverts themselves:

http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=244

on the swift boat veterans:

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.pht...rans_for_Truth


on the linkages:

http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/19695/

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.pht...=Merrie_Spaeth

general:

http://mediatransparency.org/stories/apparat.html
I am very familiar with the alleged links and none of those sources you cite prove anything near collaboration. Pointing to those who contribute money or time to both the GOP/Bush campaign and that particular 527 proves what exactly in your mind? Do you feel the same way about Move On, ACT, etc since their monies come from those strongly alligned with the Kerry campaign and there has been movement of employees from one to the other?

As I recall Kerry has only criticized one ad from the Democratic leaning 527s, is that "evidence" that he's controlling them? Of course not.

Pointing to a source claiming that Kerry's words from his Senate testimony were taken out of context while trying to justify the Kerry campaign's outright lie that Laura Bush's words are evidence of a link between Bush and the Swift Boat group is a bit outlandish.

But if those sources prove to you that Laura Bush saying:
Quote:
"Not really," she replies. "There have been millions of terrible ads against my husband."
means that George Bush is controlling the Swift Boat group then I guess we really have nothing else to discuss.
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.
onetime2 is offline  
 

Tags
boat, bush, evidence, group, support, swift

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:47 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360