Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-01-2003, 08:32 AM   #1 (permalink)
Junkie
 
HarmlessRabbit's Avatar
 
Location: San Jose, CA
Missing billions in Iraq

Interesting story about sloppy accounting in Iraq. Apparently the numbers being reported by different sources contradict each other, with as much as $2.5 billion in Iraqi aid unaccounted for.

The democrats have asked for more accountability for the money being sent to Iraq. It's sad that that message is being lost in partisan rhetoric.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story...074267,00.html

Quote:
Where are the missing billions?

Christian Aid journalist Dominic Nutt calls for accountability from Iraq reconstruction funds

Thursday October 30, 2003

The billions pledged for the reconstruction of Iraq at the donors' conference in Madrid look pretty good on paper. It would certainly be churlish to sniff at $33bn (£20bn) - specially when you consider that at a similar conference for Afghanistan, after the Taliban were defeated, the world could only scrape together $4.5bn (£2.7).

In fact, the world has promised the equivalent of around $1,400 (£848) for each Iraqi citizen, when Afghans got just $57 (£34).

So, should we be asking why Iraq, a middle-income country, is worth so much more to the world than Afghanistan, which is one of the poorest countries on earth and has few natural resources?

It may genuinely be the case that President George Bush has stumped up $20bn (£12bn) of the Madrid money for altruistic reasons. But it does raise the question: why has Iraq been given more than four times the amount pledged to Afghanistan? Is it because Afghanistan does not produce oil?

The problem is that raising such questions is likely to fuel Iraqi mistrust of the American-led Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) which effectively runs the country at the moment. This mistrust should not be underestimated.

Iraqis lived for decades under the control of a totalitarian state and its legacy provides fertile ground for distrust, rumour-mongering, conspiracy theories and a belief in hidden agendas. Many Iraqis are convinced that the coalition is motivated by a desire to control Iraqi oil. This cynicism aggravates the insecurity and violence that are taking an ever-tighter grip on Iraq.

It does not help that much of the extra $13bn (£7.65bn) pledged by governments and institutions like the International Monetary Fund, comes in the form of loans.

Iraq is already estimated to have accrued anything from $120bn (£72bn) to $400bn (£240bn) of debt during the Saddam era. It is often assumed that oil will bail out Iraq. However, even the most optimistic projections for Iraqi oil sales suggest that the most the country could raise through sales, after the long process of rehabilitation, will be $50bn (£30bn) a year. Meanwhile, interest will pile up on debts and reconstruction must be funded.

It should come as no surprise if Iraqis feel that the international community is writing a post-dated cheque to be drawn on their oil in future years. The prospect of new debts will further crank up mistrust.

And it gets worse. At the Madrid conference, we at Christian Aid revealed in our report, Iraq: the Missing Billions, that the American-led coalition had failed to account for $4bn (£2.4bn) in oil revenues and assets from the Saddam regime.

The United Nations had empowered the coalition to gather this money - estimated to be worth around $9bn (£5.4bn) by the end of the year - and spend it on Iraq's reconstruction through the Development Fund for Iraq (DFI). Under UN resolution 1483, the UN also obliged the coalition to set up an independent monitoring board to oversee and to publish these oil accounts.

This was meant to happen in May this year and failure is no minor matter.

Christian Aid has been working in Iraq for more than 10 years and the people we talk to constantly tell us they mistrust American intentions towards their country. Many feel that the US wants their oil. Therefore it is crucial that the coalition lets the Iraqi people know how it is spending Iraq's oil money.

We have been asking the coalition what on earth it has to hide? Is it putting the cash to the best use for the people of Iraq? Or is it rewarding American companies with lucrative and overpriced reconstruction contracts?

Unemployment in Iraq is soaring; hundreds of thousands of Iraqi soldiers - still with their guns - have been demobilised with no hope of work. They are poor and they are angry. And that makes them dangerous. They are entitled to ask why they are not getting jobs from all these reconstruction projects.

Under pressure form Christian Aid, the coalition has finally published some figures on where the oil money has so far been spent. This is good news - it means the coalition has recognised the need for transparency. But in reality the information is less than the bare minimum. You would expect more details on your own bank statement.

For example, the accounts state that $125m (£75m) has been spent on buying wheat. Is this Iraqi wheat or American wheat? They say that $6m (£3.6m) has been spent on oil infrastructure. But who has benefited from these payments - Iraqi or American companies?

Crucially, the account on the coalition website now says that $192m (£115.2m) from the US Treasury Special Account - that is money from frozen Iraqi bank accounts - has been transferred into the DFI. This is as it should be - the DFI is the fund that oil and assets money is meant to support.

But Christian Aid sources tell us that money from frozen Iraqi bank accounts totals around $1.7bn (£1bn). This, added to $800m (£480m) in funds seized in Iraq when the coalition entered the country, makes up the $2.5bn (£1.5bn) in unaccounted for assets we refer to in our report. So, where is the rest of the money?

By publishing these accounts, the CPA has acknowledged the need to be open about how it is spending Iraqi money - but it has far from fulfilled that need.

Suspicion will hang over the coalition until it comes clean.

· Dominic Nutt is emergencies journalist for Christian Aid
HarmlessRabbit is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 11:34 AM   #2 (permalink)
Banned
 
Who has benifited? Ask any Iraqi who's pay has quadrupled on average while inflation has remained constant. Ask any Iraqi who is no longer afraid to speak without being killed for it. Ask any Iraqi that has , and probably did, vote for the new local democratic leaders.

Man, you think that NOTHING positive has happened in Iraq since the Americans took out Saddam if you believed Harmless Rabbit.
Food Eater Lad is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 04:18 PM   #3 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: Sweden
Did I miss something? Did they have elections in Iraq? When?
__________________
Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones. - Psalms 137:9
Nad Adam is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 04:42 PM   #4 (permalink)
Banned
 
They had local elections, not national ones. They are comming soon, to a former suppressed people near you.
Food Eater Lad is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 07:53 PM   #5 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: Just outside the D.C. belt
Quote:
Originally posted by Food Eater Lad
Who has benifited? Ask any Iraqi who's pay has quadrupled on average while inflation has remained constant. Ask any Iraqi who is no longer afraid to speak without being killed for it. Ask any Iraqi that has , and probably did, vote for the new local democratic leaders.

Man, you think that NOTHING positive has happened in Iraq since the Americans took out Saddam if you believed Harmless Rabbit.
So, 2.5 VERY large grows legs and walks off into the cool evening breezes and you're back on RNC talking points memo v8.54.02.6

Accountability for this liberation/occupation will help seperate it from the graft & coruption that was one of the defining factors in the not-so-great SouthEast Asian War.

Fiscal responsibility is not a bad thing.

2Wolves
2wolves is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 09:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
Banned
 
I agree fiscal responciblity is a great thing, now you admit that we are making great strides in Iraq.
Food Eater Lad is offline  
Old 11-02-2003, 09:30 AM   #7 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: Just outside the D.C. belt
Quote:
Originally posted by Food Eater Lad
I agree fiscal responciblity is a great thing, now you admit that we are making great strides in Iraq.
I repectfully disagree. How could you possibly spin my response as "you admit that we are making great strides in Iraq?"

Unless of course you feel that having $2,500,000,000.00 tax/debt dollars vanish into the ether as a great stride.

Once again that's $2,500,000,000.00 tax/debt dollars. Care to pick up THAT tab?

2Wolves
2wolves is offline  
Old 11-02-2003, 06:51 PM   #8 (permalink)
Thank You Jesus
 
reconmike's Avatar
 
Location: Twilight Zone
Quote:
Originally posted by 2wolves
I repectfully disagree. How could you possibly spin my response as "you admit that we are making great strides in Iraq?"

Unless of course you feel that having $2,500,000,000.00 tax/debt dollars vanish into the ether as a great stride.

Once again that's $2,500,000,000.00 tax/debt dollars. Care to pick up THAT tab?

2Wolves
This wasnt tax dollars, this was money that was frozen FROM Iraq and money found in the country,

plus it is peanuts compared to the tax money that goes up in crack smoke.
__________________
Where is Darwin when ya need him?
reconmike is offline  
Old 11-02-2003, 07:06 PM   #9 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: Just outside the D.C. belt
Quote:
Originally posted by reconmike
This wasnt tax dollars, this was money that was frozen FROM Iraq and money found in the country,

plus it is peanuts compared to the tax money that goes up in crack smoke.
You are correct and I'm in error.

(see neo-cons it can be said without hari-kari)

2Wolves
2wolves is offline  
 

Tags
billions, iraq, missing

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:42 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360