09-07-2003, 07:55 AM | #1 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: San Jose, CA
|
Bush approval numbers reach new low
A chart that I couldn't paste in is located at the linked story.
gg Bush! http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=732 Quote:
|
|
09-07-2003, 09:14 AM | #5 (permalink) |
Conspiracy Realist
Location: The Event Horizon
|
Sometimes I question polls; especailly if I dont know who's conducting the poll. I tried to do a little research on Zogby International. I assumed it was a Democratic funded in some way. Not infering that's a bad thing, but polling would seem to have more crediability if given from a neutral proctor (if there is such a thing)
From what I see Zogby has a fairly wide and diverse client base. Does anyone know anything more of them?
__________________
To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit.- Stephen Hawking |
09-07-2003, 09:15 AM | #6 (permalink) |
Winner
|
More people say we need someone new in office than think President Bush deserves re-election.
So why is it that the pundits keep saying that Bush is unbeatable? As the article says, even 63% of Democrats have been brainwashed into believing Bush will surely be re-elected. What's that about the liberal media? |
09-07-2003, 10:04 AM | #7 (permalink) |
Banned
Location: St. Paul, MN
|
bush is going down...from the moment he was elected, i never gave up hope that we would be done with this debacle in four years. the democratic feild needs to narrow quickly...but once that's done, i think there is a really strong opportunity to take the mutha down.
|
09-07-2003, 10:30 AM | #9 (permalink) | ||
Junkie
Location: San Jose, CA
|
Quote:
Bush Sr. had an approval rating of 92% directly after the gulf war, but that had plummeted to well under 50% by the time he lost the election. It's telling to read the account here: http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stori...ew/954/1/.html Quote:
|
||
09-07-2003, 11:56 AM | #10 (permalink) |
Huggles, sir?
Location: Seattle
|
I don't see how Bush's approval rating could ever get that low if Republicans truly controlled the media.
Just a thought!
__________________
seretogis - sieg heil perfect little dream the kind that hurts the most, forgot how it feels well almost no one to blame always the same, open my eyes wake up in flames |
09-07-2003, 12:29 PM | #13 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: San Jose, CA
|
Quote:
I don't think even http://www.takebackthemedia.com/ claims that the conservatives control all the media. Anyway, I'm sure I'm taking your joke too literally. |
|
09-07-2003, 01:13 PM | #14 (permalink) | |
Huggles, sir?
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
__________________
seretogis - sieg heil perfect little dream the kind that hurts the most, forgot how it feels well almost no one to blame always the same, open my eyes wake up in flames |
|
09-09-2003, 08:08 AM | #17 (permalink) |
This vexes me. I am terribly vexed.
Location: Grantville, Pa
|
Current polls from a wide variety of pollsters
http://www.pollingreport.com/bush.htm Get the Bush approval/disapprove ratings easily from here: http://www.dailykos.com/ The approve/disapprove are on the right side. Hit Page Down twice and you will see them start with the heading BUSH JOB RATINGS |
09-09-2003, 05:33 PM | #18 (permalink) |
Adrift
Location: Wandering in the Desert of Life
|
Let's be honest, it is still too early to tell what will happen. A great deal will depend on who the Dems. nominate. Bush, much like his father, has an amazing ability to piss away high approval ratings and even though his numbers are higher than both Reagan and Clinton at this time in their terms, he is not nearly the candidate they were.(this is a polical observation, not refering to his ability to govern) Bush has(IMO) about a 50-50 chance of being reelected right now, about the same as he had in the last election. It will most likely be very close unless the Iraq situation clears up, the economy booms back or the Dems nominate an ineffectual candidate.
__________________
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." -Douglas Adams |
09-09-2003, 09:19 PM | #19 (permalink) |
lost and found
Location: Berkeley
|
I don't see how any prez could be popular right now, with the economy still struggling and people getting fired by the thousands as jobs move to India and don't look like they're coming back any time soon. Then there's this continual struggle with Iraq and people still talking about why we went there in the first place since there seems to be little connection between them and al Qaeda and no evidence of WMD. People want a return to better times, and the most recent better times had a Democrat steering the ship. I think thousands of people will "anti-vote" for a Democrat come election time, unless the economy really starts picking up.
__________________
"The idea that money doesn't buy you happiness is a lie put about by the rich, to stop the poor from killing them." -- Michael Caine |
09-09-2003, 09:31 PM | #20 (permalink) |
Crazy
Location: Simi Valley, CA
|
Its really going to have to depend on the Dems nomination I think as well. Many fear that if Dean is elected he will scare away many moderate democrats/swing independents etc. This does seem like a problem to me, and I'm hoping that Dean doesn't get the vote. Right now hes riding on a wave of support from far lefties who absolutely despise Bush and love Deans rhetoric against him. But come the real thing, such a position won't be holding much water I think.
I heard some poll that a disturbing 70% or so of Americans believe Saddam had connections directly with 9/11. Theres no evidence of this of course, and I don't *think*Bush has made any "misleading" statements over this. This still seems to lend quite a bit of support to Iraq... Economy should be the front and center issue. It is improving, but job improvement suffers time lag so it might not be enough for those voting from their pocketbooks. I'd give Bush a higher chance then 50/50 still, but its definitely not a sure thing like I think it was just 6 months ago.
__________________
"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth then lies." - Nietzsche |
09-09-2003, 10:12 PM | #21 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Wherever I am!
|
Gee I wonder why his aproval ratings have dropped.....hmmm....
Could it be that he had a surplus in the budget when he got into office and now we have a gaping defict? Or could it be the fact that he lied to the american people to get us into Iraq? He said the Iraqi oil would pay for the rebuild, now we are shelling out the dough again. He said we were in immenent danger of Hussein, we still have not found any WMD. Or could it be that he has no clue what he is doing in office? As for the first part, out here in California we have a governor who has the same problem, and he's in the middle of a recall!!!
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, then wipe this smile off my face! |
09-10-2003, 05:07 AM | #22 (permalink) |
Dubya
Location: VA
|
Maybe the american people are starting to wake up to the fact that the president has pissed away 2 Trillion of their hard-earned dollars.
__________________
"In Iraq, no doubt about it, it's tough. It's hard work. It's incredibly hard. It's - and it's hard work. I understand how hard it is. I get the casualty reports every day. I see on the TV screens how hard it is. But it's necessary work. We're making progress. It is hard work." |
09-10-2003, 06:39 PM | #23 (permalink) |
Invisible
Location: tentative, at best
|
In my house, his numbers have held their own.
0% approval then; 0% approval now.
__________________
If you want to avoid 95% of internet spelling errors: "If your ridiculous pants are too loose, you're definitely going to lose them. Tell your two loser friends over there that they're going to lose theirs, too." It won't hurt your fashion sense, either. |
09-12-2003, 05:40 AM | #24 (permalink) |
Winner
|
Here's a great graph of the President's approval ratings. As you can see, other than the peaks after 9-11 and the war in Iraq, the President's numbers have consistently gone done almost every time. The reason: he's done almost nothing positive while in office. So he's going to try to exploit the deaths of those on 9-11 and in Iraq to try and win re-election. I hope we don't let him get away with this.
|
09-12-2003, 06:06 AM | #26 (permalink) |
Unfair and Imbalanced
Location: Upstate, NY
|
It's all too early to see where this is leading. If GWB's job performance ratings are the same or lower in the summer of 2004, he has trouble ahead.
__________________
"Youth and Strength is no match for Age and Treachery" |
09-12-2003, 07:30 AM | #27 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: NJ
|
I have never thought that GWB was unbeatable in the next election. Polls are polls, everyone has one and they all can say vastly different things. This far from election, undefined opposition, economic limbo, Democratic strategy, etc are all big question marks so no poll done now will have any predictive value.
Time will tell.
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant. |
09-13-2003, 01:12 AM | #28 (permalink) |
Insane
|
Many people have brought in the issue about polls being able to predict how the presidential elections would go. I think that it's interesting to remember that the inspiration for the "terror market" has a much better record for predicting election results than any pollls.
just interesting to note. Since 1988, the Iowa Election Markets (IEM), conducted by the University of Iowa, has consistently bested pollsters when it comes to predicting presidential-election results |
09-13-2003, 05:49 AM | #30 (permalink) |
Psycho
Location: NC
|
With the election race starting, most people view this approval as a comparison with a "phantom" opponent. With the dems not coming out strong with a clear, alternative message, the race is still greatly in W's favor.
__________________
The sad thing is... as you get older you come to realize that you don't so much pilot your life, as you just try to hold on, in a screaming, defiant ball of white-knuckle anxious fury |
09-13-2003, 12:15 PM | #32 (permalink) | |
‘Crotch Level’ Intellectual
Location: Southwest, USA
|
Quote:
__________________
"...to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government .. " -- The US Declaration of Independence |
|
09-16-2003, 03:51 AM | #34 (permalink) | |
This vexes me. I am terribly vexed.
Location: Grantville, Pa
|
I think THIS is the most telling poll that came out to date.
http://www.emergingdemocraticmajorit...t6_26_2003.cfm Quote:
|
|
09-24-2003, 03:49 PM | #36 (permalink) |
I change
Location: USA
|
It's easy to criticize.
He's steering the world through trouble. Popularity is popularity. It's not worth a whole lot. When citizens actually vote, they tend to weigh realities. I don't see a lot of serious thought in this thread. I see some but not a lot.
__________________
create evolution |
Tags |
approval, bush, low, numbers, reach |
|
|