Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-04-2008, 03:45 PM   #1 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: watching from the treeline
What's so good about Diversity?

..
__________________
Trinity: "What do you need?"

Neo: "Guns. Lots of guns."

-The Matrix

Last edited by timalkin; 12-20-2010 at 07:53 PM..
timalkin is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 04:00 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by timalkin View Post
Although not surprising, Obama is filling his Cabinet and staff with minorities in an effort to promote "diversity." What is so inherently good about putting people in positions of power and responsibility based on what color they are? Why are we still placing so much importance on race in the 21st Century?
Obama is filling his cabinet with qualified individuals who bring a diversity of life experiences into his inner circle.

IMO, that is a good thing....unless you believe that some of his selections are not qualified and were selected solely on the basis of race, gender or sexual orientation.
-----Added 4/12/2008 at 07 : 01 : 32-----
Should not life experiences be a factor? And arent those experiences defined in some measure by race and gender?
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 12-04-2008 at 04:01 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
dc_dux is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 04:11 PM   #3 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
Different points of view and experience brings a richness of experience to the table.

Would you be happier if he had a cabinet full of black folks? That would represent a lack of diversity, no?

To my mind, as long as these people are qualified for their positions, the more diverse his advisers, the better (note: diversity in this case also includes hiring people that don't share his point of view... unlike the previous administration he is asking for dissenting voices).
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 04:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: watching from the treeline
..
__________________
Trinity: "What do you need?"

Neo: "Guns. Lots of guns."

-The Matrix

Last edited by timalkin; 12-20-2010 at 07:52 PM..
timalkin is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 04:57 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by timalkin View Post
I really doubt that people qualified enough to be appointed are coming from dramatically different backgrounds. Wealthy families are more able/likely to send their kids to the kind of educational institutions that traditionally mold young adults into professionals worthy of appointment. It seems that wealth and social status are probably pretty close among all of the potential candidates, on average. That isn't really diversity, even if the skin colors are not white.
I would encourage you to look deeper into the backgrounds of Obama's appointments...

...a first generation American and son of a Nicaraguan father and mother from Spain who spent his youth in Mexico, a daughter of black middle class family who grew up in segregated Washington DC....a Cuban who emigrated to the US as a child...a middle class white woman from suburbia with a public school education....a white guy from the NYC....a white guy who immigrated with his family from Israel......

Vastly different backgrounds and life experiences.
-----Added 4/12/2008 at 08 : 05 : 52-----
But I am lost....first you complain about diversity, then you suggest they arent diverse.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 12-04-2008 at 05:07 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
dc_dux is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 05:08 PM   #6 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by timalkin View Post
I really doubt that people qualified enough to be appointed are coming from dramatically different backgrounds.
Consider that for a minute. Consider that everyone has similar or the same experiences. Now what happens if a problem doesn't have a solution in this limited set of experiences? Then we're screwed. Diversity means a larger pool of ideas.
Quote:
Originally Posted by timalkin View Post
Wealthy families are more able/likely to send their kids to the kind of educational institutions that traditionally mold young adults into professionals worthy of appointment.
I got a 1556 (out of 1600) on my SAT score. I graduated early and went to a private university with several scholarships. Other than half of 4th grade at a private religious school, I had nothing but public education.

Supposedly private schools are better than public, but the truth is that there are a ton of absolutely fantastic public schools, and a ton of absolutely horrible private schools. And there are good and bad students at both.

BTW, Hillary went to public schools.
Willravel is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 05:15 PM   #7 (permalink)
Human
 
SecretMethod70's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post
BTW, Hillary went to public schools.
Indeed, my dad went to school with her
__________________
Le temps détruit tout

"Musicians are the carriers and communicators of spirit in the most immediate sense." - Kurt Elling
SecretMethod70 is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 05:17 PM   #8 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post
Consider that for a minute. Consider that everyone has similar or the same experiences. Now what happens if a problem doesn't have a solution in this limited set of experiences? Then we're screwed.
Like we have been for the last eight years, you mean? The rich white men have done GREAT so far, haven't they?

timalkin: I sense that you're touchy on the issue of race. What's that about?
ratbastid is offline  
Old 12-06-2008, 09:37 AM   #9 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: watching from the treeline
..
__________________
Trinity: "What do you need?"

Neo: "Guns. Lots of guns."

-The Matrix

Last edited by timalkin; 12-20-2010 at 07:52 PM..
timalkin is offline  
Old 12-06-2008, 09:57 AM   #10 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by timalkin View Post
So all of the minorities that Bush appointed really didn't help much? Rice, Powell, Gonzales? What was the problem? They sure looked diverse to me.
Rice somehow ended up being a neocon (probably when she worked for Chevron), yes. There have been times when she's not totally towed the line, though. She took a big step away from being a neocon when, in 2006, she spoke out against Israel's asymmetrical response to Hezbollah. But, for the most part, she's been an old white man.

If you don't think Powell brought different ideas to the table, you may not have been paying attention. He was a nay-sayer up until he was finally forced to go before the UN. He's a good example of diversity being beneficial.

Gonzales was a yes-man.
Willravel is offline  
Old 12-06-2008, 10:19 AM   #11 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
If people truly wanted 'change', his diversity would be selecting people who weren't already part of the government machine.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 12-06-2008, 10:24 AM   #12 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: watching from the treeline
..
__________________
Trinity: "What do you need?"

Neo: "Guns. Lots of guns."

-The Matrix

Last edited by timalkin; 12-20-2010 at 07:51 PM..
timalkin is offline  
Old 12-06-2008, 10:29 AM   #13 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by timalkin View Post
According to the article, the main focus of diversity in the White House is on the color of the skin. I'm trying to understand what the color of someone's skin has to do with whether they'll be an effective member of the government. Why is so much importance being placed on how people look instead of how qualified they are?
It is because a huge majority of people in this country are superficial. skin color obviously denotes huge differences in culture, temperament, lifestyle, intelligence, wisdom, thinking patterns, and most of all ideas. by choosing people who aren't 'wealthy white men', we've instituted major change in our nation.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 12-06-2008, 12:09 PM   #14 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
is this thread about anything? what i saw in the article was NOT an explanation of how obama is assembling his cabinet, but only a commentary on its composition as viewed from one or two specific, narrow angles. there is superficiality here, but most of it is in the way the op was done, in the choice of material, in the way of misreading that material.

there are things which concern me about obama's appointments--but this thread touches and can touch on none of them.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 12-06-2008, 01:05 PM   #15 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Right, Other RB. I don't recall Obama making any big pledges about diversity in his administration. This is one editorial that happens to hit timalkin right on his sore spot, inevitably triggering a new thread here on TFP.
ratbastid is offline  
Old 12-06-2008, 01:45 PM   #16 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by timalkin View Post
According to the article, the main focus of diversity in the White House is on the color of the skin. I'm trying to understand what the color of someone's skin has to do with whether they'll be an effective member of the government. Why is so much importance being placed on how people look instead of how qualified they are?
The main focus is to appoint qualified individuals. A diversity of backgrounds and experience is an added benefit. But you just wont accept that.

Instead you ignorantly claimed they were all from wealthy families, elite social status and benefited from the best private schools and therefore werent so diverse.

I would ask you again since you never answered.....who among Obama's announced (or rumored) appointments do you think is not qualified?

Bush also promoted diversity in his cabinet.

Here is the difference, using the Secretary of Labor as an example.

Bush appointed Elaine Chao as Secretary of Labor, the first asian-american to serve in any cabinet. A bright woman by any measure, but absolutely NO experience in the field of labor relations. She is the wife of Senator Mitch McConnell, so that probably earned some points with Republicans.

A leading candidate for Obama's Secretary of Labor is Mary Beth Maxwell, who would be the first openly gay member to serve in any cabinet. Her qualifications -- founding Executive Director of American Rights at Work, a national labor advocacy organization, and more than 15 years of experience in the field of labor relations.

See the difference?
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 12-06-2008 at 01:58 PM..
dc_dux is offline  
Old 12-06-2008, 02:41 PM   #17 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Amaras's Avatar
 
Location: At my daughter's beck and call.
Choices have been made for generations having little to do with "qualifications".
These choices are political in nature, like all such choices. I believe the bureaucracy
of Gov't, the Federal employees, have a far greater effect over the long term, especially those
whose jobs continue from administration to administration.

The choices being made by Obama are not really any different, at least they haven't shown it yet, from any other administration.

Once they've been around a while their actions will speak louder than appearances.
Appearances, and perception, go to the heart of politics. Perception is reality, at least until choices are made, policy enacted.

Until then this is all thunder and fury, signifying nothing.

As to timalkin's prediliction of bringing up race, well, it's been seen in many threads.
I give him/her credit for a consistent point of view, which I heartily disagree with. Still, that's what free speech is all about, no?
He/She has the right to an opinion, and he/she is studiously careful to not cross any particular line of decorum.
I've been goaded into anger in the past. Now I will try to be philosophical about it. I agree to totally, unequivocally, disagree with him/her.

My 0.02c worth......
__________________
Propaganda is to a democracy what the bludgeon is to a totalitarian state.
-Noam Chomsky
Love is a verb, not a noun.
-My Mom
The function of genius is to furnish cretins with ideas twenty years later.
-Louis Aragon, "La Porte-plume," Traite du style, 1928
Amaras is offline  
Old 12-06-2008, 04:02 PM   #18 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
I've not noticed anything particularly remarkable nor particularly alarming about any of Obama's appointments, thus far.

After the last 8 years I consider that a good thing.

What I sense here is a need for something to be outraged about. Post-election deflation. Anticlimax.

But this is what you get when a centrist moves into the White House - as much as folks wanted to believe that Obama was a 'raging liberal,' he's not. He's a moderate and he will be a moderate president.

I understand the desire now, after the plethora of material for outrage handed out by the Bush Administration, for the conservatives to have (at least) its fair share of the adrenaline rush that comes from watching in horror while the 'other side's' guy confirms your worst fears, but I really don't think you're going to get it from this administration.

And you want to know why I know this? Because this country would never elect a 'real' liberal president. At least you can take comfort in the fact that it will, indeed, elect a really 'real' conservative one.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 12-06-2008, 06:02 PM   #19 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: watching from the treeline
..
__________________
Trinity: "What do you need?"

Neo: "Guns. Lots of guns."

-The Matrix

Last edited by timalkin; 12-20-2010 at 07:49 PM..
timalkin is offline  
Old 12-06-2008, 06:08 PM   #20 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by timalkin View Post
Does "diversity" simply mean non-white?
exactly. if Obama wants to show diversity, try appointing me to a federal court. thats diversity.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 12-06-2008, 07:03 PM   #21 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Why is ethnic diversity good? Even today, people of different ethnicities can bring with them unique experiences that may not have been available to people of other ethnicities. I'll bet Barack Obama spending time in a Muslim community gives him a better perspective on our troubles in the Middle East than George W. who spent his childhood in Texas. It's not really the color of skin, but more where the person has come from.

In politics you're a combination of two things: your history and your abilities. A broad spectrum of backgrounds and abilities means more perspectives to draw from when making a decision.
Willravel is offline  
Old 12-07-2008, 04:02 AM   #22 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post
I got a 1556 (out of 1600) on my SAT score. I graduated early and went to a private university with several scholarships. Other than half of 4th grade at a private religious school, I had nothing but public education.

You scored what on your SAT? How's that even possible?
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 12-07-2008, 07:59 AM   #23 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Amaras's Avatar
 
Location: At my daughter's beck and call.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tully Mars View Post
You scored what on your SAT? How's that even possible?
I got a 1330. His score is possible, just extremely rare. Most folks aren't that balanced
when it comes to math/language skills.
__________________
Propaganda is to a democracy what the bludgeon is to a totalitarian state.
-Noam Chomsky
Love is a verb, not a noun.
-My Mom
The function of genius is to furnish cretins with ideas twenty years later.
-Louis Aragon, "La Porte-plume," Traite du style, 1928
Amaras is offline  
Old 12-07-2008, 09:25 AM   #24 (permalink)
Asshole
 
The_Jazz's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Hmmm, I thought SAT scores were still only in multiples of 5. When did that change? It was definitely the case when I took it in the late 80's.

To address the OP, I see nothing that says that those nominated aren't qualified. On top of that, many of those that are nominated seem to be eminently qualified to me.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo

Last edited by The_Jazz; 12-07-2008 at 09:33 AM..
The_Jazz is offline  
Old 12-07-2008, 10:38 AM   #25 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tully Mars View Post
You scored what on your SAT? How's that even possible?
I used to be one of those people obsessed with good grades and test scores. I did a great deal of prep and I took several practice tests. If I took it today, I can't see myself getting above a 1400 (or the current equivalent, since the grading system changed some time after I graduated).

Jazz, I think the essay was worth 6, but frankly I can't remember for sure. Otherwise, I think the scores are base 10.
Willravel is offline  
Old 12-07-2008, 11:04 AM   #26 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Right here
scores have changed considerably since the 80's, Jazz. I took mine in '93 and they've been normalized since then, as well.
and I just looked at the SAT website and it appears the test has again been changed since 2005.

I know from past real life discussions with people in my cohort that comparing scores from different versions is worse than pointless. my scores were about 200 pts lower than some of the other students but my percentile score was similar to some and higher than others. then I looked it up and our scores were roughly similar taking the changes in scoring into account.

I don't remember having an extra essay portion. we had a standardized verbal portion. if we did, I don't think it was scored separately like my GRE's were scored. oh well, that's my piece on this because the rest of the thread is uninteresting to me.
__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann

"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman
smooth is offline  
Old 12-07-2008, 01:09 PM   #27 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
There was a change in 1994 and then another in 2002 or 2004 I believe.
Willravel is offline  
 

Tags
diversity, good


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:26 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360