Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-19-2008, 04:13 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Election Reform?

Despite the fact that our recent election did not result in a meltdown of the system or widespread fraud or abuse....do we need comprehensive election reform in the US?

I think so.

Here is the reform I would like to see for elections involving national offices (Pres and Congress):
Standardized voter registration requirements for all states. Or better yet, automatic registration tied to something like Social Security number (if you are over 18 and you have a SS card, you are registered..period.)

If not automatic registration, a federal requirement to allow same day registration (currently only 9-10 states allow it) in all states.

Federal requirement for all states to hold early voting or voting by mail (like Oregon). The highest turnouts are the in the states that have these voting options.

Standardized voting machines for all precincts in all states w/testing procedures and paper trails.

Stiff penalties for deceptive practices (like mailings that target certain voters with false information)
We spend $billions to promote "free and fair" democratic elections around the world and yet our system is flawed in many ways.

The Republicans have opposed most serious attempts at election reform in recent years with the assumption that any such reform would more likely benefit Democrats.

I think we will see new efforts at election reform from the 111th Congress.

Is it necessary? What should it include?
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 11-19-2008, 06:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
Junkie
 
SabrinaFair's Avatar
 
Location: Louisville, KY
I am TOTALLY in favor of stiff *criminal* penalties for those spreading deceptive messages about voting. This is voter intimidation, and a very ugly fly-by-night form of it. I've seen a lot of this in recent years here in my city; Robocalls telling uninformed voters that Republicans vote on Tuesday, Democrats on Wednesday, or that polling hours have been extended, or that if you are delinquent in your child support, you will be arrested when you go to vote. I think this is disgusting. I don't point fingers at any one party or interest group, but I think something has to be done to combat this problem.

I'm also in favor of automatic re-instatement of voting rights upon completing a criminal sentence. Here in Kentucky, there is a long process that a convicted felon must go through in order to have his civil rights restored. There's a big movement to change this, but its slow going...
__________________
"With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams,
it is still a beautiful world.
Be cheerful. Strive to be happy."
-Desiderata
SabrinaFair is offline  
Old 11-19-2008, 08:19 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
There is very good chance that we will see legislation to address the issue of deceptive practices like those described above.

A bill, Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act,sponsored by Rahm Emanual (now Obama's WH chief of staff) passed in the House last year.
Amends the federal criminal code to make it unlawful for anyone before or during a federal election to knowingly communicate, or attempt to communicate, false election-related information about that election, with the intent to prevent another person from exercising the right to vote.

Increases from one year to five years' imprisonment the criminal penalty for intimidation of voters.

Authorizes any person to report to the Attorney General false election information or intimidation of voters.

Requires the Attorney General, immediately after receiving such a report, to consider and review it and, if there is a reasonable basis to find that a violation has occurred, to: (1) undertake all effective measures necessary to provide correct information to voters affected by the false information; and (2) refer the matter to the appropriate federal and state authorities for criminal prosecution or civil action after the election.
The Senate companion bill was sponsored by Obama.

I dont think either of them will be letting the issue go.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 11-19-2008 at 08:29 PM.. Reason: fixed link
dc_dux is offline  
Old 11-19-2008, 08:44 PM   #4 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux View Post
Despite the fact that our recent election did not result in a meltdown of the system or widespread fraud or abuse....do we need comprehensive election reform in the US?
Absolutely!

Later Campaigning: You have 2 months to pick a nominee and 2 months to pick one of the nominees for president. 4 months. That's it. I don't want to start hearing about an election a year in advance

Finance Reform: Kill soft money for good; make a Constitutional amendment. Limit the donation at $5000 per election. Provide a certain amount of free, government sponsored ad time in TV, print, and radio so that poorer candidates aren't simply shut out.

Every Party: After each major party (Dems, GOP, Libertarian, Green, Independent) has a nominee, they all are allowed to campaign and debate.

Real Debates: No BS 2 minutes, then 30 seconds rebuttal. I never did that in school, and we actually managed to let people know what we were thinking. Unless they start to filibuster one another, let them answer the question. If the moderator doesn't believe they're on topic, let him or her shut off the mic.

Auto-Registration: I totally agree with automatic voter registration. If you're a citizen and alive, there should be no need to register for a right already guaranteed.

Paper ballots: We need an absolutely uncrackable election, which means no more machines. If Canada can get up-to-the-minute election results with paper, so can the US of A.

Put the SCOTUS in a room with some food and water on election night and don't open the door until someone has over 270 electoral votes.
Willravel is offline  
Old 11-19-2008, 09:55 PM   #5 (permalink)
Junkie
 
SabrinaFair's Avatar
 
Location: Louisville, KY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post

Paper ballots: We need an absolutely uncrackable election, which means no more machines. If Canada can get up-to-the-minute election results with paper, so can the US of A.
+1

We actually use paper ballots in my county; we're pretty much the only county left in the state that uses them, but we also have the fastest, most accurate vote counts in the state.
__________________
"With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams,
it is still a beautiful world.
Be cheerful. Strive to be happy."
-Desiderata
SabrinaFair is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 04:40 AM   #6 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i support most of these, but i would also like to see the election cycle for president made shorter. the last cycle was 2 years long. by the end, it was an exercise in sustained mediocrity---particularly at the level of the press coverage, which i found appalling.

and i've liked a feature of the french system since i encountered it: 3 days before the vote, ALL political advertisement connected to the campaign stops. the assumption seems to be--now you've seen the adverts and gathered actual information. voting requires some deliberation. deliberation takes a bit of time. the gap assumes people are actually making up their minds. so they're thinking, not reacting. something about that assumption seems very far indeed from that which you can see at work in the current american system. it makes voting seem like a dignified act and not a response to consumer stimulii.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 05:37 AM   #7 (permalink)
Junkie
 
samcol's Avatar
 
Location: Indiana
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post
Absolutely!


Paper ballots: We need an absolutely uncrackable election, which means no more machines. If Canada can get up-to-the-minute election results with paper, so can the US of A.
This is the biggest problem. Throw these corrupt machines away...
__________________
It's time for the president to hand over his nobel peace prize.
samcol is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 08:07 AM   #8 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux View Post
There is very good chance that we will see legislation to address the issue of deceptive practices like those described above.

A bill, Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act,sponsored by Rahm Emanual (now Obama's WH chief of staff) passed in the House last year.
Amends the federal criminal code to make it unlawful for anyone before or during a federal election to knowingly communicate, or attempt to communicate, false election-related information about that election, with the intent to prevent another person from exercising the right to vote.

Increases from one year to five years' imprisonment the criminal penalty for intimidation of voters.

Authorizes any person to report to the Attorney General false election information or intimidation of voters.

Requires the Attorney General, immediately after receiving such a report, to consider and review it and, if there is a reasonable basis to find that a violation has occurred, to: (1) undertake all effective measures necessary to provide correct information to voters affected by the false information; and (2) refer the matter to the appropriate federal and state authorities for criminal prosecution or civil action after the election.
The Senate companion bill was sponsored by Obama.

I dont think either of them will be letting the issue go.
It would be hard to prosecute this because it says "intent". What they need is 2 penalties. The first is for distributing false information (minor offense) and the second is for knowingly distributing false information.

Proving intent is almost always impossible.
Rekna is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 08:43 AM   #9 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy View Post
and i've liked a feature of the french system since i encountered it: 3 days before the vote, ALL political advertisement connected to the campaign stops. the assumption seems to be--now you've seen the adverts and gathered actual information. voting requires some deliberation. deliberation takes a bit of time. the gap assumes people are actually making up their minds. so they're thinking, not reacting. something about that assumption seems very far indeed from that which you can see at work in the current american system. it makes voting seem like a dignified act and not a response to consumer stimulii.
Deliberation time is a really interesting idea. I'm sure any break from political adverts would be appreciated by the masses, but a break to deliberate and consider? Very clever, France.
Willravel is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 12:40 PM   #10 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
term limits, god almighty PLEASE can we do term limits?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 01:31 PM   #11 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rekna View Post
It would be hard to prosecute this because it says "intent". What they need is 2 penalties. The first is for distributing false information (minor offense) and the second is for knowingly distributing false information.

Proving intent is almost always impossible.
I agree. Not only is the intent issue a problem but the issue of remedial action has the potential to create total chaos and can cripple our federal government government. This legislation concentrates too much power in the office of AG, a political appointed position ,regardless of the theoretical stuff about what the AG is supposed to be, it is a partisan office. The AG would have the authority find if a "reasonable" violation occurred. So one hurdle is "intent", (odds are a subjective finding) and another we have the AG making a "reasonableness" finding (also subjective) and then we go into the phase of determining what corrective action to take, i.e. corrective advertising or maybe re-elections. the AG will be under tremendous political pressure. And the kicker is that all of this would have to be done in a very short time frame and at a micro-level because much of this deceptive information/activity may be at a precinct level.

I understand the intent, but from a practical point of view I think we should stay with existing laws and regulations regarding deceptive practices.
-----Added 20/11/2008 at 04 : 34 : 41-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux View Post
The Republicans have opposed most serious attempts at election reform in recent years with the assumption that any such reform would more likely benefit Democrats.
Some of us just don't support legislation that won't improve our electoral process, and we give our reasons.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."


Last edited by aceventura3; 11-20-2008 at 01:34 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
aceventura3 is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 01:42 PM   #12 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
ace....do you think existing laws deal appropriately with the type robocalls (or targeted mailings particularly to minorities) that sabrina described.....if you are delinquent in your child support (or have an outstanding parking ticket), you will be arrested when you go to vote.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 01:42 PM   #13 (permalink)
Junkie
 
I think we need to move to instant runoff voting. no more 2 party system. As long as you can "waist" your vote the system will continue to be ruled by 2 parties. With instant runoff voting there is no longer a waisted vote.
Rekna is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 01:45 PM   #14 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
ace....on the issue of registration, do you think a citizen should be denied a vote (or required to file a provisional ballot) because someone in the county voter registrars office mistyped the voter registration form when submitted and it doesnt match exactly an ID presented at the polls?
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 02:40 PM   #15 (permalink)
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux View Post
ace....do you think existing laws deal appropriately with the type robocalls (or targeted mailings particularly to minorities) that sabrina described.....if you are delinquent in your child support (or have an outstanding parking ticket), you will be arrested when you go to vote.
In North Carolina Elizabeth Dole (R), incumbent, ran an ad against her opponent Kay Hagen (D) associating Hagen with an atheist group implying that Hagen was godless. Dole lost, many believe because of the ad, even many Republicans including religious leaders denounced the ad. Hagen also filed a defamation lawsuit, which she later withdrew. Even in my opinion Dole stepped over the line with the ad, I generally want to know why I should vote for a candidate rather than wanting to know why I should vote against someone. The electorate saw the ad for what it was, a last desperate attempt to win and any cost. Dole may have lost anyway, but the ad clearly cost her votes.

So, first I don't underestimate the electorate. And, second I think other means are currently available to address deceptive campaign materials.


On the issue of "you will be arrested" and other urban myths targeted toward minorities, I have not seen any evidence that supports that minorities don't vote because of those rumors. Secondly, how do you prove them and find the original source? Those rumors won't come formally from any campaign.
-----Added 20/11/2008 at 06 : 02 : 34-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux View Post
ace....on the issue of registration, do you think a citizen should be denied a vote (or required to file a provisional ballot) because someone in the county voter registrars office mistyped the voter registration form when submitted and it doesnt match exactly an ID presented at the polls?
I think this is a state level issue. If state law is discriminatory or in violation voting rights law I think there a mechanisms to address those problems. I agree that our system is not perfect, but I can not support legislation that in my view would create bigger problems.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."


Last edited by aceventura3; 11-20-2008 at 03:02 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
aceventura3 is offline  
Old 12-08-2008, 06:41 PM   #16 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Here, There, Everwhere
> Federal requirement for all states to hold early voting or voting by mail (like Oregon). The highest turnouts are the in the states that have these voting options.

I won't even get into the problems I have with the words "federal requirement," but as much as I love voting by mail (I served in the military and I'm young, so I've never actually had the opportunity to go to a physical "booth") I have one problem with it. Family pressure.
I have a friend who told me he voted for Obama as soon as his ballot came in the mail while his parents were still at work because he feared his conservative parents would pitch him a bunch of bull.

One thing I wish would go away or be managed somehow are 527's like Moveon.org and Swiftboat Vets, etc. These organizations have no limits on the money they collect and can say whatever they want as long as they don't SPECIFICALLY endorse a candidate. The way I see them get involved in local races now irks me even more. I don't need some lobbyist from D.C. who's never visited my state to tell me who NOT to vote for.
Dorp is offline  
Old 12-09-2008, 06:59 AM   #17 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
- term limits for Congress (one 6-year term for the Senate, 2 or 3 2-year terms for the House)

- uniform voting system for federal offices. If states want to cry "state rights" over their local/state voting, fine, but the POTUS voting should be uniform nationwide.

- single day primary voting. Give the candidates 2-4 months to campaign around the country, but have all the primaries vote on the same day....none of this "one state builds momentum for the next" BS....all due respect to Iowa and New Hampshire, but I don't want them determining the primaries months before I get to vote.

- uniform primary voting (both between states and between parties). Right now some states have votes, some caucuses. Dems use super-delegates, Reps don't. All Dem primaries are "per district", some Reps are "winner take all". It's chaos.

- kill the idea of Super Delegates.
Derwood is offline  
 

Tags
election, reform

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:05 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360